-
9 votes
-
An app lets you de-stress by screaming at the Icelandic wilderness from afar
9 votes -
You've been through a lot this year and it looks like you need the perfect place to let your frustrations out – record your scream and we'll release it in Iceland
7 votes -
Families of children with disabilities face acute challenges under COVID-19
8 votes -
Finnish basic income pilot improved wellbeing – first major study of scheme comes as economic toll of coronavirus prompts fresh interest in idea
13 votes -
Lockdown productivity: Spaceship you
16 votes -
That discomfort you’re feeling is grief
8 votes -
Icelandic farming union has been surprised by the enthusiastic response to its appeal for volunteers to help sick farmers out during the Covid-19 outbreak
7 votes -
How the working-class life is killing Americans, in charts
26 votes -
Greenland has the world's highest suicide rate, and teenage boys are especially vulnerable
9 votes -
Confessions of a slaughterhouse worker
23 votes -
The new breed of sex addicts - who don't have sex
10 votes -
Why Finland leads the field when it comes to winter cycling – progressive policies help get people on their bike, even in below-freezing conditions
8 votes -
What I learned about life at a company that deals in dead bodies
5 votes -
I worry for my teenage boys – the beauty standards for young men are out of control
28 votes -
Use this, not that: Positive swaps for the New Year
This is a bit of a sibling topic to the one about changing habits for 2020. Rather than looking at habits specifically, I want to look at "swaps" that people can make. What's something someone...
This is a bit of a sibling topic to the one about changing habits for 2020. Rather than looking at habits specifically, I want to look at "swaps" that people can make.
What's something someone could change out for a better alternative?
A swap should be recommended if it is,
- more ethical,
- more sustainable,
- heathier,
- or just overall better in an individual or collective way.
Importantly: the swap should be both feasible and sensical, and should be something that is relatively easy to do. This isn't about making huge lifestyle changes but about taking what we're already doing and making it better.
Please give your reasoning for your swap, as well as any important caveats. Mentioning specific brands/companies is fine if that's an important part of the swap. Also, swaps can be for anything so don't feel limited to consumer products. Feel free to give good food/service/app/software/store swaps as well!
See my post below for an example, if the setup I've given here is unclear!
54 votes -
Air filters create educational gains
14 votes -
For the eleventh year in a row, Iceland is the country ranking first in the World Economic Forum's Geneva Equality List
7 votes -
Companion dog acquisition may reduce loneliness among community dog owners
6 votes -
On finding the freedom to rage against our fathers
8 votes -
Inside the Ethics Committee
Inside the Ethics Committee is a BBC Radio 4 programme. They describe it like this: Joan Bakewell is joined by a panel of experts to wrestle with the ethics arising from a real-life medical case....
Inside the Ethics Committee is a BBC Radio 4 programme. They describe it like this:
Joan Bakewell is joined by a panel of experts to wrestle with the ethics arising from a real-life medical case.
Each episode is chaired by Bakewell, with a range of different experts (who all sit on hospital ethics committees), talking about the ethical difficulties faced by healthcare professionals (and the organisations they work for) in different real life cases.
Some of it hasn't aged very well - there's an episode about HIV testing an unconscious patient after a needle-stick injury. With advances in treatment and reductions in stigma I think would have made it a very different programme today.
But most of it is pretty good, and explains in detail how some decisions are made.
For example: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0643x61
Ashley is 14 years old when doctors discover a brain tumour. Tests reveal that it's highly treatable; there's a 95% chance of cure if he has a course of radiotherapy.
Ashley begins the treatment but he has to wear a mask which makes him very anxious and the radiotherapy itself makes him sick. He finds it increasingly difficult to bear and he starts to miss his sessions.
Despite patchy treatment Ashley's cancer goes into remission. He and his mother are thrilled but a routine follow-up scan a few months later shows that the cancer has returned.
Ashley is adamant that he will not have the chemotherapy that is recommended this time. He threatens that he will run away if treatment is forced on him. Although Ashley is only 15 he is 6'2" and restraining him would not be easy.
Should the medical team and his mother persuade him to have the chemotherapy? Or should they accept his decision, even though he is only 15?
5 votes -
Men
41 votes -
Anxiety looks different in men and often appears as anger, muscle aches or alcohol use
7 votes -
Is it time for asleep divorce?
11 votes -
Where disease stopped and my brother began: Coming to terms with a sibling's suicide
3 votes -
Horns are growing on young people’s skulls. Phone use is to blame, research suggests.
15 votes -
Is porn making young men impotent?
24 votes -
Men have no friends and women bear the burden
27 votes -
The loneliness problem in LA starts with traffic. Could it end with a walk?
6 votes -
Sex strikes have a long and controversial history as a tool of women's protest
8 votes -
Where's masculinity headed? Men's groups and therapists are talking.
14 votes -
The American Dream is killing us
14 votes -
Taking mushrooms for depression cured me of my atheism: Psilocybin not only eased my depression, it showed me a new way to live.
22 votes -
Long school commutes are terrible for kids
10 votes -
The first ever World Health Organisation physical activity guidelines for under-fives, recommend no screen time for one-year-olds and no more than an hour for two- to-four-year-olds
An article on a parenting website: Guidance recommends no screen time for under-twos An article in Time magazine: World Health Organization Issues First-Ever Screen Time Guidelines for Young Kids....
-
An article on a parenting website: Guidance recommends no screen time for under-twos
-
An article in Time magazine: World Health Organization Issues First-Ever Screen Time Guidelines for Young Kids. Here's What to Know
-
The WHO's press release: To grow up healthy, children need to sit less and play more
26 votes -
-
Is prison necessary? Ruth Wilson Gilmore might change your mind.
20 votes -
Women suffer needless pain because almost everything is designed for men
18 votes -
Millennials are sick of drinking, but they’re not giving up booze just yet
6 votes -
Bigger than that - complex thoughts on a life spent being the short guy
10 votes -
This is what the life of an incel looks like
32 votes -
Loneliness
41 votes -
I am staying home on New Year's Eve, and I'm totally fine about it
13 votes -
The real roots of American rage - How anger became the dominant emotion in our politics and personal lives—and what we can do about it
22 votes -
Why standing desks are overrated
18 votes -
Reddit founder warns 'hustle porn' is 'most toxic, dangerous thing in tech'
31 votes -
Indonesian policewomen measured through 'purity and beauty', subjected to virginity testing
13 votes -
Living with Slenderman
7 votes -
Let’s all stop shaming moms for showing emotion
5 votes