-
7 votes
-
Jon Stewart on the false promises of AI
38 votes -
An American education: Notes from UATX
4 votes -
The real danger to civilisation isn't runaway AI it's runaway capitalism (2017)
87 votes -
Capitalism is dead. '[Technofeudalism is] something much worse’: Yanis Varoufakis on extremism and the tyranny of big tech
36 votes -
Unpopular opinion: Capitalism is a better ideology than socialism or communism because greed is a more tolerable emotion than fear/envy
I'm someone who typically leans on the left of center on political spectrum but today, I realized something intrinsic to human nature and its emotions that made me consider shifting my compass...
I'm someone who typically leans on the left of center on political spectrum but today, I realized something intrinsic to human nature and its emotions that made me consider shifting my compass towards right of center (capitalism).
The core thought process here is asking yourself this fundamental question of which human emotion or tendency gives rise to these ideologies.
Capitalism is primarily driven by human greed, be it the greed to put tasty food on your table or better your living standard by getting a new equipment or acquire more stocks in some limited company. Greed for more resources is the motivation here.
On the other hand, the Communist and Socialist ideologies are primarily driven by much darker emotions of fear and envy. The envy is that the "rich capitalist" has a lot more resources than I have, and/or the fear is that the wealth inequality may increase even more due to inflation and my resources will naturally decline over the due course of time.
Despite the world being an unfair place and such fears even having some validation in economic data, I want to still insist that even though both emotions are roughly in the same realm of darkness (and beneath the realm of positive spiritual emotions like love and compassion), greed is way more preferable than fear/envy.
We can understand this with the help of an often used analogy of Would you rather your Foe be an X or Y?:
If you're lost in a forest, would you rather be chased by a Lion or a Cheetah?
I remember reading this anecdote or puzzle many years ago somewhere. Most people would answer Cheetah here as it would seem a less ferocious animal than Lion. However, when you consider that Cheetah can climb trees while Lions can't, you might reconsider that answer as you might get lucky if there is a tree around which you can use to climb and save yourself. However, what really makes Cheetah more ferocious is that it kills just for survival. Cheetah doesn't care if it's hungry or not, it sees you as a threat to be eliminated just due to some innate tendency (fear?). On the other hand, a Lion is more likely to kill you only if it's hungry (greed for meals?).
Would you rather your foe be a ruthless capitalist or a ruthless communist?
A ruthless capitalist is the Lion in above example. They might come after you but only if the cost-benefit analysis of coming after you makes sense and they materially gain something like money, wealth, data, etc. But a ruthless communist, on the other hand, would come after you regardless and blinded by the ideology just because you own more resources (or fall in a higher income strata than them). A ruthless communist will always try to shame you while reminding you of your "privileges" regardless of who you are because their ideology is powered by fear.
If we talk about religious ideologies like Christian Supremacy, Zionism, Islamist, Hindutva, etc, they also roughly fall in this same category as Communist/Socialist, they're also primarily driven by fear. As you climb up the wealth ladder, the fear of blaspheming your religious doctrine declines and the fear of losing the already acquired wealth increases - which is very much a positive fear because this fear doesn't harm anyone, it merely seeks to preserve and protect.
We know there is massive wealth inequality in this world, it isn't just or fair in any manner. But the way towards betterment is using the path of higher emotions like love, compassion and even positive greed and not the darker emotions of fear and envy. Wouldn't you agree?
67 votes -
You've just been fucked by psyops; the death of the internet
20 votes -
Why does Germany continue to self-destruct?
7 votes -
Sam Altman’s second coming sparks new fears of the AI apocalypse
28 votes -
AI belongs to the capitalists now
31 votes -
"Zeitgeist | Requiem" by Peter Joseph | Official trailer
4 votes -
Fairphone Keep Club: Sustainable consumerism?
As you may well know, Fairphone is a company that originally arose from a kickstarter campaign and makes phones that are as easily repairable, as sustainable and as fairly sourced as possible....
As you may well know, Fairphone is a company that originally arose from a kickstarter campaign and makes phones that are as easily repairable, as sustainable and as fairly sourced as possible. They do have their issues, but compared to other big phone companies they've done a great job with this.
Now it appears that Fairphone is due to announce the so called 'Fairphone Keep Club' on the 14th of September - a bonus program as we all know it. You buy stuff, you get points for what you buy, and when you've got enough points you can redeem them to buy more stuff.
The keep club website claims that it's the only rewards program that gives back to those who keep their Fairphones as long as possible, but judging by the listed 'challenges' it appears that the most efficient way to gain points is to simply buy new stuff.
Personally I'm a bit torn on this, due to the idealistic viewpoints I tend to judge Fairphone under in accordance with their stated sustainability goals. I do realize that is a much higher standard than the big-players in the phone industry achieve. I also get that Fairphone wants to build its brand identity and create incentives to keep customers and sell their products. But at the same time I can't help but think that in the end that program is an incentive to be less sustainable, as it ultimately provides you with those fancy points as a psychological incentive to buy the newest and latest Fairphone product.
So I wanted to bring this topic into a wider community that may not currently be as deep in the Fairphone bubble: Do you think such bonus programs will rather help spread the idea of a more repairable, sustainable approach to phones, or will it rather serve as an incentive to artificially shorten a phone's lifecycle by prematurely buying a new one? And more generally speking: Do you think advertising strategies rooted in consumerism and classic capitalistic company goals are compatible with sustainable product lifecycles somehow, despite not exactly having aligned interests?
Note that I also posted this on Lemmy. I'm interested to see how those discussions will compare.
22 votes -
Autoenshittification: How the computer killed capitalism
83 votes -
Tax prep companies shared private taxpayer data with Google and Meta for years, congressional probe finds
45 votes -
Meta loses appeal on how it harvests data in Germany
26 votes -
Stop using Google Analytics, warns Sweden’s privacy watchdog, as it issues over $1M in fines
28 votes -
No Instagram Threads app in the EU: Ireland's Data Protection Commission says Meta's new Twitter rival won't be launched there
48 votes -
Google updates its privacy policy to clarify it can use public data for training AI models
44 votes -
The catastrophe no one talks about
4 votes -
Gen Zers are turning to ‘radical rest,’ delusional thinking, and self-indulgence as they struggle to cope with late-stage capitalism
74 votes -
Are we in "late stage" capitalism? What's next?
I often engage in thoughtful discussions with my friends regarding our current socio-economic situation, and I find it challenging to discover a more fitting description than the term coined for...
I often engage in thoughtful discussions with my friends regarding our current socio-economic situation, and I find it challenging to discover a more fitting description than the term coined for it.
Wherever I direct my attention, I observe life increasingly being shaped by the well-oiled machinery of capitalism, a system devoid of inherent morals and existing solely to maximize profits for its shareholders.
To me, the notion of "late stage" capitalism implies a bleak future fueled by the insatiable demand for constant and unsustainable growth. This, in turn, hampers our ability to effectively plan for the future, as investors prioritize immediate gains. Consequently, our planet suffers the repercussions through climate change and the exacerbation of wealth inequality.
Moreover, the ruling of FEC vs Citizens United, wherein corporations were granted the ability to lobby as individuals, seems to have unleashed a relentless flywheel that perpetuates and nourishes the insatiable beast of capitalism and greed.
I am genuinely intrigued by the perspectives of others on this topic. If we collectively recognize that we are heading in an unfavorable direction, what steps can we take to regain a more positive trajectory? How can we incentivize prioritizing moral values and environmental impact over monetary gains?
101 votes -
Everything must be paid for twice
109 votes -
I’m a Luddite. You should be one too
15 votes -
Banks devising ways to ID mass shooters before they strike
6 votes -
We need a library economy
8 votes -
Capitalism as Religion (1921)
5 votes -
How Mondragon became the world’s largest co-op
11 votes -
Failure to cope "under capitalism"
14 votes -
Mental health challenges related to neoliberal capitalism in the United States
8 votes -
Twitter’s board gave up
7 votes -
American phone-tracking firm demo’d surveillance powers by spying on CIA and NSA
11 votes -
How our ancestors used to sleep can help the sleep-deprived today
7 votes -
Mental health is a political problem
9 votes -
The mythlogy of work and other thoughts on the growing anti-work movement
14 votes -
The inside story of the Pfizer vaccine: A 'once-in-an-epoch windfall'
6 votes -
A secretive hedge fund is gutting newsrooms
8 votes -
Modern Luddism and the battle for your soul
11 votes -
'Find this fuck:' Inside Citizen’s dangerous effort to cash in on vigilantism
12 votes -
Twitch streamer Destiny and economist Richard Wolff debate capitalism, achieve nothing
19 votes -
Capitalism Is Dead, Long Live Debtism
8 votes -
There are signs the world might be running out of natural rubber. Disease, climate change and plunging global prices have put the world's rubber supplies into jeopardy.
4 votes -
Yanis Varoufakis: Capitalism has become ‘techno-feudalism’
9 votes -
When capitalists go on strike
5 votes -
Is capitalism devouring democracy?
5 votes -
Sorry, wrong apocalypse: Horizon Zero Dawn, Heaven’s Vault, and the eco-critical video game
6 votes -
I spent a year deleting my address online, then it popped up on Bing
20 votes -
Fed up with Capitalism, Marxism gains popularity among youth in China
12 votes -
Capitalists are bad at business
10 votes -
Manufacturing a better foot | Running shoes
4 votes -
The fake futurism of Elon Musk
21 votes