9
votes
Weekly US politics news and updates thread - week of March 1
This thread is posted weekly - please try to post all relevant US political content in here, such as news, updates, opinion articles, etc. Extremely significant events may warrant a separate topic, but almost all should be posted in here.
This is an inherently political thread; please try to avoid antagonistic arguments and bickering matches. Comment threads that devolve into unproductive arguments may be removed so that the overall topic is able to continue.
Opinion: The White House’s use of Zoom for meetings raises China-related security concerns
They should use Signal :-)
Jesus, Zoom is banned where I work (government contractor). How ironic.
Alabama Senate votes to make hormone therapy and surgery for trans youth a felony
Can you say, federal lawsuit?!
What does this mean? Was is a bad idea that they regretted or was is a great idea that they backed out of?
Maine Sen. Susan Collins said Wednesday she will support New Mexico Rep. Deb Haaland to be Interior secretary, the first Republican senator to publicly back a nominee set to become the first Native American to lead a Cabinet agency.
I don't think I've ever been more excited about a cabinet nomination. I'm hoping that Sen. Collins' vote combined with Sen. Manchin's, who said last week that he would be voting for her, will insure her confirmation.
Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska will be backing Haaland (I didn't expect that one)!
Biden’s interior secretary pick, Deb Haaland, is headed to confirmation as two Republicans announce support.
From Atlanta Journal-Constitution:
Voting restrictions bill passes Georgia House over strong opposition
And
Voting protest leads to clash between police and Georgia lawmaker
Video of this
Some right-winger comparing this to the Capitol storming of 1/6
Senate rejects Bernie Sanders proposal for $15 minimum wage in coronavirus relief package: Eight Democrats join Republicans to reject attempt to add wage hike into $1.9 trillion relief bill
/offtopic
Yeah, I don't know about that. Those are shoddy at best and pull away from actual, serious allegations of sexual assault at worst.
"I completely and wholeheartedly denounce any kind of white nationalism, any kind of Nazism. We fought a war where the American people went to war to end the scourge of Nazism across this country and I'm very thankful for that because it's evil and its vile" seems pretty cut and dry, as does calling Hitler a "supreme evil" and "one of the greatest evils in human history" in both of the social media posts he was criticized for.
aside
It's the motto of ancient Rome. Most Millennials probably know it from Percy Jackson.
I feel like this is an important caveat to the story. Sad as it is that this has become noteworthy, I think it's important to recognize that he very clearly and unambiguously condemned nazism & white supremacy.
Could it be that his private opinion is the opposite of this public one? Sure. Could it be that he's an asshole even if that's not the case? Absolutely, but it still feels to me that it rather takes weight off your words when you call someone a nazi despite their very explicit speaking against such. I don't support him, but perhaps it'd be better to wait for something more concrete before calling him a Nazi, lest the word lose it's meaning.
Huh. I've always wondered when culturally conservative minorities would break with the Democrats, although I largely assumed it would be whenever significant progress on racism is made and an end might actually be reachable or whenever the Republicans take the L and let minorities vote peacefully rather than literally right now because the Democrats coopted a leftist slogan instead of making a moderate one themselves. I think this should be a wakeup call that the Democrats need to pass pro-electoral legislation to stem the coming exodus of conservative minorities with young people.
I wonder if income plays a part in this.
I agree with college education being a divisor line politically, but given people without college education tend to often be poorer, I wonder how are these minorities who are already disproportionately poor accepting Republican economics.
This article from the Times yesterday on the swing of Latino men towards the Republicans seems to hit the nail on the head:
So something I'd never thought I'd see, a literal example of the "temporarily embarrassed millionaires" quote. I hate calling people stupid, but I have a hard time seeing this as anything but a stupid take on the situation. "Oh, I wanna be rich so I'll vote for the people who only care about them?" I love the "oh, paying rent is more important than fighting social injustice in their minds" quote from a Rep strategist in it too. Real rich, coming from the party that's making it materially harder for people who aren't wealthy to do so.
I 100% agree with that sentiment, which is why I vote for the Dems, even though they're not that great on that front either. I'm not so stupid that I would let my frustrations with that take me to the party that's objectively worse on the front of my material conditions.
I don't get this impulse of, "Oh, the Dems haven't been great on improving our lives, so let's go to the party that's been actively trying to make it even worse instead."