Starting Friday, dockworkers in all Swedish ports will refuse to offload Teslas, cleaning crews will no longer clean showrooms, and mechanics won't fix charging points

To provide some additional context for those who wish it, the Wired article links to a Facebook post by Stefan Löfven, which the Mest Motor article also refers to, but does not link.

Stefan Löfven was the party chairman of the Swedish Social Democrats 2012 - 2021, and prime minister of Sweden 2014 - 2021. The post on Facebook is from his account, saying:

Så får vi veta att Tesla inte tänker teckna kollektivavtal här i Sverige. Det är en unken, förlegad syn på sina anställda och svaret kommer nu helt följdriktigt: IF Metall har enligt reglerna tidigare varslat om och nu påbörjat en strejk.

Det borde vara självklart för ett företag att följa dom seder som finns i de länder man verkar men det ser ut som att Tesla har tänkt strunta i svensk arbetsmarknadsmodell. Det ser riktigt illa ut och företagets agerande måste naturligtvis både påtalas och motarbetas!

Jag hoppas t ex att den som äger en Tesla hör av sig till företaget och påpekar att förutom hållbarhet för klimat och miljö ska också social hållbarhet gälla. Jag hoppas att den som kanske är på väg att köpa en Tesla säger att det köpet sätts i vänt-läge till avtal tecknats.

Vi äger ingen bil men åker en del taxi. Jag åker naturligtvis med Taxi Stockholm som har kollektivavtal. Nu kontaktar jag dom och säger att dom får skicka något annat än Tesla, så länge det märket inte har kollektivavtal. Det kan vi bli många som gör oavsett vilket taxiföretag du använder.

Detta har inte de anställda på Tesla jämfört med om de hade kollektivavtal:

• Ett komplett paket med försäkringar hos Fora
• Det omfattande omställningsstöd som finns i huvudavtalet mellan arbetsmarknadens parter
• Lönerna ligger lägre än genomsnittet i Motorbranschavtalet
• Utan kollektivavtal garanteras inte årliga löneökningar
• De har inte möjlighet till deltidspension
• De har inte heller arbetstidsförkortning
  Skäms Tesla, skäms!

I apologize for the long Swedish section, but I prefer providing the source material easily accessible. My own translation:

And so we get to know that Tesla does not intent to sign a collective agreement here in Sweden. It is a musty, obsolete view of their employees and the answer is now rightly this: [the trade union] IF Metall has in accordance with the rules already notified of and now started a strike.

It should be self-evident to a business that they should follow the customs in the countries in which they operate but it looks like Tesla intends to ignore the Swedish labour market model. It looks really bad and the corporation's actions must naturally be both highlighted and counteracted!

I hope for instance that whoever owns a Tesla contacts the corporation and points out that with respect to sustainability it is not only climate and environment that matters, but also social sustainability. I hope that whoever is considering buying a Tesla let's it be known that that purchase is put on hold until a [collective] agreement is signed.

We don't own a car but we do take a taxi sometimes. Naturally, I use Taxi Stockholm which has signed a collective agreement. Now I contact them and tell them that they'll have to send something other than a Tesla as long as that brand does not have a collective agreement. Many of us could do so regardless of which taxi company we use.

The employees of Tesla do not have the following things which they would have with a collective agreement:

• A complete package of insurance with [the insurance company] Fora
• The extensive support for change of vocation which are included in the main agreement between the parts of the labour market
• The salaries are lower than average in [the collective agreement for the car- and truck industry]
• Without collective agreements there is no guarantee for yearly salary increases
• They do not have an opportunity for partial pension
• Nor do they have [standard reduction of work hours]
  Shame, Tesla! Shame!

Please note that the last section is a bit haphazard because the source does not parse that well syntactically. He opens the list with "these are things they are missing out on" but then not all of the bullet points follow that structure grammatically.