This also marks the highest opening weekend for an R-rated film since the pandemic (previous record holder was Halloween Kills). And it even topped Bad Boys For Life which was released right...
This also marks the highest opening weekend for an R-rated film since the pandemic (previous record holder was Halloween Kills). And it even topped Bad Boys For Life which was released right before the pandemic and no R-rated film had been able to match since.
I was really skeptical after John Wick 3, which I loved but it felt like the entire premise was starting to bust at the seams towards the end. I'm so glad to hear the feedback on 4 suggests that...
I was really skeptical after John Wick 3, which I loved but it felt like the entire premise was starting to bust at the seams towards the end.
I'm so glad to hear the feedback on 4 suggests that it not only meets but exceeds the quality of the prior two.
….ehhhh I saw it and feel that your description of the premise bursting at the seams is pretty apt. Kinda felt like the later stage of a video game where the enemies are tougher but it’s the same...
….ehhhh I saw it and feel that your description of the premise bursting at the seams is pretty apt. Kinda felt like the later stage of a video game where the enemies are tougher but it’s the same strategy.
Is it? Genuinely asking. Because at least around here, theaters upcharge for long movies. I just went and checked my local theater. A regular length-movie ticket is €17, John Wick 4 is almost €20....
Is it? Genuinely asking. Because at least around here, theaters upcharge for long movies.
I just went and checked my local theater. A regular length-movie ticket is €17, John Wick 4 is almost €20.
I don't know how big a percentage of this opening weekend is the extra ticket price though.
In the US they don't charge extra for longer movies. It's just a flat fee (with an extra charge if you want 3D). But longer movies means fewer showtimes, so unless it's a Marvel movie and you can...
In the US they don't charge extra for longer movies. It's just a flat fee (with an extra charge if you want 3D).
But longer movies means fewer showtimes, so unless it's a Marvel movie and you can start shows at 10 a.m. and go until 2 a.m., it limits the amount of shows you can fit in.
There is an extra ticket price being paid here, but that has to do with premium large formats (IMAX or other similar things). The length of the movie does not determine the price in the U.S.
There is an extra ticket price being paid here, but that has to do with premium large formats (IMAX or other similar things). The length of the movie does not determine the price in the U.S.
Oh you will pay extra for those things here, too, on top of the length. IMAX is only available 2 places in my country and John Wick 4 in IMAX will then be €22!
Oh you will pay extra for those things here, too, on top of the length.
IMAX is only available 2 places in my country and John Wick 4 in IMAX will then be €22!
wtf? I mean..... from a business standpoint, I get it. But also, GTFO you greedy bastards. We're lucky to have a first-run local chain that has a $6 matinee. Which includes reserved seating and...
Because at least around here, theaters upcharge for long movies.
wtf? I mean..... from a business standpoint, I get it. But also, GTFO you greedy bastards. We're lucky to have a first-run local chain that has a $6 matinee. Which includes reserved seating and power reclining heated leather chairs.
Cheapest I could find in my city (3 cinemas here) are about €11 and this is for niche movies, on or before noon, on tiny screens, with like 30 seats in the theater. Why even go to the theater when...
Cheapest I could find in my city (3 cinemas here) are about €11 and this is for niche movies, on or before noon, on tiny screens, with like 30 seats in the theater. Why even go to the theater when it's such a format... I am envious of your theaters and prices. Cost of living is a bitch!
Can someone explain to me what the draw is? I saw the first one, and it was decent, entertaining, but easily forgettable, and nothing about it seemed ground-breaking or original, and I have never...
Can someone explain to me what the draw is? I saw the first one, and it was decent, entertaining, but easily forgettable, and nothing about it seemed ground-breaking or original, and I have never felt any motivation to see any of the sequels. What gives? What is so special about this series that I'm not getting?
The fight choreography and the stunts are incredible. It also has a certain aesthetic beauty to it, and the world is, while silly, pretty interesting. The first one stood out at the time because...
The fight choreography and the stunts are incredible. It also has a certain aesthetic beauty to it, and the world is, while silly, pretty interesting.
The first one stood out at the time because we were just coming off a decade-long trend of handheld shaky cam fight scenes that were piss-poor copies of The Bourne Ultimatum. John Wick offered something refreshing. Locked down cameras and long takes so that we can actually see the fights, similar to the Jackie Chan action movies of the 80s.
Since then the sequels have doubled down. The set pieces have gotten longer and more complex, with different elements thrown in to keep it visually engaging. It’s just incredible action filmmaking from Chad Stahelski. No one is doing it like he is.
I haven't seen this new one, but I will definitely agree that the aesthetics are very prevalent and indeed beautiful. However I feel the point about fight choreography only holds true for the...
I haven't seen this new one, but I will definitely agree that the aesthetics are very prevalent and indeed beautiful. However I feel the point about fight choreography only holds true for the first movie, in my opinion. In the second and third movies, I thought things were over-choreographed and too theatrical. At certain points, I thought it was much too obvious that the actors were waiting for each other's moves. So instead of reacting, they waited to act - if that makes sense.
Keanu really knows his combat, and it shows. Pure action, no romance. It's refreshing. Interesting world, initially grounded but increasingly fantastical. You get glimpses of it and grow curious....
Keanu really knows his combat, and it shows.
Pure action, no romance. It's refreshing.
Interesting world, initially grounded but increasingly fantastical. You get glimpses of it and grow curious.
Great villains.
Dogs.
Lance Reddick.
Real violence, no neck snapping bullshit. Martial arts with shots to the head. It's vicious. Gruesome wounds.
Kinda feels like shounen, where you have multiple levels of enemies to progressively defeat, and the next one is always stronger, more badass, etc.
Some combo of turn your brain off action, well known franchise with a consistent quality across movies, and a touch a Keanu charm. I'm not a fan myself but I get why it's a solid money making formula.
Some combo of turn your brain off action, well known franchise with a consistent quality across movies, and a touch a Keanu charm. I'm not a fan myself but I get why it's a solid money making formula.
This also marks the highest opening weekend for an R-rated film since the pandemic (previous record holder was Halloween Kills). And it even topped Bad Boys For Life which was released right before the pandemic and no R-rated film had been able to match since.
I’ve seen it! Can confirm it’s good, even though it’s not my usual style of movie.
I was really skeptical after John Wick 3, which I loved but it felt like the entire premise was starting to bust at the seams towards the end.
I'm so glad to hear the feedback on 4 suggests that it not only meets but exceeds the quality of the prior two.
….ehhhh I saw it and feel that your description of the premise bursting at the seams is pretty apt. Kinda felt like the later stage of a video game where the enemies are tougher but it’s the same strategy.
Tons of lore drops in this one, though.
It's doubly impressive when you consider the 2 hour 40 minute runtime of the movie.
Is it? Genuinely asking. Because at least around here, theaters upcharge for long movies.
I just went and checked my local theater. A regular length-movie ticket is €17, John Wick 4 is almost €20.
I don't know how big a percentage of this opening weekend is the extra ticket price though.
In the US they don't charge extra for longer movies. It's just a flat fee (with an extra charge if you want 3D).
But longer movies means fewer showtimes, so unless it's a Marvel movie and you can start shows at 10 a.m. and go until 2 a.m., it limits the amount of shows you can fit in.
There is an extra ticket price being paid here, but that has to do with premium large formats (IMAX or other similar things). The length of the movie does not determine the price in the U.S.
Oh you will pay extra for those things here, too, on top of the length.
IMAX is only available 2 places in my country and John Wick 4 in IMAX will then be €22!
wtf? I mean..... from a business standpoint, I get it. But also, GTFO you greedy bastards. We're lucky to have a first-run local chain that has a $6 matinee. Which includes reserved seating and power reclining heated leather chairs.
Cheapest I could find in my city (3 cinemas here) are about €11 and this is for niche movies, on or before noon, on tiny screens, with like 30 seats in the theater. Why even go to the theater when it's such a format... I am envious of your theaters and prices. Cost of living is a bitch!
Can someone explain to me what the draw is? I saw the first one, and it was decent, entertaining, but easily forgettable, and nothing about it seemed ground-breaking or original, and I have never felt any motivation to see any of the sequels. What gives? What is so special about this series that I'm not getting?
The fight choreography and the stunts are incredible. It also has a certain aesthetic beauty to it, and the world is, while silly, pretty interesting.
The first one stood out at the time because we were just coming off a decade-long trend of handheld shaky cam fight scenes that were piss-poor copies of The Bourne Ultimatum. John Wick offered something refreshing. Locked down cameras and long takes so that we can actually see the fights, similar to the Jackie Chan action movies of the 80s.
Since then the sequels have doubled down. The set pieces have gotten longer and more complex, with different elements thrown in to keep it visually engaging. It’s just incredible action filmmaking from Chad Stahelski. No one is doing it like he is.
I haven't seen this new one, but I will definitely agree that the aesthetics are very prevalent and indeed beautiful. However I feel the point about fight choreography only holds true for the first movie, in my opinion. In the second and third movies, I thought things were over-choreographed and too theatrical. At certain points, I thought it was much too obvious that the actors were waiting for each other's moves. So instead of reacting, they waited to act - if that makes sense.
Keanu really knows his combat, and it shows.
Pure action, no romance. It's refreshing.
Interesting world, initially grounded but increasingly fantastical. You get glimpses of it and grow curious.
Great villains.
Dogs.
Lance Reddick.
Real violence, no neck snapping bullshit. Martial arts with shots to the head. It's vicious. Gruesome wounds.
Kinda feels like shounen, where you have multiple levels of enemies to progressively defeat, and the next one is always stronger, more badass, etc.
Live action Hotline Miami.
Some combo of turn your brain off action, well known franchise with a consistent quality across movies, and a touch a Keanu charm. I'm not a fan myself but I get why it's a solid money making formula.
For comparison, it made more in its opening weekend than Shazam: Fury of the Gods has since it came out.