Maryn McKenna Fungal infections are rising worldwide and climate change may be to blame. Medicine isn’t ready All of those outbreaks are different: in size, in pathogen, in location, and the...
Maryn McKenna
Fungal infections are rising worldwide and climate change may be to blame. Medicine isn’t ready
In February, A dermatologist in New York City contacted the state’s health department about two female patients, ages 28 and 47, who were not related but suffered from the same troubling problem. They had ringworm, a scaly, crusty, disfiguring rash covering large portions of their bodies. Ringworm sounds like a parasite, but it is caused by a fungus—and in both cases, the fungus was a species that had never been recorded in the US. It was also severely drug-resistant, requiring treatment with several types of antifungals for weeks.
Then, in March, some of those same CDC investigators reported that a fungus they had been tracking—Candida auris, an extremely drug-resistant yeast that invades health care facilities and kills two-thirds of the people infected with it—had risen to more than 10,000 cases since it was identified in the US in 2016, tripling in just two years.
In April, the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services rushed to investigate cases of a fungal infection called blastomycosis centered on a paper mill, an outbreak that would grow to 118 people, the largest ever recorded.
And in May, US and Mexican health authorities jointly rang an alarm over cases of meningitis, caused by the fungus Fusarium solani, which seemed to have spread to more than 150 clinic patients via contaminated anesthesia products. By mid-August, 12 people had died.
All of those outbreaks are different: in size, in pathogen, in location, and the people they affected. But what links them is that they were all caused by fungi—and to the small cadre of researchers who keep track of such things, that is worrisome
The question is: Why? There may be multiple answers. More people are living longer with chronic illnesses, and their impaired immune systems make them vulnerable. But the problem isn’t only that fungal illnesses are more frequent; it is also that new pathogens are emerging and existing ones are claiming new territory. When experts try to imagine what could exert such widespread influence, they land on the possibility that the problem is climate change.
“Speculative as it is, it's entirely possible that if you have an environmental organism,...you only need a very small change in the surface temperature or the air temperature to.....allow it to proliferate,” says Neil Stone, a physician and fungal infections lead at University College London Hospitals. “And it's that plausibility, and the lack of any alternative explanation, which makes it believable as a hypothesis.”
For this argument, C. auris is the leading piece of evidence. The rogue yeast was first identified in 2009 in a single patient in Japan, but within just a few years, it bloomed on several continents.
Genetic analyses showed the organism had not spread from one continent to others, but emerged simultaneously on each. It also behaved strikingly differently from most yeasts, gaining the abilities to pass from person to person and to thrive on cool inorganic surfaces such as plastic and metal—while collecting an array of resistance factors that protect it from almost all antifungal drugs.
At the height of the Covid pandemic, India experienced tens of thousands of cases of mucormycosis, commonly called “black fungus,” which ate away at the faces and airways of people made vulnerable by having diabetes or taking steroids.
In California, diagnosis of coccidioidomycosis (also called Valley fever) rose 800 percent between 2000 and 2018.
And new species are affecting humans for the first time
In 2018, a team of researchers from the US and Canada identified four people, two from each country, who had been infected by a newly identified genus, Emergomyces. Two of the four died. (The fungus got its name because it is “emerging” into the human world.) Subsequently, a multinational team identified five species in that newly-named genus that are causing infections all over the world, most severely in Africa.
Fungi are on the move
Last April, a research group from the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis examined the expected geographic range in the US of what are usually called the “endemic fungi,” ones that flourish only within specific areas.
Using Medicare data from more than 45 million seniors who sought health care between 2007 and 2016, the group discovered that the historically documented range of these fungi is wildly out of step with where they are actually causing infections now.
Researchers who are paying attention to rising fungal problems make a final point about them: We’re not seeing more cases because we’ve gotten better at finding them. Tests and devices to detect fungi, especially within patients, haven’t undergone a sudden improvement.
Well that's one of the scariest things I've ever read. Is it new for similar fungi to appear in multiple locations without any obvious link? Because that makes it feel like anything could happen....
Well that's one of the scariest things I've ever read. Is it new for similar fungi to appear in multiple locations without any obvious link? Because that makes it feel like anything could happen.
And how do I protect myself? Wear shower shoes at the gym??
The biggest general risk factor for many fungal infections is a weakened or undeveloped immune system. So things like sleep, diet and exercise all matter. Also immunosuppressants, steroids and...
The biggest general risk factor for many fungal infections is a weakened or undeveloped immune system. So things like sleep, diet and exercise all matter. Also immunosuppressants, steroids and other drugs that interfere with immune function can make you prone to all sorts of infections, fungus included.
It's always frustrating to see diabetes as a risk factor - not because it wouldn't be but unless all diabetics are impacted it would be helpful to know if it's about how managed your diabetes is,...
It's always frustrating to see diabetes as a risk factor - not because it wouldn't be but unless all diabetics are impacted it would be helpful to know if it's about how managed your diabetes is, or what type, or other complications.
It's a general frustration at the "increased risk" without context on a lot of things that I've had since COVID (and my own diabetes diagnosis) while I try to juggle whether my partner who is also diabetic and with many many more risk factors is better off not taking a steroid to address Problem A while trying to avoid catching Problem B
Any proteins or cells that get glycosylated from sugar in diabetes weakens or damages anything in the body. This includes nerves, immune cells, and vasculature. If you're more controlled the risk...
Any proteins or cells that get glycosylated from sugar in diabetes weakens or damages anything in the body. This includes nerves, immune cells, and vasculature.
If you're more controlled the risk is less, but the risk is always there.
Sure but it's, like so many other things, never contextualized. And it would be helpful if it were. As it's frustrating that it never ever is. Then again, diets for diabetes online are essentially...
Sure but it's, like so many other things, never contextualized. And it would be helpful if it were. As it's frustrating that it never ever is.
Then again, diets for diabetes online are essentially like "if the beet doesn't kill you, you'll have a heart attack so eat a plain boiled chicken breast so you don't die before your feet fall off." So nuance is not a thing in internet health issues anyway
This is why I hate my job and think the internet was a mistake. I'm an expert in my field with a doctorate, but some kid gets to post a tic tok video or an AI generated article, and I get the...
Then again, diets for diabetes online...
This is why I hate my job and think the internet was a mistake.
I'm an expert in my field with a doctorate, but some kid gets to post a tic tok video or an AI generated article, and I get the pleasure of deconstructing it. It gets exhausting.
My reply seems to have been eaten. But trust that I both went to a dietician and joined a discord that does not tolerate pseudoscience bullshit. But the sites I was looking at that scared me were...
My reply seems to have been eaten. But trust that I both went to a dietician and joined a discord that does not tolerate pseudoscience bullshit.
But the sites I was looking at that scared me were legitimate medical sites. I've found better info on TikTok from RDs. And far worse in TikTok from doctors who specialize in other areas but decide to have opinions on diet (psychiatrists being the worst IME)
If it helps, I absolutely went to a dietician (and also found a supportive, pseudo-science banning discord server). But no a lot of these sites were actual medical-ish ones too.
If it helps, I absolutely went to a dietician (and also found a supportive, pseudo-science banning discord server). But no a lot of these sites were actual medical-ish ones too.
Systemic steroids just suck. If there's an underlying problem that might require them, ask your doctor to try everything else to moderate it before pulling out the old reliable. I've never yet...
Systemic steroids just suck. If there's an underlying problem that might require them, ask your doctor to try everything else to moderate it before pulling out the old reliable. I've never yet taken a course of steroids or joint injection without a horrible foot fungus or yeast flare, along with all the other side effects. I'm not a diabetic, but I've heard plenty from people who are managing both diabetes and arthritis - steroids will wreck blood sugar control.
I do try to avoid them myself. Partner has multiple chronic conditions involving multiple systems and sometimes steroids are an option and sometimes they're the best options. Thankfully he doesn't...
I do try to avoid them myself. Partner has multiple chronic conditions involving multiple systems and sometimes steroids are an option and sometimes they're the best options. Thankfully he doesn't get immediate side effects/secondary issues.
But I can related to the yeast flare - I'm listed as allergic to several antibiotics because even looking at them will send yeast into overdrive.
I'm not loving immunomodulatory drugs, either. And in the "fungus among us" category, I've apparently had histoplasmosis at some point (residual lung nodules on x-rays, positive antibody test)....
I'm not loving immunomodulatory drugs, either. And in the "fungus among us" category, I've apparently had histoplasmosis at some point (residual lung nodules on x-rays, positive antibody test). Histoplasmosis is another one of the "endemic, with increasing range" fungal pneumonias. Many people throughout the Midwestern U.S. have had it and assumed it was the 'flu.
It's entirely possible my autoimmune disease is aggravated or caused by my body trying to keep the fungal infection under control (it's dormant and impossible to treat as calcified nodules) so my rheumy is very hesitant to prescribe etanercept or Janus kinase inhibitors for fear of disseminating it.
Which is another way of saying that life sucks for anyone who's got eczema, psoriasis, or other conditions or jobs that result in a compromised skin barrier (people who work with harsh chemicals,...
Which is another way of saying that life sucks for anyone who's got eczema, psoriasis, or other conditions or jobs that result in a compromised skin barrier (people who work with harsh chemicals, etc.).
I had horrible eczema as a teen and college student - I'd regularly have to take huge doses of systemic steroids in addition to the creams, ointments, and moisturizers. Then I got ringworm on top...
I had horrible eczema as a teen and college student - I'd regularly have to take huge doses of systemic steroids in addition to the creams, ointments, and moisturizers.
Then I got ringworm on top of it, which was a major shit show. The outcome, after more unpleasant treatment, was that both the ringworm and the eczema went away. 🤷♀️. I've never had a serious eczema outbreak since. I always thought that would be an interesting avenue for immunologists/microbiologists to look into.
More and scarier details here, for those who enjoy overview papers. We had sentinel warnings of human-caused dissemination of pathogenic fungi with frog and bat die-offs. BOLO for food scarcities...
Exemplary
More and scarier details here, for those who enjoy overview papers. We had sentinel warnings of human-caused dissemination of pathogenic fungi with frog and bat die-offs. BOLO for food scarcities thanks to wheat blast, coffee rust, Panama disease of bananas, etc. Globalization and weak quarantines have been dire for ecosystems.
When right-wing pols start talking about dismantling the administrative state, they want to get rid of exactly the institutional and regulatory controls that have been struggling to manage these threats. Their ineffectiveness is due to lack of political will, international coordination, public health communication, and funding.
As individuals, we can try to support local, organic, integrated crop farmers; travel less; avoid imported plants; maintain our heath to minimize immunocompromise; follow label instructions for OTC medications and see a doctor immediately for anything that doesn't improve quickly with self-treatment. [FYI, garden variety genital yeast and athlete's foot infections are increasingly resistant to antifungals - don't spread the crap around.]
Maryn McKenna
Fungal infections are rising worldwide and climate change may be to blame. Medicine isn’t ready
All of those outbreaks are different: in size, in pathogen, in location, and the people they affected. But what links them is that they were all caused by fungi—and to the small cadre of researchers who keep track of such things, that is worrisome
“Speculative as it is, it's entirely possible that if you have an environmental organism,...you only need a very small change in the surface temperature or the air temperature to.....allow it to proliferate,” says Neil Stone, a physician and fungal infections lead at University College London Hospitals. “And it's that plausibility, and the lack of any alternative explanation, which makes it believable as a hypothesis.”
And new species are affecting humans for the first time
Fungi are on the move
Researchers who are paying attention to rising fungal problems make a final point about them: We’re not seeing more cases because we’ve gotten better at finding them. Tests and devices to detect fungi, especially within patients, haven’t undergone a sudden improvement.
Well that's one of the scariest things I've ever read. Is it new for similar fungi to appear in multiple locations without any obvious link? Because that makes it feel like anything could happen.
And how do I protect myself? Wear shower shoes at the gym??
The biggest general risk factor for many fungal infections is a weakened or undeveloped immune system. So things like sleep, diet and exercise all matter. Also immunosuppressants, steroids and other drugs that interfere with immune function can make you prone to all sorts of infections, fungus included.
It's always frustrating to see diabetes as a risk factor - not because it wouldn't be but unless all diabetics are impacted it would be helpful to know if it's about how managed your diabetes is, or what type, or other complications.
It's a general frustration at the "increased risk" without context on a lot of things that I've had since COVID (and my own diabetes diagnosis) while I try to juggle whether my partner who is also diabetic and with many many more risk factors is better off not taking a steroid to address Problem A while trying to avoid catching Problem B
Any proteins or cells that get glycosylated from sugar in diabetes weakens or damages anything in the body. This includes nerves, immune cells, and vasculature.
If you're more controlled the risk is less, but the risk is always there.
Sure but it's, like so many other things, never contextualized. And it would be helpful if it were. As it's frustrating that it never ever is.
Then again, diets for diabetes online are essentially like "if the beet doesn't kill you, you'll have a heart attack so eat a plain boiled chicken breast so you don't die before your feet fall off." So nuance is not a thing in internet health issues anyway
This is why I hate my job and think the internet was a mistake.
I'm an expert in my field with a doctorate, but some kid gets to post a tic tok video or an AI generated article, and I get the pleasure of deconstructing it. It gets exhausting.
My reply seems to have been eaten. But trust that I both went to a dietician and joined a discord that does not tolerate pseudoscience bullshit.
But the sites I was looking at that scared me were legitimate medical sites. I've found better info on TikTok from RDs. And far worse in TikTok from doctors who specialize in other areas but decide to have opinions on diet (psychiatrists being the worst IME)
If it helps, I absolutely went to a dietician (and also found a supportive, pseudo-science banning discord server). But no a lot of these sites were actual medical-ish ones too.
Systemic steroids just suck. If there's an underlying problem that might require them, ask your doctor to try everything else to moderate it before pulling out the old reliable. I've never yet taken a course of steroids or joint injection without a horrible foot fungus or yeast flare, along with all the other side effects. I'm not a diabetic, but I've heard plenty from people who are managing both diabetes and arthritis - steroids will wreck blood sugar control.
I do try to avoid them myself. Partner has multiple chronic conditions involving multiple systems and sometimes steroids are an option and sometimes they're the best options. Thankfully he doesn't get immediate side effects/secondary issues.
But I can related to the yeast flare - I'm listed as allergic to several antibiotics because even looking at them will send yeast into overdrive.
I'm not loving immunomodulatory drugs, either. And in the "fungus among us" category, I've apparently had histoplasmosis at some point (residual lung nodules on x-rays, positive antibody test). Histoplasmosis is another one of the "endemic, with increasing range" fungal pneumonias. Many people throughout the Midwestern U.S. have had it and assumed it was the 'flu.
It's entirely possible my autoimmune disease is aggravated or caused by my body trying to keep the fungal infection under control (it's dormant and impossible to treat as calcified nodules) so my rheumy is very hesitant to prescribe etanercept or Janus kinase inhibitors for fear of disseminating it.
Which is another way of saying that life sucks for anyone who's got eczema, psoriasis, or other conditions or jobs that result in a compromised skin barrier (people who work with harsh chemicals, etc.).
I had horrible eczema as a teen and college student - I'd regularly have to take huge doses of systemic steroids in addition to the creams, ointments, and moisturizers.
Then I got ringworm on top of it, which was a major shit show. The outcome, after more unpleasant treatment, was that both the ringworm and the eczema went away. 🤷♀️. I've never had a serious eczema outbreak since. I always thought that would be an interesting avenue for immunologists/microbiologists to look into.
That's very interesting. But is it also true for other fungi? Ringworm isn't the scary one.
More and scarier details here, for those who enjoy overview papers. We had sentinel warnings of human-caused dissemination of pathogenic fungi with frog and bat die-offs. BOLO for food scarcities thanks to wheat blast, coffee rust, Panama disease of bananas, etc. Globalization and weak quarantines have been dire for ecosystems.
It's not just widening geographical ranges for human-pathogenic fungi. Agricultural application of the same chemicals used to treat fungal infections is causing the same kind of drug resistance as seen with livestock and agricultural antibiotic use.
When right-wing pols start talking about dismantling the administrative state, they want to get rid of exactly the institutional and regulatory controls that have been struggling to manage these threats. Their ineffectiveness is due to lack of political will, international coordination, public health communication, and funding.
As individuals, we can try to support local, organic, integrated crop farmers; travel less; avoid imported plants; maintain our heath to minimize immunocompromise; follow label instructions for OTC medications and see a doctor immediately for anything that doesn't improve quickly with self-treatment. [FYI, garden variety genital yeast and athlete's foot infections are increasingly resistant to antifungals - don't spread the crap around.]
Mirror for those hit by the paywall:
https://archive.ph/pBUtf