-
9 votes
-
Appalachian English
6 votes -
United Nations guidelines for gender-inclusive language in English
16 votes -
The History of English Podcast
6 votes -
Why I'm possessive about apostrophes
13 votes -
Merriam-Webster's Time Traveler: Words by year of appearance
6 votes -
A dialect dissection of Britney Spears
8 votes -
Medieval Myth Busting - Arrows vs Armour, using historically accurate reproductions from time of the Battle of Agincourt (1415)
MEDIEVAL MYTH BUSTING - Arrows vs Armour from Tod's Workshop YouTube Channel Other extra videos in the series: Find out More - The Battle Find out more - The Armour Find out More - Medieval Arrows...
MEDIEVAL MYTH BUSTING - Arrows vs Armour from Tod's Workshop YouTube Channel
Other extra videos in the series:
Find out More - The Battle
Find out more - The Armour
Find out More - Medieval Arrowsedit: Tod also re-uploaded the previous video with better sound:
Find out More - Medieval Arrows*12 votes -
"You can't say that! Stories have to be about white people"
12 votes -
Politics and the English language
11 votes -
English is not normal: No, English isn’t uniquely vibrant or mighty or adaptable. But it really is weirder than pretty much every other language.
12 votes -
‘Like’ isn’t a lazy linguistic filler – the English language snobs need to, like, pipe down
13 votes -
Americanisms the British public can't bloody stand
14 votes -
Why do people say "Jesus H. Christ," and where did the "H" come from?
38 votes -
Why certain words are left out of our English Bibles
7 votes -
X is for…
6 votes -
Why is English spelling so damn weird?
8 votes -
Behemoth, bully, thief: How the English language is taking over the planet
9 votes -
Dictionaries recently added more than 1,500 words. Here are some new entries.
7 votes -
The more names change, the more they sound the same
6 votes -
Linguists found the weirdest languages – and English is one of them
16 votes -
What is the ‘-ling’ in darling? (And what is the ‘dar-’ for that matter?)
13 votes -
Oi! We’re not lazy yarners, so let’s kill the cringe and love our Aussie accent(s).
5 votes -
The art of biblical translation, part two: Modern translators and their tin-ear to the literature of the Hebrew Bible
8 votes -
The art of biblical translation, part one: On the eloquence of the King James Version
5 votes -
Meet the guardian of grammar who wants to help you be a better writer
4 votes -
The rise of the swear nerds
13 votes -
‘Kindly adjust’ to our English
8 votes -
Time Traveller by Merriam-Webster—Find out when a word was first used in print
9 votes -
Learning English from the ground up
There was a recent thread on ~talk about which linguistics habits people find annoying, and much to my horror, I have most of those which were mentioned. After thinking about it a little more, I...
There was a recent thread on ~talk about which linguistics habits people find annoying, and much to my horror, I have most of those which were mentioned. After thinking about it a little more, I realized that a lot of these habits were picked up from the media I consume and the people I interact with. I also feel that this problem is exacerbated by my poor knowledge of English grammar.
While I was taught grammar at an elementary level in school, I didn't quite grok it back then, and mostly relied on my instinct, as to what "sounded" right. I have since forgotten most of what I had learnt, and my instinct is failing me - my grammar is atrocious, my punctuation is terrible and I only have auto-correct to thank for my spelling.
I understand that English, like other languages, is constantly evolving. What is wrong now might be right tomorrow. However, I believe that this is no excuse for my shortcomings as there is merit speaking and writing in accordance with what is considered correct in the present day.
I would like to learn English from "first principles", and would greatly appreciate if some users could suggest some books/resources which could help me (bonus points for resources pertaining to British English). Any other suggestions would also be great.
Thanks, and have a nice day.
24 votes -
The politicisation of English language proficiency, not poor English itself, creates barriers.
7 votes -
How the English failed to stamp out the Scots language
7 votes -
Do you use gender-neutral pronouns? Which one do you prefer?
A series of gender neutral alternatives for the third person singular pronouns (he/she/it) have been proposed throughout the recent years (and maybe decades). I wonder the preferences of fellow...
A series of gender neutral alternatives for the third person singular pronouns (he/she/it) have been proposed throughout the recent years (and maybe decades). I wonder the preferences of fellow users here in that regard. So I'd be glad if you could answer the questions in the title, and maybe elaborate a bit on the reasons of your preference. I'm both interested in this generally, and it could be useful as a means to help me practice quantitative linguistic variation (obviously this would hardly be scientifically usable source of data for actual real research so I'm not asking this for that purposes). I'll add my preference as a comment.
31 votes -
‘Cwtch’: What the most famous Welsh-English word reveals about global dialects
5 votes -
The epic rise and fall of the name Heather
9 votes -
Why is Canadian English unique?
19 votes -
How the English language became such a mess
11 votes -
Do colorless ideas sleep furiously?
13 votes -
How did Americans lose their British accents
24 votes -
Barracking, sheilas and shouts: How the Irish influenced Australian English
3 votes -
What is the future of English in the US?
8 votes -
We use sports terms all the time. But where do they come from?
7 votes -
Since the 1960s, dictionaries have cataloged how people actually use language, not how they should. That might be changing.
9 votes -
Color or fruit? On the unlikely etymology of "orange"
8 votes -
Behemoth, bully, thief: How the English language is taking over the planet
8 votes -
I for one...
A long time ago I had noticed a trend developing on reddit where people were starting to preface their comments with: "I for one". It's pretty insignificant, which is why I never made a post about...
A long time ago I had noticed a trend developing on reddit where people were starting to preface their comments with: "I for one". It's pretty insignificant, which is why I never made a post about it at the time. Since then, its use seems to have spread significantly on the site and I've seen it a bit here as well.
It makes sense to use the phrase when talking about or quoting another person to help separate their opinions from your own. The weird thing is many people now seem to use it when its not ambiguous that the comment is their own opinion. I was under the assumption that the default position should be that the comment is the opinion of the person that posted it.
For example:
"I for one, prefer dark chocolate over milk chocolate."
Is the same as:
"I prefer dark chocolate over milk chocolate."
There's nothing wrong with using the phrase, it just reads like someone trying to pad out an essay for school.
Have you noticed people using the phrase on other sites? Is it a phenomenon more specific to reddit?
Do you use the phrase yourself? If you do, what is your thought process when typing it out?14 votes