28
votes
Scientists document first-ever transmitted Alzheimer’s cases, tied to no-longer-used medical procedure
Link information
This data is scraped automatically and may be incorrect.
- Authors
- Andrew Joseph
- Published
- Jan 29 2024
- Word count
- 1396 words
This may represent a real problem for the care of people with Alzheimers. If the amyloid beta proteins are truly transmissible in a prion-like fashion it means that all equipment that comes into contact with the central nervous system must be viewed as contaminated and treated with the same caution used for equipment exposed to prions. All the medical devices used in procedures like brain surgeries, lumbar punctures, etc. will have to undergo the same handling and disposal procedures. This often involves outright destruction of the material as prions are simply too resistant to normal sterilization methods.
Very concerning, more investigation will have to be done.
Wouldn't it be fairly apparent if there were a link like this? I would expect for us to see higher rates of Alzheimers in certain cohorts, for instance women who undergo a C-section and receive spinal anesthesia. This article seems to only look at a very specific procedure which injected growth hormone from cadaver brains which was "prepared in a particular way — a method that doesn’t eliminate protein bits".
It's very hard to say if we would have noticed it before now. Neurosurgery is not a very common procedure, especially for young people, and the incubation times of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies can be extremely long. One documented case of kuru, a disease peculiar to Papua New Guinea, is suspected to have had an incubation time of 30 years, IIRC. So it is possible that transmissions were occurring, but not detected because by the time symptoms appeared the patients were of an appropriate age to be developing the disease naturally. Meanwhile, younger people exposed might have been at low enough numbers to be documented as the rare early-onset form of Alzheimers without arousing too much suspicion. Some procedures also might carry very low risk of transmission. In your example, women of childbearing age are extremely unlikely to have Alzheimers, so equipment used for procedures in that group probably carries a low risk.
As far as I know there has not been any large-scale systematic study into a link between AD and prior neurological procedures. I'll spend some time looking for one though, I could be wrong.
Not at all familliar with the subject but I vaguely recall reading fairly recently about fraudulent research related to Alzheimers. It might have been related to this:
https://www.science.org/content/article/potential-fabrication-research-images-threatens-key-theory-alzheimers-disease
If this research is based on the above it could be just downright wrong.
Having worked in the field, I can say that most experts view the amyloid-beta hypothesis as still quite strong, with lots of other data supporting it. i can't say if they're correct, by that is the prevailing sentiment. The fabrication here, while extremely problematic, is not the sole foundation of the hypothesis. This data primarily hinges on a single form of the A-beta oligomer while more recent data shows that a wide variety of oligomers are present in diseased brains, and that their interaction may be more important than individual effects. I still have lots to learn here though, so please take my opinions with a grain of salt.
Accidentally transferring bits of protein from one person's brain to another is bad. Fortunately they don't do that anymore. But the terrible consequences are scientifically interesting:
...
...
...
Here's the original study, for those who wish to read it: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-023-02729-2
This is absolutely bizarre and incredibly interesting. Prions are somewhat difficult to study and are more akin to cancer or viruses than bacteria or fungus. Prions technically aren't alive, yet they replicate and are incredibly pernicious.
This reminds me of an older article (published 2004) that I encountered years ago about the link between Alzheimer's, Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease, and BSE (a prion disease found in cattle, also known as mad cow disease):
You may be aware, but I wanted to highlight it in case you're not. That article was published in Medical Hypotheses, a journal which is not peer-reviewed and which exists specifically to showcase unconventional ideas. The author's claim that 13% of all Alzheimer's victims actually have CJD is not substantiated by references. More broadly, the author believes that a variety of pathologies generally considered distinct (Alzheimer's, cancer, autism, and COVID) are all linked to exposure to tuberculosis bacteria.
That, in and of itself, doesn't mean that the author is wrong, but I think it is important to recognize that his views are in stark contrast to the prevailing thought.
https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Lawrence-Broxmeyer-MD-2080782549
The author also doubts AIDS is caused by HIV and has suggested that vaccines cause autism.
Publications that should exist, but should exist far away from the public eye.
They think covid is linked to TB?
of those options, at least both Covid and TB can cause a cough... the others are even more unhinged...
I didn't want to be unnecessarily unkind, but the author thinks that nearly everything is caused by tuberculerotic mycobacteria. In addition to the four things I mentioned, the author has also suggested that AIDS, diabetes, and Ebola are actually caused by mycobacteria. I'm sure there are others.