• Activity
  • Votes
  • Comments
  • New
  • All activity
    1. Thoughts on ProWritingAid

      Howdy hey folks, I've recently been trying out ProWritingAid (for the unfamiliar: a grammar/spell checker tool) specifically the premium version with the expanded tool set. And now I want to step...

      Howdy hey folks, I've recently been trying out ProWritingAid (for the unfamiliar: a grammar/spell checker tool) specifically the premium version with the expanded tool set. And now I want to step onto the internet soapbox and talk about it. It's been.

      Okay.

      To preface, I've been writing (casually) for 'bout a decade, mainly short creative fiction. (And a few novel attempts. All of which are incomplete but I'm glad I did them) Throughout my time I've gone through a few tools, text editors and what-have-you-nots. With my ever so gleaming credentials established, let's get into the ramble.

      Right out of the gate, automated grammar checkers and creative writing have a rather fun relationship. Half the suggestions are useful and the other half are useless. (This ratio can also tip forward and backward). They'll catch syntax errors, spelling mistakes, missing words or punctuation, all good things to fix.

      It'll also flag intentional word choice, sentence structure and other creative decisions. Sometimes this can help but more often than not it'll be sucking the You out of your own words.

      ProWritingAid (PWA) tries to sidestep this particular pitfall with Style Guides where it'll be more or less rigorous depending on the selected 'genre'. It's a mixed success. This flaw I don't think will ever be truly fixable given the inherent separation between Author and Tool. So we'll have to make do with clicking "ignore."

      Now PWA does a bit more than just grammar check. During my time with it, I've currently used two versions. PWA Everywhere, and PWA Desktop. Everywhere is meant to integrate with your text editing software while Desktop is a contained application. They have similar feature-sets, but not identical. Specifically, Desktop has the Word Explorer feature: a tool that if you highlight a word it'll show some synonyms or you can dig deeper with alliteration, cliches, anagrams, rhymes, reverse dictionary and more. Pretty nifty. PWA Everywhere best to my knowledge and searching does not have this feature- which is disappointing.

      Especially since everything else Desktop does, Everywhere does better. The UI alone is far more functional, without clipping or cramping. There's the convenience of direct integration. Some features like Single Chapter Critique (which I'll get into later, trust me) also blank screened in Desktop while working fine in Everywhere. Grand.

      Besides the Word Explorer, PWA also gives you AI "Sparks" and Rephrases. I'll be entirely honest, I have these turned off (Which I am glad I was able to do). I don't have much to say here besides I like getting into the creative word weeds myself.

      Alrighty, that then leaves me with two more things to discuss: Writing Reports and the Critique features.

      Okay. The writing reports are useful. Able to be granular or extensive. They scan every selected element in the text and format the results into a nifty report (or in some modes, direct text highlighting) Having all that data visualized with tables, graphs and bars oh my, (with the occasional cross-work comparison) is a great look-at. Grammar-wise it'll run into the problems mentioned above, but otherwise, this has been the feature I've liked the most.

      Finally I can get into the whole thing that inspired me to write this post. The Critique suite. Ohohoho, I have some thoughts about these. Human proofreaders are irreplaceable, just want to toss that out there (PWA also keeps that disclaimer in its header). My friends will never be escaping the random PDFs sent for their lovely review. I am ultimately writing for a human audience afterall. That in mind, I have run into a hilarious problem with the Single Chapter Critique.

      Apparently I write too good to get use from it. Truly I am suffering here. In complete honesty, the actual point I'm trying to make is the AI is a kiss-ass sycophant. I fed five of my short stories from across the years into it, just to see what it'd say. It cannot be negative. In each and every one I was praised about various element of the stories. Glowing and gushing, could say no ill.

      This is pretty useless. Sure it has the "Potential Improvements" section but it's... eh. In the name of curious study, I am having my non-writer friend compose a piece for me to feed to the machine spirit later. (I also only get three uses a day, compared to the unlimited reports with their nitty gritty)

      Now, could this simulated praise be a sign I'm a genuinely good writer? Well I don't need the AI for that- I have friends zip-tied to chairs to feed my ego. (I forever cherish one of my close writing friends telling me: "You have a voice of a fantasy writer from the 70s with a thick series full of wondererous imagination written by a twice divorce middle aged man who is disgruntled with reality. It was never exactly reprinted as it was unknown, but the aging, withered pages hold such a gorgeous narrative that it sticks with you for the rest of your life.")

      Back to the AI: Their shining critique falls apart when I look at the story myself and can point to several areas for improvement/refinement with a cursory reading. (Thank you creator's curse, you're my true reliable critic.)

      Woe to me, I cannot escape personal proofreading. (Real talk: the hope was have it be able to do the cursory stuff so I could focus on the creative viscera. That's half the fun after all—)

      There is two other Critique features, Full Manuscript Analysis and Virtual Beta Reader. I have used neither of these as I do not have any large manuscripts to toss into the jaws. To ensure jolly feelings, it's also a credit based system. So let's talk money.

      Scrivener, a writing workhorse that even after years of using I still find new features and has long cemented itself as my text editor of choice, was $45 for a lifetime license. Fantastic software, it has earned its reputation.

      ProWritingAid, a grammar and spellchecker was $115 (discounted price) for a year subscription. (Can I mention how idiosyncratic their tier system is? Free, Premium, Premium Pro? Why??? Just name it Free, Pro, Premium. Don't stack luxury words.) For $115, I get several features I don't even use, or aren't very useful. Oh, a discount for the aforementioned analysis credits. ($25 for 1, $70 for 3, $175 for 10. Full priced it's $50, $150, $500 respectively. Spend this money on an actual person please)

      Now what's worst off is I wasn't even the one to spend the $115. That was someone else wanting to support me and my writing; an act I am quite grateful for and the meaning behind it. I feel bad complaining. I have hopes for PWA. Something that can act as a quick look proofreader would be wonderful. But perhaps I'm just asking for too much from what is again, a grammar and spellchecker.

      So far, I don't know yet. I don't know if I'd call it good or bad. As I started with: it's okay?

      Maybe I'll do a retrospective after a while once I've utilized it longer. Maybe features will be better fine tuned in the future.

      And that leads me here. What have been y'all's experience with it, if any? Searching online has been miserable; I'd like to hear from other people.

      [As a footnote, PWA was not used when writing this. Kinda forgot that I never set it up for browser. Tallyho]

      16 votes
    2. Save Point: A game deal roundup for the week of April 13

      Add awesome game deals to this topic as they come up over the course of the week! Alternately, ask about a given game deal if you want the community’s opinions: e.g. “What games from this bundle...

      Add awesome game deals to this topic as they come up over the course of the week!

      Alternately, ask about a given game deal if you want the community’s opinions: e.g. “What games from this bundle are most worth my attention?”

      Rules:

      • No grey market sales
      • No affiliate links

      If posting a sale, it is strongly encouraged that you share why you think the available game/games are worthwhile.


      All previous Save Point topics

      If you don’t want to see threads in this series, add save point to your personal tag filters.

      15 votes
    3. What are your favorite music videos?

      I've been on a really big Geese kick lately and the video for Cowboy Nudes made me chuckle. It made me want to watch some of my old favorites, but there is still plenty of itch left to scratch. So...

      I've been on a really big Geese kick lately and the video for Cowboy Nudes made me chuckle. It made me want to watch some of my old favorites, but there is still plenty of itch left to scratch. So what are your favorite music videos, and why do you like them so much?

      If anyone is curious, my two favorites are:

      Typical by Mutemath. They learned how to play the song backwards, which seems impressive and is very Ok Go-esque.

      Sleep Now in the Fire by Rage Against the Machine. The Who Wants to be a Millionaire spoof featuring not fun facts that have become less fun over time is good. The directing/editing is great. The bass player jamming out while the cops push him back is amazing. I'd like to say I'd never charge the NYSE floor for a music video, but I can't guarantee what I might do while under the influence of a sweet Tom Morello riff.

      26 votes
    4. Formula 1 Bahrain Grand Prix 2025 - Qualifying and Race Discussion

      Warning: this post may contain spoilers

      As requested last week, I'm doing something different for this race. This will be a discussion post for both Qualification and the Grand Prix itself. Or anything else concerning this weekend: Free Practices, Formula 2, Formula 3, whatever. There's also a Formula E in Miami race this weekend and an INDYCAR race in Long Beach on Sunday. Plus MotoGP in Qatar and IMSA also in Long Beach.

      I'll post Quali results here. Plus, as usual, the race results. Maybe one of our cool, seemingly never sleeping, Tildes mods can rename the post after everything is finished!

      Qualification Session:
      Saturday, April 12, 2025 - 16:00 UTC / 12:00p US EDT

      Bahrain Grand Prix:
      Sunday, April 13, 2025 - 15:00 UTC / 11:00a US EDT

      See your local time here

      Next race:

      Saudi Arabian Grand Prix
      Jeddah Corniche Circuit
      Sunday, April 20, 2025

      Grand Prix Results, Provisional -- SPOILER
      Pos No Driver Car Laps Time/retired Pts
      1 81 Oscar Piastri McLaren Mercedes 57 1:35:39.435 25
      2 63 George Russell Mercedes 57 +15.499s 18
      3 4 Lando Norris McLaren Mercedes 57 +16.273s 15
      4 16 Charles Leclerc Ferrari 57 +19.679s 12
      5 44 Lewis Hamilton Ferrari 57 +27.993s 10
      6 1 Max Verstappen Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT 57 +34.395s 8
      7 10 Pierre Gasly Alpine Renault 57 +36.002s 6
      8 31 Esteban Ocon Haas Ferrari 57 +44.244s 4
      9 22 Yuki Tsunoda Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT 57 +45.061s 2
      10 87 Oliver Bearman Haas Ferrari 57 +47.594s 1
      11 12 Kimi Antonelli Mercedes 57 +48.016s 0
      12 23 Alexander Albon Williams Mercedes 57 +48.839s 0
      13 27 Nico Hulkenberg Kick Sauber Ferrari 57 +53.472s 0
      14 6 Isack Hadjar Racing Bulls Honda RBPT 57 +56.314s 0
      15 7 Jack Doohan Alpine Renault 57 +57.806s 0
      16 14 Fernando Alonso Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes 57 +60.340s 0
      17 30 Liam Lawson Racing Bulls Honda RBPT 57 +64.435s 0
      18 18 Lance Stroll Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes 57 +65.489s 0
      19 5 Gabriel Bortoleto Kick Sauber Ferrari 57 +66.872s 0
      NC 55 Carlos Sainz Williams Mercedes 45 DNF 0

      *Provisional results. Note - Lawson received a five-second time penalty for causing a collision and a 10-second time penalty for causing a collision. Doohan received a five-second time penalty for track limit infringements.

      DOTD: Lewis Hamilton

      Source: F1.com

      FINALIZED Qualifying Results/Starting Grid -- SPOILER
      Pos No Driver Car Time
      1 81 Oscar Piastri McLaren Mercedes 1:29.841
      2 16 Charles Leclerc Ferrari 1:30.175
      3 63 George Russell Mercedes 1:30.009
      4 10 Pierre Gasly Alpine Renault 1:30.216
      5 12 Kimi Antonelli Mercedes 1:30.213
      6 4 Lando Norris McLaren Mercedes 1:30.267
      7 1 Max Verstappen Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT 1:30.423
      8 55 Carlos Sainz Williams Mercedes 1:30.680
      9 44 Lewis Hamilton Ferrari 1:30.772
      10 22 Yuki Tsunoda Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT 1:31.303
      11 7 Jack Doohan Alpine Renault 1:31.245
      12 6 Isack Hadjar Racing Bulls Honda RBPT 1:31.271
      13 14 Fernando Alonso Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes 1:31.886
      14 31 Esteban Ocon Haas Ferrari
      15 23 Alexander Albon Williams Mercedes
      16 27 Nico Hulkenberg Kick Sauber Ferrari 1:32.067
      17 30 Liam Lawson Racing Bulls Honda RBPT 1:32.165
      18 5 Gabriel Bortoleto Kick Sauber Ferrari 1:32.186
      19 18 Lance Stroll Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes 1:32.283
      20 87 Oliver Bearman Haas Ferrari 1:32.373

      Source: F1.com / FIA [PDF]

      10 votes
    5. Looking for a (potentially multiplatform) app for pixel art

      I wanted to practice my stagnant drawing skills and something I always liked is pixel art, but I don't know any program for that (beside Paint and Photoshop) so I would like for recommendations...

      I wanted to practice my stagnant drawing skills and something I always liked is pixel art, but I don't know any program for that (beside Paint and Photoshop) so I would like for recommendations here, the only big feature I need is multi layers management and that preferably runs in multiple platforms (You know, like Gimp and Inkscape).

      Anything that runs on Linux/Windows/Android is welcomed. I guess there should be open source apps for that, and since it's only for practice I would to waste money on paid apps.

      11 votes
    6. Looking for the PC equivalent of Garage Band

      Hey there musical types! I'm on the hunt for something I can use to create music that doesn't require a PhD in comp.sci and music theory. I downloaded LMMS and found myself immediately in the...

      Hey there musical types! I'm on the hunt for something I can use to create music that doesn't require a PhD in comp.sci and music theory. I downloaded LMMS and found myself immediately in the weeds, so I'm hoping someone out there can point me in a more elementary direction. The end goal is to create a theme track for my YouTube channel that has a good old fashioned 80s metal feel, if such an animal exists...

      Thanks in advance!

      25 votes
    7. What have you been listening to this week?

      What have you been listening to this week? You don't need to do a 6000 word review if you don't want to, but please write something! If you've just picked up some music, please update on that as...

      What have you been listening to this week? You don't need to do a 6000 word review if you don't want to, but please write something! If you've just picked up some music, please update on that as well, we'd love to see your hauls :)

      Feel free to give recs or discuss anything about each others' listening habits.

      You can make a chart if you use last.fm:

      http://www.tapmusic.net/lastfm/

      Remember that linking directly to your image will update with your future listening, make sure to reupload to somewhere like imgur if you'd like it to remain what you have at the time of posting.

      5 votes