Grzmot's recent activity

  1. Comment on Netflix hit with $5M suit over “sexism” of ‘Queen’s Gambit’ line about Soviet chess legend in ~tv

    Grzmot
    (edited )
    Link
    The writers fucked up. I think this suit has some merit, I don't know if 5 million merit, but I can understand what Gaprindashvili is going for. That line in the show wouldn't have taken much...

    The writers fucked up. I think this suit has some merit, I don't know if 5 million merit, but I can understand what Gaprindashvili is going for. That line in the show wouldn't have taken much research to dispute, but sometimes people get lazy. You can fault the USSR for many things, including being very autocratic, but it did do gender equality better than the world on the other side of the iron curtain.

    Reminds me of when Lyudmila Pavlichenko, probably the most famous Soviet sniper (due to being the woman with the most confirmed kills) was touring the US and Canada in 1942 in an attempt to garner war support against the Nazis, and was hit by questions about the length of her skirt in battle and if she put on makeup for combat.

    In 1942, Pavlichenko was sent to Canada and the United States for a publicity visit as part of the Soviet Union's attempts to convince the other Allies of World War II to open a second front against Nazi Germany. When she visited the United States, she became the first Soviet citizen to be received by a US president, as Franklin D. Roosevelt welcomed her to the White House. Pavlichenko was later invited by First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt to tour the US, relating her experiences as a female soldier on the front lines. During the publicity tour, Pavlichenko was not taken seriously by the press and was referred to as the "Girl Sniper." When meeting with reporters in Washington, DC, she was dumbfounded by the kind of questions put to her. "One reporter even criticized the length of the skirt of my uniform, saying that in America women wear shorter skirts and besides my uniform made me look fat." They also asked if she used makeup on the front line. She was described by the reporters as very blunt and unemotional in her responses.

    Source

    9 votes
  2. Comment on How Tourette's syndrome impacts my life in ~life

    Grzmot
    Link
    A few of you may know this woman under her streamer name "Sweet Anita", and possibly from some funny compilation videos on youtube. This is a more serious video in which she details her life with...

    A few of you may know this woman under her streamer name "Sweet Anita", and possibly from some funny compilation videos on youtube. This is a more serious video in which she details her life with Tourettes and how it impacted her until it finally (and way too late) got diagnosed.

    4 votes
  3. Comment on The tragedy of America's rural schools in ~life

    Grzmot
    Link
    You know, not living on the continent, even picturing rural America as I was told or shown about it, I didn't know it was this fucking bad. I know that the running joke about Mississippi is that...

    You know, not living on the continent, even picturing rural America as I was told or shown about it, I didn't know it was this fucking bad. I know that the running joke about Mississippi is that it is in last place for fucking everything, but I didn't imagine they wouldn't even have text books. That's third world school material, not the USA.

    5 votes
  4. Comment on Warning of income gap, Xi tells China’s tycoons to share wealth in ~news

    Grzmot
    Link
    Sounds like the Chinese Communist Party is about to become actually communistic. Will be interesting to see if this will be the start of the end for the party or if it will boost the country...

    Sounds like the Chinese Communist Party is about to become actually communistic. Will be interesting to see if this will be the start of the end for the party or if it will boost the country further. Xi probably isn't doing this out of the love in his heart, but probably because this is just the next step in his bid to secure power in China and ensure that he is, under all circumstances, the absolutely last instance of power.

    5 votes
  5. Comment on Dutch cities want to ban property investors in all neighborhoods in ~news

    Grzmot
    Link Parent
    In general I don't have a problem with renting, as it provides a market for people who wish to spend a few years of their life in a city maybe studying or working or whatever and then somewhere...

    In general I don't have a problem with renting, as it provides a market for people who wish to spend a few years of their life in a city maybe studying or working or whatever and then somewhere else, the problem comes from the fact that the people who want to settle down there, found a family, live for decades, can't cause the prices are so insane. Additionally to that, property investory in my country love to buy an asset and don't even rent it out cause it could lower the value when they sell it later. Vienna usually alternates with Salzburg between what city has the higher prices for rent, but Vienna is also the city with largest amount of empty apartments. It's insane.

    4 votes
  6. Comment on Dutch cities want to ban property investors in all neighborhoods in ~news

    Grzmot
    Link
    Yes please, property investments needs to die.

    Yes please, property investments needs to die.

    21 votes
  7. Comment on Mumford & Sons, Baaba Maal - There Will Be Time (Live in South Africa) (2016) in ~music

    Grzmot
    Link
    One of my favourite live performances. The emotion unloaded on stage, the appreciation that the musicians show to each other and the art, the people in the crowd, it's amazing.

    One of my favourite live performances. The emotion unloaded on stage, the appreciation that the musicians show to each other and the art, the people in the crowd, it's amazing.

    1 vote
  8. Comment on What Guantánamo made out of them in ~life

    Grzmot
    Link
    Under each headline, DIE ZEIT added a picture, I'd urge you to look at them too. There's one that Mister X painted of himself which is rather telling. If you want the article in English with the...

    Under each headline, DIE ZEIT added a picture, I'd urge you to look at them too. There's one that Mister X painted of himself which is rather telling. If you want the article in English with the pictures, I have a Google Doc here:

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rQutoE039yzDzs4OB-Abab8_eXubZK6r5KjItFgD9VM/edit#heading=h.bpwh7j4i2w30

    The reason why this is machine translated is because I needed to share it quickly with a friend and so I thought I might as well post it here. You can sense the English is a bit simplistic, but it gets the message across.

    3 votes
  9. What Guantánamo made out of them

    By Bastian Berbner and John Goetz, published 1 September, 2021 The man who called himself "Mister X" in Guantánamo wore a balaclava and mirrored sunglasses when he tortured. The person he was...

    By Bastian Berbner and John Goetz, published 1 September, 2021

    The man who called himself "Mister X" in Guantánamo wore a balaclava and mirrored sunglasses when he tortured. The person he was torturing was not supposed to see his face. Now, 17 years later, Mister X is standing at a potter's wheel in his garage in Somewhere, America. A bald man with a greying beard, tattooed on the back of his neck. His hands, big and strong, mould a grey-brown lump of clay. The pot won't turn out very nice, you can already tell. He says that's the way it is with his art, he's more attracted to ugliness.

    Mister X thought long and hard about whether he wanted to receive journalists and talk about what happened back then. It would be the first time that a Guantánamo torturer has spoken publicly about what he did. The meeting on this day in October 2020 was preceded by numerous emails. Now, finally, we are with him. An interview of several hours is already behind us, in which Mister X told us about his cruel work. We told him that the man he maltreated at that time would also like to talk to him. Mister X replied that on the one hand he had longed for such a conversation for 17 years - on the other hand he had dreaded it for 17 years. He asked for half an hour to think it over. He said he could think well while making pottery.

    The man who would like to talk to him is called Mohamedou Ould Slahi. In the summer of 2003, he was considered the most important prisoner in the Guantánamo Bay camp. Of the almost 800 prisoners there, according to all that is known, no one was tortured as severely as he was.

    There are events that determine a biography. Even if they do not last that long in terms of lifespan, in this case barely eight weeks, they unfold a power that makes everything before fade into oblivion and captivates everything after.

    Back then, in the summer of 2003, Mister X was in his mid-thirties and an interrogator in the American army. He was part of the so-called Special Projects Team whose task was to break Slahi. The detainee had so far remained stubbornly silent, but the intelligence services were convinced that he possessed important information. Perhaps even information that could prevent the next major attack or lead to Osama bin Laden, who was then the world's most wanted terrorist: the leader of Al-Qaeda, the main perpetrator of the attacks of 11 September 2001.

    The team's mission was to defeat evil. To achieve this, it opposed him with another evil.

    Mister X always tortured at night. With each night that Slahi's silence lasted, he tried a new cruelty. He says torture is ultimately a creative process. Listening to Mister X describe what he did can leave you breathless, and sometimes Mister X seems to feel that way himself as he tells the story. Then he shakes his head. Pauses. Runs his hand through his beard. Fights back tears. He says, "Man, I can't believe this myself."

    The way he speaks, you don't get the impression that it was all so long ago. In fact, it's not over at all. Mister X says there is hardly a day when he does not think about Slahi or when he does not haunt his dreams. Slahi was the case of his life, in the worst sense of the word.

    There was a moment back then that not only burned itself into his memory, it also poisoned his soul, Mister X says. That night he went into the interrogation room where Slahi, small and emaciated, sat in his orange jumpsuit on a chair, chained to an eyelet in the floor. Mister X, tall and muscular, had thought of something new again. This time he pretended to go berserk. He screamed wildly, hurled chairs across the room, slammed his fist against the wall and threw papers in Slahi's face. Slahi was shaking all over.

    Mister X says the reason he never got rid of that moment was not that he saw fear in Slahi's eyes, but that he, Mister X, enjoyed seeing that fear. Seeing the trembling Slahi, he says, felt like an orgasm.

    Mohamedou Slahi is 50 years old today. In December 2020, two months after our visit to Mister X, he is standing on the Atlantic beach. In front of him the waves break on the Mauritanian coast, not far behind him begins the endless expanse of the Sahara. Slahi wears a Mauritanian robe and a turban, both in the bright blue of the sky above him. With narrowed eyes, he looks out to sea and says that if he were to sail off here on a steady westerly course, he would arrive where he was held for 14 years, at the south-eastern tip of Cuba.

    Slahi has been free again for five years. But like Mister X, he too cannot shake off his time in Guantánamo. He now lives again in Nouakchott, the capital of Mauritania, on the edge of the desert, the place where the USA had him kidnapped a few weeks after 11 September 2001. Unlike then, he is now a celebrity. He is approached on the street, he zooms out of his house into universities and onto podiums around the world to denounce human rights abuses by the United States. He says that when he closes his eyes at night and sleep comes, sometimes the masked man comes again.

    When one of the authors of this article first visited him in 2017, Slahi expressed a wish - he would like to find his torturers. At the time, he had already written a book about his time in Guantánamo. In the last sentence, he had invited the people who had tortured him to have tea with him: "My house is open."

    The trauma of 11 September 2001

    At that first meeting and again now, in December 2020, he says that during the torture period in Guantánamo he felt one thing above all: Hate. Again and again, he imagined the cruel way in which he would kill Mister X. He said that he had to kill him, his family and everyone else. Him, his family and everyone who meant something to him. But then, in the solitude of his cell, while thinking, praying and writing, he realised that revenge was not the answer. So he decided to try something else: Forgiveness.

    In the silence of his cell, he forced himself to think that this big, strong man, Mister X, was in fact a small, weak child. A child to whom he, Mohamedou Slahi, patted his head and said: What you did is bad, but I forgive you. The process of re-educating himself took several years. But at some point, still sitting in his cell in Guantánamo, he had managed to convince himself so much of the sincerity of this thought that he really felt the need to want to forgive.

    When Slahi expressed a desire to speak to Mister X, he said he hoped it would bring peace to his still troubled soul. In the best case scenario, he could replace the old, painful memories of that time with new, good memories.

    Thus began our search for Mister X.

    How must one imagine a man torturing another? In American files, for example in a Senate investigation report, there is a list of what Mister X did. They are descriptions of the crudest psychological and sometimes physical violence.

    When you meet him, something strange happens: you don't connect the image that all the reports have created in your head with the man sitting in front of you. We know for sure that he is Mister X. Former colleagues of his have confirmed his identity to us. But the Mister X we meet is: a subtle art lover. An educated man interested in history. All in all, a pretty nice guy. After spending several days with him, one cannot escape the impression that he is apparently also a very empathetic person.

    Mister X tells us that he occasionally invites homeless people to the restaurant, also that it happens that he cries in front of the TV when he sees reports from disaster areas. It is precisely because he can empathise so well that he has been so good as an interrogator, as a torturer. You have to put yourself in the other person's shoes. What causes him even greater pain? What could make him feel even more insecure? Where is his weak point? But precisely because of empathy, he says, he was also broken by what he had done at the time.

    Shortly after he left Guantánamo in the winter of 2003, Mister X began to drink. It was not unusual for him to drink three bottles of red wine a night. He spent more and more time in bed and spoke less and less with his wife and children. He hardly found any sleep any more. He toyed with the idea of killing himself, he says. A doctor diagnosed him with severe post-traumatic stress disorder. The torturer, of all people, had suffered the kind of trauma one would expect to find in his victim.

    There are many studies on the psychological suffering of torture victims. War refugees from Syria, refugees who were mistreated in Libyan camps, Uighur prisoners from China - in such people, depression, addictions, concentration problems, sleeping problems and suicidal thoughts are increasingly observed.

    Mister X also suffered from all these symptoms.

    One could see the distraught Mister X as the personification of the trauma that has gripped the entire United States since 11 September 2001. After that primal experience, the country that wanted to defend the values of the West in the fight against terror betrayed precisely those values. Rule of law. Justice. Democracy. And since that primordial experience, the country has been ravaged more than ever by an omnipresent violence perpetrated by broken people. Spree killings, assassinations, hate crimes. Maybe the whole US has some kind of post-traumatic stress syndrome?

    For 17 years, Mister X says, he has been working through the guilt he has brought upon himself. He has taken medication, undergone therapy and looked for a new job. For 17 years he has been trying to make up for his mistake. A few things have helped him. A little. But not really. Maybe also because he had secretly known all these years that in order to really come clean with himself, he would have to do one thing urgently. "The decent thing to do would be to tell Slahi to his face that I regret what I did to him. That it was wrong."

    In that sense, Slahi's offer to talk to us reporters is a gift. An opportunity to draw a line under the matter. But there's a thought that's been troubling Mister X and making it difficult for him to accept the offer.

    Mister X still thinks Mohamedou Slahi is a terrorist. And for one of the most brilliant in recent history. A charismatic. A manipulator. A gifted communicator who already spoke four languages, Arabic, French, German and English, and taught himself a fifth, Spanish, in Guantánamo.

    Slahi was probably the smartest person he had ever met, Mister X says. So smart that Slahi managed to fool his interrogators, just as he now manages to make millions of people around the world believe he is innocent. Mister X says he knows this person's psyche better than that of his own wife. For weeks he did nothing but put himself in this man's shoes and one thing was clear: Slahi was a brilliant liar.

    He looks his tormentor in the face

    In 2010, a US federal judge ruled that Slahi must be released because the US government's alleged evidence against him was just that, not evidence: Evidence. The government appeals.

    In 2015, the book Slahi wrote in prison is published: Guantánamo Diary. It is extensively redacted, but the message is clear: the US tortured an innocent man. The book becomes a bestseller.

    In 2016, Slahi is released, after 14 years without charges. In Mauritania, he is received like a hero.

    In 2019, it is announced that Guantánamo Diary will be made into a film. Jodie Foster and Benedict Cumberbatch will star, and Oscar-winner Kevin Macdonald will direct.

    In 2020, the Guardian's website will publish the trailer for a documentary in which one of Slahi's guards travels to Mauritania and former enemies become friends.

    Apparent friends, says Mister X. He doesn't buy any of this "forgiveness stuff" from Slahi. The film scenes - the walk in the Sahara sand, Slahi laughing and helping his guard into a Mauritanian robe - , Slahi has really staged all that masterfully. Slahi who generously forgives, the decent David who rises above the corrupt Goliath - the narrative of a hero.

    That is what makes Mister X hesitate for so long: Slahi, he fears, could also use him for his production. He could show the whole world: Look, now not only an insignificant guard apologises, but also my torturer, and I forgive him too! Slahi would become an even greater hero.

    Is Mister X's urge to face his victim stronger than his fear of being instrumentalised?

    Mister X has made a small, ugly potty. It must now dry. He puts it aside, wipes his hands on a towel and looks serious. He is silent for a long time and then says, "I'm going through with this now. Oh God."

    The picture jerks, the sound wobbles, and for a brief moment hope is written on Mister X's face that technology will save him from his courage. Then the face he knows so well appears before him on the computer screen - narrow as ever, but aged. The man on the screen, unlike Slahi in 2003, has hardly any hair left. And Slahi now wears glasses, with black rims.

    It is late in Mauritania, almost midnight, but Mohamedou Slahi has stayed awake. He also has a visit from a member of our team. By phone, we have been keeping Slahi updated from the US for the past few hours: There is a delay; Mister X needs a little more time.

    Now a picture is also building up on the monitor in Mauritania. The greying beard, the bald head, the tattoos on the back of his neck.

    Mohamedou Slahi looks his tormentor in the face. No mask, no sunglasses.

    Mister X: Mister Slahi. How are you doing?

    Mohamedou Slahi: How are you, sir?

    Mister X: Not bad, and you?

    Mohamedou Slahi: I am very well.

    Mister X: That's good.

    Mohamedou Slahi: Thank you for asking.

    Mister X: Yes, sir. I was extremely hesitant to make this call. But let me explain a few things to you.

    The first time Mister X saw him was on 22 May 2003. Mister X was standing in an observation room in Guantánamo, looking through a pane of glass that was a mirror from the other side. There, in the interrogation room, Slahi was being questioned by two FBI agents. For half a year they had spoken to him almost every day - without the slightest success. In a few days, it had already been decided, the military would take over, Mister X and his colleagues.

    There was a table in the middle of the room, on one side the agents, on the other Slahi. The FBI had brought cakes. One of them, blond and tall, obviously the boss, was leafing through a Koran and saying something about a passage. Then Slahi stood up. He wore no handcuffs, no chains. He walked around the table, took the Koran from the agent's hand and said, no, no, he got it wrong, he had to see it this way and that way. In the end, Mister X watched as the agents hugged Slahi like a friend. "I couldn't believe it," he says.

    The FBI agent who leafed through the Koran is Rob Zydlow. We spoke to him as well. He lives in California, he retired a few months ago. He thinks failure is a harsh word. But, yes, in Slahi's case, his plan didn't work. He tried the nice way, but no matter whether he brought home-made cakes, as he did that day, or burgers from McDonald's, whether he watched animal documentaries with Slahi or let him teach him Arabic, Slahi just didn't talk. He would always just say, "I'm innocent."

    Slahi, on the other hand, says today that the FBI cake tasted good, that he liked the documentary about the Australian desert best, and that Rob Zydlow's attempt to learn Arabic was simply ridiculous. It was true that the FBI people had been reasonably nice to him for months, but he did not owe those agents any answers. On the other hand, they owed him answers. Why had the US had him kidnapped?

    Slahi did not know that on that day, behind the glass, the man he would meet a little later as Mister X was watching. He did not know that in the Pentagon a document was just being passed from one office to the next, signature by signature, all the way to Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld, giving examples of what methods this man could use to get the prisoner Mohamedou Slahi to talk. It was a paper that provided a framework, but still left the torture team plenty of room to come up with their own ideas.

    Rob Zydlow says he sensed a real hunting fever in the army people who took over.

    Mister X says he went to the army shop and bought a bluesuit. Slahi was a man-catcher, as his dealings with the FBI agents proved. So, that was the logic, Slahi would now not be dealing with a human being, but with a figure from a horror film.

    "What we did to you was wrong".

    In high school, Mister X was in the drama club. Even today he plays Dungeons & Dragons, a board game with elves, orcs and dragons, he reads comics and loves science fiction. While some of his colleagues were boring in their interrogation methods back then - question, question, question - he really immersed himself in the roles.

    On the evening of 8 July 2003, Mister X put on his overalls, black military boots, black gloves and a black balaclava, along with mirrored sunglasses. He had Slahi brought into the interrogation room and hooked to the eyelet in the floor, but the chain was so short that Slahi could only stand bent over. Then Mister X switched on a CD player and heavy metal music filled the room, deafeningly loud.

    Let the bodies hit the floor
    Let the bodies hit the floor
    Let the bodies hit the floor
    Let the bodies hit the floor

    Mister X put the song on continuous loop, turned off the lights, turned on a strobe light that emitted bright white flashes, and left the room. For a while, he says, he watched from the next room. But the music was so loud that he couldn't think. So he went outside for a smoke.

    Slahi says he tried to pray, to take refuge in his own thoughts. He did not talk.

    Mister X was trying out new songs. The American national anthem. A commercial for cat food that consisted only of the word "meow". Mister X turned up the air conditioning until Slahi was shaking all over. Mister X turned up the heating until Slahi had sweated through his clothes. Mister X put his feet up on the table in front of Slahi and told him that he had had a dream. In it, a pine coffin had been lowered into the ground in Guantánamo. There had been a number on the coffin. 760, Slahi's prisoner number. Then there was his outburst, which he could not get rid of later.

    No matter what he did, Slahi remained silent.

    Mister X: It is difficult for me to have this conversation because I am not convinced of your innocence. I still believe that you are an enemy of the United States. But what we did to you was wrong, no question about it. Nobody deserves something like that.

    Mohamedou Slahi: I can assure you that I have never been an enemy of your country. I have never harmed any American. In fact, I have never harmed anyone at all. Never.

    Whether Mohamedou Slahi was a terrorist, as Mister X thinks, or completely innocent, as Slahi himself claims, will probably never be clarified. Perhaps he was something in between, a sympathiser. In the search for concrete criminal acts, for terrorist actions by Mohamedou Slahi, we have spoken to many people who were close to him or who know his case well. There were constitutional protectors in Germany, where Slahi lived for eleven years, intelligence officers in Mauritania and the USA, investigators and several members of the Special Projects Team. We read German and American files. After years of research, we found - nothing.

    Mohamedou Slahi grew up two hours' drive from Nouakchott, in the sandy foothills of the Sahara. His father tended the camels, his mother the twelve children. He was an exceptionally good student - just like his cousin Mahfouz, who was the same age. As teenagers, in the mid-eighties, the cousins shared a room. Late into the night, they read books about Islam and longed to join the thousands of young men from all over the Islamic world and travel to Afghanistan to fight the infidel Soviet occupiers. But they were too poor to make such a journey. Then Slahi got a scholarship to study in Germany.

    In 1990, at the age of 19, he enrolled in electrical engineering in Duisburg. Five years later, now a graduate engineer, he started a job at the Fraunhofer Institute for Microelectronics. He now built microchips for the renowned German research institution, earning 4000 marks a month.

    That was one life of Mohamedou Slahi. The other had begun during his studies.

    1990: Stay in an Al-Qaida training camp in Afghanistan. Weapons training, oath of allegiance to Emir Osama bin Laden.

    1992: second trip to Afghanistan, where the Islamists were on the verge of overthrowing the Afghan government. Slahi was deployed in an artillery unit. After two months, he returned to Germany, allegedly, as he would later say, because the Islamists had disappointed him with their fighting among themselves - it was not at all the paradisiacal reign of God on earth that he had imagined.

    At that time, there was still a kind of community of interest between Al-Qaida and the West; after all, Bin Laden's people had helped to drive the Soviet occupiers out of Afghanistan.

    If you ask Slahi what his relationship with Al-Qaeda was like in 1992 after his return to Germany, he says: "That chapter of my life was closed. I cut all ties. I stopped reading the magazines, stopped informing myself about Al-Qaeda's activities, had no more friends in the organisation, no more contacts, with anyone, no phone calls, nothing."

    If this were true, Slahi would have turned her back on the organisation before turning against the US.

    But it isn't true. Slahi kept in touch: with his cousin, with whom he used to share a room and who had since become a confidant of Osama bin Laden under the name Abu Hafs al-Mauritani - once the cousin even called him on bin Laden's satellite phone; with a friend in Duisburg who was involved in the attack on the synagogue on Djerba in April 2002; with another friend who was later convicted of planning an attack on La Réunion. And Slahi, in Duisburg in October 1999, had three overnight guests, one of whom was Ramzi Binalshibh, who would later become one of the key planners of 9/11. Binalshibh later told his American interrogators that the other two visitors were two of the hijackers. At the meeting in Duisburg, Slahi advised them to travel to Afghanistan.

    Slahi's involvement with Al-Qaeda

    Slahi did not break off all contacts. On the contrary, the list of his friends and acquaintances reads like an extract from Al-Qaeda's Who's Who.

    If you ask Slahi about these contacts, he confirms everything, but acts as if it is an insult that you bring up these little things at all. These were his friends, and what his friends believed or did had nothing to do with him.

    All those contacts and friendships - it is not hard to imagine that hunting fever broke out among Mister X and his colleagues. It's hard to imagine what Slahi might know. Even if he himself was perhaps hardly involved.

    Perhaps he would lead the investigators to his cousin, bin Laden's confidant. It was suspected that the cousin and Bin Laden were on the run together.

    I wonder how many lives could be saved if only he finally came clean?

    Mister X says that as a team they felt they were fighting on the front line of the war on terror. He says he was aware that if he got anything of significance out of Slahi, President George W. Bush would be informed personally.

    For weeks, Mister X worked his way around Slahi. To no avail. Then he got a new boss, a man called Richard Zuley, known as Dick.

    Mister X says of him today, "Dick is a diabolical motherfucker."

    Richard Zuley himself says, "All Mister X got out of Slahi was petty stuff. Slahi had everything under control, we had to change that."

    Zuley now lives in a row house on Chicago's north side. For years he worked here as a police officer; now, in retirement, he spends a lot of time at the airfield where his small plane is parked. When Zuley talks about how he took over Slahi's interrogations, he smiles. "There was then no question about who was in charge."

    Zuley suggested to Slahi that the latter's mother could be raped if he didn't talk. And under Zuley's command, Slahi was beaten half to death. That was one day in late August 2003. When Mister X saw Slahi's bloody and swollen face, he says, he was shocked. For him, this raw physical violence went far beyond the limits of what was permissible and was also not compatible with Rumsfeld's list. Mister X confronted his boss - and was taken off the case the same day.

    When asked why, Zuley replies, "I used people who were effective." One senses no sense of injustice, only pride that he managed to break Slahi.

    Slahi was moved to a new cell that evening. "There was nothing in the cell," Slahi remembers, "no window. No clock. Nothing on the wall that I could look at. It was pure loneliness. I don't know how long it lasted, I didn't even know when it was day and night, but eventually I knocked and said I was ready to talk."

    After months of silence, Slahi was now talking so much that Zuley had paper and pens brought to him, and later a computer. Slahi wrote that he had planned an attack on the CN Tower in Toronto. He listed accomplices. He drew organigrams of terror cells in Europe. Slahi says it was all made up.

    In fact, intelligence agencies soon raised doubts about the veracity of the information Zuley's team passed on to them. In November 2003, Zuley ordered a lie detector test on Mohamedou Slahi. The latter recanted his confession and the machine failed.

    Mohamedou Slahi: You know so little about me. Obviously your government has given you very little information ...

    Mister X: Let me make something clear.

    Mohamedou Slahi: May I please finish my sentence?

    Mister X: Excuse me, please continue.

    Mohamedou Slahi: The military prosecutor who was going to charge me, Stuart Couch, was going to ask for the death penalty at the beginning, but then he realised that I am innocent.

    Stuart Couch is now 56 years old and a judge. An accurately dressed man with a military short haircut and a fierce southern accent. On a Sunday morning in January 2021, we have an appointment at a hotel in Charlottesville, Virginia. Couch talks about his Christian family and his time as a soldier in the Marines, which shaped him. He paints a picture of himself as a man who was shaped by a strong belief in values and rules. Rules that demanded a lot of him when he had to make the most difficult decision of his career in spring 2004.

    The US government had given him, the military prosecutor, the task of indicting the most important prisoner in Guantánamo Bay, Mohamedou Ould Slahi. Of course, this was a potential death penalty case, says Couch. After all, it had to be assumed that Slahi had recruited the later hijackers for al-Qaida - at the meeting in the Duisburg flat.

    There was a lot of circumstantial evidence for Slahi's involvement with Al-Qaeda, namely the many friendships and contacts. Couch assumed that with all the smoke, it was a matter of time before the fire was encountered. "My grandfather used to say, 'If you lie down with the dogs, you'll get fleas.' And man, Slahi must have lain with a lot of dogs."

    But Couch found no fire - not a shred of evidence. Instead, he found something else. On a site visit to Guantánamo, he heard loud music blaring from an interrogation room in a hallway. Let the Bodies hit the floor. Through the crack in the door he saw bright flashes of light. Inside, a detainee was chained to the floor in front of two speakers.

    "What I did was torture. No doubt about it"

    The scene repelled him as a human being and as a Christian, he says. As a prosecutor, he immediately understood: if they did the same to Slahi, he had a huge problem. What he had said or would still say would have no relevance in court. "Under torture, people tell everything, whether it is true or not, the main thing is that the torture stops," says Couch.

    He began investigating what was going on at Guantánamo. Shortly after Slahi's confession reached him, he had certainty: it was worth nothing.

    Stuart Couch says he wrestled with himself for days. Not pressing charges would mean possibly letting a terrorist get away with it. He consulted with his priest. Then he told his superior that he was withdrawing from the case.

    The case never went to trial. Nevertheless, Slahi remained in prison for another twelve years. Only in October 2016 was he released, one of the last decisions of the Obama administration.

    Asked today if Stuart Couch believes Slahi was a terrorist then, he replies, "I don't know."

    Mister X says he is sure. All you have to do is look at the way Slahi communicates. He plays games - no innocent man does that.

    In fact, watching Slahi talk to Mister X, one sometimes gets the impression of watching a shrewd politician. Mister X says a total of six times that the torture should not have happened. Slahi never responds to this. Instead, he talks about other things - his innocence, criticism of America. Once he starts talking about Chalid Sheikh Mohammed, the chief planner of 9/11, who is still in Guantánamo. Another time about the US war in Afghanistan.

    Mister X: I won't say anything about Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, nor about politics. I can only talk about the techniques I used. That they were wrong and I should never have done it. They should never have been abused. They should never have been beaten. That's not who we are. That's not who I am.

    Mister X tells Slahi that he painted him, six years after that August day in 2003. Bleeding Slahi in oil with a busted lip and a swollen eye. Now, during the conversation, he asks us reporters to send a photo of the painting to Mauritania via WhatsApp.

    Mohamedou Slahi: Ah, wow. This prisoner in the picture looks much better than the real prisoner back then. (Slahi laughs)

    Mister X: You actually didn't look very good that day. And this painting is not meant to ... it's to reflect what happened to you that day.

    Mister X painted the picture when he had just resigned from the army. His post-traumatic stress disorder had become so bad that he could no longer work. The alcohol had stopped helping, the medication was no longer working either. So now painting. He says he had hoped that the artistic confrontation would trigger a catharsis. But it only brought pain. So he destroyed the painting again. Only the photo is still there.

    Mister X: I have to live with this shame. Maybe this is a small victory for you, that I have to live with my behaviour.

    Mohamedou Slahi: Um, I don't know ... I always had the impression that you were an intelligent person. And it was hard for me to understand how you could do such a thing to me.

    Slahi asks exactly the question that determines Mister X's life. After art failed to give him an answer, he tried science. He enrolled in Creative Studies at university. He studied how creativity is used for evil purposes, for cigarette advertising, weapons of mass destruction, torture. He read study after study in search of an explanation for why he was capable of so much cruelty. From all that reading, he took away: The tendency to cruelty is in all human beings. It asserts itself when the circumstances allow it. The circumstances in his case were: a country that craved revenge. A president who demanded success. A superior who spurred on the interrogators.

    "My country made me do some pretty shitty things, and I did them," says Mister X. "I hate myself for it. And I hate my country for making me this monster." He speaks out, "What I did was torture. One hundred percent. No doubt about it."

    The few studies that exist on people who have tortured suggest that there are two types of torturers. The ones who live on afterwards as if nothing had happened. And the others who break. Scientists suspect that it is the worldview of the torturer that determines which category he or she will fall into.

    For example, if a person tortures, like Richard Zuley, in the belief that it is morally right to torture one individual in order to possibly save thousands, then he is more likely to escape unscathed.

    If, like Mister X, he tortures in contradiction to his own humanism, then shame and guilt are more likely to trigger trauma. The symptoms then often resemble those of torture victims, only one thing is sometimes added: a deep mistrust in institutions. Those who have been forced to do abysmal things in the name of a system, an ideology, a country, their trust in this system, this ideology, this country is sometimes shaken by this.

    Can there ever be reconciliation?

    Mohamedou Slahi, the victim, on the other hand, has managed something that therapists very rarely see. Victims are often stuck in a situation of helplessness and hopelessness. Slahi has broken out of this helplessness. He has made himself an actor.

    You can watch numerous videos of Slahi's performances on the net. The audience is often visibly moved when he talks about how he received his guard in Mauritania. Actress Jodie Foster, who won a Golden Globe for her role as Slahi's lawyer in the film The Mauritanian, said of him in a statement at the awards ceremony: "You taught us so much: what it means to be human. Joyful of life. Loving. Forgiving. We love you, Mohamedou Ould Slahi!"

    It is always this one thing that touches people, what they admire him for: that he is willing and able to forgive.

    In a way, Slahi says in one of our interviews in Mauritania, forgiveness is also a form of revenge for him. He is taking revenge on his tormentors and all the people who fought the American war on terror for 20 years: before the eyes of the world public, he exposes the actions of those who thought they were the good guys as evil. And he stylises himself, the supposedly so evil, as the good guy.

    Mohamedou Slahi: I want to tell you: I forgive you, just as I forgive all those who have caused me pain. I forgive the Americans ...

    Mister X: Yeah ...

    Mohamedou Slahi: ... With all my heart. I want to live in peace with you.

    Mister X: It is important for me to clarify that I did not ask for your forgiveness. I have to forgive myself.

    It doesn't work for Mister X, he rebuffs Slahi. The two do not find each other. One last try: Slahi tries another subject.

    Mohamedou Slahi: How are you today? Are you married? Do you have children?

    Mister X: I'm not going to talk about my family or where I live, what I do or don't do. That's how it is, mate.

    The conversation lasts 18 minutes and 46 seconds and ends with frustration on both sides.

    Mohamedou Slahi: Anyway, I wish you all the best.
    Mister X: You too.
    Mohamedou Slahi: I think you are what you do. I forgive you with all my heart, even if you don't ask me to.
    Mister X: It's okay. I have nothing more to say. Goodbye, Mister Slahi.
    Mohamedou Slahi: Bye.
    When the video link ends, the two are left unreconciled, the weak, self-doubting perpetrator, and the strong victim.
    When one person tortures another, it's quite intimate. Tears. Screams. Pain. Fear. Nudity. A torturer sees things that otherwise only the partner sees, if at all. Mister X and Mohamedou Slahi are familiar with each other and strangers at the same time. They know everything about each other - and nothing. In this conversation, in which there seems to be nothing in common, it becomes clear that there is one thing they do share: Eight weeks in Guantánamo in the summer of 2003 have made them who they are today.
    Mohamedou Slahi lives largely from his story, from what was done to him. His suffering has brought him not only pain and nightmares, but also wealth and prestige. He married a human rights lawyer who worked in Guantánamo and had a child with her. He has turned his destiny around.
    In Mister X's life, almost everything has turned into its opposite. He no longer votes for the Republicans, as he used to, but for the Democrats. He is no longer for the death penalty, but against it. He is no longer sure he wants to continue living in the USA, but is thinking of emigrating.

    For several years, Mister X has been teaching young soldiers and FBI agents interrogation techniques. At the beginning of the course, there are always people who say: torture should be allowed. He then says, no, absolutely not. Torture exacts a high price. Not only of the person who suffers it. But also on the one who commits it. Sometimes he talks about himself.

    Source: https://www.zeit.de/2021/36/folter-guantanamo-mohamedou-ould-slahi-gefangener-folterer-gespraech-terrorismus/komplettansicht

    Translated with DeepL: https://www.deepl.com/

    10 votes
  10. Comment on Climate change won't stop while America hates trains and walking in ~enviro

    Grzmot
    Link Parent
    Just because the space isn't available doesn't mean that the smartest utilization of that space is parking space. Parking space is one of the worst ways to use public space. You flatten and...

    Just because the space isn't available doesn't mean that the smartest utilization of that space is parking space. Parking space is one of the worst ways to use public space. You flatten and asphalt greenery into a grey landscape that, for most of the time, is pretty empty. You can't really do anything with it because the space needs to be empty so cars can move in if they need it.

    In my country rural communities often have a problem with more parking space, because even though they are rural, it's not endless, and people want to use it for something better.

    6 votes
  11. Comment on The Reddit COVID blackout has begun in ~tech

    Grzmot
    Link
    Are subs getting banned? Which of your subs are you worried about and why?

    Are subs getting banned? Which of your subs are you worried about and why?

    5 votes
  12. Comment on Some background regarding the recent OnlyFans changes in ~tech

    Grzmot
    Link Parent
    License to Thrill would be an absolutely fantastic name for it holy shit. i just don't see how a license like that would do much more than verify age, something any other public license already...

    License to Thrill would be an absolutely fantastic name for it holy shit.

    i just don't see how a license like that would do much more than verify age, something any other public license already does. What venues did you think should it open?

    4 votes
  13. Comment on I bought an engagement ring today in ~life

    Grzmot
    Link Parent
    That's the right way to do an engagement! Just think of something that means a lot to both of you, it doesn't need to be grand or expensive. It's the thought that counts. :) I'm happy for you and...

    That's the right way to do an engagement!

    Just think of something that means a lot to both of you, it doesn't need to be grand or expensive. It's the thought that counts. :)

    I'm happy for you and congrats.

    10 votes
  14. Comment on Some background regarding the recent OnlyFans changes in ~tech

    Grzmot
    Link Parent
    Unionisation is a good idea but really hard to do when the overwhelming majority of power is concentrated on in a single company, i.e. Mindgeek with the rest being so tiny they don't matter...

    Unionisation is a good idea but really hard to do when the overwhelming majority of power is concentrated on in a single company, i.e. Mindgeek with the rest being so tiny they don't matter anymore or on foreign soil where they also don't matter.

    Porn also has this unique aspect where fresh blood is always coming in and careers tend to last for a really short amount of time. Even the real stars of porn are only big for a 2-3 years if you get lucky. If you are replaceable, it's hard to wield your importance with any kind of power, because there absolutely is someone out there who only cares about the paycheck.

    3 votes
  15. Comment on Some background regarding the recent OnlyFans changes in ~tech

    Grzmot
    Link Parent
    Oh it definitely is an iffy comparison, because ultimately there's a stark difference between an unborn fetus and a person who is alive. An an important aspect of the Holocaust is of course that...

    Oh it definitely is an iffy comparison, because ultimately there's a stark difference between an unborn fetus and a person who is alive. An an important aspect of the Holocaust is of course that it wasn't just genocide, it was Industrial genocide. Even the Soviet gulags, which by the way killed way more people, were work camps with punishment being the primary goal, and not death, they simply had an incredible high rate of attrition for the unfortunate souls locked inside.

    Even if you accept the point of view that abortion is murder, the industrial aspect isn't really given, as there is no profit incentive, no ulterior motive but to help, which is in stark contrast to the Shoah, where the goal was to eradicate everyone Hitler deemed as undesirable. But I can see why the comparison is drawn, is all. It's also a very provocative statement which means it will get eyeballs on your issue.

    In general, people love to make provocative statements more than they want to think about them and any comparison to Hitler which doesn't actively involve genocide is uncalled for.

    2 votes
  16. Comment on Some background regarding the recent OnlyFans changes in ~tech

    Grzmot
    Link Parent
    How is it similar to holocaust denial? If anything, equating it to the holocaust uses the countless murders committed during it as an illustration to what people who are against abortion believe;...

    How is it similar to holocaust denial? If anything, equating it to the holocaust uses the countless murders committed during it as an illustration to what people who are against abortion believe; that you are murdering an alive person, who is simply unborn. At least it's how I understand it. If you deny the holocaust, the argument of calling abortions a holocaust falls apart.

    9 votes
  17. Comment on Some background regarding the recent OnlyFans changes in ~tech

    Grzmot
    Link
    Thread reader app: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1428584131835748359.html I can't verify the statements about Exodus Cry being anti-semitic. The Wikipedia article is short, and only notes the...
    • Exemplary

    Thread reader app: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1428584131835748359.html

    I can't verify the statements about Exodus Cry being anti-semitic. The Wikipedia article is short, and only notes the founder's opposition to abortion and gay marriage (equating the former to the holocaust, lol).

    I'd suggest also reading the linked articles in the tweets.

    13 votes