10 votes

Weekly coronavirus-related chat, questions, and minor updates - week of December 28

This thread is posted weekly, and is intended as a place for more-casual discussion of the coronavirus and questions/updates that may not warrant their own dedicated topics. Tell us about what the situation is like where you live!

49 comments

  1. [4]
    dredmorbius
    Link
    I've been watching US data for any signs of a post-Thanksgiving surge and ... I'm not really seeing it. What there is are both: An ongoing case increase that had been well underway before...

    I've been watching US data for any signs of a post-Thanksgiving surge and ... I'm not really seeing it.

    What there is are both:

    • An ongoing case increase that had been well underway before Thanksgiving, notably in California. California's Rt was already decreasing by Thanksgiving (Nov 25).
    • An inverted horizontal sigmoid deviation in case and death data, almost certainly due to delays in testing and reporting. Counts first dipped, then climbed, then resumed (for the most part) their previous trend.

    This doesn't absolutely mean that there was no "Thanksgiving bump", and it's possible that there was a slight increase which will show up down the road. As it is though, daily new cases peaked on December 18 at 662/1million, and are now trending downwards. Canada follows a nearly identical trend, whilst the UK are moving sharply upward (still just below the US in incidence/million).

    Otherwise ... the thing about pandemics is that they're difficult to predict, behaviour is exceedingly dependent on human response, though viral behaviour (notably mutations, of which much recent discussion) and environment (seasonal changes, other variables) can also have effects. The North American Holiday Bump so far has, thankfully, been a bust.

    10 votes
    1. skybrian
      Link Parent
      Yes, it’s hard to see much of a Thanksgiving bump in the data. It’s too soon to say for Christmas. The holidays result in delays in most government reporting, and now there is another holiday...

      Yes, it’s hard to see much of a Thanksgiving bump in the data. It’s too soon to say for Christmas.

      The holidays result in delays in most government reporting, and now there is another holiday period. I’ve read that during holiday periods, only hospital data should be trusted. This graph looks very bad. One reason you can’t see a Thanksgiving bump in particular is that it keeps going up.

      Also it seems that a big increase in California is matched by a decline in the Midwest, so nationwide averages can be misleading.

      7 votes
    2. [2]
      jzimbel
      Link Parent
      Massachusetts had a noticeable bump in positive test rates shortly after Thanksgiving that's been more or less sustained since then. Latest daily /r/boston post Direct stats link page 1 Direct...

      Massachusetts had a noticeable bump in positive test rates shortly after Thanksgiving that's been more or less sustained since then.
      Latest daily /r/boston post
      Direct stats link page 1
      Direct stats link page 2

      I'm not excited to see what these charts look like in a week or two when we start to see the results of all the Christmas/New Year gatherings.

      6 votes
      1. dredmorbius
        Link Parent
        If you look at the Massachusets new daily case values from ~ Nov 20 to Dec 10, what you see is a continuation of existing trend, with the reporting sigmoid I mentioned: falling Thanksgiving week,...

        If you look at the Massachusets new daily case values from ~ Nov 20 to Dec 10, what you see is a continuation of existing trend, with the reporting sigmoid I mentioned: falling Thanksgiving week, rising the following week, but not persisting. Since the 10th, new reported cases fall, but that gets into any current data lags and possibly underreported cases. An actual increase in new cases tends to persist, as active cases are the source of new cases, possibly mitigated by harsher shutdowns. Shutdowns themselves take about two weeks to appear in data. Data artefacts --- delays in testing and reporting --- more typically describe what is being seen here. Holiday periods stand out very sharply in healthcare data generally as people tend to to, or not to be able to, seek out care, and that which is administered is not promptly reported. Unfortunately this makes holiday-induced infectious disease influences harder and slower to tease out of data.

        The real kicker is the Rt trend, which shows Massachusetts transmission decreasing through the Thanksgiving weekend, though it has potentially risen very slightly (1.05 to 1.08) in December. As those values are . 1.0, total new cases are still increasing, though fairly slowly.

        Contrast California and Vermont. Both have seen Rt . 1, in California begining 23 September and rising to 1.18 on November 16, and falling since, to just aabout spot on 1.0 now. California's tremendous run-up in cases resulted from that slight but prolonged trend which has been reversing through the holiday period. Having started with an already considerable active cases rate, the effects were huge. Vermont's Rt has been >1 since 16 August, rising as high as 1.33 (through 16 October), and falling since though still about 1.10. Vermonts daily cases have exploded ... but from a far lower level: 3 implied infections on 16 August, 14 on 16 October, and rising despite the falling Rt to 109 currently. (Absolute numbers, not thousands). That's a 33x increase. California's implied infections on 23 September were 3,530, today 17,354, much larger in absolute terms but less than a 6x increase. Vermont's trend if continued is the more troubling.

        With infectious disease, it is spread rate * time that is most critical, and is why higher doubling rates, even from a far lower initial infected population, are so concerning. The same applies to any exponential growth dynamic.

        It won't be until the 3rd or 4th week of January before the Christmas/New Years effects are evident.

        6 votes
  2. [2]
    Adys
    Link
    Another week, another reason to be pissed off at Belgium's increasingly incompetent handling of the pandemic. Coronavirus: Vaccinations set to begin in nursing homes, health workers in March...

    Another week, another reason to be pissed off at Belgium's increasingly incompetent handling of the pandemic.

    Coronavirus: Vaccinations set to begin in nursing homes, health workers in March

    MARCH.

    HEALTH WORKERS IN MARCH.

    NINE MONTHS TO PREPARE.

    Seriously, nine months to prepare, and they're acting like Edward Jenner just showed up two weeks ago.

    7 votes
    1. Adys
      Link Parent
      If you dig into why those numbers look bleak, you'll quickly understand that the problem is two-fold: We're not making the vaccines available in pharmacies. There should be as much personnel able...

      If you dig into why those numbers look bleak, you'll quickly understand that the problem is two-fold:

      1. We're not making the vaccines available in pharmacies. There should be as much personnel able to administer the shot as possible.
      2. We're not fucking taking this seriously. Israel wants a continuous 24/7 shift. They're aiming for 25% within a month. THAT is what it looks like to take it seriously.

      Back to Belgium. First, some population statistics:

      1. Belgium has a population of ~11.5 million. (source)
      2. Around 1.5 million are children 12 and under, who can be semi-safely ignored for immediate purposes of vaccination.
      3. Around 1.5 million are seniors above the age of 70.

      So, 1.5 million high priority vaccine targets, and another 8.5 million lower priority. We most likely want a penetration of ~80% in the high priority group (1.2m), and ~70% overall (7m, target source), which gives us 1.2 million high priority seniors to vaccinate (with some margin for health care personnel), and 7 million lower priority targets.

      Now, the Pfizer vaccine has special storage requirements, but that doesn't prevent it from being made available to pharmacies the day of (as it has to thaw anyway). But if we are just counting hospitals able to store it, there are 19 centres in Wallonia, 6 in brussels, and another 20 in flanders.

      Let's make some reasonable assumptions (or at least, reasonable expectations). A shot takes ~12 minutes to process end to end, including paperwork. So 5 patients per pipeline per hour. A single hospital, depending on its size, can handle a concurrent 5-10 patients for the shot, so let's be liberal and say 10. So we're able to vaccinate … 50 patients per hour per hospital, or 18000 per day in Belgium over an 8 hour day.

      That is… drumroll… 540k per month, or roughly the correct calculations the government has made to say "we're going to vaccinate health workers in March".

      I think it's reasonable to be pissed off at how unprepared the country is. These numbers suck ass. There are ~5k pharmacies in Belgium. If one tenth of those were able to distribute the vaccine, we would be done by March.

      Would it require money? Yes. Money we're losing as long as the lockdown continues.

      Would it require training? Yes. We had time to train.

      Would it require special logistical handling to distribute the Pfizer version? Yeah, THIS IS NOT NEW.

      Collecting the coronavirus vaccine from the pharmacist and having it administered by your general practitioner, like the flu vaccine now, could become a possibility in the future, as well.

      Fucking doy.

      5 votes
  3. [7]
    no_exit
    Link
    America's vaccine rollout is already a disaster [...]

    America's vaccine rollout is already a disaster

    How badly are we doing? In September, President Trump promised 100 million vaccinations by the end of the year. As a country, we have only 40 million doses, and had aimed, according to Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar, to vaccinate 20 million by year-end. That’s bad enough. But we have administered only 2 million of those — barely 10 percent of the goal. At this rate, achieving sufficient vaccination to reach herd immunity and bring the pandemic to a close in the U.S. will take about seven years. In Israel, they are vaccinating about one percent of the population each day, meaning the full program of population-wide vaccination will be done by this March.

    [...]

    Though refrigeration capacity varies from location to location, vaccines are only cleared for 30 days of storage in the most common units (including those in which they have been shipped). States have been rushing to build out their storage capacity, but have been warned of monthslong waits for ultracold freezers that could extend shelf life to about six months. That means that, in many places, this first batch of vaccine is set to expire in late January, around the time Joe Biden, who has been criticizing the rollout and promising to accelerate it, is set to take office.

    7 votes
    1. [5]
      skybrian
      Link Parent
      While disappointing, it seems like this could change rapidly? Bob Wachter tweeted that “@UCSF we started w/ ~600 people/day & will hit ~3x that next wk”. It would be good to know the overall rate...

      While disappointing, it seems like this could change rapidly? Bob Wachter tweeted that “@UCSF
      we started w/ ~600 people/day & will hit ~3x that next wk”.

      It would be good to know the overall rate of growth in vaccinations. This seems better than assuming a constant rate?

      3 votes
      1. [4]
        arghdos
        Link Parent
        One also hopes that the incoming administration has a more thought out distribution plan than the current approach of “let the states undergoing various levels of budget crisis plan and fund the...

        One also prays to literally every diety ever concocted by mankind hopes that the incoming administration has a more thought out distribution plan than the current approach of “let the states undergoing various levels of budget crisis plan and fund the vaccination roll out “. Jan. 20th can’t come soon enough if for no other reason than the change in pandemic management, although obviously the change will not be instantaneous (and may have been further delayed by the current administration’s intransigence...)

        But words can’t describe how depressing it will be if/when some non-trivial percentage of this initial wave of vaccines expires unused.

        Rant It’s so stereotypically American to partake in the largest worldwide scientific outpouring of all time to create a miracle vaccine, only to fail because we can’t figure out how to efficiently distribute it over our fractured health systems (not to mention the last decade of underfunded rural hospital closures). I can’t wait for members of Congress to start calling for elimination of public health funding for the pandemic because “the vaccine is available.” (satire, I fucking pray).
        4 votes
        1. [3]
          skybrian
          Link Parent
          I'm reading stories about why there are delays and not really getting it. It seems like at a hospital or nursing home level, they should already have the management and staff to give a shot. Why...

          I'm reading stories about why there are delays and not really getting it. It seems like at a hospital or nursing home level, they should already have the management and staff to give a shot. Why shouldn't a decentralized approach work?

          3 votes
          1. [2]
            vektor
            Link Parent
            Probably logistics. Storage, transportation, etc. is inconvenient. This vaccine doesn't come in single-dose vials that you chuck in a fridge, they come in vials that contain many doses that need...

            Probably logistics. Storage, transportation, etc. is inconvenient. This vaccine doesn't come in single-dose vials that you chuck in a fridge, they come in vials that contain many doses that need to be stored at -70°C for long-term storage and needs to be at fridge-temp for administration. But it can't be refrozen, so you have to administer the entire vial of 100 doses in a day.* Particularly for smaller hospitals in lower-density areas, this is hard to do if you also have conditions like wanting to vaccinate the risk groups first.

            *Details here might vary, these are just some of the concerns I've heard.

            3 votes
            1. Omnicrola
              Link Parent
              Each vial contains 5 doses, however they are deliberately overfilled to compensate for normal waste, and it's sometimes possible to get 6 or 7.

              Each vial contains 5 doses, however they are deliberately overfilled to compensate for normal waste, and it's sometimes possible to get 6 or 7.

              2 votes
    2. Akir
      Link Parent
      I'm arguably an "essential worker" and so should be able to get my vaccine relatively early, but with the way it's been going I am honestly thinking it's more likely that I'll be able to import...

      I'm arguably an "essential worker" and so should be able to get my vaccine relatively early, but with the way it's been going I am honestly thinking it's more likely that I'll be able to import the UK vaccine before that happens.

      1 vote
  4. Deimos
    Link
    Last week, I posted about the TSA saying that on December 23 they screened the highest number of airline passengers since March. This page on the TSA's site shows their daily numbers, and they set...

    Last week, I posted about the TSA saying that on December 23 they screened the highest number of airline passengers since March.

    This page on the TSA's site shows their daily numbers, and they set another record on December 27. Other than December 24th and 25th they've been in the area of 1 million - 1.2 million every day since a week before Christmas. That's still only about half of what their volume was at this time last year, but that's still a lot of people flying. The volume has been closer to 25% for most of the year.

    6 votes
  5. Deimos
    Link
    Incoming US House representative Luke Letlow (Louisiana, Republican) died at 41 from COVID-19 complications. He was supposed to be sworn in this Sunday, as the youngest rep in the state. A doctor...

    Incoming US House representative Luke Letlow (Louisiana, Republican) died at 41 from COVID-19 complications. He was supposed to be sworn in this Sunday, as the youngest rep in the state. A doctor from the hospital was very specific that his death was caused by COVID, and that it's absolutely not a situation like, "oh, he died from something else entirely, but because he tested positive they blame it on COVID":

    Asked if Letlow had any underlying conditions that would have made his death more likely, Ghali said in a text message, "none. All COVID related."

    6 votes
  6. [2]
    Ellimist
    Link
    I received the first shot of the Moderna vaccine on the 31st. As a 911 dispatcher, I qualified as a first responder(Texas being one of the few states that recognize dispatchers as first...

    I received the first shot of the Moderna vaccine on the 31st. As a 911 dispatcher, I qualified as a first responder(Texas being one of the few states that recognize dispatchers as first responders).

    The overall process was extremely smooth.

    Three lines of vehicles lined up outside of the building where the shot was being given. As people got the shot and moved on, people left their vehicles where they were, ran inside, got the shot, and then went back to their vehicles where they relocated to another part of the parking lot to wait 15 minutes for reactions. An ambulance with two paramedics was waiting close by. If anyone had a reaction, all they had to do was honk their car horn and the medics would come check them out.

    I was in and out in less than 30 mins, including the 15 mins waiting time

    So far, I can't say I've had any real negative side effects. A slightly sore arm is about the extent of it. Although I have been told that it's after the second shot that any side effects are likely to kick in.

    6 votes
    1. Omnicrola
      Link Parent
      Congratulations, and thank you for the work that you do.

      Congratulations, and thank you for the work that you do.

      4 votes
  7. [7]
    spit-evil-olive-tips
    Link
    Why getting COVID-19 vaccines to rural Americans is harder than it looks, and how to lift the barriers And a similar story in the Washington Post: Why a Michigan doctor is driving coronavirus...

    Why getting COVID-19 vaccines to rural Americans is harder than it looks, and how to lift the barriers

    The current vaccines’ cold storage requirements and shipping rules mean many rural hospitals can’t serve as vaccination distribution hubs. That can leave rural residents – about 20% of the U.S. population in all – traveling long distances, if they’re able to travel at all.

    Getting the word to rural residents about when they can be vaccinated isn’t easy either, and the extraordinary amount of misinformation downplaying the risk of the coronavirus this past year has had an impact on rural residents’ willingness to get the vaccine.

    We work in rural health care settings and have been examining the barriers to health care for these patients to find ways to ensure health and safety.

    And a similar story in the Washington Post:

    Why a Michigan doctor is driving coronavirus vaccines from hospital to hospital in his Honda pickup truck

    5 votes
    1. [6]
      skybrian
      Link Parent
      I still don’t understand why it’s hard. It seems like it should be possible to reach community health centers with iceboxes, dry ice, and and a lot of driving? It shouldn’t be hard to hire people...

      I still don’t understand why it’s hard. It seems like it should be possible to reach community health centers with iceboxes, dry ice, and and a lot of driving? It shouldn’t be hard to hire people or even recruit volunteer drivers to help with an important cause like this. Businesses that do a lot of shipping might help too.

      3 votes
      1. [5]
        spit-evil-olive-tips
        Link Parent
        I think there's a couple factors behind it. One is that the response at the federal level in the US continues to be a fucking joke. So each state is probably being left to figure it out on their...

        I think there's a couple factors behind it.

        One is that the response at the federal level in the US continues to be a fucking joke. So each state is probably being left to figure it out on their own.

        In a sane world, we'd have a team of smart people in the federal government, working solely on the problem of rural vaccine delivery, and coordinating with rural health centers in all 50 states about best practices and resources etc. I seriously doubt the Trump administration has a team like that as part of their Covid task force.

        Another factor is that no one is willing to gamble with wasting doses due to logistics fuckups. The Pfizer vaccine, for example, is shipped in units of 975 doses. If there's a snowstorm, or a truck broken down in the middle of nowhere, or a dry ice shipment never arrives, or whatever, you risk losing that entire batch.

        Or, if you hold a mass-vaccination drive at some rural health center, you might have less than 1000 people show up due to vaccine misinformation, and end up wasting part of the batch.

        And the whole thing needs to be done all over again 4ish weeks later, including making sure all the people who got the first dose show up for the second one.

        Again, imagining a fantasy world with a well-functioning US federal government, the thing you'd want to do is do trial runs in maybe 4-6 rural counties around the US, have actual experts in public health and logistics weighing in and observing, and then distill what they learned into a guide they could send to every county in the US. And again...I sorta doubt that's happening right now, or will happen before February.

        8 votes
        1. [4]
          skybrian
          Link Parent
          Some kind of appointment system, along with a few extra people on standby from slightly further down the priority list, should be enough to make sure someone gets vaccinated. I don't know why we...

          Some kind of appointment system, along with a few extra people on standby from slightly further down the priority list, should be enough to make sure someone gets vaccinated.

          I don't know why we worry about people getting the second dose. I don't expect to get a chance to get the vaccine for quite a while, but when I do get a chance, I am going to cancel the second appointment, because I think it's unethical to get a second dose when other people didn't even get their first dose.

          Like, if you had a chance to get vaccinated, and you could give one dose to your spouse, wouldn't you do it?

          I would guess they are too rule-bound to do anything other than follow the official schedule, but shouldn't be so rule-bound that they're not willing to "look the other way" or cut corners when people decide to do the right thing.

          1 vote
          1. [3]
            MimicSquid
            Link Parent
            My understanding is that you need both injections to be properly vaccinated. Is that not the case?

            My understanding is that you need both injections to be properly vaccinated. Is that not the case?

            4 votes
            1. skybrian
              (edited )
              Link Parent
              Yes, that is officially how they are doing it, because it's the same way the trials were run and we don't know for sure whether immunity from just one dose would wear off. However, there is a big...

              Yes, that is officially how they are doing it, because it's the same way the trials were run and we don't know for sure whether immunity from just one dose would wear off.

              However, there is a big debate going on. It sure looks like people get immunity within 14 days of the first dose. Here are two commonly reshared graphs from the trials. Here is Zeynep Tufekci making a respectable argument for this.

              Unfortunately, it looks unlikely that anyone is going to do a scientific study to prove whether one dose is enough.

              So it's an educated guess. Our risk is low anyway because we are early-retired and don't go out much, so I'm comfortable with that risk for myself.

              It really sucks that nobody is going to find out for sure whether our limited supply of vaccines can be stretched to twice as many people. But hey, at this point, what's another 100,000 deaths?

              2 votes
            2. spit-evil-olive-tips
              Link Parent
              There's early evidence that just one dose is effective, but somewhat less effective than two doses: I think it's entirely possible that by the time I get vaccinated (I'm in 0 high-risk groups, so...

              There's early evidence that just one dose is effective, but somewhat less effective than two doses:

              Moderna actually collected data from people who only received one dose of its vaccine, Gill says. Some 2,000 participants in Moderna’s phase three clinical trial received just a single injection of either a placebo or the vaccine. In that population, the efficacy of the single vaccine dose was roughly 80 to 90%.

              I think it's entirely possible that by the time I get vaccinated (I'm in 0 high-risk groups, so my current estimate is a 50/50 chance I can get vaccinated in the first half of 2021) we'll have more data and based on that the medical guidance might be reduced to only a single dose. But I'm also hoping by that time, vaccine logistics are fairly well sorted out, and by getting a second dose I won't be taking one away from someone else in a zero-sum way.

              It's also possible, AFAIK, that we could end up with some sort of "2 doses for healthcare workers and high-risk groups, 1 dose for general herd immunity" tiered system. Right now everyone who's getting vaccinated is in the high-priority groups, so getting the second dose for full ~95% immunity makes sense (especially with the more infectious strain spreading like wildfire right now). That might change as it rolls out to more people.

              Personally, I'm going to follow the advice of the doctor or pharmacist giving it to me. If they say 1 dose, I'll be fine with that. If they say come back in a month, I'll be fine with that too.

              2 votes
  8. [4]
    spit-evil-olive-tips
    (edited )
    Link
    Tweet thread from Trevor Bedford, professor at UW and Fred Hutch here in Seattle and one of the experts I've been following since the very beginning of the pandemic:

    Tweet thread from Trevor Bedford, professor at UW and Fred Hutch here in Seattle and one of the experts I've been following since the very beginning of the pandemic:

    With data that has emerged in the last week, I'm now 80-90% convinced that infections by the UK variant virus ... are more transmissible.

    5 votes
  9. skybrian
    Link
    L.A. County hospitals turn away ambulances, put patients in gift shop: ‘I’ve never seen anything like this’ [...] [...]

    L.A. County hospitals turn away ambulances, put patients in gift shop: ‘I’ve never seen anything like this’

    The crisis at Los Angeles County hospitals hit new levels as patients continued to stream in during the holiday weekend, and the medical system is bracing for a new wave of coronavirus spread arising from Christmas travel and gatherings. L.A. County’s cumulative COVID-19 death toll is expected to climb past 10,000 this week.

    Hospitals are so inundated that they’ve resorted to placing patients in conference rooms and gift shops. But even so, many facilities are running out of space. Virtually all hospitals in L.A. County are being forced to divert ambulances with certain types of patients elsewhere during most hours. On Sunday, 94% of L.A. County hospitals that take in patients stemming from 911 calls were diverting some ambulances away.

    “But soon, there won’t be any places for these ambulances to go,” said Dr. Christina Ghaly, the L.A. County health services director. “If every hospital is on diversion, then no hospital is on diversion.”

    [...]

    Kaiser Permanente is postponing nonurgent and elective surgeries and procedures at its facilities throughout California. The pause will remain in effect through Jan. 10 in Kaiser’s Southern California region and through Jan. 4 in Northern California, according to statements from the healthcare consortium. In Southern California, Kaiser is not scheduling any new elective surgeries through January.

    [...]

    “If there is a Christmas surge, we probably have not experienced it yet,” Spellberg said, noting that cases arising from that holiday may not show up for another week or two.

    5 votes
  10. [2]
    spit-evil-olive-tips
    Link
    South Africa hits 1 million coronavirus cases as new variant spreads rapidly

    South Africa hits 1 million coronavirus cases as new variant spreads rapidly

    The country’s new variant of the coronavirus, 501.V2, is more contagious and has quickly become dominant in many areas of the resurgence, according to experts.

    The warning came as South Korea became the latest country to detect cases of the Covid variant that is believed to have originated in the UK.

    4 votes
    1. skybrian
      Link Parent
      South Africa imposes strict new rules as it surpasses 1 million covid-19 cases [Reposted in the right place.]

      South Africa imposes strict new rules as it surpasses 1 million covid-19 cases

      In an emotional address Monday night, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa reintroduced bans on public gatherings and alcohol sales, made mask-wearing required in public and lengthened a curfew as a second wave of coronavirus cases sweeps Africa's worst-hit country at "an alarming and unprecedented rate."

      Earlier this month, South African scientists discovered a new variant of the coronavirus, similar to one found in Britain. Ramaphosa said it was “well established” throughout the country at this point. Testing positivity rates have soared above 30 percent nationwide, up from just 5 percent two weeks ago.

      Cases of the South African variant have also been found in Britain, Finland and Switzerland, but Ramaphosa did not close the country’s borders as he had during its first wave.

      Only a handful of countries have banned travel from South Africa. South Africa’s health ministry pushed back against assertions that its new variant is more dangerous than Britain’s, saying there was “no evidence” to support that claim.

      [Reposted in the right place.]

      4 votes
  11. skybrian
    Link
    Israel zooms past 1 million vaccinations in sprint to vanquish pandemic [...]

    Israel zooms past 1 million vaccinations in sprint to vanquish pandemic

    The Jewish state has so far greatly outpaced other countries, per capita, with 11.55% of the population inoculated, according to statistics from the Our World in Data website operated by Oxford University. Second place is held by Bahrain with 3.45%, followed by the UK with 1.39% (though the latter’s data is a few days old). The US stands at 0.84%. The world average is 0.13%.

    Israel is currently in its third nationwide lockdown to contain the outbreak. It has reported more than 426,000 cases and at least 3,338 deaths since the pandemic began.

    [...]

    Israel started vaccinating on December 20, with a focus on healthcare workers and then on those over 60 and at-risk sectors.

    Its globe-leading vaccination drive has been attributed to various factors, including its relatively small but densely packed population and highly professional, community-integrated health services.

    4 votes
  12. skybrian
    Link
    43 San Jose Kaiser Staff Members Test Positive in COVID Outbreak [...] [...]

    43 San Jose Kaiser Staff Members Test Positive in COVID Outbreak

    The hospital is investigating whether an incident in which a staff member appeared briefly in the emergency department on Christmas Day wearing an air-powered costume with a fan may have led to air droplets being spread around the hospital.

    [...]

    The hospital is working to quickly test all emergency department employees and doctors for the virus, and anyone who tests positive or who has symptoms will quarantine per Centers for Disease Control guidelines, hospital officials said.

    [...]

    Kaiser said some of the healthcare workers infected had received their first dose of the COVID vaccine, but they would not have been expected to reach immunity when the exposure occurred.

    4 votes
  13. [3]
    monarda
    Link
    Are you eligible for a COVID-19 vaccine? Washington state to launch tool, rely on honor system

    Are you eligible for a COVID-19 vaccine? Washington state to launch tool, rely on honor system

    Washington state will rely on an honor system to determine eligibility for COVID-19 vaccinations, so those administering vaccines do not have to police who qualifies.

    4 votes
    1. [2]
      spit-evil-olive-tips
      (edited )
      Link Parent
      I'm a Washington state resident and I think this is fucking fantastic. For an example of the opposite strategy: $1 million fines, licenses in peril for COVID-19 vaccine fraud in NY Pharmacists and...

      I'm a Washington state resident and I think this is fucking fantastic.

      For an example of the opposite strategy: $1 million fines, licenses in peril for COVID-19 vaccine fraud in NY

      Pharmacists and doctors have enough to worry about right now without having to exhaustively check the documentation of everyone they vaccinate, and worrying about huge fines or losing their license if they get duped.

      People will inevitably cheat and skip the line. Oh well. They're still getting vaccinated. Out of all the undesirable outcomes, I'd prefer 100 people getting vaccinated who don't "deserve" it over 1 single dose of wasted vaccine, as we've seen in many other states.

      7 votes
      1. monarda
        Link Parent
        You summed up my thoughts on the matter perfectly. I'm also a Washington state resident and in general have been proud of our states response to the pandemic.

        You summed up my thoughts on the matter perfectly. I'm also a Washington state resident and in general have been proud of our states response to the pandemic.

        4 votes
  14. [2]
    skybrian
    Link
    Some healthcare workers refuse to take COVID-19 vaccine, even with priority access [...] [...] [...]

    Some healthcare workers refuse to take COVID-19 vaccine, even with priority access

    At St. Elizabeth Community Hospital in Tehama County, fewer than half of the 700 hospital workers eligible for the vaccine were willing to take the shot when it was first offered. At Providence Holy Cross Medical Center in Mission Hills, one in five frontline nurses and doctors have declined the shot. Roughly 20% to 40% of L.A. County’s frontline workers who were offered the vaccine did the same, according to county public health officials.

    [...]

    A recent survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 29% of healthcare workers were “vaccine hesitant,” a figure slightly higher than the percentage of the general population, 27%.

    [...]

    At Laguna Honda Hospital in San Francisco, about 10% of the nursing staff has opted out of the vaccine, said spokeswoman Zoe Harris.

    [...]

    It’s unclear what happens when a hospital ends up with extra doses. State guidance allows hospitals to offer the vaccine to lower-priority people if frontline workers have already been offered the vaccine.

    In Tehama County, unused doses at hospitals are being distributed to the next group of people who are eligible: staff and residents of assisted living and skilled nursing facilities.

    3 votes
    1. pvik
      Link Parent
      I think these quotes are equally important, as I was trying to figure out why this would be the case: Seems like a combination of lack of trust in the government and the vaccine seems to be the...

      I think these quotes are equally important, as I was trying to figure out why this would be the case:

      April Lu, a 31-year-old nurse at Providence Holy Cross Medical Center, said she refused to take the vaccine because she was not convinced it was safe for pregnant women. She is six months pregnant.

      Clinical trials have yet to be conducted on pregnant women who take the vaccine, but experts believe the vaccine is unlikely to pose a specific risk, according to the Centers for Disease Control. The agency says pregnant women may choose to be vaccinated.

      Respondents to the Kaiser Family Foundation survey who said they probably wouldn’t get the vaccine said they worried about side effects; they lacked trust in the government to ensure the vaccines were safe; they had concerns about the role of politics in the development of the vaccines; or they believed the dangers of COVID-19 had been exaggerated.

      In online forums, some healthcare workers throughout the country have expressed frustration over going first — a status some have associated with experimentation.

      Seems like a combination of lack of trust in the government and the vaccine seems to be the case largely along with fear of uncertainty of what the long-term effects (if any) may be.

      It is also weird to see "...; or they believed the dangers of COVID-19 had been exaggerated." come from healthcare workers at this stage of the pandemic.

      6 votes
  15. [3]
    skybrian
    Link
    Zeynep Tufekci: The Mutated Virus Is a Ticking Time Bomb [...]

    Zeynep Tufekci: The Mutated Virus Is a Ticking Time Bomb

    We are in a race against time, and the virus appears to be gaining an unfortunate ability to sprint just as we get closer to the finish line. Although the initial rollout of the vaccines has been slow, it is expected to increase rapidly. The U.S. may have 50 million to 100 million people vaccinated as early as March. That is a huge difference, one that could save many lives, especially since we also have perhaps that many people with some degree of postinfection immunity.

    [...]

    All this means that the speed of the vaccine rollout is of enormous importance. There are already worrisome indicators of slow rollout. Vaccination of a broad population, not vaccines in and of themselves, saves lives, and epidemics are fought with logistics and infrastructure. We should put every bit of energy, funding, and relentlessness into vaccinating as many people as possible as quickly as possible.

    Meanwhile, the United States was reportedly planning to hold back half the vaccine it has in freezers as a hedge against supply-chain issues, and some states may be slowed down by murky prioritization plans. Scott Gottlieb—the former FDA chief and a current board member of Pfizer—has argued that the U.S. should also go ahead with vaccinating as many people as possible right now and trust that the supply chain will be there for the booster. Researchers in Canada—where some provinces decided to vaccinate now as much as possible without holding half in reserve, and will administer the booster with future supplies—estimate that this type of front-loading can help “avert between 34 and 42 per cent more symptomatic coronavirus infections, compared with a strategy of keeping half the shipments in reserve.” (Note that this strategy, which is different from the one the United Kingdom just announced it will adopt in prioritizing the first dose, does not even necessarily involve explicitly changing booster timing protocols in order to maximize vaccination now; it just means not waiting to get shots into arms when the vaccines are currently available.) These were already important conversations to have, but given the threat posed by this new variant, they are even more urgent.

    3 votes
    1. [2]
      skybrian
      Link Parent
      Covid variant found in Florida; more cases identified in California [...]

      Covid variant found in Florida; more cases identified in California

      The variant has been found in other countries, including Canada, where cases have been reported in Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta and Quebec, according to Canada's chief public health officer.

      [...]

      The California case announced Wednesday in San Diego County involved a 30-year-old man, also with no history of travel. The three new cases were all men, two in their 40s and one in his 50s, and none had known contact with one another or the first case, the county said.

      "The discovery of the additional cases leads County Health Officials to believe that the new strain of the virus is widespread in the community," the county said in a statement.

      3 votes
      1. DanBC
        Link Parent
        I don't think people fully appreciate how serious B117 variant is. It doesn't appear to be more lethal, but it is considerably more infectious....

        I don't think people fully appreciate how serious B117 variant is. It doesn't appear to be more lethal, but it is considerably more infectious. https://twitter.com/dgurdasani1/status/1344774555718590464

        2 votes
  16. skybrian
    Link
    Dozens of residents die at Belgian care home after Santa visit

    Dozens of residents die at Belgian care home after Santa visit

    The outbreak followed a visit on 5 December by volunteers dressed as Saint Nicholas and his helper Zwarte Piet, organised by the nursing home’s management. The white-bearded, red-robed figure of Saint Nicholas, or Sinterklaas, brings gifts to Belgians every 6 December.

    But within days, residents had displayed symptoms of coronavirus. Twenty six have since died and 85 more have tested positive for coronavirus, along with 40 staff.

    3 votes
  17. skybrian
    Link
    L.A. homeless sites ‘overwhelmed’ by COVID-19: ‘These are the toughest times’ [...]

    L.A. homeless sites ‘overwhelmed’ by COVID-19: ‘These are the toughest times’

    Though infections among the homeless have generally lagged slightly below the county’s per capita rate, belying early predictions of devastating outbreaks in shelters and encampments, the December surge has brought a spike in the homeless numbers as well, further straining the overstretched services system.

    After averaging about 60 new cases each week through the fall, infections of homeless people doubled in the week after Thanksgiving and have since continued to climb sharply. On Tuesday, the Department of Public Health’s latest report showed 547 new cases in the previous week.

    “The unexplainable protection that people who are homeless have had from COVID is disappearing,” Bales said. “All of skid row and many agencies/missions are hot spots. All are overwhelmed.”

    [...]

    To keep up with the upsurge in cases, the agency opened four new isolation/quarantine sites in December, more than doubling the available beds.

    The rapid response was partly assisted by the state’s Project Homekey program through which the county has purchased 10 motels and hotels for homeless housing. Most are being used as interim housing before being converted into permanent homes. Two have been converted temporarily into medical isolation/quarantine sites.

    A third site was set up in a motel that was phased out of Project Roomkey, the program to house medically vulnerable homeless people during the pandemic. A nonprofit provided the fourth site on a property it had acquired for a future project.

    3 votes
  18. [3]
    skybrian
    Link
    U.K. Delays Second Covid-19 Vaccine Dose as Europe Ponders How to Speed Up Immunization [...] [...]

    U.K. Delays Second Covid-19 Vaccine Dose as Europe Ponders How to Speed Up Immunization

    The U.K. will focus on giving as many people as possible a first dose of a coronavirus vaccine, even if this delays administering a second one, the government said Tuesday, despite a lack of data about the extent of the immunity conferred by a single dose.

    The news comes as scientists in Europe are debating whether recipients should be given one dose instead of two given the scarcity of the vaccine, the difficulties in fending off a winter surge in infections, and a rapidly mounting death toll.

    The problem: While scientists say a single dose may well confer sufficient immunity to stop the spread of the virus, there isn’t sufficient data confirming this because the clinical trials for available vaccines and those nearing authorizations were all designed around a two-dose regimen.

    Britain, which is coming under severe strain amid the spread of a new, more infectious variant of the virus, is the first European government to change its policy. It stressed that vaccine recipients would still get a second dose, just three months later than planned.

    [...]

    A vaccine made by Pfizer Inc. and BioNTech SE was the first to be authorized in the West. It is now being unrolled globally after emergency authorizations by various regulators on the basis of a successful months-long trial that involved giving two shots to more than 20,000 volunteers. The second injection was administered 21 days after the first.

    While the trial data shows that the vaccine conferred immunity to over 50% of the participants after the first dose, marketing only one shot would require a new study in which only one dose would be administered to another set of volunteers, said BioNTech Chief Executive Uğur Şahin.

    “It could be that the next generation of the vaccine consists of simply one dose,” Dr. Sahin said.

    [...]

    A vaccine developed by Moderna Inc., which was authorized in the U.S. and could be given a green light by the European Union regulator in January, also consists of two doses. A third vaccine, developed by Oxford University and AstraZeneca PLC and authorized by the U.K. Wednesday, similarly has two doses.

    Advocates of a one-dose approach say this might be the only way to vaccinate enough people to avoid another big surge in infections next winter, because of the limited availability.

    2 votes
    1. skybrian
      Link Parent
      Here is the official justification for why the UK is doing this: Optimising the COVID-19 vaccination programme for maximum short-term impact [...] Also, a Twitter thread by a virologist supporting...

      Here is the official justification for why the UK is doing this:

      Optimising the COVID-19 vaccination programme for maximum short-term impact

      • Short term vaccine efficacy from the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is calculated at around 90%, short term vaccine efficacy from the first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine is calculated at around 70% (efficacy estimates are not directly comparable between the two vaccines)

      • Given the high level of protection afforded by the first dose, models suggest that initially vaccinating a greater number of people with a single dose will prevent more deaths and hospitalisations than vaccinating a smaller number of people with two doses

      • The second dose is still important to provide longer lasting protection and is expected to be as or more effective when delivered at an interval of 12 weeks from the first dose

      [...]

      With most vaccines an extended interval between the prime and booster doses leads to a better immune response to the booster dose. There is evidence that a longer interval between the first and second doses promotes a stronger immune response with the AstraZeneca vaccine.

      There is currently no strong evidence to expect that the immune response from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine would differ substantially from the AstraZeneca and Moderna vaccines.

      Also, a Twitter thread by a virologist supporting the decision.

      It's a judgment call. On one hand is evidence-based medicine's scepticism of anything not directly proven 'beyond reasonable doubt' in an RCT; on the other is a 'balance of probabilities' approach based upon the biology.

      Based upon the biology, I'd eat my hat if the Pfizer vaccine is substantially less effective with a longer dose interval. Most vaccines induce stronger immune responses with longer intervals. A couple of examples below. There are more.

      4 votes
    2. skybrian
      Link Parent
      Doctors criticize UK health officials for changing Pfizer Covid vaccine plan [...] [...]

      Doctors criticize UK health officials for changing Pfizer Covid vaccine plan

      U.K. health regulators on Wednesday said they would prioritize giving as many people their first dose of vaccine as quickly as possible, which could delay providing those who have already been inoculated their second dose by up to 12 weeks. Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine, which it developed with BioNTech, recommends administering the second shot three weeks after the initial dose.

      [...]

      "We have real and grave concerns about these sudden changes to the Pfizer vaccine regime," the Doctors' Association UK, a non-profit advocacy group of volunteer medical professionals, said in a tweet Thursday. "It undermines the consent process, as well as completely failing to follow the science."

      [...]

      Pfizer pushed back on the U.K.'s decision in a statement to CNBC on Thursday, however, saying its large clinical trials tested a 21-day interval. Two doses administered three weeks apart were shown in clinical trials to provide maximum effectiveness, the company said.

      3 votes
  19. skybrian
    Link
    A Continent Where the Dead Are Not Counted [...] [...] [...]

    A Continent Where the Dead Are Not Counted

    In 2017, only 10 percent of deaths were registered in Nigeria, by far Africa’s biggest country by population — down from 13.5 percent a decade before. In other African countries, like Niger, the percentage is even lower.

    [...]

    The United Nations Statistics Division collects vital statistics from around the world. In North and most of South America, Europe and Oceania, it says at least 90 percent of deaths are registered. In Asia, coverage is patchier.

    But for most African countries, the United Nations has no death data at all.

    [...]

    Half a dozen coffin carpenters and funeral directors on Odunlami Street said they had noticed that business was particularly brisk in June and July.

    “The mortuaries were jam-packed,” said Tope Akindeko, manager of Peak Caskets, leaning on a coffin decorated with gilded reproductions of the Last Supper. The coffins he sold then were rough, cheap models, he said, while expensive American-made steel ones shipped in from Batesville, Ind., stayed on the shelves.

    Could it have been a spike in Covid-19 deaths? Or perhaps a backlog of funerals, after two months of lockdown in Lagos? Because few deaths are registered, it was hard to tell.

    [...]

    [R]esearchers have just declared that there was a huge, hidden outbreak in the capital of Sudan. In the absence of a good death registration system, they used a molecular and serological survey and an online one distributed on Facebook, where people reported their symptoms and whether they’d had a test. The researchers calculated that Covid-19 killed 16,000 more people than the 477 deaths confirmed by mid-November in Khartoum, which has a population roughly the size of Wisconsin’s.

    Khartoum is only one city in a vast, diverse continent with a variety of approaches to fighting the pandemic. But several factors that the researchers cited for why the Covid-19 caseload might be vastly underreported — stigma, people unable to get tested, the fact that the threshold for reacting to any disease is high — are true in many African countries.

    1 vote
  20. skybrian
    Link
    The Worst Of COVID-19 Should Be Over For Manaus, Brazil. But It's Not Here is a graph on Twitter.

    The Worst Of COVID-19 Should Be Over For Manaus, Brazil. But It's Not

    In Brazil's jungle metropolis of Manaus, nurse Francinete Simões thought she had seen the last COVID-19 death at the urgent care center where she works in July. Hospitals finally had space to take critical patients again after a violent initial wave of the virus left many of the city's dead in mass graves.

    But in recent weeks, Simões says, hospitals are "filling up, and I'm seeing people die again." The state government has now ordered non-essential businesses to close between December 26 and January 10 as a virus containment measure for this city of 2.2 million.

    Here is a graph on Twitter.