7
votes
Nasdaq rewrites its index inclusion rules ahead of SpaceX IPO
Link information
This data is scraped automatically and may be incorrect.
- Title
- SpaceX IPO Is Forcing Changes To Index And Underwriting Rules
- Authors
- Garth Friesen
- Word count
- 1093 words
One of the reasons I'm not a fan of passive investing. Passive investing only works under the assumption that there are enough active investors out there properly pricing in information and applying rational analysis to the market. If enough people are passively investing, then you'll lose a lot of rational price discovery. Some will say that this is naturally self-correcting, since active investors will always be able to profit off irrational valuations. But, if the market doesn't correct for longer than you can stay solvent or, in the less extreme case, stay within an acceptable band of performance, then your clients will take their wealth to another fund. Add in post-2008 moral hazard (or as Buffet has called it, the "too big to fail" paradigm), the growth of unsophisticated retail investing, and rational investors trading off expectations of irrationality within the market, it becomes harder to impossible to make sustained bets on truly fundamental rational analysis. And, once the canonical valuation models start to fail or underperform, the game theory starts to really favor trading off of momentum and sentiment over true fundamentals.
SpaceX's plan is to create an absurdly high valuation through a small portion of the market that's highly risk-loving, cynical, and/or irrational, then to stabilize that price through an accelerated entry into the Nasdaq-100.
On a related note, I found this excerpt a little funny:
"Too large to digest" = bullshit valuation.
Other indexes have different rules. Looks like the S&P 500 might have a rule change, though not as extreme:
Elon Musk's SpaceX Could Be Fast-Tracked Into S&P 500 After IPO Under Proposed Rule Changes