If happy people do nothing?
"I mean, pain is the ultimate driving force of life itself. Why do we sleep? Because we're tired. Why do we eat? Because we're hungry. Why do we talk to people? Because we fear isolation, etc. Just like in the movie Trainspotting (1996), where heroin users drown out the pain of existence with substances. Does that mean if someone becomes overly focused on anything, they feel a stronger dissatisfaction with life? And could this be used against us? Like this quote from the book Reasons to Stay Alive by Matt Haig:
The world is increasingly designed to depress us. Happiness isn’t very good for the economy. If we were happy with what we had, why would we need more? How do you sell an anti-ageing moisturiser? You make someone worry about ageing. How do you get people to vote for a political party? You make them worry about immigration. How do you get them to buy insurance? By making them worry about everything. How do you get them to have plastic surgery? By highlighting their physical flaws. How do you get them to watch a TV show? By making them worry about missing out. How do you get them to buy a new smartphone? By making them feel like they are being left behind.
There's a book called How to Do Nothing by Jenny Odell that I highly recommend. There's so much good content in that book it's almost hard to find the right quote to respond with, but I'll give you this one by Thoreau to start:
To answer the question on focus, Odell actually argues that we need to focus (i.e pay attention) more to things; just different things.
I wrote a little bit about this the other day, too. Attention is something the modern world has unitized and turned into a sort of currency to be collected for profit. But in doing so, we are starved of context. We continue to outsource much of what makes us human, and sometimes we don't even realize the tradeoff we're making.
There's also a really interesting concept I was first introduced to in the book about "I-It vs. I-Thou Thinking" that really resonated with me.
If we go through the world as I-It thinkers, we end up in situations like this:
The world is so rich, and tapping into that requires some pushback against a myriad of instincts that are maladapted to the modern world. It requires a little more Thou, and a little less It. Or as Odell put's "an I-It world without Thou's is an impoverished and lonely place to live."
Yes, life is driven by what life lacks, it's not news to most people. Is Haig's commentary prescriptive or just rather descriptive? His observations are just the merchant class doing its thing, the political classes doing their thing, the psych and beauty classes doing their thing. We're humans and we're doing things, that's what we do.
Why do we, as humans, do anything? What motivates us? Is the constant feeling of discomfort truly a driving force in life? Or we are striving just to eliminate this constant dissatisfaction rather than achieve a state of perpetual happiness.
當其無,有車之用。
埏埴以為器,
當其無,有器之用。
鑿戶牖以為室,
當其無,有室之用。
故
有之以為利,
無之以為用。
dāng qí wú, yǒu chē zhīyòng.
Shān zhí yǐ wéi qì,
dāng qí wú, yǒu qì zhīyòng.
Záo hùyǒu yǐ wéi shì,
dāng qí wú, yǒu shì zhīyòng.
Gù
yǒu zhīyǐ wèilì,
wú zhīyǐ wéi yòng.
The wheel's use comes from emptiness.
Clay is molded to make a pot.
The pot's use comes from emptiness.
Windows and doors are cut to make a room.
The room's use comes from emptiness.
Therefore,
Having leads to profit,
Not having leads to use.
知有之。
其次親而譽之,
其次畏之,
其次侮之。
信不足焉,
有不信焉。
悠兮其貴言:
功成
事遂
百姓皆謂:
我自然。
zhī yǒu zhī.
Qícì qīn ér yù zhī,
qícì wèi zhī,
qícì wǔ zhī.
Xìn bùzú yān,
yǒu bùxìn yān.
Yōu xí qí guì yán:
gōng chéng
shì suì
bǎixìng jiē wèi:
wǒ zìrán.
They are aware it exists.
Next they witness and praise.
Soon they fear.
Finally they despise.
If trust is not enough,
There is no trust to gain.
Be careful in valuing words:
When the work is done,
And affairs are settled,
Everyone says
We just acted naturally.
From what layers do you want those answers? It's not a simple answer as you have to turn to philosophy about the existential (higher softer layers), science about the physical reasons we do things (as I was discussing with someone else here, the lower layers), the softer sciences like psychology and some might even say religion but it's even softer than philosophy as far as real answers go. But yes, OP postulates we desire what we lack, basically, which is pretty obvious.
As an honest reply to your question here, I see life as having both positive and negative motivators. Sometimes both work, as in motivating others to help you, teaching others, with childcare, etc, sometimes it's one or the other. No offense but I think your question is much ado about nothing, as it can be with some philosophy and hence why I don't follow it much anymore. That or those answers can be found in other harder disciplines to much more satisfaction.
I think elimination of dissatisfaction and pursuit of happiness are two sides of the same coin. One cannot exist without the other, right? To identify dissatisfaction, you've had to have felt happiness before, and vice versa. Everyone's got their own set of external and internal factors affecting their physical and emotional wellbeing.
From the outside, it might seem like some happy people are "doing nothing". But it's not up to us to decide what happiness looks like to other people. Everyone's also got their own inner lives and internal motivations. "Simple" goals like enjoying hobbies, having a dog, or raising a family (which is a full time job in itself) can be enough to bring fulfillment. Others might like organizing events, running a company, pursing careers, whatever.
Maybe what happy people are doing is focusing on value add rather than the elimination of dissatisfaction. They already know that suffering is inevitable, so deal with it as it comes - or else be driven mad by fear. Fear as a motivator vs. value add: Which mindset will let you live your life to the fullest?
What about boredom? If you're happy doing what you're doing, then I guess you're not bored, but most people get bored doing nothing, so they'll want to find something to do.
Good point. Also, I feel like there's doing things just based on genuine interest. Sometimes I tinker with electronics, even when I'm not bored, and not out of any sense of dissatisfaction or avoidance of something--It's just interesting to me. And certainly sometimes I tinker because I'm just bored, or because something broke and I'm trying to avoid paying for repairs, but just doing it for the hell of it because it's enjoyable is totally valid too.
I suppose that could be framed as doing something in order to avoid boredom, but the two feel distinct in my experience.
I don't strive to do nothing so much as I strive to be content. That's a word that you will very rarely hear in our capitalistic culture - "contentment" - because you can't sell something or push someone or incite an argument with someone who is content.
Sometimes I think I could make more money. I could buy more things. I could gather many more experiences... but the bigger question is why?
And that is all the philosophical reasoning I can do for this day. I am content to leave it there.
Indeed, some find their drive in setting high goals for themselves because they enjoy the sense of purpose, direction, and focus that can bring as well as the journey it takes them on. The exact goal and what lies at the end may not even matter.