There's a hundred illegal erections in the hills behind my parents' house
If you're a native English speaker, you know what "tramp" means. If you're not, you can read the wikipedia article, but also look up "tramp stamp" to get a different, more contemporary meaning. Neither is particularly helpful here though.
If you're in Czechia or Slovakia, it means something else altogether. "Tramping" describes a hobby and an identity that strongly relates to woodcraft, Scouting and perhaps a romanticized version of the old-school hobo life. Basically tramps are a loose community of people who like to walk through the forests, sleep outside, sing songs around the fire, usually drink, all the while respecting the nature and each other.
The part that I want to write about, though, is more interesting: their camps. Semi- or entirely illegal hidden spots in the forest, built and maintained by volunteers and free for use by anybody who finds them and behaves.
The community has existed for over 100 years and what helped it quite bit were oppressive regimes - first Nazis and then especially communists. People liked to escape the everyday atmosphere of oppression in the towns and disconnect from it in the countryside, where they could feel truly free for a couple of days.
When you want to sleep in the forest, you can of course just use a tarp and a sleeping bag anywhere, but there's a much more comfortable way: tramp camps. Some are legalized, with private ownership, and these days often contain your standard countryside cottages. But the majority is not. Popular tramping areas are full of spots that range from just a campfire with a couple of logs to sit on, through many places that contain comfortable benches and a wooden sleeping platform with a tarp-covered roof, to full-on small log cabins.
Some of these, mostly the bare campfire spots, are easy to find and near main trails. Others, especially the log cabins, tend to be hidden. There are no public maps. The more hidden they are, the more helpful stuff they tend to contain: a saw for making firewood, various pots for cooking and also for carrying water to douse the fire, a fire grate, sometimes even shelf-stable condiments, books, more comfortable sleeping arrangements... And most have a visitor's logbook too.
The beauty here is that all of those are free to use for anyone who finds them, and many of them are also completely illegal. I'm not sure what the rules are specifically in standard forests (though as far as I know making a fire is illegal even in those), but many tramp camps are in protected forests as well. This may sound bad, and sometimes it is. But many of the camps existed for decades before the environmental protection was established, and the people using them tend to not cause issues, so they're usually tolerated.
A large group of people of all ages that isn't organized in any way and merely like doing what they do has spent countless hours working to build and maintain these spots - just to bring joy not only to themselves and their friends, but also to other people they've never met.
It all relies on two things. First, the locations of these spots will only be shared privately or found by people who care and make the minimal effort to find them, and therefore are unlikely to abuse them. Second, the authorities know this too and therefore have no reason to interfere even where law says they should.
I love these instances of systems that work entirely without the involvement of any official structures, based on trust among completely unknown people, only protected by minimal gatekeeping. What they're doing could be harmful to the environment if they were selfish or irresponsible, but they're neither, so it has worked for a century.
Their image has some specifics
Oh, and there's one more thing that may seem cute to people from north America. Tramp culture used to almost idolize some small parts of US and to a smaller degree Canadian history and culture. This was understandable - the freedom of living in the wilderness of old-timey North America or in the wild west as known from literature and Western films felt like the complete antithesis to living under the oppression of soviet-style communism. But it often brought things that in retrospect may seem cute, a bit silly or even wrong.
For example every legalized and permanent tramp village had a leader who would settle disputes etc., called a sheriff. Unfortunately, those people were often targets of the communist secret police, trying to break them to snitch on their friends. Many camps have vaguely foreign names, or names inspired by real places in the US or Canada. I remember a camp called "Ontarko", a diminutive of Ontario.
But aside from western symbols like clothes, cow skulls etc., sometimes some Native American imagery or military references (tramps to this day like older versions of US Army backpacks) you would also often see Confederate flags.
These days they're almost gone, but you may still encounter them among old tramps. In the pre-internet era, with heavily censored information coming from the west, they were often seen simply as a symbol of rebellion, freedom and independence. American Civil War was barely understood here, and almost nobody saw the negative connotations that many people in the West immediately perceive today.
Why am I writing this now?
One of the prime tramping locations is around the area where my parents live, and every time I visit I take a bike to ride into the hills and then walk around interesting potential spots - near streams and springs, on steep hill sides farther away from paths, behind unusually dense patches of forest etc. So far I have found around 7 of them nearby (and probably 10 others elsewhere). It's like a game of geocaching that, instead of just giving you a virtual point, grants you a new place you can grill sausages and then sleep in, often times quite beautiful too.
Unfortunately, the fact that many of the spots are on protected land and therefore illegal has one obvious downside: it would just take one person with a lot of time and energy to start pressuring the authorities to remove them, even if they don't want to.
Quite honestly, some of the camps are a bit much. Log cabins partially covered in creosote (preserves wood but is quite far from eco friendly), with store-bought doors, on protected land... Yeah. I can see why somebody would have a problem with that. This is a small minority though.
As often happens, the one person unfortunately eventually appeared and started pushing for the removal of all of those camps. He's a journalist known mainly for being contrarian and combative. There are some minor aspects of tramping that are clearly too much as mentioned above, and others that are clearly up for discussion, but this is not his approach: his work feels truly personal, fueled by hostility towards the whole subculture, ego, and an unwillingness to understand why these places matter to people.
His communication is spiteful, full of juvenile snark, including things like mockingly misspelling tramp slang. He (or possibly some accomplice) also uses dirty tactics like mapping the camps and then anonymously publishing the maps online and in smartphone apps, where the pretense is "democratizing access to the camps", but the real intent is to remove the gatekeeping so that people who do not care about nature start using the camps, leaving a mess and causing issues, which forces authorities to act.
Unfortunately it works. In the most popular protected area many of the camps have been removed, others are scheduled for removal. Just a few camps are planned to be legalized with some conditions, despite his demands, at least.
So far this only concerns the protected areas, the hills behind my parents' house should be safe for now. Most of the forests around there are privately owned, which may or may not help when he tries to target them in the future. I hope it does. The mapping of the area is already slowly starting though.
I'm giving you some crude phone photos of the camps I or other people have found. I really want you to imagine the feeling of walking around the beautiful temperate forests of central Europe and knowing that these places are probably somewhere around you and they are free for you to use and enjoy, if you just find them and leave them in the same state after using them. They're not alpine cabins intended for survival, they are purely for enjoyment with your friends, family or alone.
A couple examples
I wish I could share more, but I only started taking photos of them relatively recently, and there are a couple that I'm not comfortable sharing even anonymously here.
And here's a video of my band playing a very old tramp song from 1939 (yeah, I know what I say below) in another one - a big campfire with a half-circle of benches around it, likely established by a local scout troop.
I am not a member of the subculture, I am not a tramp. I hate the music they traditionally play, I don't like cheap rum and I don't have that much in common with many of them. But I have a lot of respect for their traditions and the beauty of the whole concept is that I can experience some of it on my own terms.
I can only hope that in the future, when the one majorly disliked person pushing for their removal no longer has the strength to do what he does, the camps will gradually get rebuilt and the tradition will recover in some way.
(no, I will not address the clickbait elephant in the title)
This is basically a blogpost. It's something I wanted to write about because of recent experiences, but I don't write regularly, don't have a blog and Tildes seemed like a good place for it, being populated by reasonable people from other parts of the world.
I welcome any similar experiences from your respective countries and will of course also answer questions about the post itself.
This was incredibly interesting to read. Thank you for sharing it with us. Balancing democratic access and protecting wild spaces is tough. If you want semi-related subculture drama, there’s lot of drama about pitons/bolting routes for climbing (in the US but possibly elsewhere too).
And, thank you for combining erections and tramps in such a surprising, unconventional manner.
This is as close to real life MMORPG as we can get, huh. The photos seem endearingly familiar, and honestly without reading your post I would not have thought them special, probably just a regular camp area or even some guy's back yard. (For some definitions of yards; folks own back woods here)
As a Canadian I'm especially intrigued by the overseas admiration of our culture. And even though I'm not a big hiker, here in rural Atlantic Canada near Crown forests, I can already confirm some of these sensibility does exist: a live and let live attitude; appreciation for solitude and another guy's privacy in the woods; a sort of "don't tell me how to be caretaker of the land when you turn around and sell commercial fishing permits or authorize clear cuts" antagonism to the official oceans and fisheries or forestry or provincial bodies; an unofficial source of information that's transmitted via trust based network only; the generosity and trust that's granted once you are part of the network.... There's a lot of freedom here. With satellite images readily available how do these clearings stay hidden?
As an outsider, I don't want to idealised too much, though, because this sort of system is extremely hostile to outsiders and as a result offer no protection, no equity, no recourse towards folks that have pissed off just one local or only been here one generation or any number of reason, and there's no way to get an appeal.
A shame that it sometimes only needs one person to ruin a hundred year old good thing. My hope is that your governing bodies also feel the same way you do and bureaucratically drag their heels long enough for the one guy to go away. The one guy is just doing it for clicks isn't here, just to create outrage and controversy and get famous and make money?
:) mods could change your clickbait title, you know, but hey you got me so fair is fair.
There are three camps in this image. Can you find them? I couldn't, and I know where they are - this is an area that has already been mapped and the maps published.
I certainly hope so. Right now he's winning, but so far that's two isolated protected areas, and it took him years. We can only hope that all the bureaucracy annoyments and/or court processes in other areas take him just as long and aren't sped up by what already happened, which is somewhat plausible since many of the other spots are not on protected land, so his case would have to be stronger.
From what I know about him I believe it's truly just ego and a combination of spite and rationalizing yourself into believing you're the one person against all who's doing the right thing, without any other objective goal. He does have some background in ecology, but he was never really an eco activist. Back channels also claim that he lost his woman to a tramp, which I didn't include above because I have no way to validate it and it feels like a very cheap attack, but I wouldn't bet against it considering how personal this whole thing seems to be from his side and also frankly considering that he's an unattractive and not particularly liked middle aged man (and has been long before this battle).
I knew nothing about this and otherwise likely never would have heard of it. This knowledge will probably serve no purpose in my life but I'm happy about it anyway.
This is what makes the internet great, thanks for posting.
And also that journalist can fuck all the way off.
Thank you, this was a great read. It reminded me of visiting the catacombs under Paris: it’s illegal and you enter through a manhole. You have to know someone who knows their way around. And along the (underground) way, there are many interesting rooms in which people have carved the stone walls out with miniature cities, busts, furniture, seats, etc. No one will ever see or enjoy them unless they go down there. It was a pretty cool experience, not dissimilar to what you’re talking about (I’d imagine)
I do urban exploration as well, never been in a place as interesting and as dangerous as the Paris catacombs, but I definitely see the appeal. One thing that I like about urbex is that you go to places that may be quite near to where normal people commonly go, and yet most of them have no idea the place even exists, so there are definitely some parallels. But I enjoy how pure and idealistic tramping can be when compared to urbex.
This was a really interesting read, and the song is lovely, too. Thank you for sharing!
One thing I love about hiking in the Nordics is that national parks often have free-to-use huts and lean-to shelters, and other fairly well maintained amenities that look a bit like the ones in your pictures. I'm actually heading to the Arctic Circle this weekend for a five-day hike, and although I will be sleeping in a tent, I still appreciate the availability of firewood and composting toilets along the trail.
You wrote that in Czechia and Slovakia "when you want to sleep in the forest, you can of course just use a tarp and a sleeping bag anywhere". I'm surprised (and a little excited) to hear this, as I was under the impression that wild camping is illegal in the two countries, like it is in most countries in the area. But am I mistaken here? Am I a fool to travel to the other side of the continent to get my yearly tramping fix?
Also, I think in New Zealand, they also use the word "tramping" to refer to hiking.
I would have to double check, but from what I remember it is legal to camp in non-protected forests and also in the lowest form of protected land (CHKO, chráněná krajinná oblast), but the restriction is that it can only be wild camping with a tarp, sleeping bag, hammock etc., no permanent structures (which I think may include tents as well) and no fires, and it can only be for a limited time in one spot, I think like 3 days. The "no fires" rule is often ignored unless the weather has been very dry and forest fire warnings have been issued, but I believe the law says you have to be something like 50 meters from the edge of the forest to legally start a campfire. You can legally collect dry firewood sticks up to a diameter of 7 cm and collect berries or edible mushrooms for personal use.
It's not something I normally do and it's been over 20 years since I left Boyscouts, so do check those things if you ever come here - which I think is a great idea, both Czechia and Slovakia are quite beautiful. Czechia is more tame, no particularly difficut terrain and a high density of villages almost everywhere, whereas Slovakia has actual mountains. Slovakia also has some bears, around here the only dangerous animal is the tick, and possibly wild boars if you're unlucky enough to get between a mother and her young.
Thanks! I’ve hiked in the Slovakian Tatras a couple of times (just day hikes though) and seen some stunning places, but never yet been hiking in Czechia. Maybe one day!
There definitely is a difference between Central Europe and the Nordics in terms of population density. I’m based in Hungary and you never really are more than a stone’s throw from a busy road, a farmer’s field or a settlement.
Thanks for taking the time to write and share this. I don't mean to devalue your post, or the cultural phenomenon it describes, but: I'm reminded of the natural scenery in the Kingdom Come: Deliverance series (game), which is set in 15th century Bohemia. Even seeing the structures and wood piles reminds me of it.
Not a devaluation at all! KC:D is the most accurate depiction of czech forests in a videogame that I know of. One of the reason why I love playing it is that the landscapes remind me of childhood summer vacations.
I love this post. I learned something new and interesting I wouldn't have known about otherwise.
That guy sounds like a real prick.
I'm American, and I'm not so sure about other countries, but the US has an absolute shit ton of laws. Most of them, you're defacto allowed to break as long as you know what you're doing. Things like drinking in public can be done as long as you have a paper bag and you're doing it in the right place. You can speed, as long as you know what the customary amount of speeding is appropriate in the area you're in and the road youre on. You can pee in public, as long as you know what's an appropriate pee spot.
Generally, you can break most laws here, as long as it's not too visible and it doesn't bother anyone. If I had to put a number on it, I probably break at least 10 laws a day. There's a red light I run literally every afternoon because it's stupid and is a massive waste of time.
I'd say anyone who goes out of their way to get people in trouble that are breaking laws that don't actually hurt anyone is a massive asshole. The cops think they're assholes, the judges that prosecute the cases think they're assholes, the general public think they're assholes, and especially the people getting in trouble think they're assholes.
It's too bad these tramps can't organize and get those laws changed so that this asshole doesn't have a leg to stand on, but I get that political organization takes a whole lot of time and effort, and visibility is probably the last thing a community like that wants anyway.
It's also interesting that you framed gatekeeping as a good thing in some situations. I agree with you there, especially related to hobbies. I think that's sort of an unpopular idea nowadays, but I've seen enough to understand why you say it. Communities with high barriers to entry are much more effective to police internally than ones without them. I've also noticed that as things I'm interested in become more accessible over time, the average participants passion for them lessens, and bad behavior increases.
I think that this is the most solid case for libertarianism (as a general idea, not the libertarian party in the US) that exists. This overabundance of laws that most people break makes it really easy for either the state (which happened commonly during communism) or as we see here even for one asshole to endlessly bully you. I need to say that I am not a libertarian and wouldn't want to live in an actually libertarian state, but I think this kind of healthy paranoia over regulating everything and its consequences is an angle that we should consider and think about hard every time we push for a new law.
True, but also I'm worried there's not even any way to do it. I can't see a way in which you could define proper behavior in a law, in a way that can be checked and enforced. Tramping seems like the special category of "we need to regulate it on paper because if every common idiot did it, the damage would be too big, but a sane person doing it is harmless and even welcome". In an ideal situation the solution is obvious: decide it on a case by case basis and if a camp gets too popular among people who misbehave* and generates too much trouble, it can be removed. But in reality you get one spiteful person who creates a map of camps with the explicit purpose to make them all problematic in that way.
This I see as the biggest tragedy of the whole thing. Things that are not sanctioned by state or whatever regulating body tend to disappear over time because a portion of people is unable to participate in an acceptable way, and most of the time there's no way back. We rarely relax or prune old regulations, and so the continued existence of such things is often dependent on a few people in the right positions of power willing to take responsibility and even legal risk to themselves to defend them. That's a fragile system that often fails and so we very slowly move into a life more and more regulated and controlled. Is there even a way to go back?
* We call them "mastňáci", something like "fatty guys", origin is not related to being overweight but probably comes from leaving trash like oily sausage wrappers etc.
Honestly I don't get the hate for gatekeeping at all. I think that most of the internet clearly shows us that some sort of gatekeeping is necessary for good communities, reddit especially is a particularly bad example. I get that artificially restricting things is bad in principle and sometimes in practice too, I would never think of asking somebody who wears a shirt of my favorite band to name 3 songs (this is a meme, no idea how often it actually happens). But many of us talk about how great some aspects of the old internet used to be, and one of the main reasons for that was that it was all gatekept in various ways. My hot take is that the dislike for gatekeeping is a part of a broad trend of mainstream antiintelectuallism, but this is truly a hot take that I don't want to defend here, I'm sharing it to provoke a bit but not to pollute this thread.
This made me cry; happy, happy, hopeful tears.
I'm on the bus to work with tears in my eyes.
Thank you!
I wouldn't worry too much about the "journalist", if this culture has survived Nazis & Soviets it will have no problem with a neoliberal state and one journalist on a crusade.
I think, but am probably wrong (as happens quite often when I guesstimate on social issues) that part of the strength of the culture is it's resistance.
Like skaters, urban explorers, graffiti vandals, punks, etc a part of what makes the culture strong is resisting to comply with society at large.
Camps will "just" move... the forests are too beautiful to not stay in, the campfires are too mesmerising to not make, the songs are too familiar to be forgotten and the rum and other drugs are necessary to cope and enhance life with (of so it seems anyway!).
Or maybe I have my rose tinted glasses on?
In any case: thank you for this, it truly made my day and I will treasure this story and the knowledge about this culture for as long as I live (or at least remember it)!
The next couple of months will be wonderful, looking for spots around my woods to set up camps, thank you, thank you, thank you!
(If there is anything I can do to aid in the resistance I'm happy to lend a hand, but I suspect that drawing international attention to it might just make matters worse... (but again, what do I know?))
Thank you for the kind words.
This is a good point. With regards to camps returning to the protected land I am skeptical, but surely it's going to survive in some way.
To be fair I haven't thought about that too hard because I don't have the energy, but yeah, I suspect that just letting it blow over and at most encouraging whatever relevant autority to drag their feet for as long as possible may be the best tactic here. It makes me sad though that it may take a decade or more till we get to the "quietly rebuilding" phase and many old tramps may not live to see it. Thinking about it rationally with some perspective though, that's just how life goes and there are much worse things than this that could happen.