-
11 votes
-
One great article about every planet in the solar system
4 votes -
First impressions using Astro
4 votes -
New photos of Jupiter by the James Webb Space Telescope
22 votes -
James Webb Space Telescope: The world is about to be new again
24 votes -
First image from the James Webb Space Telescope
@NASA: It's here-the deepest, sharpest infrared view of the universe to date: Webb's First Deep Field.Previewed by @POTUS on July 11, it shows galaxies once invisible to us. The full set of @NASAWebb's first full-color images & data will be revealed July 12: https://t.co/63zxpNDi4I pic.twitter.com/zAr7YoFZ8C
36 votes -
They found two new craters on the moon and a new mystery - Searching through imagery from NASA, researchers found the discarded stage of a forgotten rocket crashed in March, but other questions remain
5 votes -
There are more galaxies in the Universe than even Carl Sagan ever imagined
10 votes -
Resemblance between features on Europa's frozen surface and landform in Greenland provide new indications moon may be capable of harboring life
5 votes -
What picture did Nasa take on my birthday? How to find your Hubble Telescope photo using the APOD calendar.
8 votes -
Scientists just found a 'significant' volume of water inside Mars' grand canyon
19 votes -
Netta Engelhardt discovered an escape from Stephen Hawking’s black hole paradox
7 votes -
1800s astronomical drawings vs. NASA images
13 votes -
Why is the Earth round but the Milky Way flat?
6 votes -
Inside a Martian canyon
6 votes -
Harvard astrophysicist says 2017 interstellar object sighting was humanity’s first contact with an artifact of extraterrestrial intelligence
12 votes -
Surprise! First peek inside Mars reveals a crust with cake-like layers
4 votes -
What if Earth got kicked out of the solar system? Rogue Earth
3 votes -
Australian telescope maps new atlas of the universe in record speed
5 votes -
Why do most lunar spacecraft eventually crash into the moon?
6 votes -
Pluto’s ice-capped peaks are like Earth’s—but not
3 votes -
New evidence for cyclic universe claimed by Roger Penrose and colleagues
6 votes -
A new cosmic tension: The universe might be too thin
5 votes -
Water on Mars: Discovery of three buried lakes intrigues scientists
8 votes -
LIGO/Virgo’s newest black hole merger defies mass expectations
5 votes -
What if the Big Bang was actually a Big Bounce?
9 votes -
Early Mars was covered in ice sheets, not flowing rivers
9 votes -
How to catch a glimpse of the comet NEOWISE dazzling the skies right now
5 votes -
Scientists just found the biggest neutron star (or smallest black hole) yet in a strange cosmic collision
5 votes -
Italian amateur astronomer captures amazing photo of Mercury’s comet-like sodium tail
7 votes -
Searching for scalar dark matter using compact mechanical resonators: Resonators could access a broad segment of previously unprobed parameter space
4 votes -
United States seeks to change the rules for mining the Moon
6 votes -
Mystery of lava-like flows on Mars solved by scientists: mud volcanoes
2 votes -
New type-II supernova 2020jfo detected in Messier 61 galaxy
5 votes -
ESO instrument finds black hole 1000 lightyears from Earth
6 votes -
Research reveals possible active tectonic system on the moon
8 votes -
Ask a cosmology PhD student (almost) anything!
Hi all, I am a PhD student focusing in cosmology. I wanted to up the science content here on Tildes, and I thought that one way to do so is to have an informal little Q&A session. As such, feel...
Hi all,
I am a PhD student focusing in cosmology. I wanted to up the science content here on Tildes, and I thought that one way to do so is to have an informal little Q&A session. As such, feel free to use this post to ask any questions you might have about cosmology specifically, and physics in general.
This may not be as exciting as some other science AMAs given that I am a rather early graduate student, so there may be a lot of questions I don't know the answer to. However, I'm willing to try my best and answer over the next few days, and to let you know I don't know if I don't!
A bit about myself: I did my undergraduate degree at the University of Chicago where I studied physics and mathematics, and then I was a student researcher in a computational cosmology group at a national lab. I subsequently enrolled at UC Davis to continue studying cosmology. Ask me anything about physics, cosmology, or high performance computing!
I also invite anyone else with expertise to chime in as well!
23 votes -
Observations of a star orbiting the supermassive black hole at the centre of the Milky Way over almost thirty years confirm that it moves just as predicted by Einstein’s general theory of relativity
8 votes -
Mars 2020 remains on track for July launch
8 votes -
Remembering Big Bang basher Fred Hoyle
5 votes -
What is the geometry of the universe?
5 votes -
Planetary science decadal survey to include astrobiology and planetary defense
3 votes -
WFIRST, proposed for cancellation, is approved for development
3 votes -
A new understanding of Mars is beginning to emerge, thanks to data from the first year of NASA's InSight lander mission
9 votes -
What we know about dark matter
3 votes -
Dark Energy may be an illusion: Gravitons themselves may have mass
20 votes -
The "Devil's Horns"
6 votes -
Purchasing an astrophotography mount
I do some astrophotography for fun in my spare time. I'd like to get into doing deep sky photography. In order to do that, I need a moving mount that can keep the camera aligned with the stars for...
I do some astrophotography for fun in my spare time. I'd like to get into doing deep sky photography. In order to do that, I need a moving mount that can keep the camera aligned with the stars for minutes to hours at a time. I'll be using (at least initially) a Canon 7D (original version) with Canon lenses rather than a telescope. I currently have a 200mm lens with 2x extender, which makes it 600mm equivalent on that body.
I'd like to know if others here have ever done this and what type of hardware they've used for the motor and mount? Prices seem to be all over the place and options vary greatly on different devices. For example, I see the following:
Sky-watcher EQM-35 - $623.00US - Seems pretty full-featured for the price, as it includes tripod, motorized mount, alignment scope, and database of astronomical objects.
Celestron Advanced VX Computerized Mount - $899.00US - Seems very similar to the above, but does not include a scope, but is ~$250 more
Orion AstroView EQ Mount & EQ-3M Motor Drive Kit - $269.99US - Like the first one, but without the scope and holds less weight, and no database of objects to look atI get the difference in price between the first and last, but not the middle one.
In any event, curious if anyone has used any of the above or any others and what their thoughts are on the quality of different brands, and anything I should be looking for or avoiding.
7 votes -
SpaceX has quietly—and retroactively—relicensed its photos out of the public domain
14 votes -
Neutron stars – The most extreme things that are not black holes
10 votes