-
13 votes
-
Google responds to EU by adding a fee to Play Services
18 votes -
Ubuntu 18.10 released
28 votes -
How Facebook’s Chaotic Push Into Video Cost Hundreds of Journalists Their Jobs
11 votes -
Disrupting cyberwar with open source intelligence
5 votes -
The Australian prime minister has forgotten to renew his domain name
10 votes -
How do you view your participation on the Internet?
It’s no secret that the Internet has significantly changed even from just a decade ago. I’ve been thinking about online communities - particularly forums - and I’ve really begun to miss the sense...
It’s no secret that the Internet has significantly changed even from just a decade ago. I’ve been thinking about online communities - particularly forums - and I’ve really begun to miss the sense of discovery when finding a new one while browsing online. It was like lifting a rock and finding an entirely new collective of people writing to one another about anything (complete with graphic signatures). It was an internet subculture in progress. Something something Wild West.
Small forums like that did a number of things that I feel we haven’t been able to replicate. You got to know people over time. It wasn’t a feed you vaguely subscribed to, but a forum (in literal definition of the word) that you chose to participate in.
I often think about what probably defines a typical experience online for people these days and I feel that the smaller and more cozy feeling of actual community has been replaced by the digital equivalent of big box stores. Twitter, Youtube, Facebook, Twitch, Netflix. Big corporate places with portals and algorithms.
These aren’t necessarily bad things in and of themselves (aside from the chasing of a world in which nothing is left unplanned), but I’m trying to hone in on the idea that the sheer randomness of this medium has more or less vaporized. The concept that anything and everything you do on the Internet wasn’t aggressively being tracked and developed into digital profiles to be traded, used, shared, and sold by ad companies and an array of other organizations was a fart in the wind compared to what it’s like online today. Websites simply didn’t have 5 megabytes+ of Javascript whereas now you need a half a dozen browser extensions to make the internet a halfway decent thing to be on.
My hunch is that once upon a time, people (at least those that even had access to it) had a kind of amateur desire of wanting to create an account at a website (particularly a forum). Coming up on 2019, I think long and hard before creating another account anywhere. There even was an expectation to introduce yourself in some introduction subforum at many of these boards.
A theme that has become completely domineering is the inflated ego linked to tribalism. I see people being so serious about everything; there can be no reciprocal discussion about anything.
I think it’s probably trivial to dismiss this as nostalgia but I feel there are some real truths to this. The Internet is something you had the choice of actually logging off and disconnecting but today, everyone is constantly connected. We are in the age of distraction and preoccupation. Think about it: how many times have you picked up your (smart)phone purely out of reflex, not even to check something with purpose? You see it everywhere in public, certainly. The constant stream of brightly colored iconography, beeps, alerts, buzzing, push/notifications, and beyond are endless. Everything demands your attention, and it is never enough.
53 votes -
Thoughts on private trackers
What are y'all thoughts on private tracker, or p2p in general? How private trackers compete with usenet, scene ftps etc.
27 votes -
Did Uber steal Google’s intellectual property?
7 votes -
Faster check-in as Shanghai airport starts using facial recognition
4 votes -
Twitter makes datasets available containing accounts, tweets, and media from accounts associated with influence campaigns from the IRA and Iran
8 votes -
The internet apologizes …Even those who designed our digital world are aghast at what they created. A breakdown of what went wrong — from the architects who built it.
32 votes -
A genocide incited on Facebook, with posts from Myanmar’s military
8 votes -
Instagram Has a Massive Harassment Problem
24 votes -
'Do Not Track' the Privacy Tool Used by Millions of People, Doesn't Do Anything
20 votes -
One healthy diversity data point: research reports an uptick in women applying for IT jobs
4 votes -
Twilio to Acquire SendGrid, the Leading Email API Platform
8 votes -
Foreign disinformation is killing Americans
9 votes -
Sneaky subscriptions are plaguing the App Store
16 votes -
Facebook to ban misinformation on voting in upcoming U.S. elections
10 votes -
Palm is back (sort of), and it built a tiny smartphone sidekick
9 votes -
Rogers, Fido and Bell call centre workers penalized for reducing plans, offering credits
4 votes -
Pinboard on Twitter: Palmer Luckey has made the maximum legal donation this year to Steve King, the nation's most openly white supremacist congressman.
@pinboard: Palmer Luckey has made the maximum legal donation this year to Steve King, the nation's most openly white supremacist congressman.
25 votes -
PeerTube reaches its first stable 1.0 release
23 votes -
Mastodon's two year anniversary: A retrospective
16 votes -
‘I Fundamentally Believe That My Time at Reddit Made the World a Worse Place’
31 votes -
The rise and demise of RSS
11 votes -
Reddit is changing the r/popular algorithm so that more discussion-focused subreddits and posts gain visibility
56 votes -
Alexa, should we trust you?
10 votes -
Boston Dynamics' humanoid robot Atlas does parkour
18 votes -
Facebook Says Hackers Stole Detailed Personal Data From 14 Million People
10 votes -
Internet hacking is about to get much worse - We can no longer leave online security to the market
22 votes -
Why are African governments criminalising online speech? Because they fear it.
8 votes -
Now Is the Time to Start Planning for the Post-Android World
22 votes -
Belgium has regional elections on Sunday, voting machines use USB sticks and store votes on a Linux partition which users will be prompted to format when using Windows, deleting all the votes
@rubenvanassche: Belgium has it's regional elections this sunday, the voting machines are using USB sticks and store the votes on a separate Linux partition. But the stick should also be used on windows which wil ask the users to format it and so it will delete all the votes. 😮
32 votes -
Amazon and the bridge too far
5 votes -
Apple's new proprietary software locks kill independent repair on new MacBook Pros
38 votes -
EEVBlog looks at the method used to shred the Banksy Artwork
5 votes -
Microsoft re-releases Windows 10 October 2018 update with explanation of data loss bug
23 votes -
Google's beefing up user data privacy (which includes shutting down Google+)
42 votes -
Why we’re still not ready for ‘like-war’
3 votes -
Thirty-five US states tell the Federal Communications Commission to get off its ass and do something about spoofed robocalls
6 votes -
The Death of Google
14 votes -
New technology favors tyranny. Yuval Noah Harrari on artificial intelligence, democracy, and the bigger picture
6 votes -
Microsoft now faces a big Windows 10 quality test after botched update
27 votes -
Why do you lock your smartphone?
I'm genuinely curious. I'm a late adopter FWIW and am still rocking an older iPhone that doesn't support any face recognition or finger prints. But I don't use a pass code either, and never have,...
I'm genuinely curious. I'm a late adopter FWIW and am still rocking an older iPhone that doesn't support any face recognition or finger prints. But I don't use a pass code either, and never have, and doubt I ever will. I just don't get it... what are folks afraid of happening if they don't lock their phone? I suppose the "nightmare" scenario would be someone steals your phone and then messages your contacts asking for $. Is that it?
I've always practiced greater digital security than physical security (counting the phone unlock as physical) as I think it much more likely that a ne'er-do-well would attack some large company than to single me out in person. I mean if the FBI or some hacker is going through my garbage then I probably have larger problems, right?
For me it's cost/benefit - swiping/fingerprinting/face IDing multiple times a day is not worth the slim chance that my phone is stolen by someone who going to use the info in it for something nefarious. I wouldn't lock my car if I was in/out of 20x a day, I just wouldn't leave anything terribly valuable in it.
Please let me know why locking your phone is/isn't important to you.
EDIT: To be clear, I have one banking app and it requires an additional password to get in. It's an app so there isn't a saved password for it anywhere.
EDIT2: Made this as a comment below, but thought I'd add it up here as well - "I find it strange that people in general seem to be OK with putting up with an inconvenience (even though minor to many) that affects them multiple times a day, but we hold large companies almost wholly unaccountable for major data breaches. "
EDIT3: This just occurred to me. We lock our phones, but not our wallets/purses. The argument that a pass-code is a protection against identity theft rings sort of hollow when we consider we have much of the same info on an ID card that we keep unprotected. Some states will even list the SSN on a driver's license.
EDIT4: I'm convinced everyone thinks their personal lives are terribly interesting to strangers and my suspicion is they're not. Only two real cases of bad things happening when a phone is unlocked that I've counted so far: 1) long distance calls 2) pokemon themed contacts.
EDIT5: That said, sounds like the fingerprint scanner is the way to go for convenient security. I'll be checking that out. Sincere thanks!
EDIT6: Some folks said that edit 4 came off as condescending. Not my intention. I was trying to tie in the idea of "everyone being the main character in their own story." I'm definitely not implying that people should leave their phones unlocked because others wouldn't find their lives uninteresting.
I think many have a personal connection to their devices that I do not feel. Intellectually I find that very interesting as this seems less a monetary issue and more a privacy issue. It'd be as if a stranger picked up a lost diary and started reading. I fear my diary would be more like a ship captain's logbook and wholly uninteresting. If I were to have my phone stolen I'd simply change a couple passwords and buy a new one.
32 votes -
Google announces "Made by Google" family 2018: Phones (Pixel 3, Pixel 3 XL), tablet (Pixel Slate), and virtual assistant (Google Home Hub)
6 votes -
Facebook Isn’t Sorry — It Just Wants Your Data
15 votes -
Data for good: Wonderful ways that big data is making the world better
7 votes -
Alphabet to shut Google+ social site after user data exposed
18 votes