-
38 votes
-
In a win for the climate (and safety), urban US speed limits are dropping
27 votes -
African ports may be overwhelmed by Red Sea reroutings
7 votes -
US traffic control device standards get long-awaited update
14 votes -
Port of Long Beach, CA has $1.57 billion to expand freight access and get trucks off the road
10 votes -
Tesla faces an inquiry by Norway's traffic safety regulator into suspension failures in the company's electric cars that could result in a recall
13 votes -
Paris is saying 'non' to a US-style hellscape of supersized cars – and so should the rest of Europe
82 votes -
Volkswagen, Porsche, and Audi finally say they will use Tesla’s EV charging plug in the US
23 votes -
Tesla confirms wireless inductive electric car home charger is coming
20 votes -
Greyhound bus stops are valuable US assets. Here’s who’s cashing in on them.
13 votes -
California gas tax revenue will drop by $6 billion, threatening roads
27 votes -
US warns Yemen's Houthis to stop attacks on ships traveling through the Red Sea
15 votes -
Waymo launches curbside robotaxi pickup at Phoenix airport
4 votes -
Tesla recalls two million US vehicles over Autopilot software issue
35 votes -
How does the Panama Canal slowdown affect shipping contracts?
8 votes -
Amsterdam to cut speed limits 40% to improve road safety
46 votes -
Helicopters on Everest
9 votes -
If you had up to $55k to purchase an electric vehicle (new/used) with a range of a least 250 miles, what would you buy?
I'm in the market for another EV. I have a Leaf currently and love it for in town driving. I want something with more range for longer trips. I've looked at Hyundai, Tesla, VW, and Ford vehicles....
I'm in the market for another EV. I have a Leaf currently and love it for in town driving. I want something with more range for longer trips.
I've looked at Hyundai, Tesla, VW, and Ford vehicles. No vehicle is perfect. I like the HUD of the Hyundai and the full self driving of the Tesla. I don't like the look of the Ford Mustang, and the Lightning is comfy but enormous. And since Tesla has been around for a while, there's the option of a used Model S compared to a new Model 3 (for instance).
This doesn't necessarily have to be an advice thread - trying to find the best vehicle for me. I'm more looking for your personal pros/cons of vehicles in the EV market from your perspective.
Like the title asks, what would you buy in today's market?29 votes -
$1B grant will help make high speed rail a reality from Raleigh to Richmond
34 votes -
Helsinki Airport clears runway snow in just eleven minutes – why do some airports cope better with snow than others?
11 votes -
Polish train manufacturer Newag bricks trains which spend time in competitors' depots
40 votes -
Las Vegas-S. California high-speed rail gets $3 billion federal grant
28 votes -
Reading to Philadelphia train takes a major step forward as it gets federal funding (also, Scranton to NYC)
7 votes -
Denmark's largest trade union has joined strike action by Swedish Tesla workers, piling pressure on the US electric car company to agree to collective bargaining rights
21 votes -
The Pentagon says a US warship and multiple commercial ships have come under attack in the Red Sea
25 votes -
REVR plans to turn your ICE car into a plug-in hybrid for US$3,200
20 votes -
‘A bus is open to everyone regardless of class’: riding the world’s biggest network
8 votes -
$15 tolls likely for nation’s first congestion pricing program
13 votes -
Missiles fired from Yemen toward US warship that responded to attack on commercial tanker
15 votes -
Tesla has filed a lawsuit against the Swedish Transport Agency as striking workers halted the delivery of licence plates of new vehicles manufactured by the US automaker
29 votes -
Is Los Angeles’ transit Olympics-ready?
13 votes -
Sweden's Northvolt says new lithium-free sodium-ion battery is cheaper, more sustainable and doesn't rely on scarce raw materials
49 votes -
Swedish A-traktors, vehicles modified to not go above 19mph, became a teenage rite of passage – amid a rise in accidents there are calls for a ban
16 votes -
Realigning railway curves in (otherwise) fast zones to speed up trains
14 votes -
The reincarnation of totaled Teslas—in Ukraine
13 votes -
Two people in vehicle that exploded at NY/Canada border crossing declared dead at scene
21 votes -
US National Transportation Safety Board calls on automakers to install speed-limiting tech in new vehicles
32 votes -
Tesla may have picked an unwinnable fight with Sweden's powerful unions
23 votes -
How Norway's EV rising star Easee fell foul of Swedish regulators, which took it to the brink of bankruptcy
8 votes -
My friend was hit by a car
Recently a close friend of mine was riding a bicycle along a city street. They had the right of way. A careless driver making a fast turn either did not see my friend (somehow... it's not like...
Recently a close friend of mine was riding a bicycle along a city street. They had the right of way. A careless driver making a fast turn either did not see my friend (somehow... it's not like there were obstructions) or did not even bother to look. The driver and their 2000-pound steel machine slammed into my friend, throwing them off the bike.
The bike was completely destroyed/unusable. My friend was scraped up, and shaken, but by a miracle did not hit their head or have to be hospitalized. They were lucky: the car was traveling fast enough to kill. The driver was apologetic and paid for my friend's bicycle and medical bills. But this should not have happened. My friend could have died or been permanently paralyzed.
I don't know all the details. But I do know that intersection. This was so ridiculously avoidable.
- Had the bike lane been fully protected with a clearly visible (but not sight-line-blocking) concrete curb or at least a bollard at the intersection, the driver probably would not have taken the turn so fast, or would maybe have been more generally aware of cyclists. They may have had time enough to stop before crashing into my friend, or the impact may have been small enough not to hurt them.
- Had there been a raised crosswalk or had the entire intersection been raised (as a speed table), requiring cars to slow down, the driver would definitely not have taken the turn so fast. The driver may also have been more aware of pedestrians/cyclists and more likely to yield.
- Had there been a curb extension shortening the crosswalk (in this case a pedestrian crossing island past the bike lane, I guess), the driver would probably have subconsciously taken the turn more slowly, as they would probably have felt more enclosed within the intersection.
- Had signal priority been given to cyclists/pedestrians, the driver probably also would not have made the turn at that point in the light cycle, and would probably not have hit my friend. (I'm pretty sure my friend was going straight on green, but if they were making a right turn, then had no right turn on red also been enforced for cars, the driver would probably not have made the turn at that point in the light cycle, and would probably not have hit my friend.)
(This wasn't a parking-protected bike lane: the city had just removed parking from that side of the street and left it fully unprotected. If it were parking-protected, I would also suggest that two parking spaces be removed approaching the intersection to ensure that the driver could see cyclists in their peripheral vision. As it stands, I have no idea how this person did not see my friend. Gross negligence. They should not be allowed to operate a motor vehicle.)
Driving shouldn't be considered such a mundane thing. When someone steps into a car they should be aware that, at any point, they could kill someone. But really infrastructure is an easier, more repeatable, and less exhausting solution than trying to change attitudes directly. Probably had any one of these infrastructure changes been implemented, my friend would not have been hit by a car. Had more than one or two been implemented, there would realistically never be a cyclist collision here.
It irritates me that my friend's life was put in danger because a driver was being careless. But also that they were able to make a careless mistake. And incidents like this remind me that traffic safety is not a theoretical problem. At any time, without warning, the life of someone you care about could be immediately taken away because we have a culture that normalizes driving a dangerous vehicle with basically zero oversight; and because our roads are designed for car throughput and not to be safe for vulnerable people.
Someone called me "militant [about traffic safety]" once. This is why.
54 votes -
Norse Atlantic Airways successfully completed the world's first Boeing 787 Dreamliner flight to Antarctica, carrying scientists and essential research equipment to the continent
11 votes -
A high-tech ferry in Sweden could soon set a new standard – Candela says its hydrofoil technology reduces the energy per passenger-kilometer by 95%
19 votes -
Starting Friday, dockworkers in all Swedish ports will refuse to offload Teslas, cleaning crews will no longer clean showrooms, and mechanics won't fix charging points
44 votes -
Opinion: US infrastructure law offers too little progress on climate and equity
9 votes -
“Do your job.” How the US railroad industry intimidates employees into putting speed before safety.
18 votes -
US lawyers insist Nikola founder shouldn't face prison time for fraud — unlike Elizabeth Holmes
5 votes -
There's a big problem with your car's tires
28 votes -
The US is having a rail travel renaissance, but you probably didn’t notice
27 votes -
[Books explaining] why the heyday of the automobile is over
8 votes -
UAW workers at major Ford and GM truck plants vote 'no' on record contract deals
20 votes