-
16 votes
-
The obvious reason the US should not vaccinate like Denmark – it isn't Denmark
6 votes -
On the increased popularity and serious risks of choking during sex
35 votes -
Exploring the dangers of AI in mental health care
15 votes -
The boss of mobile gaming giant Supercell says the industry needs to take bigger risks to compete
7 votes -
Norway launches full-scale industrial carbon capture project with billions in subsidies – carbon dioxide shipped to North Sea and injected into reservoirs of oil majors
12 votes -
When the Swedish town of Kallinge discovered their drinking water contained extremely high levels of PFAS, they had no idea what it would mean for their health and their children's future
21 votes -
Genetic variant tied to doubled dementia risk for older men
14 votes -
Waymos are getting more assertive. Why the driverless taxis are learning to drive like humans.
45 votes -
Risk of death higher from emergency surgery at private equity owned hospitals in the US
36 votes -
OpenAI is a systemic risk to the tech industry
35 votes -
The new US tariffs - weird formulas, risks, and the coming trade war
34 votes -
Anti-Trans National Risk Assessment Map: March edition
22 votes -
What is the truth about risks and benefits of seed oils?
19 votes -
Navigating differences in risk tolerance regarding health
Hey Tildoes, my partner and I have been navigating a broad, government level health challenge and I was hoping to pick the hivemind for help on navigating it. As some of you may have seen in...
Hey Tildoes, my partner and I have been navigating a broad, government level health challenge and I was hoping to pick the hivemind for help on navigating it.
As some of you may have seen in articles posted here, there was a massive fire at the lithium ion battery plant in Moss Landing a few months ago. It ended up spewing a slough of nasty chemicals into the air, which inevitably landed in the surround agricultural fields and waterways. My partner was in Australia when the fire occured, thank god, but was still freaking out about downstream effects. There have been studies from a 3rd party group from UC Davis and San Jose State - that found elevated levels of heavy metals - however those have been downplayed by local agencies claiming there are not major impacts and that distribution was surface level. With everything we know about state and federal agencies oversight, sometimes they are less than transparent about reporting toxic impact factors - like what happened in Hinkley and was popularized by the movie Erin Brockovich. However today the California Certified Organic Farmers put out their own update and press release. They summarized what has happened and seem to be endorsing the safety of the farms they have certified in the area.
So here is the rub: Federal, state, county, and local agencies have determined there is not significant contamination, the CCOF has agreed with these agencies, and my partner is still uncomfortable eating local produce. It feels a bit like we're back in covid times, and she is looking for cherry picked studies to justify strict behavioral and consumption restrictions within our household. We have always agreed to "shift our risk tolerance according to data" and now - with the Trump administration and a general distrust of our fed/state agencies - she's advocating we continue to avoid these foods until there is "definitive proof" that the food is safe.
I'm kind of at a loss of what do to. On one hand, it's a minor thing to change where we get our food. Food systems are complex and we can kind of get it from anywhere. On the other hand, I love my time at our farmers markets, experimenting with new foods, and supporting our local community. I also think the more obscure the process from farm to shelf, the more possibility for health/employee/environmental shenanigans by the producers. To me buying broadly "American" or "Mexican" kale doesn't mean we aren't going to have similar or worse impacts to our food.
I'm trying to find a reasonable middle ground or a bellwether indicator we can use as a go/no-go, but every time I think we've agreed on one it feels like the goal posts have been moved. Do any of you have similar issues or possible navigated differences in risk tolerance during Covid well? If so, how did you do so? I know this is a bit of a random thread, but I'd love to hear what you think!
16 votes -
Finnish utility Fortum focusing on renewable energy and nuclear lifetime extensions to cover growing electricity demand
8 votes -
Living off Microsoft Copilot - risks and threats of Copilot
7 votes -
‘Unprecedented risk’ to life on Earth: Scientists call for halt on ‘mirror life’ microbe research
55 votes -
Looking back at the Future of Humanity Institute
7 votes -
Norway's $1.8 trillion wealth fund issues stock market warning – heightened uncertainty and concerns over the economic outlook mean that stock market risks are tilted to the downside
9 votes -
Declaration of Helsinki turns sixty – how this foundational document of medical ethics has stood the test of time
8 votes -
Recent French research indicates that certain food emulsifiers may increase the risk of type 2 diabetes
18 votes -
Anti-Trans Legislative Risk Assessment Map: June 2024 edition
11 votes -
UK's NHS computer problems put patients at risk of harm
5 votes -
More exposure to artificial, bright, outdoor night-time light linked to higher stroke risk
16 votes -
What libraries risk when they go entirely digital
6 votes -
US emergency risk index used for allocating disaster prevention and mitigation spending ignores coastal Washington tsunami risk and other predictable disasters
9 votes -
Melatonin use soars among US children, with unknown risks
29 votes -
Adderall risks: Much more than you wanted to know (2017)
35 votes -
Is cinema dying? And if so, who is responsible? – A murder mystery.
23 votes -
The language used to describe AI risks
6 votes -
Hyundai and Kia recall nearly 3.4 million vehicles due to fire risk and urge owners to park outdoors
46 votes -
Growing fire risks, rising insurance costs, home owner concerns, spell opportunity for fire hardening and prevention industry
6 votes -
Executive summary - Elsevier’s acquisition of Interfolio: risks and responses (2022)
5 votes -
Many people think cannabis smoke is harmless − a physician explains how that belief can put people at risk
35 votes -
What physicians get wrong about the risks of being overweight
8 votes -
Locals have been sounding the alarm for years about Lahaina wildfire risk
9 votes -
Analysis of self driving vehicle experience and suggestions re LLMs and other AI
10 votes -
Wildfires and California: A discussion of mitigation efforts, government policy, insurance and more
13 votes -
Heat and smoke are smothering most of the US, putting lives at risk
14 votes -
9/26 is Petrov Day
7 votes -
GM recalls all Chevrolet Bolt electric vehicles, due to fire risk from high-voltage LG batteries
22 votes -
We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google. Here’s what it says.
19 votes -
What are the Big Problems?
What are the Big Problems? I'm leaving this open-ended, there's no specific criteria for responses. I'm interested in both your list and the reasons why. Submitting your suggestions before reading...
What are the Big Problems? I'm leaving this open-ended, there's no specific criteria for responses.
I'm interested in both your list and the reasons why. Submitting your suggestions before reading others' contributions would be preferred.
Optionally: who is (or isn't) successfully addressing them. Individuals, organizations, companies, governments, other. How and/or why not?
I've asked this question periodically on several forums (G+, Reddit, HN, Tildes) for seven years now.
I've written fairly extensively on my own views, reasonably findable if you wish, but my interest here is in gaining fresh input, resetting my own biases, and not colouring the discussion overly myself.
27 votes -
What are the Big Problems?
What are the Big Problems? I'm leaving this open-ended, there's no specific criteria for responses. I'm interested in both your list and the reasons why. Submitting your list before reading...
What are the Big Problems? I'm leaving this open-ended, there's no specific criteria for responses.
I'm interested in both your list and the reasons why. Submitting your list before reading others' contributions would be preferred.
Optionally: who is (or isn't) successfully addressing them. Individuals, organizations, companies, governments, other. How and/or why not?
I've asked this question periodically on several forums (G+, Reddit, HN) for seven years now.
I've written fairly extensively on my own views, reasonably findable if you wish, but my interest here is in gaining fresh input, resetting my own biases, and not colouring the discussion overly myself.
34 votes -
Highly potent weed has swept the market, raising concerns about health risks
7 votes -
Why safe playgrounds aren't great for kids
13 votes -
Amazon will pay a whopping $0 in Federal taxes on $11.2 billion profits
9 votes