- 
        11 votes
- 
        Abortion Search Noise Generator10 votes
- 
        Security and privacy tips for people seeking an abortion14 votes
- 
        ‘A mass invasion of privacy’ but no penalties for Tim Hortons8 votes
- 
        Mozilla releases local machine translation tools as part of Project Bergamot11 votes
- 
        A more detailed — and more sympathetic — review of the Murena One5 votes
- 
        The Murena One shows exactly how hard it is to de-Google your smartphone8 votes
- 
        Introducing: AMD Privacy View12 votes
- 
        Move fast and break things6 votes
- 
        Contra Chrome13 votes
- 
        Analysis by computer science professor shows that "Google Phone" and "Google Messages" send data to Google servers without being asked and without the user's knowledge, continuously11 votes
- 
        Mozilla Rally - Data collection for research about data collection9 votes
- 
        Retrieving your browsing history through a fake CAPTCHA12 votes
- 
        Facebook, Google and other tech firms must verify identities under proposed UK law3 votes
- 
        My journey down the rabbit hole of every journalist’s favorite app, Otter.ai4 votes
- 
        Google drops FLoC after widespread opposition, pivots to “Topics API” plan16 votes
- 
        Suicide hotline shares data with for-profit spinoff25 votes
- 
        Where a thousand digital eyes keep watch over the elderly3 votes
- 
        The battle for a powerful cyberweapon: A Times investigation reveals how Israel reaped diplomatic gains around the world from NSO’s Pegasus spyware4 votes
- 
        No place to hide - UK campaign against end-to-end encryption9 votes
- 
        Diskless infrastructure in beta (System Transparency: stboot)4 votes
- 
        Norway's data privacy watchdog fines Grindr $7.16 million for sending sensitive personal data to hundreds of potential advertising partners without users' consent7 votes
- 
        VPN testing reveals poor privacy and security practices, hyperbolic claims20 votes
- 
        Vizio’s profit on ads, subscriptions, and data is double the money it makes selling TVs22 votes
- 
        How to scrub your online footprint?I don't necessarily want to delete everything there is about me, but I want to significantly clean it. I've been deleting old accounts lately, I've seen some screenshots of my tweets on Reddit and...I don't necessarily want to delete everything there is about me, but I want to significantly clean it. I've been deleting old accounts lately, I've seen some screenshots of my tweets on Reddit and I've asked the authors to delete them. They've been kind enough to do it. But I feel like there's more that I need to do. I just realized that there are probably a lot of screenshots of YouTube comments and Tweets that I've put out there in the world with my name and face. It wouldn't be so bad if I didn't drastically increase my footprint last year during my time on Twitter. I'm not a techy person, I was thinking about asking or hiring some type of hacker or expert to help me. Because they could probably find more information about me than me. Can anyone help? 17 votes
- 
        An update on Standard Notes early pricing and roadmap11 votes
- 
        Proposed illegal image detectors on devices are ‘easily fooled’9 votes
- 
        Facebook - An update on our use of face recognition15 votes
- 
        Can data die? Why one of the internet's oldest images lives on without its subject's consent.27 votes
- 
        The future of PrivacyTools17 votes
- 
        New study raises fresh ‘privacy concerns’ about data sharing from Android mobile phones6 votes
- 
        Company that routes SMS for all major US carriers was hacked for five years27 votes
- 
        Microsoft, Google, Facebook and other tech firms are pressing lawmakers to stop prosecutors from secretly snooping on private accounts3 votes
- 
        Facebook paid FTC $4.9B more than required to shield Mark Zuckerberg, lawsuit alleges11 votes
- 
        Billed as the most secure phone on the planet, An0m became a viral sensation in the underworld. There was just one problem for anyone using it for criminal means: it was run by the police14 votes
- 
        ProtonMail: Important clarifications regarding arrest of climate activist33 votes
- 
        Apple delays the rollout of its plans to scan iPhones for child exploitation images15 votes
- 
        Apple's child protection features spark concern within its own ranks: sources19 votes
- 
        An open letter against Apple's privacy-invasive content scanning technology20 votes
- 
        Apple's plan to "think different" about encryption opens a backdoor to your private life15 votes
- 
        Apple introduces expanded protections for children, including on-device scanning of images to detect child abuse imagery24 votes
- 
        Diners beware: That meal may cost you your privacy and security8 votes
- 
        Venmo gets more private—but it’s still not fully safe5 votes
- 
        The privacy war raging within the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), where normally-secretive tech companies are wrangling over the future of your data — and their own power — in plain sight14 votes
- 
        The day I almost decided to hold the press to account8 votes
- 
        Trust in software, an all time low26 votes
- 
        New ad-free search subscription service: Neeva6 votes
- 
        LinkedIn breach reportedly exposes data of 92% of users, including inferred salaries13 votes
- 
        Differential privacy code removed from ChromiumIn a discussion on Hacker News, Jonathan Mayer pointed out that the differential privacy code was removed from Chromium. It looks like they finished doing this in February. I haven't seen any...In a discussion on Hacker News, Jonathan Mayer pointed out that the differential privacy code was removed from Chromium. It looks like they finished doing this in February. I haven't seen any announcement, discussion, or explanation of this based on a brief web search, so I figured I'd note it here. At about the time this process finished, there was a Google blog post about how they're still using it in other products. We first deployed our world-class differential privacy anonymization technology in Chrome nearly seven years ago and are continually expanding its use across our products including Google Maps and the Assistant. (If you read this quickly, you might think it's still used in Chrome.) Reading between the lines, I suspect that some folks at Google are still advocating for more usage of differential privacy, but they lost an important customer. Why that happened is a mystery. 11 votes
- 
        How to make your data harder to find online7 votes