-
27 votes
-
EU Copyright reform negotiations (Article 11 and Article 13) hit a brick wall in Council
10 votes -
The EU Copyright Directive: What redditors in Europe need to know
11 votes -
Film Theory: All your memes are dead
3 votes -
On YouTube and EU Article 13
If you've been following tech news somewhat recently, you've surely heard about Article 13- the one where the EU essentially requires all content hosts to have extremely strict copyright checking...
If you've been following tech news somewhat recently, you've surely heard about Article 13- the one where the EU essentially requires all content hosts to have extremely strict copyright checking tools and have automated takedown of any potentially copyrighted works.
That got put on the backburner for a little bit, but now it's back with a vote being held in early 2019.
YouTube, being one of, if not the largest content hosts in the world, is greatly affected by this motion. In fact, they have a whole website designed to encourage their creators to talk about A13 in their videos. The page very subtly hints at massive service changes that will happen in the EU if this actually ends up passing.
The CEO of YouTube, Susan Wojcicki, has also written an op-ed for Financial times (linked to official YT blog since it's free there) about the issues facing YT if A13 passes.
I haven't heard anything from official sources, but I've heard on the rumor mill that YouTube will completely suspend creators in the EU, not allowing them to upload any content, and potentially even removing their existing content from YouTube.
What if this passes? YouTube is one of the biggest sources of free knowledge and entertainment we have today, and it's become engrained into the internet as it is today.
With all this, I simply ask, "what's next?"
9 votes -
Google responds to EU by adding a fee to Play Services
18 votes -
Amazon's use of merchant data under EU microscope
6 votes -
The European Union versus the Internet
12 votes -
Today, Europe lost the internet. Now, we fight back
10 votes -
Controversial Copyright Directive approved by EU Parliament
27 votes -
Now that the Copyright Directive has been voted through, I think it's relevant to share what type of MP's voted for this crap...
Original here: https://old.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/8sizc8/danish_mep_jens_rohde_in_facebook_post_yesterday/ I posted this on reddit a couple of months ago as I felt (and still feel) like it's...
Original here: https://old.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/8sizc8/danish_mep_jens_rohde_in_facebook_post_yesterday/
I posted this on reddit a couple of months ago as I felt (and still feel) like it's rather shocking how someone so ignorant can have any kind of power over something that they clearly know nothing about. Here's what Danish MEP Jens Rohde had to say about the public response to the directive in a Facebook post of his from ~2 months ago:
Always pleasant when the web communists hack and spam my PC in parliament. 50,000 e-mails just yesterday containing largely identical messages - in difference languages though.
This time because I tomorrow vote in favor of artist copyright is valid on the internet as well as everywhere else.
This is not about mass surveillance.
This is not about limiting freedom of speech unless you steal others' content for commercial use.
This is also not about the so-called link tax in article 11. Bloggers can calmly continue working.
This is simply about active commercial platforms which must pay to use people's content for commercial purposes. All passive platforms, marketplaces, wikis, clouds, closed networks are exempt from this proposition that I've helped create and vote for tomorrow.
Creators can themselves ask that their content is monitored, or they can upload it unprotected. That's their choice.
Technology has NOT been considered in the proposal. That will come later.
And let me repeat for the hundredth time: spam as well as hacking is especially counterproductive to me, if you want to promote your cause.
By the way, I will never subscribe to the communist pirate opinion that FREE internet is the same as internet for FREE - no matter how much you attack my PC.
13 votes -
Tomorrow, the EU will vote on the future of the internet (again)
10 votes -
Remove the search engine setting. Hard-code the search engine to Google
8 votes -
Why Google won't break a sweat about EU ruling
3 votes -
First GDPR ruling: German court finds collecting domain registrar techincal/admin contact info violates Article 5
17 votes -
ICANN't get no respect: Europe throws Whois privacy plan in the trash
11 votes -
Wikipedia blacked out across Europe in protest against laws that could change the internet forever
18 votes -
YouTube and Facebook could escape billions in copyright payouts after EU vote. Lawmakers reject overhaul of rules which aimed to make tech giant's pay a bigger share.
2 votes -
EU sends controversial internet copyright reforms back to the drawing board
13 votes -
‘Everyone is breaking the law right now’: GDPR compliance efforts are falling short
19 votes -
EU committee approves new rules that could "destroy the internet as we know it."
13 votes -
Cory Doctorow: "The EU is about to end everything that's good and pure about the internet"
12 votes -
Norwegian court orders website of public domain court decisions shut down with no due process
14 votes -
The EU's Copyright Directive, Article 13
Next week the EU parliament will vote for their new copyright directive. In general it contains some good ideas, but also some extremely bad ones, such as article 13. It will require all uploaded...
Next week the EU parliament will vote for their new copyright directive. In general it contains some good ideas, but also some extremely bad ones, such as article 13. It will require all uploaded content to be scanned, and deleted if it might contain references to other copyrighted material.
The issue here is the word might. Due to the possible fines for companies that accidentally leave up something that contains a copyrighted work, they are incentivized to act more harsh than often necessary. It's safer for them to delete everything that looks like it might infringe copyright than risk the fine.
This could be disastrous for the Internet as we know it. And this is why many movements are speaking out against it. One such example would be the open letter to EU parliament. More information is available on https://saveyourinternet.eu/resources/, and you can find much more about it all over the Internet if you search with your favourite search engine.
What's your opinion on article 13, and have you done anything to make your voice heard?
13 votes -
Why should any non-Euro companies care about the GDPR?
18 votes -
The EU could be about to ban memes and 'destroy the internet'
4 votes -
The EU's copyright proposal is extremely bad news for everyone, even (especially!) Wikipedia
8 votes -
Fall asleep in seconds by listening to a soothing voice read the EU’s new GDPR legislation
11 votes -
GDPR will pop the adtech bubble
13 votes -
Europe will vote on internet censorship on the 20th
11 votes -
Facebook and Google each face billion-euro lawsuits for being non-compliant with GDPR
8 votes -
EU's General Data Protection Regulation comes into effect today. Rather than comply with it, some US news sites have chosen to simply block EU users.
10 votes -
Instapaper is temporarily shutting off access for European users due to GDPR
10 votes -
GDPR quiz: How will data privacy law affect you?
6 votes -
Microsoft extending EU's GDPR rights worldwide
9 votes -
This is how internet regulation can go really wrong
4 votes -
GDPR will pop the adtech bubble
9 votes -
Why am I getting all these terms of service update emails?
5 votes