20 votes

What are some cheaper alternatives to Grammarly that are equally as good?

As a non-native English speaker, I use Grammarly's free tier daily. It is invaluable to help me catch common mistakes, as well as to get a better understanding of the language through the explanations it provides. I will need to write even more English in the next few months, so it seemed like a good idea to get the Premium subscription. Unfortunately, Grammarly's pricing ($144 for the year) is prohibitive when converted to Brazilian Reais. And even if I am capable of making that payment now, I would rather avoid becoming dependent on something that is so expensive for me. So, what are some affordable alternatives to Grammarly's Premium subscription?

Just to be clear, I am aware that it is not ideal to rely too much on that kind of tool. Rest assured that my domain of English is enough that I am entirely capable of taking the suggestions as extra help and not as a crutch.

16 comments

  1. [4]
    cstby
    Link
    Maybe Language Tool?

    Maybe Language Tool?

    17 votes
    1. ignorabimus
      Link Parent
      +1 – Works pretty well for me when writing in non-native languages, although I don't write anything particularly critical.

      +1 – Works pretty well for me when writing in non-native languages, although I don't write anything particularly critical.

      1 vote
    2. gco
      Link Parent
      This looked very interesting. I tried to find out what data they collect and while initially it looked like it wasn't too much, turns out they capture either URL or domain which is very...

      This looked very interesting. I tried to find out what data they collect and while initially it looked like it wasn't too much, turns out they capture either URL or domain which is very off-putting to me:

      ...
      To improve the quality and availability of our system, we also store the following information:
      ...
      The page from which the request was sent (e.g. languagetool.org),

      1 vote
    3. creesch
      Link Parent
      Yup, my favorite to use as well. As an added bonus it is possible to self host the server for extra privacy. Though, I never personally tries that.

      Yup, my favorite to use as well. As an added bonus it is possible to self host the server for extra privacy. Though, I never personally tries that.

  2. [4]
    DanBC
    Link
    Did you use Grammarly to create your post? Your written English is better than mine, and I have English as a first language. EDIT: If you're happy with dictionaries and reference books there are...

    Did you use Grammarly to create your post? Your written English is better than mine, and I have English as a first language.

    EDIT: If you're happy with dictionaries and reference books there are collections available for the software "Golden Dict". There's a big torrent that has a lot of English dictionaries, but also English Usage guides too.

    6 votes
    1. [3]
      random
      Link Parent
      Yes, I have. But nowadays it's not like it highlights my entire texts, it's just a few corrections. Grammarly greatly improved my English so, in a sense, it works to make itself less useful. That...

      Yes, I have. But nowadays it's not like it highlights my entire texts, it's just a few corrections. Grammarly greatly improved my English so, in a sense, it works to make itself less useful.

      That said, when you're not writing in your own language some errors are impossible to prevent given that I think in two languages. Grammarly doesn't write anything for me, but it greatly reduces the time I would dedicate to proofreading.

      The Premium tier includes highlighting and suggesting improvements to sentences that are difficult to read, as well as other stuff.

      5 votes
      1. DanBC
        Link Parent
        I honestly think your current level of written English is very good, and I don't think you need Grammarly. There are tools called "readability checkers" that test how easy it would be to read a...

        I honestly think your current level of written English is very good, and I don't think you need Grammarly.

        There are tools called "readability checkers" that test how easy it would be to read a passage of writing. Older versions were not sophisticated.

        Wikipedia has some information here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flesch%E2%80%93Kincaid_readability_tests

        5 votes
      2. Crimson
        Link Parent
        You probably don't really need Grammarly. Since English isn't your first language, you probably learned to write it the "correct" way rather than relying on slang/shorthand (which is how native...

        You probably don't really need Grammarly. Since English isn't your first language, you probably learned to write it the "correct" way rather than relying on slang/shorthand (which is how native speakers tend to write).

        If the reason you need to write English more is because you're traveling, you'll probably be fine. If you do need your writing to be more proper, then the free Grammarly tier you've been using is probably fine.

        4 votes
  3. [4]
    RheingoldRiver
    Link
    I used Grammarly's pro version for work for a while. It sucks a lot and gives you bad advice more often than not. Grammarly free is the cheaper alternative to Grammarly pro that's just as good....

    I used Grammarly's pro version for work for a while. It sucks a lot and gives you bad advice more often than not. Grammarly free is the cheaper alternative to Grammarly pro that's just as good.

    You can also try using ChatGPT for shorter documents, e.g. with this prompt

    Hello I am a non-native English speaker. Can you edit my grammar in the following text so that I sound like a native speaker? Please make the smallest number of changes possible. Thanks!

    6 votes
    1. [3]
      random
      Link Parent
      I see. Because I never had Premium, I only really used its features when Grammarly allowed me to try it. It felt useful, but I didn't have it for long. I forgot to mention the Hemingway Editor,...

      I see. Because I never had Premium, I only really used its features when Grammarly allowed me to try it. It felt useful, but I didn't have it for long. I forgot to mention the Hemingway Editor, which is very good but only highlights troublesome sentences without making suggestions. They're transitioning into using AI but I don't how that's working. It's a little cheaper than Grammarly. Their free trial requires a credit card, I don't really wanna try it.

      1. [2]
        RheingoldRiver
        Link Parent
        see, that's kind of the problem. You see "oh there are more suggestions" and you assume that this means there are more good suggestions. But in reality, all the good suggestions are in free...

        It felt useful,

        see, that's kind of the problem. You see "oh there are more suggestions" and you assume that this means there are more good suggestions. But in reality, all the good suggestions are in free grammarly; and then in Pro, it gives you suggestions that have maybe a 50% chance of being correct. But the only way you know which ones to accept and which ones to ignore is if you're already a skilled writer...in which case, you probably made most of the "mistakes" deliberately, for stylistic reasons.

        I would definitely not recommend any non-native speaker to use pro because it will sometimes tell you things that are wrong and you'll have no way to know better. For example, it often says "Why don't you start this sentence with So," because then you have a "transition word" (like Also, or Therefore, etc).

        But the thing is, starting with So, is a very conversational thing and a really bad writing habit. And a big thing in English writing is not to use the same "transition word" over and over and over again. But Grammarly doesn't "understand" this bigger context, and so if you listen to it then you'll have bad writing where nearly every paragraph contains a sentence that starts with "So,".

        Now all this said, I don't want to scare you off of writing in English - a lot of these rules are important when you are writing professionally, and they don't matter when you are writing casually. However, you will have your "ear" trained by what you see in your writing-correction tool, and I don't think you should let that be Grammarly's opinions.

        1 vote
        1. random
          (edited )
          Link Parent
          There are absolutley many situations in which I don't use Grammarly's suggestion, but rather my own sense of correction and style. However, the way I speak and write is naturally formal in...

          There are absolutley many situations in which I don't use Grammarly's suggestion, but rather my own sense of correction and style. However, the way I speak and write is naturally formal in Portuguese as well, so one might get the impression that a lot of what I write is profoundly influenced by Grammarly when in reality that was not the case.

          There's no point in false modesty here: I feel confident enough as a writer that when a tool makes me a suggestion that is all it is for me. A suggestion.

          Although I do have the browser extension that is useful for catching low-hanging fruit, anything of length or importance I write on a text editor without any assistance. Only when it is done, do I give it a pass on Grammarly, and I judge every suggestion attentively. I understand the concern with people who just click "NEXT NEXT NEXT" but that is just not my case. Because I read all the explanations, and sometimes cross-referenced with other tools, I ended up improving my English more and more. A tool is what you make of it, right?

          Thanks ;)

          4 votes
  4. Habituallytired
    Link
    I use LanguageTool instead of Grammarly. It's also free and they have really good privacy policies.

    I use LanguageTool instead of Grammarly. It's also free and they have really good privacy policies.

    3 votes
  5. Buddy
    Link
    I should start off by saying I have never used these tools, so I can’t comment on how well each of them work. With that said, there are a few I have heard other people mention using with good...

    I should start off by saying I have never used these tools, so I can’t comment on how well each of them work. With that said, there are a few I have heard other people mention using with good things to say.
    SlickWrite is a completely free tool that I’ve seen praised. It seems to be full-featured and have everything you’re looking for, plus being completely free with no paid version or premium tiers is surely a major advantage.
    There’s also ProWritingAid, which is one of the more direct Grammarly competitors. I’m not sure how much cheaper it is, to be honest, but it also has a free tier and I thought it worth mentioning. Readable is another tool with similar features, but there is no free version. However, a look at their pricing page tells me it is only $4 per month, $48 annually, for a non-commercial subscription and has a 7-day free trial.

    I apologize for not having the personal experience with any of the above tools and not being able to give you more information on them than simply saying they exist. I do know people who have used SlickWrite and were pleased with it and see other two frequently mentioned online, but, without Googling them and pretending I’m not simply copying and pasting what it tells me, I can’t tell you much more.

    1 vote
  6. [2]
    fineboi
    Link
    I use chat gtp and ask him/her it (sorry not sure of the correct pronoun) to reword whatever I wrote.

    I use chat gtp and ask him/her it (sorry not sure of the correct pronoun) to reword whatever I wrote.

    1. creesch
      (edited )
      Link Parent
      Be aware that this will create sentence structures that are often very easy to recognize as AI-generated. Specifically, GPT generated as different models have a different way of writing (probably...

      Be aware that this will create sentence structures that are often very easy to recognize as AI-generated. Specifically, GPT generated as different models have a different way of writing (probably something to do with their training data).

      The recognizability of the AI-generated text depends on what you ask it to do with your input. But, if you request a complete rewording, the resulting structure will likely be recognizable as AI-generated by many people.

      You can avoid some of that by adding custom instructions.

      Avoid starting paragraphs with conjunctive adverbs and phrases. 
      Avoid starting paragraphs with the following : however, furthermore, moreover, in summary, in conclusion, the, this.
      

      This is the bare minimum you should add when asking it to completely reword input.

      You can probably get much more constructive and detailed feedback if you create more detailed instructions.

      Edit: Just because I had some time on my hands and because I thought it was a fun challenge, I did work on a more complex prompt, which I included below. Some notes though:

      • The prompt is for GPT4, I am not sure how GPT3.5 does with it.
      • There is no perfect result, if you take the complete rewrites you get out of this and put them back into a new session it will find new issues with it as far as sentence structures go.
      • I did add rewrites to the output. You still need to review these to make sure they actually fit you as a person. Even with the stuff I added to make it less obviously AI generated it still goes for certain patterns.
      • This prompt is a bit overkill, as I just wanted to play around and include all the options I could think about. I'd probably settle on just one or two rewrites, but I wanted to see which one would resemble my own writing style better. An alternative would be to only focus on words being used incorrectly and grammar errors.
      • I did spend a bit of time on the prompt, but not enough to perfectly tune it.
      • Notice that I did specifically tailor this prompt to online conversations. For a different context, make the appropriate adjustments.
      # Role  
      
      Your role is to be a writing assistant or coach.
      You do this in the context of online conversations.
      
      # Goal
      
      Your goal is to identify: 
      - Sentences that are too long and can be broken up. 
      - Sentences that might be unclear. 
      - Sentences that might be shallow and not expand on the point being made. 
      - Repetitive writing. Sentences that repeat earlier made points for example.
      - Words used potentially incorrectly because of their meaning. 
      - Grammatical errors, typos, and punctuation mistakes that need correction.
      
      # Parameters  
      
      - If a line starts with "Instruction:" It contains extra instructions.
      - Do not alter or analyze lines starting with >. These are markdown quotes.
      - Assume input is written in first person. Output should also be in first person. 
      - You are not assisting with writing an essay.
      - The context of the writing is conversation between people.  
      - Text should not be padded unnecessarily. Do not suggest adding extra sentences and information unless it provides value. 
      - Avoid starting paragraphs and sentences sentences or paragraphs with conjunctive adverbs, conjunctive phrases, or specific words such as "however" "furthermore" "moreover" "in summary" "in conclusion" "the" "this" "indeed".
      - Input may have markdown formatting. Where possible retain this formatting.
      - Ensure that all suggested improvements preserve the original meaning and intent of the writer's input. While enhancing clarity, conciseness, and readability, it's crucial to respect and maintain the writer's voice and the essence of their message.
      
      # Output  
      
      You will provide the following in your answer: 
      - A list of sentences from the input that could be reworked together with, why it can be improved and the proposed improvement. 
        - If a sentence can be reworked in multiple ways, provide an entry in the list for each potential improvement.
        - Do not include sentences that do not have identified issues.
        - Do include any identified grammatical errors, typos, or punctuation issues.
      - A list of words that are used in the wrong way, together with possible alternatives to be used. 
      - Four complete rewrites of the input based on identified issues. If the original input had markdown quotes (lines starting with >) then include them verbatim, do not alter them. The rewrites need to follow this format:
        1. Moderately formal, steering clear of overly sophisticated language. Avoid grandiloquence language.
        2. A neutral version that sits right in between formal and informal. 
        3. Slightly informal, avoiding excessively modern slang. Strive for a relaxed tone without sacrificing grammar. Use personal pronouns like "I" as needed.
        4. A version in the exact same tone as the input you receive. This version will just contain fixes for all identified issues. 
      
      9 votes