Gaywallet's recent activity

  2. Comment on Charlie Kirk shooting: US President Donald Trump says suspect in custody in ~society

    Gaywallet
    Link Parent
    Because they already are? I don't see how this changes anything.

    Why do I get the feeling that furries, gamers, radical leftists and the LGBTQ community are going to come under the Trump administration's crosshairs?

    Because they already are? I don't see how this changes anything.

    15 votes

  3. Comment on We risk a deluge of AI-written ‘science’ pushing corporate interests in ~science

    Gaywallet
    Link Parent
    Yup, that's why a lot of more prestigious journals have moved to this model. But there's still plenty of large journals out there which don't require it. Or they'll preregister with a dozen...

    Preregistration would discourage that sort of blatant gaming where they fund lots of studies

    Yup, that's why a lot of more prestigious journals have moved to this model. But there's still plenty of large journals out there which don't require it. Or they'll preregister with a dozen different journals and just publish the ones with the finding they want. It's hard to prove anyone is doing this, but you could also just run 20 studies when you preregister only 1 and trash the data from the rest - if they all have the same methodology and you're just hoping to hit statistical chance, how would anyone know any better?

    It seems like it would be hard to keep secret even without preregistration, if there are a lot of people involved in these studies?

    I mean like, it's completely normal to just not publish if you find nothing of note and you're backed by a corporation. When we think of academia they publish with no findings because the funding has already been secured and there's no reason for them not to but ultimately if a company gets to decides whether you publish or not because they control your pay and thus what you work on (they instruct you to spend your time on another research project and not publishing/finishing up a paper), there's really few mechanisms to control this.

    4 votes

  4. Comment on We risk a deluge of AI-written ‘science’ pushing corporate interests in ~science

    Gaywallet
    Link
    This is just one of the many far reaching effects of the disinformation age we are headed into. It would not surprise me if, in the future (assuming humanity survives our climate crisis), this...

    This is just one of the many far reaching effects of the disinformation age we are headed into. It would not surprise me if, in the future (assuming humanity survives our climate crisis), this period of time will be contrasted with the middle ages as periods of great loss of human knowledge.

    For what it’s worth, a lot of what the article is bringing up isn’t particularly new. Fake studies are nothing new, but the scope of them will definitely increase. While it is manpower intensive, this is easily solved by peer review. In fact, perhaps ironically, AI could be used to do a first-pass review before and summarize what seems like it was AI created versus human created and send that along to a human.

    Corporation funded studies designed to get around regulation or to promote their product, on the other hand, is something we’ve been dealing with for quite some time and an issue we haven’t really solved as a society. Anyone who works in science knows how to spot these from a mile away because they’re nearly always published in tiny journals (low citation score) which either don’t do peer review or have shady guidelines. The richer companies have the money to simply run 40 or 50 studies concurrently and toss the data from every one that doesn’t have the outcome they’re looking for (in essence repeatedly rolling a d20 until they get a 20) which allows them to get their findings into a bigger journal because it’s all done above board. Some larger publishing journals have created guidelines to try and fight this, but ultimately you need meta-analyses and other researchers to disprove what’s going on, and that’s fairly costly.

    9 votes

  6. Comment on Donald Trump Department of Justice is looking at ways to ban transgender Americans from owning guns, sources say in ~lgbt

    Gaywallet
    Link Parent
    Yeah, this is nothing new. They used legislation to try and disarm the black panthers not all that long ago in our history. If you go back further, it's quite easy to find plenty of legislation...

    You see it in the attitudes toward police behavior as well: A black man with a gun? "Cops should assume he's a gangster and shoot on sight."

    Yeah, this is nothing new. They used legislation to try and disarm the black panthers not all that long ago in our history. If you go back further, it's quite easy to find plenty of legislation that was significantly more extreme, some going so far as to allow white people to enter homes and take guns from black folk.

    With all that being said, it does appear that even the NRA is planning to fight this... so while the cognitive dissonance is often quite real on the right, it appears consistency isn't entirely lost on all of them.

    13 votes

  10. Comment on US Food and Drug Administration limits approval for new coronavirus vaccines to high-risk people in ~health

    Gaywallet
    Link Parent
    Frankly speaking I don't think many of the folks pushing these policies are smart enough to even understand genetics. However, it does clearly come from a place of establishing superiority of a...

    Frankly speaking I don't think many of the folks pushing these policies are smart enough to even understand genetics. However, it does clearly come from a place of establishing superiority of a particular kind of person, and that person is undeniably white, straight, and male. I think they will happily use genetic arguments when they can and when it happens to fit the conversation (we've already seen stuff like phrenology being used by the alt-right) but its less intellectually charged than that - it's based more in feelings than science, so we have to think a bit more broadly on what a term like eugenics is trying to capture. That is to say, they're using all of the same arguments around a 'genetically pure' population but because they are also simultaneously discrediting science as a whole they aren't using quite the same arguments that the Nazi's did 100 years ago or other modern-day eugenics might.

    9 votes

  11. Comment on US Food and Drug Administration limits approval for new coronavirus vaccines to high-risk people in ~health

    Gaywallet
    Link Parent
    To add to this, I'd highly suggest that @skybrian and others who don't see it yet to keep an eye on how the federal and various state governments are dealing with transgender people. Not just what...

    To add to this, I'd highly suggest that @skybrian and others who don't see it yet to keep an eye on how the federal and various state governments are dealing with transgender people. Not just what they're saying, which is horrendous and inhumane, but the policies they're passing. They're trying to completely eliminate trans healthcare, including for adults, by re-classifying it as a mental illness. On the federal level they've already tied denying medicare reimbursement to systems which perform gender affirming surgeries on children (keep in mind this means if any doctors in your system perform this care, all medicare reimbursement is cut off... also, notably children are classified as ages 0-19 which includes legal adults) and it would not be surprising if they tie medicare reimbursement to systems which provide any transgender care before long. On the local levels they're already pushing legislation to make all kinds of gender care illegal as well as make being trans itself illegal in some fashion (legal right to deny care by any clinician who objects, making it illegal to appropriate funds to any transgender health, making child conversion therapy legal, opening the door for medical suit on transition regret, classifying gender affirming care as child abuse, making the act of unclothing one's genitals in a bathroom a sexual offense, and so on) and they talk of it like it's a disease and that these people need to be eradicated (quite literally using words such as eradicate). It would not surprise me one bit if the same framework is used to make homosexuality illegal or other forms of disability illegal and persecuted.

    9 votes

  12. Comment on The ancient Roman alternative to daylight saving time; An hour was not a consistent unit of time. In the summer it could be as long as 75 minutes and in the winter it sometimes lasted just 45 minutes. in ~humanities.history

    Gaywallet
    Link Parent
    The relevant quote We can't draw any conclusions about fatalities from this quote. There's countless actual research on the subject which is much better controlled. No research is free from some...

    The relevant quote

    The National Safety Council reported in February that pre-sunrise fatalities had risen to 20 from 18 the year before. In July, Roger Sant, then an assistant administrator-designate for the Federal Energy Administration, wrote a letter to the Post that noted a 1 percent energy saving achieved by going to DST equated to 20,000-30,000 tons of coal not being burned each day. Further, he wrote, accidents had fallen in the afternoons.

    We can't draw any conclusions about fatalities from this quote. There's countless actual research on the subject which is much better controlled. No research is free from some level of criticism and ultimately there's a split amongst whether permanent ST or DST is better, but it is clear that the act of changing times has serious issues and a huge economic cost and that daylight is important for pedestrian and motorist fatalities.

    12 votes

  13. Comment on Ed Zitron: How to argue with an AI booster in ~tech

    Gaywallet
    Link Parent
    To be fair they did say "argue" with, not "convince them to no longer be an AI booster"

    To be fair they did say "argue" with, not "convince them to no longer be an AI booster"

    7 votes

  14. Comment on How Tea’s founder convinced millions of women to spill their secrets, then exposed them to the world in ~tech

  16. Comment on At what point does the obvious invasion of the commons become too much for people? Have we already passed the threshold with smartphones? in ~tech

    Gaywallet
    Link Parent
    Yes I think establishing appropriate boundaries and respecting them is a good thing to do! I'm not disagreeing with you at all, but I also think that if you expect these boundaries without clearly...

    Yes I think establishing appropriate boundaries and respecting them is a good thing to do! I'm not disagreeing with you at all, but I also think that if you expect these boundaries without clearly expressing them, you're going to be in for a bad time.

    4 votes

  17. Comment on At what point does the obvious invasion of the commons become too much for people? Have we already passed the threshold with smartphones? in ~tech

    Gaywallet
    Link Parent
    I think its fine to set and maintain these boundaries where appropriate. I also think it's fine for people to not have these boundaries. As someone who has spent a fair deal of their adult life in...

    When you're talking to someone, talk to them. Don't do something else at the same time, regardless of the form factor or technology level. Don't be rude.

    I think its fine to set and maintain these boundaries where appropriate. I also think it's fine for people to not have these boundaries. As someone who has spent a fair deal of their adult life in nightlife and knows a lot of professional entertainers as well, being actively social and keeping up with conversations as well as issues that arise, when they arise, is a completely normal part of being in the scene. My personal boundaries are much more soft when it comes to these because I know how the life can be. In my own life I make sure to check with others what boundaries are appropriate or okay with them and do my best to respect them.

    4 votes

  18. Comment on California is moving forward with a partisan redistricting effort to counter Texas’ move in ~society

    Gaywallet
    Link Parent
    And what of the existing current extreme violence against citizens happening today, under Republican rule? I am exhausted of people repeating this line, or thinking that peace is always the answer...

    And what of the existing current extreme violence against citizens happening today, under Republican rule? I am exhausted of people repeating this line, or thinking that peace is always the answer while the opposition is being flagrantly violent.

    7 votes

  19. Comment on ‘Being short is a curse’: the men paying thousands to get their legs broken – and lengthened in ~life.men

    Gaywallet
    Link Parent
    This is important insight, but also just a side effect of a few major important differences between the sexes - notably how they are treated and separated in society (including what they are...
    • Exemplary

    This is important insight, but also just a side effect of a few major important differences between the sexes - notably how they are treated and separated in society (including what they are taught to value and what skills are reinforced) and biological realities that tend to lead sexes towards particular kinds of behavior.

    A minor quibble, however-

    I truly believe that as a man it's no different to understand a women than it is a man, because our brains really do function the same.

    As a gender-walker who has experienced life in many different presentations and social roles, I believe this statement is a bit misleading. The heart of the matter is true - we both have brains, and our brains are remarkably similar (very few sex-based differences and it's hard to say how much of it is brought on by hormones and by environment). However, it is important to note that the roles and skills which are reinforced by society absolutely shape how our brain interprets information. It's quite easy, I think, for people to imagine that the way someone raised in isolation or abuse thinks is going to be fundamentally different from the way someone raised in a healthier environment thinks. The same is true for people raised in male and female society - what society reinforces for them as skills they need to learn, what they are complimented for doing and not doing, and similarly what they are chastised for doing and not doing.

    Ultimately these do shape how men and women approach and interact with each other, as well as how we interpret and assimilate information. Sometimes these things are difficult to de-internalize, or the people may have no interest in de-internalizing them. For example, some women may feel that men need to pursue them in order for them to feel desired, and that could be deeply-seated feelings which have been internalized from what society values, how it treats women, how it tells women they should feel, and ultimately how dating is "supposed" to work. Since dating is simultaneously a dance which is informed by these values as well as a way to check on alignment on particular issues and compatibility through these lenses, it's frankly a complicated mess of an issue. I would highly suggest making friends of all genders and especially with those outside the binary if you're trying to understand how other people raised in different settings think.

    28 votes

  20. Comment on Meta appoints anti-LGBTQ+ conspiracy theorist Robby Starbuck as AI bias advisor in ~lgbt

    Gaywallet
    Link
    The president really made an executive order about preventing woke AI? Humanity is cooked fam

    The president really made an executive order about preventing woke AI? Humanity is cooked fam

    14 votes