DefinitelyNotAFae's recent activity
-
Comment on Around twenty drown in France as French seek relief from heatwave in ~enviro
-
Comment on Nobody clicks your share buttons in ~tech
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentI meant why did the author bring it up now In those circumstances I understand you found it useful, and that you think potential AI use - and correlated, writing quality and ethics - is not a...I meant why did the author bring it up now In those circumstances
I understand you found it useful, and that you think potential AI use - and correlated, writing quality and ethics - is not a relevant conversation point.
For me those things matter, but also I wasn't who you were talking to before so I don't think I'm complicating anything. Any discussion will necessarily add aspects and layers and tangents.
-
Comment on Nobody clicks your share buttons in ~tech
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentI understand it's good enough for you, but simply saying "that should be good enough" doesn't make that so, and certainly doesn't define that line for other folks. It certainly lessens my interest...I understand it's good enough for you, but simply saying "that should be good enough" doesn't make that so, and certainly doesn't define that line for other folks. It certainly lessens my interest in what is functionally "old news".
Why bring this old topic up again now if you're not going to put in human effort for my attention? Or if they write in a way I consider to be lower quality, why do I as a person want to read their article on the topic.
-
Comment on How important is sexual chemistry/ability/quality to you when you date/marry/whatever? in ~life
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentYeah none of those first list of things are my top skills I look for. And very little of what I care the most about is PIV sex. I enjoy that, but it's not the most important thing. Openness to...Yeah none of those first list of things are my top skills I look for. And very little of what I care the most about is PIV sex. I enjoy that, but it's not the most important thing. Openness to talking about what works for me - or listening if I say "I'm enjoying this but it's not going to lead to an orgasm tonight, so here's what I'm up for right now."
-
Comment on How important is sexual chemistry/ability/quality to you when you date/marry/whatever? in ~life
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentMost likely the thing they were doing was making it feel better for them than the thing your rhythm was doing. They may not have had the words or the comfort level to communicate about that but...agree that it’s not compatible but why I said they fight me is because when I would adjust to them, they switch up.
Most likely the thing they were doing was making it feel better for them than the thing your rhythm was doing. They may not have had the words or the comfort level to communicate about that but may have seen you as "fighting" what they were doing.
People don't talk enough during or about sex and think that lasting a really really long time is the goal for everyone, or that size is what matters most for everyone or whatever. I think people find more compatibility when they're not too scared to talk about what works and what doesn't.
I think "compatibility" isn't a yes/no it's a sliding scale of communication. Sure some people cant communicate (verbally or through sex) but if you can listen to each other both explicitly and implicitly, you're going to be far more likely to have an enjoyable experience.
-
Comment on The global fertility crisis is worse than you think in ~society
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentIt's a good story, but very different in a "cannot have children" vs "choosing not to have children" way. The movie is really good IMO tooIt's a good story, but very different in a "cannot have children" vs "choosing not to have children" way.
The movie is really good IMO too
-
Comment on Not so empty nesters: record-high number of US adults under 35 live at home, new data says in ~life
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentCo-residence data in this report is drawn from the IPUMS Current Population Survey (CPS) Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC), covering survey years 2000–25. The CPS ASEC is conducted by...Methodology
Co-residence data in this report is drawn from the IPUMS Current Population Survey (CPS) Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC), covering survey years 2000–25. The CPS ASEC is conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau and represents the largest annual household survey in the United States. All population estimates use CPS person-level weights (ASECWT) to produce nationally representative figures. Adults are defined as individuals aged 18 and above. Co-residence is defined as living as “child of head” of household, based on the RELATE variable in the IPUMS extract. The 2014 survey year is excluded from all trend analyses due to a CPS sample expansion that year, which creates a discontinuity in absolute population counts; percentage shares are unaffected, but the year is omitted for consistency.
The counterfactual analysis in the Trends section applies the average co-residence rate at every single year of age (18–34) from 2000–03 to the actual adult population in each subsequent year. The resulting figures represent how many adults would be living with parents had early-2000s co-residence patterns persisted, holding age structure and population growth constant.
Employment, marital status, educational attainment, and sex breakdowns are drawn from the same IPUMS CPS extract using EMPSTAT, MARST, EDUC, and SEX variables, respectively.
Looks like it's if you answer "child of head of household" on the surveys.
They're also looking at mostly younger adults meaning it's a bit less likely to have (retired) parents who move in with you at that age. Obviously not impossible. But more of an outlier perhaps.
-
Comment on The room the economy can’t see in ~society
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentIt's been more but it's never been more than 4k adjusted for inflation or an actual amount of 3.3k in 2022 which is an outlier.It's been more but it's never been more than 4k adjusted for inflation or an actual amount of 3.3k in 2022 which is an outlier.
-
Comment on ‘How the Grinch Stole Christmas’ sequel in the works with Jim Carrey, Ron Howard in ~movies
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentIt's a thing on Tiktok too, so when your friend sends you a video you can just follow them directly. I get the purpose but it's not how I use YTIt's a thing on Tiktok too, so when your friend sends you a video you can just follow them directly. I get the purpose but it's not how I use YT
-
Comment on ‘How the Grinch Stole Christmas’ sequel in the works with Jim Carrey, Ron Howard in ~movies
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentThis is a new setting you can turn off in YT for folks unaware!This is a new setting you can turn off in YT for folks unaware!
-
Comment on Offbeat Fridays – The thread where offbeat headlines become front page news in ~news
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentWe've been telling people to buy the powder/packets on Tiktok!We've been telling people to buy the powder/packets on Tiktok!
-
Comment on Who was the first transgender person? in ~lgbt
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentTrans women are (broadly) the latter example. A trick to remembering this is that the term will focus on the identity that the person has now, not who they were perceived to be at birth. That is...Trans women are (broadly) the latter example. A trick to remembering this is that the term will focus on the identity that the person has now, not who they were perceived to be at birth. That is to say, a trans woman is a woman.
Gender and sex gets more complicated from there too but that's the basic answer.
-
Comment on Who was the first transgender person? in ~lgbt
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentI do have those moments for straight cis people myself, when I'm hanging around my queer friends or online in queer spaces it can make me pause that there are other folks sometimes.I do have those moments for straight cis people myself, when I'm hanging around my queer friends or online in queer spaces it can make me pause that there are other folks sometimes.
-
Comment on Don’t call it a sequel. Or a reboot. Or a remake. Why certain words trigger Hollywood. in ~movies
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentIm referencing the original article/titleIm referencing the original article/title
-
Comment on ‘How the Grinch Stole Christmas’ sequel in the works with Jim Carrey, Ron Howard in ~movies
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentOof damn, I did not know the lore. Either they promised major changes or offered him a huge check probablyOof damn, I did not know the lore. Either they promised major changes or offered him a huge check probably
-
Comment on ‘How the Grinch Stole Christmas’ sequel in the works with Jim Carrey, Ron Howard in ~movies
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentIdk how he feels about the Grinch but some combination of the money and the job must have been right? ETA he did appear in a Dick Van Dyke doc last year but that and Sonic are it!Idk how he feels about the Grinch but some combination of the money and the job must have been right?
ETA he did appear in a Dick Van Dyke doc last year but that and Sonic are it!
-
Comment on Babylon 5 S01E15: "Grail" - Episode Discussion in ~tv
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentJudgement call on your part! I did forget this one last weekJudgement call on your part! I did forget this one last week
-
Comment on Don’t call it a sequel. Or a reboot. Or a remake. Why certain words trigger Hollywood. in ~movies
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentOh right, it's our fault the joke didn't land, especially when you doubled down on it! Oopsy doodles, how silly of me. /S Tone is hard to read in text, and Poe's law comes into effect more often...Oh right, it's our fault the joke didn't land, especially when you doubled down on it! Oopsy doodles, how silly of me. /S
Tone is hard to read in text, and Poe's law comes into effect more often than we'd like, and "I was just joking" is a common response when a statement goes awry.
Just make it clear if you're not serious, instead of saying you stand by it?
-
Comment on Babylon 5 S01E15: "Grail" - Episode Discussion in ~tv
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentOoh you caught up and I forgot to post here! This is one that I enjoy but don't find a lot of commentary for so I'll snag some comments from JMS. Christy Marx wrote most of this episode, but the...Ooh you caught up and I forgot to post here!
This is one that I enjoy but don't find a lot of commentary for so I'll snag some comments from JMS.
Christy Marx wrote most of this episode, but the trial was written by JMS. It took about a week to render the Feeder.
JMS talks about not wanting Kosh to sound like a fortune cookie but that it's ultimately more unsettling when he speaks a single word... "Why". "Good"
Maybe there are reasons to be afraid of Vorlons.No boom?
No boom.
No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow.What! Somebody's got to have some perspective around here!
-
Comment on Don’t call it a sequel. Or a reboot. Or a remake. Why certain words trigger Hollywood. in ~movies
DefinitelyNotAFae Link ParentI mean sure, you can also keep making a bunch of shitty sequels... I don't really care But if you don't want me to call your movie a sequel, don't make one. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯I mean sure, you can also keep making a bunch of shitty sequels... I don't really care But if you don't want me to call your movie a sequel, don't make one. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The ableism of "they were the most vulnerable" with any sort of disaster is incredibly stark.
As if it doesn't matter it is more OK.