-
8 votes
-
How alt-right is Friedrich Nietzsche really?
6 votes -
What Maniac does (and doesn't) get right about the Bible and the Gnostics
5 votes -
Sydney Anglicans to ban same-sex marriage, yoga on all church property
3 votes -
One man’s (very polite) fight against media Islamophobia
5 votes -
Code hidden in Stone Age art may be the root of human writing
5 votes -
Greece's geography problem
9 votes -
Philosophical/cognitive works on the concept of "pattern"?
I'm interested in patterns and culture. I think it's a fascinating topic from many perspectives. Mathematically there are many tools for pattern analysis and formation, but at the same time...
I'm interested in patterns and culture. I think it's a fascinating topic from many perspectives. Mathematically there are many tools for pattern analysis and formation, but at the same time philosophically our minds try to make things fit into patterns generally (maybe because it requires more energy to remember a whole thing than a set of rules that describe the thing). A mathematical example of cases where order arises from pure disorder (or maximum entropy) would be Ramsey theory.
I'd like to discuss the cultural influence on our pattern analysis/synthesis, but also explore a bit what is a pattern, whether everything is a pattern or nothing is a pattern, whether patterns are interesting in themselves or not, etc.
I was wondering if anyone has recommendations for readings in this area, or if anyone has an opinion on it. I know of many works regarding a single pattern (for example the different theories of linguistics, the different theories of music, the different theories of cooking... you get the idea) but I've never seen a meta-perspective on why are we so interested on patterns and whether our approach actually makes sense.
Thanks!
9 votes -
Who speaks Indonesian, ‘the envy of multilingual world’?
5 votes -
Archaeologists have just unearthed an inscription in Pompeii that suggests the Ancient Roman city might have been destroyed a full two months later than previously thought.
10 votes -
Premier of Québec, François Legault, says crucifix 'not religious symbol'
11 votes -
Learning English from the ground up
There was a recent thread on ~talk about which linguistics habits people find annoying, and much to my horror, I have most of those which were mentioned. After thinking about it a little more, I...
There was a recent thread on ~talk about which linguistics habits people find annoying, and much to my horror, I have most of those which were mentioned. After thinking about it a little more, I realized that a lot of these habits were picked up from the media I consume and the people I interact with. I also feel that this problem is exacerbated by my poor knowledge of English grammar.
While I was taught grammar at an elementary level in school, I didn't quite grok it back then, and mostly relied on my instinct, as to what "sounded" right. I have since forgotten most of what I had learnt, and my instinct is failing me - my grammar is atrocious, my punctuation is terrible and I only have auto-correct to thank for my spelling.
I understand that English, like other languages, is constantly evolving. What is wrong now might be right tomorrow. However, I believe that this is no excuse for my shortcomings as there is merit speaking and writing in accordance with what is considered correct in the present day.
I would like to learn English from "first principles", and would greatly appreciate if some users could suggest some books/resources which could help me (bonus points for resources pertaining to British English). Any other suggestions would also be great.
Thanks, and have a nice day.
24 votes -
Tech suffers from lack of humanities, says Mozilla head
10 votes -
Why atheists are not as rational as some like to think
17 votes -
A history of true civilisation is not one of monuments
6 votes -
Elections in Ancient Rome | How They Did It
6 votes -
The politicisation of English language proficiency, not poor English itself, creates barriers.
7 votes -
The Death of Stalin
4 votes -
Germany's plans to win WWI
3 votes -
How to study abusers: Should reading lists come with a content warning?
12 votes -
Postmodernism is not identity politics
7 votes -
A very brief history of the Manx language
7 votes -
The end of scientific, rational thinking: Donald Trump, Doug Ford and Jordan Peterson
13 votes -
Catholic Church has lost more members than any other religion in the US
15 votes -
For 1,500 years, Western Europe ‘forgot’ how to swim, retreating from the water in terror. The return to swimming is a lesser-known triumph of the Enlightenment.
17 votes -
Dirty dishes reveal what ancient civilizations ate. Food scraps on 8,000-year-old ceramic shards found in Turkey include barley, wheat, peas, and bitter vetch.
12 votes -
The Reykjavik Confessions
11 votes -
How the English failed to stamp out the Scots language
7 votes -
Turning her Baha’i faith into precedent, lawyer helps women gain asylum
4 votes -
Academic grievance studies and the corruption of scholarship
11 votes -
Yiddish Language was Invented by Slavo-Iranian Jewish Merchants, Scientists Say
8 votes -
The Grievance Studies Scandal: Five Academics Respond
6 votes -
Do you use gender-neutral pronouns? Which one do you prefer?
A series of gender neutral alternatives for the third person singular pronouns (he/she/it) have been proposed throughout the recent years (and maybe decades). I wonder the preferences of fellow...
A series of gender neutral alternatives for the third person singular pronouns (he/she/it) have been proposed throughout the recent years (and maybe decades). I wonder the preferences of fellow users here in that regard. So I'd be glad if you could answer the questions in the title, and maybe elaborate a bit on the reasons of your preference. I'm both interested in this generally, and it could be useful as a means to help me practice quantitative linguistic variation (obviously this would hardly be scientifically usable source of data for actual real research so I'm not asking this for that purposes). I'll add my preference as a comment.
31 votes -
World's first sci-fi convention (Royal Albert Hall, 1891)
7 votes -
How the first ever telecoms scam worked
12 votes -
The White Headhunter: The story of a 19th-century sailor who survived a South Seas heart of darkness
2 votes -
Was Hitler a socialist? A response to a common argument
11 votes -
Considering interfaith relations between Jews, Christians, and Muslims: an interview with Patrick J. Ryan, S.J.
2 votes -
The say of the land. Is language produced by the mind? Romantic theory has it otherwise: words emerge from the cosmos, expressing its soul
4 votes -
Neoliberalism, world music, and corporate aesthetics
7 votes -
Cleopatra and the Siege of Alexandria (48 to 47 B.C.E.)
7 votes -
You think you're free? Think again.
6 votes -
‘Cwtch’: What the most famous Welsh-English word reveals about global dialects
5 votes -
Western Christianity isn't dying out from natural causes. It's dying of suicide.
Original article in 'The Telegraph': Western Christianity isn't dying out from natural causes. It's dying of suicide. Same article syndicated in 'The Age': Why Western Christianity has a death...
Original article in 'The Telegraph': Western Christianity isn't dying out from natural causes. It's dying of suicide.
Same article syndicated in 'The Age': Why Western Christianity has a death wish. (in case the paywall on the Telegraph article blocks you)
16 votes -
The surprisingly not totally boring search for who invented the spring bar
6 votes -
The epic rise and fall of the name Heather
9 votes -
Eichmann in Jerusalem (1963)
7 votes -
Everyday Dialogues -- Learn Romanian with Nico
7 votes -
Religious Beliefs-Rational or Irrational?
10 votes -
How long does it take you to read an academic journal article?
I feel like I'm a bit slow, though I'm gaining practice. I cannot read two moderate or long-ish papers in one day. I guess part of that reason is that the field I'm mostly reading in is a field...
I feel like I'm a bit slow, though I'm gaining practice. I cannot read two moderate or long-ish papers in one day. I guess part of that reason is that the field I'm mostly reading in is a field I'm new to, though in accordance with that what I'm reading often is kindo-of introductory material (linguistics, and Linguistics Handbook ed. Aronoff, 2017). A chapter is around the size of an average paper (around 25-30 pages). Another factor may be that I'm not a native speaker of English, but I think I do have a quite decent command of it especially when reading, enough to read through ~60 A4 pages in five-six hours, but I just can't do it.
So I wonder if I'm too slow or maybe exaggerating it a bit? How long does it take for you, and how many can you read, without skimming/skipping, in a "day"?
11 votes