Oof. This leaves me with a lot of feelings. Preventing radicalization is good. Stigmatizing autism is bad. Protecting vulnerable people is good, but only getting services because of a referral for...
Oof. This leaves me with a lot of feelings. Preventing radicalization is good. Stigmatizing autism is bad. Protecting vulnerable people is good, but only getting services because of a referral for possible radicalization thus incentivizing the referral? Still sending those vulnerable people through the criminal justice system?
It's a lot and I will have to read up a lot more on the programs. I know there's not enough support for autistic kids in the UK. (Probably adults too) Just ugh.
Article is paywalled unfortunately. Is there a summary or mirror somewhere?
This is an archive link.
Oof. This leaves me with a lot of feelings. Preventing radicalization is good. Stigmatizing autism is bad. Protecting vulnerable people is good, but only getting services because of a referral for possible radicalization thus incentivizing the referral? Still sending those vulnerable people through the criminal justice system?
It's a lot and I will have to read up a lot more on the programs. I know there's not enough support for autistic kids in the UK. (Probably adults too) Just ugh.