49
votes
Humanity's current space behavior 'unsustainable,' due to satellite and space junk congestion, European Space Agency report warns
Link information
This data is scraped automatically and may be incorrect.
- Authors
- Andrew Jones
- Published
- Sep 14 2023
- Word count
- 591 words
Woof, I'd love to read this article but the deluge of ads makes looking at that website really difficult.
https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/ESA_s_Space_Environment_Report_2023
Thanks!
Humanity's current marketing behavior 'unsustainable', internet users warn
use the uBlock Origin ad blocker: https://tildes.net/~tech/1afn/what_is_a_simple_tech_tip_that_changed_how_you_use_your_computer_or_other_devices_in_a_significant#comment-al1f
Is this new? I sorta remember reading about this in Science Illustrated somewhere around 30 years ago.
Kessler Syndrome isn't a new concept at all but it's being talked about more recently due to the multiple commercial constellations under assembly in low earth orbits. According to the report:
So it sounds like compliance is high these days but many older objects are still around from a time when debris management wasn't prioritized, and these can take a very long time to decay and reenter naturally. ESA's report also mentions some projects they have underway to help mitigate some of these.
We certainly have the technical ability to keep our orbits clean; this problem is a political one. Space doesn't belong to any one entity and it's tough to regulate.
There's also the option of moving stuff into less desirable (more fuel required,more distance from Earth's surface) orbits instead. Space is, firstly, very very big. Kessler won't stop us from moving through 500km on the way to 1000, he might stop us from staying at 500. Of all the things where humans are being dickheads and leaving a mess behind because we don't like acting responsibly and sustainably, this is the least of them. And I say that as a space exploration nerd.
Further orbits aren't always better. Stuff below 400 km decays quickly (a year or less) on its own due to trace drag from the outer fringe of the atmosphere. Starlink is around 550 km, which takes a bit longer, but as I said earlier most large constellations have deorbit provisions so they're not as much of a concern. It's the higher orbits where you really have to be careful because objects will just stay there for centuries if you screw up.
My guess is that Kessler Syndrome is largely an issue with geosynchronous orbits. There's not very much real-estate there and no trace atmosphere to eventually bring things down.
One saving grace for GEO is that perimeter scales at 2pi times the radius, and so the further out you go the more room you have in the orbit. GEO is highly desirable, but at 35,000 km there's a lot of space to go around. And the hardware that's there is mostly going in the same direction at the same speed, which also helps.
Yes it's far out, but we're talking about a mostly 1-dimensional space vs a 2-dimensional space. 2 dimensions is going to win.
Surprise, surprise, humans doing another unsustainable thing.
I was going to say the same thing. It sounds humans really don't know how to do things without ruining the ecosystem of wherever they do things.
We absolutely do know how to do things without destroying whatever environment we happen to be in, it's worse than that, we choose destruction and we choose it everyday.