susam's recent activity
-
4 votes
-
Space-related applications of Forth (1998)
2 votes -
Analytic Number Theory book club ending today
3 votes -
FD 100
7 votes -
Our next trip to integer partitions
2 votes -
A pint a day (30 Nov 1996)
4 votes -
Our trip to the prime number theorem
9 votes -
Typography on the web
3 votes -
Twenty-five years ago, Star Trek: Voyager tackled one of its most infamous transporter questions
17 votes -
Comment on What did you do this week? in ~talk
-
TeXMe Demo: Self-rendering Markdown + MathJax documents
6 votes -
Good Quality DOSBox Video Capture
5 votes -
Bill Joy's greatest gift to man – the vi editor (2003)
7 votes -
makesite.py - Simple, lightweight, and magic-free static site/blog generator
7 votes -
Comment on Microcentury in ~science
susam Thank you for the clarification. Actually, I did not think you were attacking or criticising my blog post. I was only attempting to have a conversation about why we get the same number using both...Thank you for the clarification. Actually, I did not think you were attacking or criticising my blog post. I was only attempting to have a conversation about why we get the same number using both methods: average and rounding off. I found that interesting and wanted to share it. Thank you for commenting on this thread. It was interesting to see this topic from a different perspective and realize that the result of 52 minutes 35.7 seconds holds good both as an average as well as rounded-off values.
-
Comment on Microcentury in ~science
susam I agree and I do mention something to that effect at the end of the blog post: Did you see that section? I don't talk about average like you do. Your point about average is a great point. It just...I agree and I do mention something to that effect at the end of the blog post:
Conclusion
A microcentury is very close to 52 minutes 35.7 seconds long.
Did you see that section? I don't talk about average like you do. Your point about average is a great point. It just didn't occur to me while writing the post. But I did see that in both cases the length of a microcentury is 52 minutes 35.7 seconds when we round off the number of seconds to one decimal place. So whether we average or not, we come to the same conclusion, don't we?
-
Comment on Microcentury in ~science
susam Yes, indeed. Since the length of a microcentury is very close to 52 minutes 35.7 seconds in both cases, the average also works out to be very close to the same length.Yes, indeed. Since the length of a microcentury is very close to 52 minutes 35.7 seconds in both cases, the average also works out to be very close to the same length.
-
Microcentury
10 votes -
Love Bug's creator tracked down to repair shop in Manila
7 votes -
The safety boat: Kubernetes and Rust
6 votes
Celebrated Star Wars Day by writing some Forth code.