2 votes

Mindful posting

5 comments

  1. skybrian
    Link
    From the article: [...] [...]

    From the article:

    It is important, for the preservation of American democracy and maybe the world, that the Democrats take the House and Senate in November.

    (If you don’t agree with me about this claim, I wrote a blog post about it here.)

    I recommend donating to high-value political candidates. But I want to bring to everyone’s attention an equally important thing they can do to improve Democrats’ chances in November: practice mindful posting.

    “Mindful posting” is making sure, whenever you post about American electoral politics, that you post only content that is going to persuade your American followers to vote for a Democrat in November.

    [...]

    I’m not saying that you should never despair, rage, guilt-trip strangers, or argue in favor of radical and unappealing changes. I myself have been known to harbor the occasional violent revenge fantasy about Elon Musk. But the appropriate audience for these sentiments is a group chat with fifty people who already agree with you, a locked social media account, or if you must Bluesky in December.

    It’s difficult to generalize about how to engage in mindful posting, because people’s followerships are different. If your followers are mostly evangelical Christians who vote straight-ticket Republican, you’re going to need different content than if your followers are mostly leftists who think Trump and Biden are indistinguishably evil. No advice I can give you will outperform thinking seriously about the undecided voters in your own audience.

    [...]

    My advice is to prioritize posting about health care, which has long been the Democrats’ best issue, as well as the economy. Israel/Palestine is one of Democrats’ best issues, but I’m not sure what the American public even understands Democrats’ position on Israel/Palestine to be, so maybe be cautious about that one. I would post about immigration carefully: brutal ICE raids on sympathetic targets yes, open borders and “No One Is Illegal On Stolen Land” no. I have no idea how to interpret the findings about AI but probably if you’re inclined to post a lot about AI your top concern isn’t whether Democrats win in November.

    I would recommend being positive about the Democrats. The Democrats are unpopular, just not as unpopular as Trump—which is a fragile position going into the midterms. In particular, when posting about corruption in Washington, I’d recommend listing off positive things about Democrats and not just the endless litany of Trump authoritarianism and crimes.

    For the love of God, please save being weird and offputting about the culture war until December. There will be plenty of time for trans people to freak the mundanes when we don’t have an aspiring dictator in the White House. For now, make like the 2010s gay rights movement: if you’re going to talk about trans rights, be wholesome and sympathetic.

    Of course, these are generalizations, and you know your own audience best. If most of your followers are libertarian, posting a lot about open borders and very little about healthcare might be exactly the right move. Maybe posting freaky shit about trans people will make you seem more credible to your leftist followers when you tell them to vote.

    3 votes
  2. unkz
    Link
    I suspect a lot of people on this site are going to be very offended by this post. I don’t entirely blame them. They are broadly correct, but I do think it’s a bit ironic that this post about how...

    I suspect a lot of people on this site are going to be very offended by this post. I don’t entirely blame them.

    They are broadly correct, but I do think it’s a bit ironic that this post about how to talk to the right wing is like a case study on how not to talk to the left though.

    3 votes
  3. [3]
    DefinitelyNotAFae
    Link
    This is eyerolling, and not really relevant to people who don't have "followers" but also I don't agree that the pivot to the center is the right move and think the case of left wing values can be...

    This is eyerolling, and not really relevant to people who don't have "followers" but also I don't agree that the pivot to the center is the right move and think the case of left wing values can be made better than they portray.

    As they're a queer trans person, I hear their "don't be weird" in a much different tone than I do from a number of folks. But I think that unless their audience also leans that way they're missing the mark and potentially pandering to the transphobes with that line. Idk them, so I can't really say.

    It just feels very unnecessary, and is just a post for other people who are also posting... Is that their audience? For a post about meeting your audience and persuading them, why make this public if it's for other substack authors? Maybe they're in a particularly unique space to reach folks due to their EA (more eyeroll) output. I doubt it though? They're a small blog.

    Meh about the whole thing.

    1 vote
    1. [2]
      hobbes64
      Link Parent
      Yeah. I think the advice is exactly the opposite of what is needed. A lot of people are swayed by popular opinion. If everyone is talking about how trump and republicans are evil dumbasses who...

      Yeah. I think the advice is exactly the opposite of what is needed.

      A lot of people are swayed by popular opinion. If everyone is talking about how trump and republicans are evil dumbasses who start wars and ruin the economy, then low info voters will hear that and be swayed about it.

      Haven't we been hearing for years how successful all the negative ads and demonizing of democrats has been for republicans? Why wouldn't the same voters respond the same way to demonizing of republicans.

      1. skybrian
        Link Parent
        This seems like a recommendation to keep posting the equivalent of negative ads? But with the audience in mind.

        I would post about immigration carefully: brutal ICE raids on sympathetic targets yes, open borders and “No One Is Illegal On Stolen Land” no.

        This seems like a recommendation to keep posting the equivalent of negative ads? But with the audience in mind.