-
10 votes
-
Twitter: 'Deep concern' at social media company partnering with Israeli verification firm
10 votes -
US Supreme Court leaves in place a Texas law requiring pornographic websites to verify users' ages
33 votes -
Q* - Clues to the puzzle?
32 votes -
Bye bye blue checkmarks: Twitter removes legacy verifications
17 votes -
Twitter quietly drops $8 paid verification; “tricking people not OK,” Musk says
25 votes -
Twitter is planning to start charging $20 per month for verification. And if the employees building it don’t meet their deadline, they’ll be fired by Elon Musk.
27 votes -
Google to require all advertisers to pass identity verification process
12 votes -
Airbnb to verify all listings, CEO Brian Chesky says
7 votes -
Airbnb pledges to improve platform safety, including verifying 100% of hosts and listings by the end of next year
8 votes -
Suggestion: Have academic flair for qualified users. PhD etc..
I think this idea strongly aligns with Tildes philosophy of promoting "quality content", what is more quality than knowing a poster is qualified to make their claims. It separates the...
I think this idea strongly aligns with Tildes philosophy of promoting "quality content", what is more quality than knowing a poster is qualified to make their claims. It separates the pseudo-science from the science.
I understand it is perhaps a cumbersome process to verify qualifications but the reward in return for having verified experts validated is hard to overstate.
I propose the flair be global and not restricted to within a group(as opposed to reddit) because if we're certain the individual has credentials that still remains in effect when they comment across disciplines. It also removes redundancy and allows the individual more freedom to branch to other communities.
The idea being if someone has a PhD in math they can flair their name with something like "PhD: Math" per post if they wish. As this is a voluntary addition (not collection) of user-data I don't think it goes against Tildes philosophy.
12 votes