Haven't read the article yet but that would be so hysterically predictable Edit: so Richard doesn't think people can change their gender identities but the 0s and 1s simulating a consciousness to...
Haven't read the article yet but that would be so hysterically predictable
Edit: so Richard doesn't think people can change their gender identities but the 0s and 1s simulating a consciousness to him gets to?
Man gets AI psychosis, thinks AI is alive. First thing he does: give it a woman name.
Every. Single. Time.
This is even less surprising given Richard Dawkins track record.
Haven't read the article yet but that would be so hysterically predictable
Edit: so Richard doesn't think people can change their gender identities but the 0s and 1s simulating a consciousness to him gets to?
Trust me, that was an immediate clock on my part.
I just don't know what else to say anymore about why all this is a bad idea.