Currently these types of topics would be mostly posted to the main ~comp or ~tech with the linux tag. There's a lot of people who would be interested in such topics so don't hesitate to post them!...
Currently these types of topics would be mostly posted to the main ~comp or ~tech with the linux tag. There's a lot of people who would be interested in such topics so don't hesitate to post them! But don't sleep on tags, they're pretty versatile. Subgroups are more for when something completely takes over a group or is sufficiently different in character from the rest of it that we want a separate space for it.
@sparksbet nailed it I'll come in harder and say we don't need a group, just tag your posts. We have a lot of Linux users/enthusiasts here, but as one of them I don't think Linux needs its own...
I'll come in harder and say we don't need a group, just tag your posts. We have a lot of Linux users/enthusiasts here, but as one of them I don't think Linux needs its own group.
This isn't Reddit, we aren't trying to organize into super specific niches under subtopics/groups. I don't mean that as a dig at Reddit or you, the goal of groups is to have tags sorted under them that relate to the broader topic.
I still think in "reddit" terms when it comes to community and posting. I've been holding off some Linux related questions as I don't want to pollute the ~comp group. But as @sparksbet and others...
I still think in "reddit" terms when it comes to community and posting. I've been holding off some Linux related questions as I don't want to pollute the ~comp group. But as @sparksbet and others pointed out, tagging should alleviate the problem.
yeah I think this is understandable -- I felt the same way after switching from reddit! But people are able to filter out tags they don't want to see, so if someone is really annoyed by Linux...
yeah I think this is understandable -- I felt the same way after switching from reddit! But people are able to filter out tags they don't want to see, so if someone is really annoyed by Linux posts they can do that.
For Tildes to transition to the next stage of growth (assuming that is desirable) a few things should change IMO: More frequent migrations of groups to tags and vice versa Groups should not all be...
For Tildes to transition to the next stage of growth (assuming that is desirable) a few things should change IMO:
More frequent migrations of groups to tags and vice versa
Groups should not all be default. For example ~anime which I like, but for many people it's not for them. These types of groups should be opt-in rather than default for everyone.
A way to surface these non-default groups, e.g. a weekly personalized round-up of topics from unsubscribed groups, especially newly created ones.
(And people should be able to block groups entirely from the round-up.)
Rethink the default Activity sort, as it drowns out the more niche topics/groups in favor of general topics with broad appeal
It sounds like a lot, but these changes could be planned and performed incrementally.
Insofar as the lack of niche-specific subgroups is intentional we would need to demonstrate a need for it, typically because said subtopics reach a critical mass of posts. As an example with this...
Insofar as the lack of niche-specific subgroups is intentional we would need to demonstrate a need for it, typically because said subtopics reach a critical mass of posts.
As an example with this topic: As it stands the only thing to suggest a demand for ~comp.linux as a group has been this post, not a surge ofnposts that led to ~health.coronavirus or ~comp.advent_of_code. We have tons of Linux users here but they don't talk about it alone often, usually as it intersects with another domain, such as development or gaming, where Linux would suffice as a tag. While it is relevant, Linux was a factor rather than a goal.
I only mention this point because I agree with the other three. I'm also not leaving this comment because I disagree with the OP, but to contextualize how we have had groups formed in the past.
It's true historically that group creation was meant to be reactive, but it's since evolved to more proactive. We've seen a lot of feedback along the lines of, "I wanted to post to Tildes, but...
It's true historically that group creation was meant to be reactive, but it's since evolved to more proactive. We've seen a lot of feedback along the lines of, "I wanted to post to Tildes, but wasn't sure if the article was a good fit because there didn't seem to be a matching group. So I hesitated and then ultimately gave up/forgot." First impressions matter.
The July group updates I believe included a bunch of subjects that weren't getting many posts, but that people had a general desire to post about.
I don't really wish to retread this conversation much further here, as the last proper discussion already had hundreds and hundreds of comments. So I recommend interested parties to read through some of those comments, to hear the ideas and arguments on all sides and understand how we got here.
One more point to add context. We have one group for all science that is not medicine and one finance group for all topics loosely related to money from formal economics to real estate to personal...
One more point to add context. We have one group for all science that is not medicine and one finance group for all topics loosely related to money from formal economics to real estate to personal budgets.
The goal as far as I understand it is to avoid empty groups that will discourage newcomers.
But all relevant content is welcome within a group
Currently these types of topics would be mostly posted to the main ~comp or ~tech with the linux tag. There's a lot of people who would be interested in such topics so don't hesitate to post them! But don't sleep on tags, they're pretty versatile. Subgroups are more for when something completely takes over a group or is sufficiently different in character from the rest of it that we want a separate space for it.
LFTL: https://tildes.net/?tag=linux
Ah, one of my favourite tags.
@sparksbet nailed it
I'll come in harder and say we don't need a group, just tag your posts. We have a lot of Linux users/enthusiasts here, but as one of them I don't think Linux needs its own group.
This isn't Reddit, we aren't trying to organize into super specific niches under subtopics/groups. I don't mean that as a dig at Reddit or you, the goal of groups is to have tags sorted under them that relate to the broader topic.
I still think in "reddit" terms when it comes to community and posting. I've been holding off some Linux related questions as I don't want to pollute the ~comp group. But as @sparksbet and others pointed out, tagging should alleviate the problem.
yeah I think this is understandable -- I felt the same way after switching from reddit! But people are able to filter out tags they don't want to see, so if someone is really annoyed by Linux posts they can do that.
Definitely subjective, but ~comp seems like the type of group where that's the norm
For Tildes to transition to the next stage of growth (assuming that is desirable) a few things should change IMO:
(And people should be able to block groups entirely from the round-up.)
It sounds like a lot, but these changes could be planned and performed incrementally.
Insofar as the lack of niche-specific subgroups is intentional we would need to demonstrate a need for it, typically because said subtopics reach a critical mass of posts.
As an example with this topic: As it stands the only thing to suggest a demand for ~comp.linux as a group has been this post, not a surge ofnposts that led to ~health.coronavirus or ~comp.advent_of_code. We have tons of Linux users here but they don't talk about it alone often, usually as it intersects with another domain, such as development or gaming, where Linux would suffice as a tag. While it is relevant, Linux was a factor rather than a goal.
I only mention this point because I agree with the other three. I'm also not leaving this comment because I disagree with the OP, but to contextualize how we have had groups formed in the past.
It's true historically that group creation was meant to be reactive, but it's since evolved to more proactive. We've seen a lot of feedback along the lines of, "I wanted to post to Tildes, but wasn't sure if the article was a good fit because there didn't seem to be a matching group. So I hesitated and then ultimately gave up/forgot." First impressions matter.
The July group updates I believe included a bunch of subjects that weren't getting many posts, but that people had a general desire to post about.
I don't really wish to retread this conversation much further here, as the last proper discussion already had hundreds and hundreds of comments. So I recommend interested parties to read through some of those comments, to hear the ideas and arguments on all sides and understand how we got here.
On the topic of defaults, this is a known thing, and will be changed as the platform grows, which is the case for a lot of tildes quirks.
I have several groups blocked.
I think we could use a FAQ list, but blocking groups is straightforward
One more point to add context. We have one group for all science that is not medicine and one finance group for all topics loosely related to money from formal economics to real estate to personal budgets.
The goal as far as I understand it is to avoid empty groups that will discourage newcomers.
But all relevant content is welcome within a group