11
votes
Weekly US politics news and updates thread - week of April 20
This thread is posted weekly - please try to post all relevant US political content in here, such as news, updates, opinion articles, etc. Extremely significant events may warrant a separate topic, but almost all should be posted in here.
This is an inherently political thread; please try to avoid antagonistic arguments and bickering matches. Comment threads that devolve into unproductive arguments may be removed so that the overall topic is able to continue.
Re: Palantir....
Hmmmm.
I'm sure someone will defend this as sounding bad but "how do we know what they really mean?!" when really it's incredibly clear to me that this is some white Christian nationalist shit.
The whole thing is pretty vague - I suspect that's intentional to give them just enough cover to dodge specific accusations if needed while still appealing to techno-feudalists and conservatives. There's some language that seems to me to be trying to build more bridges between social conservatives and the tech right, which is troubling to me.
I mean cultural superiority of the "West" while insisting on religious freedom (but clearly not of inferior cultures) is not nearly as vague as all that IMO. The tech to conservative pivot is not new IMO this feels just like saying the quiet part.
No you're right, it's definitely pretty mask off. It just seems like there's enough vagueness for them to say "well of course we didn't mean that" if pressed
Oh there's a reason I'm sure someone can/will try to play reasonableness games with the language. They're trying to wear the mask still but it's mesh and we can see the whole face.
I wasn't sure the most appropriate place to post this article about Palantir's Manifesto that was posted over the weekend. There's nothing particularly surprising here if you've read much about Thiel's particular brand of Yarvinite madness, but it is surprising in how mask-off it is about a number of things.
This statement isn't the most extreme or specific, maybe, but it was the most surprising to me in that it seems to state plainly the feeling of this group that they are the "ruling class" of America.
I think point 6 is pretty concerning:
Apparently everyone should be a cog in the military machine. The connection from there to Congress doing something about unnecessary wars seems pretty indirect.
Yeah I've been seeing a lot of chatter about reinstating a draft coming from the right recently, which is deeply concerning to me.
Yes, it does seem like overheated ideological nonsense, but it seems like that quote is ambiguous on who the “ruling class” is. Also, who will do the forgiving and what do they mean by “decadence?” It seems like it was written to sound impressive rather than to be clear, but it’s basically a defense of being a defense contractor.
Lockheed is a defense contractor too and they don’t seem to have any need to publish overheated manifestos? They just keep building weapons. If someone goes to work for them, they know what they’re signing up for.
But assuming a defense of being a defense contractor is necessary, it’s not hard to justify. Most countries have a military. They’re going to have defense contractors, because someone has to make the weapons.
A defense contractor making artillery shells or missiles doesn’t get a say in whether they get shipped to Ukraine or are used in some more dubious cause. I wouldn’t want to work on that, but I also don’t want Ukraine to run short on artillery shells, because I don’t want the Russians to win. So I guess I’m happy that there are military contractors?
The upshot is that if you work for a military contractor, you end up as a cog in the military-industrial complex and someone else gives the orders. That’s why a lot of people don’t want to work for defense contractors and that should be okay too.
Given the sentence about free email pointing toward silicon valley, and other places in the post where they point toward a perceived need for silicon valley to take more of a lead in defense and crime prevention (plus prior knowledge of the kinds of thought these yahoos are immersed in) I feel pretty comfortable with my reading of that section. Could be that I'm wrong.
I think that’s a reference to Google, which provides free email and pulled out of Project Maven after employee protests.
They want to pretend that they are somehow superior for working on Project Maven.
And I don’t see why that market can’t be left to defense contractors. No company has to do everything, not even big tech companies.