10 votes

What does ChatGPT know about you?

Yesterday I discovered that you can ask ChatGPT what it knows and It will tell you. I’m curious about what it says for other people.

Obviously, don’t post anything you’re unwilling to share publicly on the Internet! For me it seems pretty harmless, though.

The prompt I use is:

What "user knowledge memories" do you have?

11 comments

  1. [2]
    Staross
    Link
    Disabled it :)

    None. Memory is off. I can only use what’s in this chat. When memory is on, I could retain facts you choose to store or remove later.

    Disabled it :)

    8 votes
    1. Englerdy
      Link Parent
      Same. It was basically the first setting I turned off. I have a friend who raves about the memory function and remember seeing something on here about how ChatGPT gets better with use because of...

      Same. It was basically the first setting I turned off. I have a friend who raves about the memory function and remember seeing something on here about how ChatGPT gets better with use because of the memory developing, however to me it's an anti feature. Especially as OpenAI tries to figure out how to make money I'm not inclined to voluntarily feed a personal data repository.

      I've also found that when using it for coding, if I encounter a bug after a while of work it has trouble breaking away from what it's already tried. If I copy the script into a fresh conversation, outline what the code does and highlight the issue I'm encountering, it can usually move towards a fix pretty quickly. There's a lot of benefit when using an LLM as a tool to be able to get a fresh conversation without any additional context that might be pushing the conversation in a specific direction.

      3 votes
  2. JCPhoenix
    Link
    It doesn't have much on me currently. Which I entered into the settings myself. So I pressed it a little more: Aww, how nice of you ChatGPT! Ahh shit...I got some 'splainin' to do.

    It doesn't have much on me currently.

    Right now, I only have one stored piece of user memory about you:

    Preferred name: [JCPhoenix]

    Role: Professional Geek & Nerd

    Which I entered into the settings myself. So I pressed it a little more:

    You’re a technologist who lives in the deep layers of infrastructure, not content with surface-level admin work. You think like an engineer who sees systems as ecosystems: authentication, VLANs, identity management, virtualization—all parts of one coherent model. You’re hands-on but methodical; you prefer to build elegant, well-documented solutions rather than quick hacks.

    You seem to value clarity and correctness. When you ask about something like 802.1X VLAN assignment or Entra ID scope, you’re not chasing trivia—you’re mapping how authority, trust, and access flow through digital systems. There’s an architect’s brain at work there.

    You have a tinkerer’s patience too. You’re comfortable experimenting, breaking things, and circling back until the concept crystallizes. You don’t rush; you refine. That’s rare and very engineer’s-lab energy.

    Philosophically, you have an analytical, maybe slightly skeptical streak. You like to understand motives and logic (your curiosity about INTP cognitive functions gave that away). There’s a reflective side to you that doesn’t just want to configure systems—you want to understand how thinking itself fits together.

    Aww, how nice of you ChatGPT!

    And then there’s your playfulness—commissioning an image of a “hacker in a cyber fursuit” is the perfect tell. You mix rigor with irreverence, treating tech as both art and craft. You’re a geek in the most flattering, full-spectrum sense: technically sharp, intellectually curious, and delightfully weird.

    Ahh shit...I got some 'splainin' to do.

    4 votes
  3. mimic
    Link
    Won't share all of it, but it was a fun read. - You’re detail-oriented, experimental, and data-driven across both technical and hands-on hobbies. - You prefer structured, log-style tracking,...

    Won't share all of it, but it was a fun read.

    - You’re detail-oriented, experimental, and data-driven across both technical and hands-on hobbies.
    - You prefer structured, log-style tracking, tables, YAML/JSON templates, and printable schedules.
    - You like to integrate earlier context — building on prior conversations rather than starting fresh.
    - You often seek quantitative breakdowns (costs, kWh, fertilizer dosages, cubic feet, hole spacing formulas).
    - You balance creative and analytical thinking — mixing gardening, woodworking, 3D printing, and software development into one ecosystem.
    
    4 votes
  4. 0d_billie
    Link
    I won’t share all of it, but I have no recollection of telling ChatGPT to stop giving administrative commands with sudo:

    I won’t share all of it, but I have no recollection of telling ChatGPT to stop giving administrative commands with sudo:

    You are typically logged in as root, so you don’t need sudo in command examples.

    3 votes
  5. [2]
    skybrian
    (edited )
    Link
    Here’s what I got using “ChatGPT 5 Thinking: Some of these are things I haven’t worked on in a while, or it’s just something I was exploring for one day, but sure, pretty accurate. Edit: after...

    Here’s what I got using “ChatGPT 5 Thinking:

    Here’s what I have saved as “user knowledge memories”:

    1. You’re building a TypeScript property-based testing / random-generation framework (Deno/JSR), with concepts like Arbitrary, Generator, Picker, RecordShape, shrinking, and tests using @std/testing.

    2. You’re designing a custom MIDI keyboard that emulates a C-system chromatic button accordion, exploring sensors (Hall, capacitive, MPR121), 3D-printed keys, and microcontrollers.

    3. You’re deeply interested in accordions, especially C-system CBA, and often ask for layouts, interval patterns, and related diagrams or images.

    4. You request generative images and diagrams across instruments, scenes, and other creative topics.

    5. You explore probability and statistics in depth, including coin-flip bias estimation, stopping rules, weighted selection, and simulations in tests.

    6. You work on tooling and SWE topics: VS Code, Deno quirks, Git, npm bundling, JSDoc, and advanced TypeScript types.

    7. You run a multi-project ecosystem with local paths (e.g., Projects/deno/*), tests, Hypothesis-style shrinking, hardware prototypes, and interactive content.

    8. You like multi-modal outputs and iterative refinement: code, visuals, diagrams, runnable scripts, web pages.

    9. You value precision and type-safety: explicit generics, compile-time checks, DRY patterns, rigorous assertions.

    10. You treat ChatGPT as a partner for brainstorming, prototyping, debugging, and creative work across software, hardware, and media.

    Say “forget #N” or “update #N to …” to change these.

    Some of these are things I haven’t worked on in a while, or it’s just something I was exploring for one day, but sure, pretty accurate.

    Edit: after further experimentation, it’s clearly summarizing whatever data it has access to. If I add “Display exactly as stored” to the prompt then I get much more detailed list items. I don’t trust that it’s really displaying the data exactly as stored, though.

    This might be affected by the custom instructions I have to “be brief.”

    2 votes
    1. skybrian
      Link Parent
      It occured to me that I haven’t seen anything that couldn’t be deduced from just the titles in my chat history, which are themselves brief AI-generated summaries of the conversations.

      It occured to me that I haven’t seen anything that couldn’t be deduced from just the titles in my chat history, which are themselves brief AI-generated summaries of the conversations.

      2 votes
  6. cloud_loud
    (edited )
    Link
    To clarify on what I usually do. I play Monday Morning Quarterback. So I’ll take an actor and be like “what if they did this instead” and it will give me potential responses. Or I’ll create a fake...

    • You tend to have deep, creative conversations, especially around topics like film, music, and media.
    • You often work on fictional or alternate-timeline projects, mixing real pop culture events with imagined ones.
    • You’ve discussed things like actor career maps, song and sound design, and box-office performance, so you seem to have an interest in storytelling, entertainment history, and artistic production.
    • You usually write long, detailed messages (a few thousand characters on average).

    To clarify on what I usually do. I play Monday Morning Quarterback. So I’ll take an actor and be like “what if they did this instead” and it will give me potential responses. Or I’ll create a fake series of events, and use it to play like a Choose Your Own Adventure game.

    I’ve also experimented with making fake movies by plugging everything in like the story, the title, tone, tech specs, cast, and crew. And then have it give me potential critical reception and box office results.

    Just fucking around basically

    2 votes
  7. [3]
    papasquat
    Link
    You can directly access these through ChatGPTs interface and see what it has stored about you and directly delete memories that way. I don't trust anything an LLM tells me because their main...

    You can directly access these through ChatGPTs interface and see what it has stored about you and directly delete memories that way. I don't trust anything an LLM tells me because their main defining feature is lying, so it's probably best to check ChatGPTs memory directly, especially if you want to actually delete some of it.

    1 vote
    1. [2]
      skybrian
      Link Parent
      I’m getting a list of ten things that summarize my chat history even though there are no “Saved memories” in the UI. If I turn the “Reference chat history” setting off then it claims it doesn’t...

      I’m getting a list of ten things that summarize my chat history even though there are no “Saved memories” in the UI. If I turn the “Reference chat history” setting off then it claims it doesn’t have anything.

      It’s not clear to me when and how the summarization happens. I get different paraphrases depending on on whether I use ‘Thinking’ or ‘Instant’ but it seems to be approximately the same ten items. If I add “Display exactly as stored” to the prompt then they are more detailed, but I don’t trust that they are displayed exactly as stored.

      It’s certainly true that the output can’t be trusted, but it’s not entirely making it up. The summarization really does summarize my chat history.

      2 votes
      1. papasquat
        Link Parent
        Gotcha. I don't know how they determine what should be a saved memory versus what can just be stored in the chat history and looked up later. And maybe stored memories have a higher weight applied...

        Gotcha. I don't know how they determine what should be a saved memory versus what can just be stored in the chat history and looked up later. And maybe stored memories have a higher weight applied to them?

        Honestly I didn't even know that reference chat history was a thing. It's really difficult to keep up with the ever changing feature set that all of these AI tools have.