22 votes

Discord is launching a beta with a game store and universal library/launcher, and adding a selection of games to Nitro

64 comments

  1. [24]
    Deimos
    Link
    This feels like the beginning of Discord flailing around in search of a business model. There are already so many game stores, I really don't think another one is needed. I can also imagine this...

    This feels like the beginning of Discord flailing around in search of a business model. There are already so many game stores, I really don't think another one is needed. I can also imagine this starting to get pushed into annoying places in the app before long (for example, prominent buttons to buy games that people on the server are playing).

    I also really don't like this, for multiple reasons:

    For our store, we’re excited to announce we’ll be supporting “First on Discord” titles — indie games that we’ve helped bring to life. Supporting indie games pushes the boundary of creative game design and is important to innovation and the long term health of the industry. Of course, we think the games are really cool too!

    To be very clear, First on Discord games are temporarily exclusive. They’re literally first on Discord — usually 90 days and then the developers can sell anywhere else they want. This beta won’t have any First on Discord titles, but we’ll be showing off some soon!

    31 votes
    1. [11]
      Bear
      Link Parent
      Yep. And why should I abandon Steam? Or even GoG? They haven't given me a good reason. Steam sales have great discounts, they've mostly gotten the bugs worked out, etc.

      This feels like the beginning of Discord flailing around in search of a business model.

      Yep.

      And why should I abandon Steam? Or even GoG? They haven't given me a good reason. Steam sales have great discounts, they've mostly gotten the bugs worked out, etc.

      16 votes
      1. [10]
        JayJay
        Link Parent
        If Valve wasn't run like a total mess they would have realized much earlier that their platform could have been exactly what Discord is going for now. They just put out a huge steam update that...

        If Valve wasn't run like a total mess they would have realized much earlier that their platform could have been exactly what Discord is going for now. They just put out a huge steam update that changes the chat system and adds common chat features that were missing for years like group chats, but they are still worlds behind services like Discord. They dropped the ball entirely on steam messenger.

        6 votes
        1. [3]
          talklittle
          Link Parent
          I don't blame Valve for sticking to their strengths and not diverting resources to a completely peripheral chat product, for which they'd draw criticism like "why are you working on this Chat crap...

          I don't blame Valve for sticking to their strengths and not diverting resources to a completely peripheral chat product, for which they'd draw criticism like "why are you working on this Chat crap Valve, fix your Steam store instead." We know that chat isn't a lucrative business, since even Discord, the king of chat, isn't satisfied with their chat-based revenue prospects. Steam is only now forced to build up their chat product as a defensive measure because Discord pivoted onto Steam's turf.

          6 votes
          1. [2]
            JayJay
            Link Parent
            I mean, to me that's why it would make more sense for steam to do it. It's not lucrative, but it keeps people on your platform. Discord had nothing to sell, so they are at a huge disadvantage....

            I mean, to me that's why it would make more sense for steam to do it. It's not lucrative, but it keeps people on your platform. Discord had nothing to sell, so they are at a huge disadvantage. Most PC users already have a steam account so adoption would have been quick. I assume they want people in the steam client as much as possible so that they are always connected to their store. The entire system was already in place to do all of this with their current system, it just needed to be upgraded.

            As for what the community wants, I think they'd be more likely to say "GIVE ME HALFLIFE 3" over "Fix the store" ;)

            4 votes
            1. talklittle
              Link Parent
              With this Discord announcement, Valve now have an excuse to do exactly what you described. Before, they could have done it, but people would have accused them of monopolistic practices, edging out...

              With this Discord announcement, Valve now have an excuse to do exactly what you described. Before, they could have done it, but people would have accused them of monopolistic practices, edging out nascent chat services for no apparent reason, wasting resources on chat during a time when chat services were exploding and Valve would have been accused of chasing fads. Now, they've been handed a concrete justification for building out their chat platform, rendering aforementioned criticisms moot.

              5 votes
        2. [6]
          SHFFLE
          Link Parent
          Group chats were a feature though, awhile ago. I don’t know what difference there is in them now but I definitely remember doing group chats occasionally just to mess around when I was in high...

          Group chats were a feature though, awhile ago. I don’t know what difference there is in them now but I definitely remember doing group chats occasionally just to mess around when I was in high school (5+ years ago). Additionally, groups each had their own chat room, though they tended to be rarely used in my experience.

          3 votes
          1. Luna
            Link Parent
            They were a thing, they were just not advertised well, clunky to setup, and weren't saved in the chat list like one-on-one chats. The new group chats have file sharing, link unfurling, easy to...

            They were a thing, they were just not advertised well, clunky to setup, and weren't saved in the chat list like one-on-one chats. The new group chats have file sharing, link unfurling, easy to resume, and are just better all around. It won't be a serious competitor to Discord until they actually have a decent mobile app IMO.

            2 votes
          2. [4]
            JayJay
            Link Parent
            Yea, you would need to join a group through the browser before to have any kind of group chat. On the new steam update you can just pick a few friends and create a chat with them no matter if...

            Yea, you would need to join a group through the browser before to have any kind of group chat. On the new steam update you can just pick a few friends and create a chat with them no matter if you're in a group or not.

            1. SHFFLE
              (edited )
              Link Parent
              No, I’m pretty sure it was possible to invite other friends to a group chat without joining an actual group. I definitely invited friends directly to chats before without utilizing the groups...

              No, I’m pretty sure it was possible to invite other friends to a group chat without joining an actual group. I definitely invited friends directly to chats before without utilizing the groups chatroom (this is so hard to talk about because Steam called their little communities “Groups” so it reads really badly lol). We even managed to all crash our Steam clients simultaneously once by changing all of our usernames to the exact same thing. By the time we had Jade(8) or (9) or so it apparently wasn’t happy with this. Again, this was many years ago.

              https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=164655181

              3 votes
            2. [2]
              Luna
              Link Parent
              You could start them through the client, they were just not advertised well, clunky to setup, and they weren't saved in the chat list like one-on-one chats. Plus, you couldn't share files through...

              You could start them through the client, they were just not advertised well, clunky to setup, and they weren't saved in the chat list like one-on-one chats. Plus, you couldn't share files through it, you had to host externally.

              The most recent chat update was initially browser-only at first, though.

              1 vote
              1. SHFFLE
                Link Parent
                Was it really? That’s... a weird way to test it, but fair enough, I suppose. I don’t know anybody who uses the Steam chat in browser. I guess if you’re at someone else’s place and don’t wanna...

                Was it really? That’s... a weird way to test it, but fair enough, I suppose. I don’t know anybody who uses the Steam chat in browser. I guess if you’re at someone else’s place and don’t wanna install it on their PC?

    2. clerical_terrors
      Link Parent
      I've been telling everyone this since day one: you can't build a successful business by handing out VoIP and chat servers like free candy, your maintenance costs will keep going up and you need to...

      I've been telling everyone this since day one: you can't build a successful business by handing out VoIP and chat servers like free candy, your maintenance costs will keep going up and you need to keep investing in "anti-evil" services and people because your platform will get abused.

      Discord's monetization never made sense to me in the first place: Nitro is an awful deal for what it costs monthly, and personal data just isn't worth that much money any more.

      3 votes
    3. [10]
      Fin
      Link Parent
      Just recently got back into discord after years of being away. It was weird seeing the "Fin is playing Fallout 4" when I haven't associated steam with a discord account ever.

      Just recently got back into discord after years of being away. It was weird seeing the "Fin is playing Fallout 4" when I haven't associated steam with a discord account ever.

      2 votes
      1. [9]
        hightrix
        Link Parent
        Just so you know, you can disable that and some of the other PC scanning features in Discord. I personally have that all disabled. I'd prefer Discord did not know about everything...

        Just so you know, you can disable that and some of the other PC scanning features in Discord.

        I personally have that all disabled. I'd prefer Discord did not know about everything running/installed on my machine.

        7 votes
        1. [7]
          Bear
          Link Parent
          That people would be happy with such an invasion of privacy is amazing to me. Unlike previous services such as Teamspeak, where not only was there no centralized server, but the server you were...

          I'd prefer Discord did not know about everything running/installed on my machine.

          That people would be happy with such an invasion of privacy is amazing to me. Unlike previous services such as Teamspeak, where not only was there no centralized server, but the server you were using didn't really store any data, Discord very likely actively stores no only data on your software and how and when it's being used, but all of your chats and your presence and times on various devices.

          5 votes
          1. [5]
            Gaywallet
            Link Parent
            Teamspeak also requires you to host the server, meaning that someone is paying for bandwidth. Discord does not. My data on what games I am playing is a cheap enough "invasion of privacy" that I'm...

            Teamspeak also requires you to host the server, meaning that someone is paying for bandwidth.

            Discord does not.

            My data on what games I am playing is a cheap enough "invasion of privacy" that I'm more than willing to give them that information to cloud-source my voice chat without paying for it with money.

            2 votes
            1. [4]
              Bear
              Link Parent
              That bandwidth for a TeamSpeak server is minimal, especially if it's just among friends. Hell, I have a good.. 800 GB per month of unused data transfer before I reach the 1 TB cap on my...

              That bandwidth for a TeamSpeak server is minimal, especially if it's just among friends. Hell, I have a good.. 800 GB per month of unused data transfer before I reach the 1 TB cap on my residential Comcast account.

              3 votes
              1. [3]
                Gaywallet
                Link Parent
                The upload speed is the limiting factor, not the actual data transferred. You need to pay for a server that can actually send the voice data quickly. If you have a reasonably large group of...

                The upload speed is the limiting factor, not the actual data transferred. You need to pay for a server that can actually send the voice data quickly. If you have a reasonably large group of friends who use voice chat, you need significant throughput or the voice quality becomes shit very quickly.

                This also ignores all the additional features that discord has over teamspeak. For example, you can't message someone you know on another teamspeak server through teamspeak. You can't really message much at all, honestly.

                3 votes
                1. [2]
                  Bear
                  Link Parent
                  TeamSpeak's upload was minimal if I recall - The voice codec used very low bandwidth, on the order of a few kilobytes per second. I want to say it was G.711, but I could be mistaken, it's been a...

                  TeamSpeak's upload was minimal if I recall - The voice codec used very low bandwidth, on the order of a few kilobytes per second. I want to say it was G.711, but I could be mistaken, it's been a while.

                  Even my cheap as hell Comcast connection has 2.4 Mbps upload bandwidth available.

                  4 votes
                  1. Gaywallet
                    Link Parent
                    I've used TS plenty in the past (especially before discord) and I can tell you that while the voice codec should be minimal, for whatever reason the servers would often get overloaded/overworked...

                    I've used TS plenty in the past (especially before discord) and I can tell you that while the voice codec should be minimal, for whatever reason the servers would often get overloaded/overworked when many people were talking in multiple rooms and voice quality would decrease.

                    At that point it may not have been bandwidth, but rather dedicated resources (ram, CPU, etc.). Either way, with discord, you don't have to worry about that.

                    1 vote
          2. clerical_terrors
            Link Parent
            It doesn't affect them directly, and in exchange they get ease of use and a slick interface. In the end most people are completely willing to part with their money and/or private data if they feel...

            It doesn't affect them directly, and in exchange they get ease of use and a slick interface. In the end most people are completely willing to part with their money and/or private data if they feel like they're getting a nice experience in return.

            1 vote
        2. Fin
          Link Parent
          Thanks I definitely need to look into the privacy options.

          Thanks I definitely need to look into the privacy options.

          1 vote
    4. [2]
      Comment deleted by author
      Link Parent
      1. clerical_terrors
        Link Parent
        There is competition in terms of stores, what's lacking is competition in terms of game launchers/social features, which seems like the thing Discord is aiming to take a shot at first and...

        There is competition in terms of stores, what's lacking is competition in terms of game launchers/social features, which seems like the thing Discord is aiming to take a shot at first and foremost. But those are typically not things you want to be using ten different apps for, so it remains to be seen if Discord can actually make it worth the while. I don't think timed platform exclusives really helped the Xbox One, I don't imagine it'll work here.

        1 vote
  2. [3]
    biox
    (edited )
    Link
    Bias upfront: I dislike Discord as a company. The reason that people like Discord so much is precisely because their business model is unrealistic. I did some napkin calculations about a year ago,...

    Bias upfront: I dislike Discord as a company.

    The reason that people like Discord so much is precisely because their business model is unrealistic.

    I did some napkin calculations about a year ago, and calculated their (very conservative) annual cost of survival. I'll look this up and post it as an edit later.

    By my math, Discord needed up to 20-30% of their userbase to subscribe to Nitro to think about breaking even cost-wise. The problem is that as their userbase expands (as free service userbases tend to) their costs grow, requiring more subscriptions. Something has to give. I maintain that it'll be advertisement based on data collected in their chat streams - it's a surefire way for them to make consistent money (and "charge" every consumer).

    This move brings them into direct competition with Steam, and spreads their resources further. It's just a matter of time.

    edit: calculated 3/23/17 (note: i'm not a mathematician, but I do work in tech and understand most costs associated with running a service)

    Discord Profitability:
    
    Employee Retention Costs:
    $4,750,000/year for employees (at least, based on average Bay Area pay of 95,000, note that this is a low estimate)
    
    Server Costs:
    Erlang on Google Cloud Services. They have PBs of data according to their job descriptions. Let’s use a messy estimate and say that 3mil/year is a reasonable assumption for everything server-side (including backups, databases, instances, lambdas, etc)
    
    Note that the above metrics do _not_ include furniture costs, computer costs, cleaning services, etc etc.
    
    Office costs:
    Discord is headed in the Bay Area. Using 225ft/person as a metric for Office space, the cheapest office in the Bay Area I could find was 3.58/ft/month. Using the above calculation, the average 40-person office costs about 32,000/month. Let’s round up and say half a million per year for office space, parking.
    
    So we have about 8,250,000 in maintenance costs per year for Discord (very, very conservatively).
    
    Discord has 25 million users as of December 2016 (server costs increase linearly with user count)
    
    At $5/month (after tax discord receives roughly 3.80/user), discord would require 2 million nitro subscribers to break even. 
    
    They currently need _at an absolute minimum_ 12% of their user base to pay $5/month to discord for an entire year to survive as they currently exist, not to mention grow. At most (assuming higher rent, pay, catered lunches, higher computing costs, etc) I would reckon ~20-30%.
    
    This is why there’s no doubt in my mind that Discord will eventually pursue other means of profit. According to their privacy policy, they collect and own the rights to:
    
    * Your voice
    * Your chat
    * Your images
    
    This is more than enough to set me on edge. There are many simple malicious avenues to revenue that could be pursued once their venture capital runs out. Including but not limited to:
    
    - Serving ads based on user preferences
    - Selling user data directly to advertisers (no ads appear in discord this way)
    - Tracking users across websites (Facebook style) to determine browsing habits. Selling this information.
    
    16 votes
    1. [2]
      clerical_terrors
      Link Parent
      I'm actually interested in hearing how you did the math on that.

      I'm actually interested in hearing how you did the math on that.

      1 vote
      1. biox
        Link Parent
        Edited with my cal'clations.

        Edited with my cal'clations.

        4 votes
  3. [5]
    hightrix
    Link
    This seems.... weird. Discord is a fantastic communications platform, but turning in to steam-lite seems like unwanted bloat. I'm worried that the communications platform part of Discord will...

    This seems.... weird. Discord is a fantastic communications platform, but turning in to steam-lite seems like unwanted bloat. I'm worried that the communications platform part of Discord will suffer from the addition of the store in terms of performance, application size, privacy, etc...

    While I understand that Discord needs to make money, I have a feeling this move will drive people away from the platform. Previously, it was a simple chat service. This move seems like Discord is trying to encompass your entire gaming life. I surely don't want that.

    For now, this is a wait and see situation. Or, is it time to start looking for/building an alternative?

    15 votes
    1. [2]
      Krael
      Link Parent
      Discord seems to be doing the classic tech startup routine: Release new "free" service, burn through as much VC cash as possible, then monetize the absolute living shit out of it while desperately...

      Discord seems to be doing the classic tech startup routine: Release new "free" service, burn through as much VC cash as possible, then monetize the absolute living shit out of it while desperately hoping for a buyout.

      They've got community momentum now, so why not shake the cup a bit at their users? They're not going to leave in droves; all of their friends use Discord!

      is it time to start looking for/building an alternative?

      The time for that was the moment a closed proprietary platform with no clear business plan was launched.

      13 votes
      1. Deimos
        (edited )
        Link Parent
        Yep, they've taken $130 million in VC so far, with the last $50M just four months ago. I'm honestly surprised to see them trying to spread out into areas like a game store to find revenue. I've...

        Yep, they've taken $130 million in VC so far, with the last $50M just four months ago.

        I'm honestly surprised to see them trying to spread out into areas like a game store to find revenue. I've always assumed that their plan was to just try to grow/not-die long enough to get acquired, but most of the companies that make sense as potential acquirers already have their own stores/launchers/etc.

        7 votes
    2. Bear
      Link Parent
      When Discord was still new, there were many posts on Reddit about it, including a few by the CEO (as far as I know). He and I got into a private message conversation, where I pointed out that...

      While I understand that Discord needs to make money, I have a feeling this move will drive people away from the platform. Previously, it was a simple chat service. This move seems like Discord is trying to encompass your entire gaming life. I surely don't want that.

      When Discord was still new, there were many posts on Reddit about it, including a few by the CEO (as far as I know). He and I got into a private message conversation, where I pointed out that server time costs money, as do employees, rent, and everything else, and asked how they planned to stay alive. His response was that eventually, they planned to sell premium chat features. I guess that's now the 'Nitro' thing, for what, $4 or so per month? (I'm not on Discord, so..)

      I live and work in SF, where Discord is based. Premium chat features alone will not pay the astronomical bills here.

      8 votes
    3. spctrvl
      Link Parent
      There's already a great alternative, Matrix!

      There's already a great alternative, Matrix!

      3 votes
  4. [2]
    teaearlgraycold
    Link
    Although I use Discord (mostly just in browser), I'd really prefer if it were to die off. Their business model is uncertain, and a free service with access to all of the information they get isn't...

    Although I use Discord (mostly just in browser), I'd really prefer if it were to die off. Their business model is uncertain, and a free service with access to all of the information they get isn't going to respect your privacy. I use mumble (FOSS, self-hosted) for VoIP as much as possible.

    9 votes
    1. Bear
      Link Parent
      I think you're doing that wrong? ;) "Tea, Earl grey, hot" (Incidentally, if you have Alexa/Echo, try "[Wake word], Tea, Earl grey, hot")

      teaearlgraycold

      I think you're doing that wrong? ;)

      "Tea, Earl grey, hot"

      (Incidentally, if you have Alexa/Echo, try "[Wake word], Tea, Earl grey, hot")

      2 votes
  5. [27]
    demifiend
    Link
    I've never liked Discord, and never understood the rationale for its existence. Is there actually anything of substance to this platform, or is it just IRC with a proprietary wrapper and an...

    This feels like the beginning of Discord flailing around in search of a business model.

    I've never liked Discord, and never understood the rationale for its existence. Is there actually anything of substance to this platform, or is it just IRC with a proprietary wrapper and an Electron app that some startup is trying to pass off as a revolutionary new technology as if they were Apple?

    6 votes
    1. Krael
      Link Parent
      It's a Slack/Ventrilo hybrid that requires almost zero technical knowledge to set up or join. It's nothing groundbreaking by ANY stretch of the imagination, but there's a reason it took off the...

      It's a Slack/Ventrilo hybrid that requires almost zero technical knowledge to set up or join. It's nothing groundbreaking by ANY stretch of the imagination, but there's a reason it took off the way it did.

      15 votes
    2. [17]
      Gaywallet
      Link Parent
      PC gamers want no-frills, easy to join voice chat. Not all games have this. Furthermore, even if a game has it, sometimes people want to chat while playing different games or keep a group of...

      never understood the rationale for its existence

      PC gamers want no-frills, easy to join voice chat. Not all games have this. Furthermore, even if a game has it, sometimes people want to chat while playing different games or keep a group of friends together after a game dies out. Combine that with the fact that it is exceptionally easy to set up, and that's why it's as popular as it is.

      11 votes
      1. [16]
        Bear
        Link Parent
        Steam has voice chat, but it's quite neglected. I've never really used it because I don't care for voice chat.

        PC gamers want no-frills, easy to join voice chat.

        Steam has voice chat, but it's quite neglected. I've never really used it because I don't care for voice chat.

        6 votes
        1. [13]
          Gaywallet
          Link Parent
          This requires everyone to be on and using steam Group chats are difficult to start, and do not allow people to drop in There's no indication that any of your friends are currently in a chat If...
          1. This requires everyone to be on and using steam
          2. Group chats are difficult to start, and do not allow people to drop in
          3. There's no indication that any of your friends are currently in a chat
          4. If you're playing with a large group of people and some want to split off to do a separate activity for a little while, there's no easy way to leave and enter a new chatroom other than to completely disconnect and start a new steam voice chat

          Combine this with a lot of other features that discord offers (such as chat history, chat rooms, etc.), it's easy to see why people flock to discord.

          7 votes
          1. [12]
            Bear
            Link Parent
            Point 1 is pretty much a given if you're gaming on the PC. Points 2, 3 and 4, not sure, but I know that Steam did recently overhaul their chat.

            Point 1 is pretty much a given if you're gaming on the PC.

            Points 2, 3 and 4, not sure, but I know that Steam did recently overhaul their chat.

            1 vote
            1. [8]
              Gaywallet
              Link Parent
              I don't start steam unless I'm using the client to launch a game. Many games do not launch through steam.

              I don't start steam unless I'm using the client to launch a game. Many games do not launch through steam.

              6 votes
              1. [7]
                Bear
                Link Parent
                Not what I've seen. Every time I launch Skyrim, Fallout 4, or Star Trek Online (3 big ones that I got from Steam and play a bit), they all launch Steam if it's not already running.

                Not what I've seen. Every time I launch Skyrim, Fallout 4, or Star Trek Online (3 big ones that I got from Steam and play a bit), they all launch Steam if it's not already running.

                2 votes
                1. [6]
                  Gaywallet
                  Link Parent
                  Well then I'd say your experiences with PC gaming are very insular.

                  Well then I'd say your experiences with PC gaming are very insular.

                  5 votes
                  1. [5]
                    Bear
                    Link Parent
                    Define "insular"? If you broke down my Reddit karma, you'd see that I gathered a lot (thousands) from the PCMR subreddit, where I used to spend a lot of time helping people troubleshoot stuff, and...

                    Define "insular"? If you broke down my Reddit karma, you'd see that I gathered a lot (thousands) from the PCMR subreddit, where I used to spend a lot of time helping people troubleshoot stuff, and I've assisted several people with building or upgrading gaming PCs.

                    I was there more to help than for memes or flash.

                    2 votes
                    1. [4]
                      Gaywallet
                      Link Parent
                      Your experiences are not mine, nor the group of friends, clans, etc. that I've been with throughout the years. Yes, many games utilize steam. But many also do not. You have not had the same...

                      Not what I've seen

                      Your experiences are not mine, nor the group of friends, clans, etc. that I've been with throughout the years.

                      Yes, many games utilize steam. But many also do not.

                      You have not had the same experiences, therefore, your experiences are insular.

                      4 votes
                      1. [3]
                        Bear
                        Link Parent
                        I don't think it's fair to call my different experiences insular, which implies that they are bad. I am less involved in the social aspect of gaming, and more involved in the technical end of...

                        I don't think it's fair to call my different experiences insular, which implies that they are bad.

                        I am less involved in the social aspect of gaming, and more involved in the technical end of helping people enjoy gaming.

                        This suits me, as I don't care for shooters or other popular types of games, except to a very limited extent.

                        1. [2]
                          Gaywallet
                          Link Parent
                          Apologies, I did not mean to imply that they are bad, simply that they are your experiences and not indicative of other people's experiences (anecdotal fallacy). You are, in effect, isolated from...

                          I don't think it's fair to call my different experiences insular, which implies that they are bad.

                          Apologies, I did not mean to imply that they are bad, simply that they are your experiences and not indicative of other people's experiences (anecdotal fallacy). You are, in effect, isolated from other large communities as you are unaware of their existence.

                          3 votes
                          1. Bear
                            Link Parent
                            I can agree with that.

                            I can agree with that.

                            1 vote
            2. [3]
              aphoenix
              Link Parent
              Almost none of the games I play with people are played through Steam. Point 1 is certainly not a given.

              Almost none of the games I play with people are played through Steam. Point 1 is certainly not a given.

              4 votes
              1. [2]
                Bear
                Link Parent
                Not what I've seen. Every time I launch Skyrim, Fallout 4, or Star Trek Online (3 big ones that I got from Steam and play a bit), they all launch Steam if it's not already running.

                Not what I've seen. Every time I launch Skyrim, Fallout 4, or Star Trek Online (3 big ones that I got from Steam and play a bit), they all launch Steam if it's not already running.

                1 vote
                1. aphoenix
                  Link Parent
                  Fortnite, LoL, HotS, WoW, Hearthstone, Overwatch, SCII, Diablo, Destiny 2 - just some of the games that get played a lot that don't interact with Steam at all, and which one might play with...

                  Fortnite, LoL, HotS, WoW, Hearthstone, Overwatch, SCII, Diablo, Destiny 2 - just some of the games that get played a lot that don't interact with Steam at all, and which one might play with friends. All of the ones that I listed (that don't start with D) are relatively popular, too.

                  Steam's really not a given; it's been months since I've played something multiplayer on Steam, if not longer, and I don't think I'm really an outlier.

                  5 votes
        2. [2]
          what
          Link Parent
          Steam's chat features have never been great though, although it seems like Steam is just now evolving it's friends, chat and groups system into something more Discord-like. I haven't really used...

          Steam's chat features have never been great though, although it seems like Steam is just now evolving it's friends, chat and groups system into something more Discord-like. I haven't really used it much, but it looks alright, the problem is that ship has already long sailed to Discord. Maybe if it came in around the same time as Discord it could've been more successful.

          4 votes
          1. Bear
            Link Parent
            All I know is that if it's true that Discord is now flailing around for a business model - and if it fails to find a suitable one, which is pretty common - Steam will be there to take the chat...

            All I know is that if it's true that Discord is now flailing around for a business model - and if it fails to find a suitable one, which is pretty common - Steam will be there to take the chat users back.

            1 vote
    3. [8]
      aphoenix
      Link Parent
      Discord does a few things and it does them very well: voice communication with exceptional quality (teamspeak-like) simple to manage chat rooms (IRC-like) it's free available in-browser (no...

      Discord does a few things and it does them very well:

      • voice communication with exceptional quality (teamspeak-like)
      • simple to manage chat rooms (IRC-like)
      • it's free
      • available in-browser (no installation) or via an electron app

      Those are four big wins. You can replace a lot of things that gaming guilds use with a one-stop shop.

      9 votes
      1. [7]
        Bear
        Link Parent
        TeamSpeak did most of these. There were (are?) even free servers around. People can run a server on their home machine for free, if they want. TeamSpeak also does not log your...

        TeamSpeak did most of these. There were (are?) even free servers around. People can run a server on their home machine for free, if they want. TeamSpeak also does not log your chats/programs/presence data/etc.

        Sure, there is a learning curve, but most PC gamers are used to that.

        The one thing that TeamSpeak does not offer as far as I know is a slick app.

        3 votes
        1. [2]
          aphoenix
          Link Parent
          I think that you're forgetting that if something is convenient and free, people will use that instead of doing any work at all. Also, many people who play games actually have no technical...

          Sure, there is a learning curve, but most PC gamers are used to that.

          I think that you're forgetting that if something is convenient and free, people will use that instead of doing any work at all. Also, many people who play games actually have no technical knowledge at all. My sister, for example, knows absolutely nothing about computers and wouldn't be able to deal with TeamSpeak, but has no problems with Discord. She can even make her own Discord server really easily.

          9 votes
          1. Bear
            Link Parent
            I can't disagree with that.

            I can't disagree with that.

            2 votes
        2. [4]
          TheJorro
          Link Parent
          Not anymore. Gone are the days when PC gamers were a traditionally tech savvy bunch, the market's so big now that there's no guarantee that your average PC gamer actually knows much about tech....

          Sure, there is a learning curve, but most PC gamers are used to that.

          Not anymore. Gone are the days when PC gamers were a traditionally tech savvy bunch, the market's so big now that there's no guarantee that your average PC gamer actually knows much about tech. They just have a beefy PC.

          It's one thing to say that TeamSpeak can do all these things, but it's abundantly clear that it didn't do them anywhere nearly as well or as accessibly as Discord considering how insanely fast Discord took over the market.

          The flashy app wasn't what made the difference, it was the UX. TeamSpeak is awful to set up compared to Discord. Is that an inherent trade-off to better privacy and security? Sure, but that's clearly not what most people want.

          9 votes
          1. [3]
            Bear
            Link Parent
            I can't disagree with the ease of use argument for Discord, but I value my personal privacy, and I'm amazed that more people don't, especially with stories like Facebook leaking triple digits...

            I can't disagree with the ease of use argument for Discord, but I value my personal privacy, and I'm amazed that more people don't, especially with stories like Facebook leaking triple digits millions of entire Facebook accounts to Cambridge Analytica, Equifax being hacked, etc.

            2 votes
            1. [2]
              aphoenix
              Link Parent
              That's the kicker right there. People will give up so much information about themselves for the sake of convenience. Hell, I know about it and it bugs me, but I still do it. Sure, phone, track...

              but I value my personal privacy, and I'm amazed that more people don't,

              That's the kicker right there.

              People will give up so much information about themselves for the sake of convenience. Hell, I know about it and it bugs me, but I still do it. Sure, phone, track everywhere I go and everything I do! That's wonderful. It's so convenient for me later on, and I enjoy being able to go back over my week retrospectively.

              Sure, I'll buy a google home and just let it listen to every single thing that I do. It's so convenient!

              And then I feel like I'm one of the smart ones. /shrug

              7 votes
              1. Bear
                Link Parent
                I'm right there with you. I think the difference is that we know exactly what we're giving up, and to whom. For example, as much as worrying about the evil things that Google might do is a thing...

                People will give up so much information about themselves for the sake of convenience. Hell, I know about it and it bugs me, but I still do it. Sure, phone, track everywhere I go and everything I do! That's wonderful. It's so convenient for me later on, and I enjoy being able to go back over my week retrospectively.

                Sure, I'll buy a google home and just let it listen to every single thing that I do. It's so convenient!

                And then I feel like I'm one of the smart ones. /shrug

                I'm right there with you.

                I think the difference is that we know exactly what we're giving up, and to whom.

                For example, as much as worrying about the evil things that Google might do is a thing for some people, for many years, they have had my data, and from my perspective, they've been good stewards of it.

                I too have a connected speaker (Echo), and I understand how it works on a technical level, so I know that listening to me 24/7 just isn't feasible. But that doesn't stop people from worrying, or cover Amazon server glitches.

                I also have a Google Home (original model) in the closet, and I'm waiting to see which is better.

                So far, I just love being able to address my devices as "Computer", since I'm a Star Trek fan. Plus, as a fun aside, the Echo devices are loaded with tons of pop culture reference easter eggs, Trek included. For example, if I say "Computer, how many lights are there?" it will say "There! Are! Four! Lights!". ;)

                1 vote
  6. autopsy_turvy
    Link
    TBH I'm down for a universal library that works like they said

    TBH I'm down for a universal library that works like they said

    1 vote
  7. Whom
    Link
    I guess it's time to be overly safe and have a backup for my Discord server on Slack for when people inevitably get pissed at Discord or when it eventually goes under. Just gives me some peace of...

    I guess it's time to be overly safe and have a backup for my Discord server on Slack for when people inevitably get pissed at Discord or when it eventually goes under. Just gives me some peace of mind, I wouldn't want to deal with trying to track everyone down and set up a backup after the fact.

    1 vote
  8. DeFaced
    Link
    I really don't want a launcher to launch more launchers to launch games. All I want is one simple interface with enough features for everything I need. I'm not going anywhere, I'm invested in...

    I really don't want a launcher to launch more launchers to launch games. All I want is one simple interface with enough features for everything I need. I'm not going anywhere, I'm invested in valve with two steam links a steam controller and I've setup a cat6 gigabit network in my home to accommodate for steam in home streaming. It's going to take a lot to move me away from steam.

    I wish them luck, but discord first Indies is super sketchy and anyone interested in this service should treat this as someone trying to invest in a "get rich quick" scheme because that's pretty much what this is, discord trying to make a quick buck off a niche market.

    1 vote