18 votes

Trump will undergo televised medical evaluation on Friday night, Fox News announces

16 comments

  1. [4]
    mono
    Link
    Dr. Marc Siegel, MD, the doctor who will be performing the evaluation, is a practicing internist boarded in Internal Medicine, based in New York City. He's the Clinical Professor, Department of...
    • Exemplary

    Dr. Marc Siegel, MD, the doctor who will be performing the evaluation, is a practicing internist boarded in Internal Medicine, based in New York City. He's the Clinical Professor, Department of Medicine at NYU Grossman School of Medicine, and Clinical Professional Coordinator, NYU Langone Medical Center on the Sirius Radio Project.

    He's also been a FOX News medical contributor since 2008, often appearing on Tucker Carlson's show, and has also contributed to the Wall Street Journal and National Review.

    In March, he said, "there's no reason to believe [COVID-19 is] actually more problematic or deadly than influenza," and he has strongly advocated for hydroxychloroquine.

    In July, in an interview on Tucker Carlson's show, Trump said to Siegal, "I watch you all the time. You're almost like my guide to this, 'cause frankly you really have a good take on it."

    So, clearly, he's totally independent and unbiased, and we can trust everything he says.

    32 votes
    1. mono
      Link Parent
      He's also written a few books: What an odd coincidence!

      He's also written a few books:

      False Alarm: The Truth about the Epidemic of Fear (2005, link)
      Inside flap:
      Life today for citizens of the developed world is far safer, easier, and healthier than for any other people in history. Modern medicine has all but wiped out many diseases that once were common killers. Science and technology have given us countless devices that protect our bodies from injury, secure our property, and warn us of impending disaster. And modern intelligence gathering can pinpoint threats to our domestic security as they arise. So why is an epidemic of fear sweeping America?
      The answer, according to nationally renowned health commentator Dr. Marc Siegel, is that we live in an artificially created culture of fear.From the anthrax panic to the SARS "epidemic," from "official" rumors of bioterror to Orange alerts to West Nile virus-- the media continually bombard us with breaking news of yet another super-bug, terrorist plot, or natural disaster that's about to wreak havoc. Most of the time the disasters never materialize. But even if they did, the odds that any of us would suffer harm from them is infinitesimally small-- especially when compared to the much greater risks of dying in a car accident or from coronary heart disease.

      Bird Flu: Everything You Need to Know About the Next Pandemic (2006, link)
      Editorial review:
      The most important thing to know about the avian flu pandemic is that it probably ain't coming, argues this brisk debunking of the latest medical scare story. Siegel, an associate professor at the NYU School of Medicine (False Alarm: The Truth About the Epidemic of Fear), cites evidence that the death rate from avian flu could be much lower than the reported estimate of 50% and it will probably not mutate to be readily transmissible between humans. And unlike the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic, Siegel contends, a new bird flu pandemic would face effective public health measures and medical treatments. Revisiting the West Nile virus, anthrax, SARS and bioterrorism panics, Siegel sees bird flu as the latest "bug du jour" hyped by government and media alarmism. Meanwhile, he complains, attention is diverted from far more deadly diseases like AIDS, malaria and regular flu. In his own lapse into medical panic, he insists that stress induced by medical panics is itself a serious medical problem.

      Swine Flu: The New Pandemic (2009, link)
      Without minimizing the risk for current strains of H1N1 to become more dangerous, author and physician Siegel (Bird Flu: Everything You Need to Know About the Next Pandemic) offers a calming dose of reality regarding swine flu; while ""we need to be in awe of the potential for damage,"" Siegel prescribes ""learning to understand why the likelihood of the worst case coming to pass is awfully low."" A practicing internist, associate professor and newspaper columnist (as well as a parent), Siegel addresses many common concerns over the H1N1 pandemic, giving clear explanations about the nature of the virus, historical examples, risk factors, available treatments, and more. He also explains how the 1918 flu pandemic killed as many as 50 million people-the chaotic aftermath of WWI played no small part-and how the present pandemic is simply incomparable. Breaking down the science of virus transmission, Siegel explains the conditions by which H1N1 could mutate into something more dangerous, as well as the anti-viral drug, Tamiflu, and the swine flu vaccine (and how the vaccine's safety is being assured).Taking a balanced approach, Siegel offers a realistic and concise guide for any concerned citizen.

      What an odd coincidence!

      15 votes
    2. [2]
      Turtle
      Link Parent
      To be fair, this was basically the consensus opinion up till mid February or so. Here you can see what the media was saying around that time. Highlights: This is a right leaning news site so it...

      there's no reason to believe [COVID-19 is] actually more problematic or deadly than influenza,"

      To be fair, this was basically the consensus opinion up till mid February or so. Here you can see what the media was saying around that time. Highlights:

      “Don’t worry about the coronavirus,” BuzzFeed wrote on Jan. 29. Worry about the flu.” On Jan. 31 – the same day the Trump administration imposed a ban incoming visitors from China – the “explainer” news site Vox was telling readers, “Is this going to be a deadly pandemic? No.” On Feb. 1, the Washington Post ran an article headlined, “Get a grippe, America. The flu is a much bigger threat than coronavirus, for now.”
      [...]
      By Feb. 3, China had extended the quarantine to 50 million people and imposed a travel ban on 16 cities. Now the Washington Post was worried, but about government’s response, not the virus, writing a critical story with the headline “Why we should be wary of an aggressive government response to coronavirus.” The complaint was that harsh measures “scapegoat already marginalized populations”
      [...]
      On Feb. 7, The Daily Beast was saying, “Coronavirus, with zero American fatalities, is dominating headlines, while the flu is the real threat.” As late as March 4, CNN’s Anderson Cooper was telling viewers, “So if you’re freaked out at all about the coronavirus, you should be more concerned about the flu.”

      This is a right leaning news site so it mostly focuses on the "liberal" media but I'm sure there are plenty of conservative sites that said similar. It would be interesting to know his current opinion on HCQ though.

      4 votes
      1. mono
        Link Parent
        Firstly, I don't think it's fair to extrapolate media sentiment to a general consensus, especially not amongst the medical community. Secondly, the quote was from March 6th. China had about 80k...

        Firstly, I don't think it's fair to extrapolate media sentiment to a general consensus, especially not amongst the medical community.

        Secondly, the quote was from March 6th. China had about 80k reported cases. There were already outbreaks in Europe and Iran. The first U.S. death had already occurred, and there was that huge outbreak on a cruise ship. The WHO declared a pandemic only a few days later.

        Lastly, whatever degree COVID-19 was believed to be not as bad as the flu didn't justify dismissing the risk when, unlike the flu, we knew hardly anything about it and there isn't a vaccine.

        13 votes
  2. [6]
    JXM
    Link
    I just...this is some reality show shit right here. I am literally at a loss for what to say about this...

    I just...this is some reality show shit right here. I am literally at a loss for what to say about this...

    23 votes
    1. [5]
      MonkeyPants
      Link Parent
      I struggle with the incongruity of this versus the perception I have of the Republican Party being all about the respect of the office. I imagine even Trump supporters also struggle with this. The...

      I struggle with the incongruity of this versus the perception I have of the Republican Party being all about the respect of the office.

      I imagine even Trump supporters also struggle with this. The announcement is deeply buried inside the Fox News website.

      The interview will take place on "Tucker Carlson Tonight" at 8 p.m. ET. Dr. Marc Siegel will conduct a medical evaluation and interview during the program.

      5 votes
      1. [4]
        babypuncher
        Link Parent
        It would be pretty funny if the doctor found a mysterious lump during the live evaluation.

        It would be pretty funny if the doctor found a mysterious lump during the live evaluation.

        5 votes
        1. [3]
          RyJones
          Link Parent
          That happened in the past. A viewer of a TV news show noticed a lump on an anchor's neck, called the station. Turns out, cancer.

          That happened in the past. A viewer of a TV news show noticed a lump on an anchor's neck, called the station. Turns out, cancer.

          2 votes
          1. [2]
            Iliketoast
            Link Parent
            Also happened to an HGTV star https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.today.com/today/amp/tdna58226
            2 votes
            1. RyJones
              Link Parent
              I was looking for the one I had in mind, but holy cow, there are a lot of them. https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/24/us/florida-reporter-cancer-viewer-lump-trnd/index.html...
              2 votes
  3. JoylessAubergine
    Link
    This is pro-wrestling as fuck. I sympathise for you Americans but holy shit i hope its true and i hope Steve Austin pops up with a bed pan.

    This is pro-wrestling as fuck. I sympathise for you Americans but holy shit i hope its true and i hope Steve Austin pops up with a bed pan.

    15 votes
  4. [2]
    AshySlashy
    Link
    From what I gathered from skimming the article posted on the Fox website after the interview, they claim he is basically nearly cured and not on any medications. Do I believe it? Not until I hear...

    From what I gathered from skimming the article posted on the Fox website after the interview, they claim he is basically nearly cured and not on any medications. Do I believe it? Not until I hear an official statement from the white house.

    4 votes
    1. JXM
      Link Parent
      I'd trust a statement from this administration about as far as I could throw a 10,000 lb rock.

      Do I believe it? Not until I hear an official statement from the white house.

      I'd trust a statement from this administration about as far as I could throw a 10,000 lb rock.

      11 votes
  5. [2]
    Parliament
    Link
    I read in another article that the evaluation will be done remotely rather than in person.

    I read in another article that the evaluation will be done remotely rather than in person.

    3 votes
    1. JXM
      Link Parent
      I kind of figured that would be the case. Even so, it's just crazy that it's happening in any form.

      I kind of figured that would be the case. Even so, it's just crazy that it's happening in any form.

      3 votes
  6. Eabryt
    Link
    I refuse to believe this is the correct timeline.

    I refuse to believe this is the correct timeline.

    2 votes