-
12 votes
-
Does generative AI have a natural limit without a major innovation?
I was musing about this recently with the recent models becoming more capable. The core of gen AI is the model, which is trained on a massive dataset. To date, gen AI has improved because the...
I was musing about this recently with the recent models becoming more capable. The core of gen AI is the model, which is trained on a massive dataset. To date, gen AI has improved because the models have become larger, more efficient, the data they are trained on has become better and the software/harnesses around them has improved to help query them.
As I see it, surely the bottleneck will soon become the data they are trained on? If we imagine a scenario where a models could consume an infinite amount of training data, and there is no limit to the training time or quality. The sum of human skill/knowledge is the limiting factor. Gen AI should (in theory) never be able to out preform or push the boundary of the sum of humanity at time of training.
Or, counterpoint, is there enough randomness and speed to iterate that gen AI can actually step change and improve if training times/cost were less prohibitive? Most companies/models today will save good output and feed it back into the next iteration, but right now that's taking months. What if that took minutes?
What do you think?
Is gen AI going to take us to general intelligence?
Will gen AI get to a place where it's "intelligence" and reasoning is actually better than the sum of Humanity?28 votes -
I hope you don't use generative AI - an essay about my experience offering an open-source tool
71 votes -
AI’s memorization crisis
24 votes -
Indie Game Awards rescinds Clair Obscur's GOTY wins over use of generative AI [for now-removed background assets]
29 votes -
AI might not be coming for lawyers’ jobs anytime soon
7 votes -
'Saturday Night Live' hit with backlash for using AI images
14 votes -
Prime Video pulls eerily emotionless AI-generated anime dubs after complaints
23 votes -
Square Enix says it wants generative AI to be doing 70% of its QA and debugging by the end of 2027
17 votes -
MIT report: 95% of generative AI pilots at companies are failing
43 votes -
Decrypted Apple Intelligence safety filters
18 votes -
Disney and Universal vs. Midjourney: A landmark copyright fight over genAI
25 votes -
I think I’m done thinking about genAI for now
37 votes -
Generative AI tool marks a milestone in biology - Evo 2 can predict the form and function of proteins in the DNA of all domains of life
29 votes -
GenAI is reshaping work—don’t let it dull human intelligence
20 votes -
Microsoft will train AI on user data
44 votes -
Generative AI requires massive amounts of power and water, and the aging US grid can't handle the load
27 votes -
Mitigating Skeleton Key, a new type of generative AI jailbreak technique
15 votes -
How generative AI could reinvent what it means to play
15 votes -
Generative AI is not going to build your engineering team for you
15 votes -
Generative AI - We aren’t ready
27 votes -
Tumblr to begin selling user content to AI generative service companies, opt-out will be per blog
75 votes -
Google's Say What You See - Come up with a prompt to match an already generated image
12 votes -
Fooocus - The most user-friendly local image-gen interface to date
42 votes -
Making or using generative ‘AI’ is, all else being equal, a dick move
44 votes -
Meta is releasing AudioCraft: Generative AI for audio made simple and available to all
34 votes -
Apple tests ‘Apple GPT,’ develops generative AI tools to catch OpenAI
17 votes -
Google updates its privacy policy to clarify it can use public data for training AI models
44 votes