-
29 votes
-
How to not build the Torment Nexus
28 votes -
Would you get sick in the name of science?
11 votes -
Throwing in the towel: The case for surrender
4 votes -
How Christianity took over pagan Scandinavia
4 votes -
Sámi introduce certification to promote ethical tourism in Finland – Responsible Sámi Tourism Certificate will recognise tourism businesses whose operations align with Sámi values
13 votes -
The ethics of fake guitar
10 votes -
A new wave of positive-impact experiences in northern Finland is finally allowing the Sámi to benefit from the tourism boom
8 votes -
Kroger CEO resigns after probe into his personal conduct
23 votes -
She is in love with ChatGPT
29 votes -
Novo Nordisk rebuked by UK watchdog over failure to disclose payments to health groups – Danish drug giant found to have failed to accurately report spending even after admitting to errors
13 votes -
Why I make smart devices dumber: a privacy advocate's reflection
36 votes -
Study on hydroxychloroquine by Didier Raoult and colleagues gets pulled on ethical and scientific grounds
11 votes -
‘Unprecedented risk’ to life on Earth: Scientists call for halt on ‘mirror life’ microbe research
55 votes -
FIA seeks rule changes after president allegations
18 votes -
Someone made a dataset of one million Bluesky posts for 'machine learning research'
20 votes -
What are your forgivable sins?
The user @trim posted an interesting question in ~Tech and it made me wonder: what are my forgivable sins? What kinds of misdeeds on the part of companies that are suppliers of goods or services...
The user @trim posted an interesting question in ~Tech and it made me wonder: what are my forgivable sins? What kinds of misdeeds on the part of companies that are suppliers of goods or services do I tacitly concience or to which I will turn a blind eye?
Whenever there is a scandal, the easy answer is, "I don't know, but definitely not that." This, however, is just an ad hoc definition that can be applied to any unsavory revelation on the part of a service or product provider. What would I be left with? I couldn't retreat from society if I wanted to and the cost of commercial puritanism would be prohibitively high.
What I realized in that topic was that (1) I will not sanction providers merely for doing business with others to whom I am opposed and (2) I will not sanction providers merely for issuing words or statements that I disagree with.
That said, I'm curious about others. What are your criteria for bad behavior in a service or product provider that you would judge to be nonetheless admissible?
20 votes -
Otto Drakenberg is challenging Alisher Usmanov for the leadership of the International Fencing Federation – Usmanov is the heavy favorite despite international sanctions
3 votes -
Declaration of Helsinki turns sixty – how this foundational document of medical ethics has stood the test of time
8 votes -
Covert racism in AI: How language models are reinforcing outdated stereotypes
20 votes -
The games behind your government's next war
11 votes