-
11 votes
-
Apple can delete purchased movies from your library without telling you
31 votes -
Netflix will now interrupt series binges with video ads for its other series
32 votes -
Don’t tell Scotty but here’s an oral history of ‘Scotty Doesn’t Know’
7 votes -
Spinach Puffs from The Emperor's New Groove | Binging with Babish
13 votes -
How pie-throwing became a comedy standard
4 votes -
The Last Dragon - What happened to Laura Charles manager - What are you thoughts on Laura Charles?
I always had a little problem with Laura Charles in this 1985 cult classic. At the beginning of the movie, Laura's manager is begging her to play a tape. He tells her a man named Eddie Arcadian...
I always had a little problem with Laura Charles in this 1985 cult classic.
At the beginning of the movie, Laura's manager is begging her to play a tape. He tells her a man named Eddie Arcadian will hurt him if he doesn't get it played. He is literally terrified and begging. You can see he is terrified.
Laura actually says to him, "My life isn't filled with all that...... Drama." That's how she says it, she pauses before the word drama. Think about how dismissive that is. He is scared for his life and tells her as much, and she just says something that dismissive. Then she berates him like it is his fault he is in the situation. And the kicker is, she says her life isn't filled with all "of that drama" for two reasons. She liked the idea of it. The idea of thinking she was this person with no drama. And because she didn't care because it didn't affect her.
So the movie goes on. Now Laura is in danger of Eddie. It was all because Eddie wanted the tape played. There wasn't any "drama" in her life that caused it. But does she stop and realize that? Nope. Does she for one second think, "Gee maybe it wasn't my manager's fault he was in this situation. I wonder if he is okay?" Nope. She suddenly cares because it affects her.
And then everything in the end works out for her of course. And we never know if Eddie killed the manager or what happened to him. Laura never even looked for him to even just apologize, let alone make sure he wasn't dead.
What are your thoughts?
3 votes -
Frank Abagnale: "Catch Me If You Can" | Talks at Google
6 votes -
How gay is too gay? Steve Coogan's Ideal Home accused of stereotyping
3 votes -
Bill Murray explains how he pulled himself out of a deep, lasting funk: He took Hunter S. Thompson’s advice and listened to the music of John Prine
6 votes -
Incredibles 2's stay-at-home dad a watershed moment for superheroes
5 votes -
How would you theoretically go about mitigating the potential near-complete loss of archived audio and video media from 1990 to 2020?
This article from last year provides an alarming look into the woes that media preservation (specifically audio and video) is facing this century due to a content explosion that shows no signs of...
This article from last year provides an alarming look into the woes that media preservation (specifically audio and video) is facing this century due to a content explosion that shows no signs of slowing down. It’s not a new problem, as journalist Bill Holland showed nearly 20 years ago (warning, it’s a long read).
To summarize: In the past, many predecessors to existing media studios did a bad job of archiving their collections of recorded material. In some cases they actively destroyed or threw out parts of their catalogs to make way for new material. This wiped out portions of the available media to be preserved, especially the older stuff. Now that most studios have improved their archival practices though, their remaining catalogs are facing a new foe: Moore’s Law.
The problem with LTO (tapes) is obsolescence. Since the beginning, the technology has been on a Moore’s Law–like march that has resulted in a doubling in tape storage densities every 18 to 24 months. As each new generation of LTO comes to market, an older generation of LTO becomes obsolete… Already there have been seven generations of LTO in the 18 years of the product’s existence… Given the short period of backward compatibility — just two generations — an LTO-5 cartridge, which can still be read on an LTO-7 drive, won’t be readable on an LTO-8 drive. So even if that tape is still free from defects in 30 or 50 years, all those gigabytes or terabytes of data will be worthless if you don’t also have a drive upon which to play it.
If the worst case scenario were to happen, this is apparently what it would look like according to “a top technician at Technicolor”:
“There’s going to be a large dead period,” he told me, “from the late ’90s through 2020, where most media will be lost.”
But not everyone is that worried, the article also includes this counterpoint,
“Most of the archivists I spoke with remain — officially at least — optimistic that a good, sound, post-LTO solution will eventually emerge.”
/u/boredop and I have been discussing the implications of this in the thread they posted a few days ago about a John Coltrane release, and in the course of that discussion they provided that second link to Bill Holland’s multi-part investigation (thanks!).
So my question is this: What direct or indirect measures would you theoretically take to prevent or mitigate the loss of the vast majority of recorded media from 1990 to 2020? Should any measures be taken to preserve these cultural artifacts?
By direct measures I mean innovations to physical archiving or storage methods. By indirect measures I mean public awareness, strategies for choosing what to save, workarounds, etc.
23 votes -
Valve will soon release apps for streaming Steam games, movies, and shows to phones and tablets
6 votes