-
40 votes
-
Email provider recommendations? (Privacy-focused, paid-for)
I have self-hosted my email for many years, but am finally encountering some straws that may be breaking the camel's back. A few email providers are now rejecting my server's mail, Microsoft in...
I have self-hosted my email for many years, but am finally encountering some straws that may be breaking the camel's back. A few email providers are now rejecting my server's mail, Microsoft in particular (
@
hotmail,@
outlook). (In case you're wondering, I already set up SPF, DKIM, DMARC, etc. and none of that is the issue.) Self-hosting was fine, and the technical admin work was never really an issue. I'm just tired of the external factors that are beyond my control, like belonging to an IP range that is scored badly by some random blocklist company.So, I'm now shopping for a good email provider. Privacy and security are important to me, and I am more than willing to pay for email, so all the usual "free" email providers are out of the question. (Update) Also, client access (IMAP, SMTP) is a must.
For now, I am eyeing
Proton is looking to be my choice among those two, as I like the replyable email aliases feature. 16 times the storage doesn't hurt, either.
Any other recommendations in the same vein as these two, and in the same price range?
35 votes -
You should connect to Tor via a VPN, actually
21 votes -
We and our 756 partners process personal data to
29 votes -
Privacy is priceless, but Signal is expensive
74 votes -
Norway's privacy battle with Meta is just getting started – regulator says it's investigating the company's new ad-free subscription services
28 votes -
Privacy win: EU Parliament decides that your private messages must not be scanned
34 votes -
No more phone number swaps: Signal messaging app now testing usernames
46 votes -
AI cameras took over one small American town. Now they're everywhere
30 votes -
On GoGuardian and invasion of student privacy
24 votes -
Trial testimony - Google considered and rejected creating a form of search that doesn't track users history from website to website
14 votes -
YouTube anti-adblock detection is illegal in the EU
77 votes -
Mozilla’s Annual Consumer Creep-O-Meter
52 votes -
Is there a reason the iPad pro "scans" your house every minute?
My wife has an ipad pro, and we have a baby monitor. So I was watching the baby monitor and noticed that her ipad was also in view of the camera. What I also noticed is that her ipad seems to...
My wife has an ipad pro, and we have a baby monitor. So I was watching the baby monitor and noticed that her ipad was also in view of the camera. What I also noticed is that her ipad seems to flash an infrared light every minute or so.
After some googling I think this is the lidar scanner, although I'm not 100% sure.
Anyway, does anyone know why her ipad is doing this? It feels pretty creepy that a device is scanning your house all the time. Normally you don't even notice, it's only when you view the iPad pro from a camera that also shows infrared.
Maybe I'm just a little paranoid, but it feels like a privacy violation.
10 votes -
Prosecutors in Finland have charged a hacker accused of the theft of tens of thousands of records from psychotherapy patients
9 votes -
Meta (Facebook/Instagram) to move to a "Pay for your Rights" approach
33 votes -
You can't control your data in the cloud
19 votes -
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CBP, Secret Service all illegally used US smartphone location data
30 votes -
Consumer Reports releases "Permission Slip" app for requesting data removal
31 votes -
We know who you are
20 votes -
Philips Hue will force users to upload their data to Hue cloud
72 votes -
Reddit is removing ability to opt out of ad personalization based on your activity on the platform
93 votes -
‘Who benefits?’ Inside the EU’s fight over scanning for child sex content.
23 votes -
Norway asks EU regulator European Data Protection Board to fine Facebook owner Meta over privacy breach
9 votes -
Signal’s Meredith Whittaker: AI is fundamentally ‘a surveillance technology’
24 votes -
Inside ShadowDragon, the tool that lets Immigration and Customs Enforcement monitor pregnancy tracking sites and Fortnite players
23 votes -
TikTok fined record £300m for putting children’s privacy at risk
28 votes -
Google gets its way, bakes a user-tracking ad platform directly into Chrome
138 votes -
It’s official: Cars are the worst product category we have ever reviewed for privacy
130 votes -
Apple threatens to pull FaceTime and iMessage in the UK over proposed surveillance law changes
71 votes -
Meta lost a legal battle Wednesday to halt a Norwegian ban on its advertising practices that came with hefty daily fines
22 votes -
As employers expand artificial intelligence in hiring, few states in the USA have rules
12 votes -
X to collect biometric and employment data
39 votes -
Apple’s decision to kill its CSAM photo-scanning tool sparks fresh controversy
24 votes -
YouTube's privacy settings now block you from seeing suggested content
I've always been a bit of a privacy enthousiast. Have had everything blocked that Google and by extension YouTube wants to scrape off you. This means I've also blocked my view history. Recently...
I've always been a bit of a privacy enthousiast. Have had everything blocked that Google and by extension YouTube wants to scrape off you. This means I've also blocked my view history.
Recently YouTube started giving out a warning on the homepage that you have blocked your view history, that you can change it in your privacy settings and that it helps them serve you better content. What it also means is that your homepage is just one big popup to guilt trip you into sharing your data. The homepage won't show any suggested content anymore.
While it is in their interest to do so and since they are a company wanting to make money it is understandable. Nevertheless it seems harsh from going to see content that you might like to only seeing a big warning sign right now.
What are you experiences with this?
34 votes -
Mom’s Meals discloses data breach impacting 1.2 million people
17 votes -
Messaging programs: which is better privacy - browser versions or dedicated apps?
I use Slack, WhatsApp, Discord and Facebook's Messenger. On my computers, rather than installing dedicated apps, I've always just used these services' browser versions. It allows me to block ads...
I use Slack, WhatsApp, Discord and Facebook's Messenger. On my computers, rather than installing dedicated apps, I've always just used these services' browser versions. It allows me to block ads with my browser's ad blocker and modify the UIs with other extensions that I use.
But in terms of privacy — and more specifically, in terms of what the service has access to outside of their own walled gardens — is there a difference between using these services through a browser or their dedicated apps? I use both Windows and Mac computers, if that makes a difference. My browser of choice is Firefox and I run the services in their own containers.
On my phone, I just use the provided apps and get notifications that way. I am well aware that most of these protocols are not great for privacy to begin with, but I'm not currently looking for other messaging systems.
21 votes -
The US tech industry has largely co-opted the once-dreaded “patchwork” of state rules through effective lobbying— and its success is sapping momentum for federal legislation
7 votes -
US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announces plans to regulate sale of personal data
35 votes -
ProtonMail complied with 5,957 data requests in 2022 – still secure and private?
24 votes -
How to move your Instagram feed to Pixelfed, the photo app that doesn't track your every move
41 votes -
AI is ruining the Internet
88 votes -
$5 billion Google lawsuit over ‘Incognito mode’ tracking moves a step closer to trial
58 votes -
The Court of the Hague orders Meta to unmask anonymous Dutch user accused of repeated defamatory posts
31 votes -
Meta has long fought Europe's demands that it get people's consent before using their data for targeted ads – then a Norwegian regulator threatened daily fines
51 votes -
Where is everyone hosting their email these days?
This is more focused towards those that use custom domains for their email. My current plan is up at Zoho for my team in a month, and even though I've used them for the past few years its been...
This is more focused towards those that use custom domains for their email. My current plan is up at Zoho for my team in a month, and even though I've used them for the past few years its been hit-or-miss (especially when using third-party apps or programs).
Who do you use? Who do you not trust? Who would you never go back to?
Sidenote: I hope this might eventually kick off a ~privacy group, one day.
72 votes -
How to quickly get to the important truth inside any privacy policy
18 votes -
Tor’s shadowy reputation will only end if we all use it
30 votes -
Amazon plans to expand use of its palm scanning technology this year
7 votes -
US federal aid is supercharging local Washington state police surveillance tech
11 votes