13 votes

Built-in FTP implementation to be removed in Firefox 90

9 comments

  1. [7]
    hamstergeddon
    Link
    Here's the original announcement from last March stating the reason (security, age of the FTP code, etc.) Kind of a bummer. Certainly not a feature I use with much regularity, but it is incredibly...

    Here's the original announcement from last March stating the reason (security, age of the FTP code, etc.)

    Kind of a bummer. Certainly not a feature I use with much regularity, but it is incredibly convenient when you come across the occasional FTP directory. Hopefully the handoff from Firefox to FileZilla is smooth.

    6 votes
    1. [2]
      p4t44
      Link Parent
      Note that Filezilla is not associated with Mozilla (despite the name) and has longstanding issues with bundled adware to be careful of.

      Note that Filezilla is not associated with Mozilla (despite the name) and has longstanding issues with bundled adware to be careful of.

      14 votes
      1. hamstergeddon
        Link Parent
        Yeah I've tried to only grab it via package managers where it was my understanding that wasn't as much of a concern. Not sure if that's true or not. Either way maybe I should look into an...

        Yeah I've tried to only grab it via package managers where it was my understanding that wasn't as much of a concern. Not sure if that's true or not. Either way maybe I should look into an alternative FTP client on mac.

        1 vote
    2. [4]
      vord
      Link Parent
      Best FTP client for Windows: WinSCP Otherwise, just use the ones built into Windows.

      Best FTP client for Windows: WinSCP

      Otherwise, just use the ones built into Windows.

      10 votes
      1. Octofox
        Link Parent
        On Linux I'd suggest just trying your file manager. Gnome Files has built in support for loads of remote filesystem types including ftp.

        On Linux I'd suggest just trying your file manager. Gnome Files has built in support for loads of remote filesystem types including ftp.

        5 votes
      2. Wes
        Link Parent
        +1 for WinSCP. It's so good I even run it in Wine on Linux. It fits my workflow so much better than Filezilla. It looks great and it's only as complicated as it needs to be.

        +1 for WinSCP. It's so good I even run it in Wine on Linux. It fits my workflow so much better than Filezilla. It looks great and it's only as complicated as it needs to be.

        4 votes
      3. Apos
        Link Parent
        I just got WinSCP and automated a lot of manual work using their scripting API. Feels pretty good. (Meant to do that a while ago.)

        I just got WinSCP and automated a lot of manual work using their scripting API. Feels pretty good. (Meant to do that a while ago.)

        2 votes
  2. [2]
    Octofox
    Link
    This is fine imo. FTP is pretty much a legacy filesystem these days and not something regular users would ever use. WebDAV, HTTP servers with indexs and websites like Google drive/Dropbox have...

    This is fine imo. FTP is pretty much a legacy filesystem these days and not something regular users would ever use. WebDAV, HTTP servers with indexs and websites like Google drive/Dropbox have pretty much entirely replaced FTP.

    5 votes
    1. Adys
      Link Parent
      The real replacement for FTP imo is S3. The API has become a pseudo standard, as it is supported by various cloud providers (B2, Google Cloud Storage, Digital Ocean Spaces, and many more)

      The real replacement for FTP imo is S3. The API has become a pseudo standard, as it is supported by various cloud providers (B2, Google Cloud Storage, Digital Ocean Spaces, and many more)

      2 votes