24
votes
The Israeli settlers attacking their Palestinian neighbors – With the world’s focus on Gaza, settlers have used wartime chaos as cover for violence and dispossession
Link information
This data is scraped automatically and may be incorrect.
- Title
- The Israeli Settlers Attacking Their Palestinian Neighbors
- Authors
- The New Yorker
- Published
- Feb 26 2024
- Word count
- 8193 words
I feel like this belongs more in ~news, I am not sure why it was moved from there? Or otherwise ~misc.
It certainly does not belong on ~life given the tildes description
@mycketforvirrad or @cfabbro I guess. I just realized I have no clue how to contact mods or know who they are? Can't seem to find it in the docs either.
I've moved it to ~misc.
@Deimos is the mod, but moving posts and changing tags is something several people can do, including the people you pinged here.
I do not have any privileges to change anything, but thought I'd answer.
Also the malice tag is the report button.
Well yeah, I know Deimos effectively can do everything. But I don't know who else can move things around and what actually is the best way to reach them. Other than just knowing who can, and pinging them.
You pinged the two I know about. I have their names saved because spelling.
You know how to send private messages? Pinging and messaging are the two methods I know.
Might as well ping them then. I was mostly wondering if I am missing/overlooking some reporting mechanism, or if that simply hasn't been implemented yet.
The only reporting mechanism I am aware of is the malice tag
It boggles my mind that we keep having to mince words – referring to these thieving, murderous, terrorists with delicate euphemisms like "settler".
I don't think it's a euphemism. Maybe "settler" has a positive connotation sometimes, but it's also used in terms like settler colonialism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Settler_colonialism
That’s true, but if I can play devils advocate here: if you aren’t in the know, as many aren’t, then it seems like a neutral term. It could be interpreted as someone who settles down, for example.
Terms like thief are much clearer. It’s a bit brutal but leaves little room for ambiguity.
The trouble with a term like thief is it's very broad. It also has a particularly ugly history when used to describe ethnic groups, so I think it's best avoided.
Maybe you could specify "land thief", but that's just as problematic from an ethnosemantics point-of-view. At the point we're using two words, settler colonialists is more descriptive.
I think it's fine to just say the settlers are stealing peoples' homes. Language is an imperfect medium anyway.