-
28 votes
-
Despite its founding promise to be ad-free, the Baldur's Gate 3 fan wiki is going to put up ads, because its creator thinks he can make a lot of money
47 votes -
What GoFundMe conceals: The campaigns that fail
17 votes -
Has sexual content invaded too much of the internet?
Something I have been thinking about lately is how sexual content online seems to be proliferated and normalized much more than it used to be. I'll give a couple of examples. While I do not use...
Something I have been thinking about lately is how sexual content online seems to be proliferated and normalized much more than it used to be. I'll give a couple of examples.
While I do not use the big social media sites (Instagram, Facebook, TikTok) very often, I've seen questionable content while others are scrolling, as well as conversations both online and offline with others who do use them. Nearly all of these sites contain profiles of people who are primarily there to market an OnlyFans account or similar. And these profiles are pushed to various demographics, seemingly moreso to males.
Reddit has a very questionable history with this type of content. But outside of that, any subreddit that allows submission of photos of people will often include these models trying to promote themselves, and they frequently make it to the top of the subreddit. (Some reddit users make fun of this in subreddits such as r/UNBGBBIIVCHIDCTIICBG, which stands for "Upvoted Not Because Girl, But Because It Is Very Cool; However, I Do Concede That I Initially Clicked Because Girl").
Twitch is a livestreaming platform that primarily hosts streamers who are playing video games. Streaming other events or "just chatting" has grown in popularity, which I have no complaints about. But there has been a lot of controversy about sexual content on the platform. To address this to some degree, Twitch added a "Pools, Hot Tubs, and Beaches" category for people who are streaming in that specific context. But OnlyFans models do not stick to that category, and can easily be found in "Just Chatting." And I can personally say that regardless of how many times I select "Not Interested" on these streams, I continue to get suggestions for them.
Even generic chat applications (such as WhatsApp and Discord) are plagued with bot accounts that are either representative of an actual model or part of a scam, but in both cases, try to lure users in with sexual content.
I do want to say I have no issue with adult content when it is in the appropriate venue. Sites dedicated to pornography are completely fine for consenting adults. What I take issue with is how this content has expanded far beyond dedicated sites.
Society has reached a point where we hand off internet-connected devices to children at a very young age. Chromebooks are used in schools very early in education, and smartphones are given to kids early in life. It already seems to be common knowledge that social media use results in self-image issues in youth. These issues will likely be accelerated by social media not only showing a false image of how people live their lives but also the lengths they go to appear sexually appealing.
I'm not proposing some overreaching "save the children" censorship legislation is needed. But it's hard to imagine how this trend can be turned around. It produces a ton of clicks, which is all these user-posted content sites (and advertisers) care about. Is there anything that can be done, or is this just the new internet?
46 votes -
Google now only search engine allowed to provide results from Reddit
88 votes -
Roblox’s pedophile problem
27 votes -
Any other Tildes users posting from within the great firewall?
It's nice having english language forums that don't require a vpn to access. Anyone got any other suggestions and any recommendations for vpns that work on mobile data reliably? I've found PIA,...
It's nice having english language forums that don't require a vpn to access. Anyone got any other suggestions and any recommendations for vpns that work on mobile data reliably? I've found PIA, Nord, and Proton to not work but Surfshark does for now if intermittently (more reliably on wifi).
59 votes -
Bangladesh imposes curfew after dozens killed in anti-government protests
23 votes -
What's our thoughts on Perplexity.ai for search?
If you haven't used it yet, it's more like a cited source summary tool. I actually really like for questions such as "Who is X and why are they important?" I'm interested in people's thoughts on it.
15 votes -
Internet mysteries: The website you can only open once
21 votes -
Mastermind speedrunner bakes twelve actual cookies in under four minutes, forces site mods to make a whole new category
65 votes -
What happened to user interfaces?
23 votes -
Someone is wrong on the internet (AGI Doom edition)
28 votes -
Microsoft says it's okay to steal content published on the web
16 votes -
Microsoft CEO of AI claims online content is 'freeware' [and can be used to train LLMs in the absence of a specific directives from the author against this]
43 votes -
Polyfill supply chain attack hits 100K+ sites
45 votes -
Internet Archive forced to remove 500,000 books after publishers’ court win
59 votes -
Squabblr is now a free speech platform
139 votes -
Anti-Defamation League faces Wikipedia ban over reliability concerns on Israel, antisemitism
37 votes -
Wikipedia's Philosophy game: A breakdown, and how someone broke it
10 votes -
US House GOP leaders vow to block online privacy bill over intraparty pushback
19 votes -
Instagram is not a cigarette
11 votes -
ArcFox, an opensource project to make Firefox flow like Arc browser
33 votes -
Goldfish memories - most of China’s early websites have disappeared
30 votes -
You’ve read your last free article, such is the nature of mortality
41 votes -
The Stanford Internet Observatory is being dismantled
15 votes -
Retailers hate that you buy big things on your laptop
38 votes -
Internet addiction affects the behavior and development of adolescents
8 votes -
Hundreds of thousands of US internet routers destroyed in newly discovered 2023 hack
23 votes -
The invisible seafaring industry that keeps the internet going
21 votes -
Minnesota repeals law that protected ISPs from municipal competition
22 votes -
Google just updated its algorithm. The Internet will never be the same.
56 votes -
The Canterbury Tales, or, how technology changes the way we speak
14 votes -
Weighing in on "Man or Bear" - from a woman that left society to the Alaskan wilderness
59 votes -
Kabosu, the beloved Shiba-Inu behind the Doge meme, passes away at 18
36 votes -
How the internet revived the world's first work of interactive fiction
13 votes -
Fecal microbiota transplant: Inside the black market for human poop
30 votes -
Privacy woes and autonomy, where do I go now?
I'm very sorry, but this is going to be rant. One that may seem to come up almost daily, but I still feel the need to vent. Every day I feel like I'm jumping through hoops to keep a little bit of...
I'm very sorry, but this is going to be rant. One that may seem to come up almost daily, but I still feel the need to vent.
Every day I feel like I'm jumping through hoops to keep a little bit of privacy and autonomy, without ever winning. DuckDuckGo is my search engine, use a paid mail provider, I try to stay away from anything Google and Meta, use only Signal, ad blocking everywhere, hosting most services locally, etc. It seems, however, to make no difference in the long run. The user-profile-building just seems to enter the home faster than I can mitigate it. Kids install some new app or new hardware ends up listening in, privacy infringement is there.
The reason I'm starting this post now is because I switched ISP and TV provider recently, but it has been on my mind for a long time. Finding one that isn't owned by one of huge 3 parent companies, is almost impossible here. After a year of deciding, I finally figured it was time to throw in the towel and just pick the least bad option. Yesterday was the day of switching and it has been such a frustrating process.
The provided router doesn't allow me to turn off its WLAN. I live in a city, so the airwaves are already crowded enough as it is. No need to keep that antenna on, but screw me, that's not possible. Opened up the device to just remove the card, but everything is soldered on the board and disconnecting the antennas didn't do shit.
It's possible to buy a modem/router myself, but it'll need to follow their requirements and will set me back $200. It would be okay if the rest of the service was great, but here comes the TV part!The device they use for TV is apparently Android TV. I assumed it would be IPTV with this subscription, but Android TV isn't that. Booting the device makes it immediately clear they are here to harvest data. It makes me so unhappy that a service I'm paying for, is also making money on the side by collecting data. To get a quick idea of what's being done, I routed the box through wireshark to sniff DNS traffic. It's riddled with domains used for data collection and ads. That combined with the features this box wants me to agree to (location, using the mic, access local network, sign into PlayStore, make a profile including real life information) does not make me trust this device. So I've decided to not play and will be sending it back.
People around me are pretty conscious about what they do online, but compared to them I'm highly paranoid. Wherever I look, there are privacy issues. It seems impossible to escape from. How are other people dealing with this?
UPDATE: I don't know if anybody is really interested, but I thought I would update anyway. I decided to listen to my gut and I cancelled the subscription. It feels like the best decision I've made in a long time. It's nice to feel like I'm still a little bit in charge, even though I know that's also just a false sense of autonomy. Suck it, Google! You're not the boss of me :-)
33 votes -
Thoughts on the current state of discoverability and search
I guess I'll post another thoughtful analysis rant on tech trends. It has been mentioned here in a few threads already but I simply wanted to try to start a focused discussion. Personally I first...
I guess I'll post another
thoughtful analysisrant on tech trends. It has been mentioned here in a few threads already but I simply wanted to try to start a focused discussion.Personally I first noticed significant degradation of search functionality around 2018 or so, while specifically Google was mentioned at least as far back as 2016. But it is not simply Google or even just general search engines. Any random site specific search functionality or discoverability algorithms on various sites share these trends too.
It really seems that the focus is simply on delivering as many results as possible with actual quality or even relevance being somewhere on the tail end of priorities. It is not even just lack of(useful, consistent) search operators, lack of transparency, lack of structured search possibilities, lack of sorting options, lack of granularity - it is the simple disregard for the basic intent of the query with some implementations sometimes being actually more accurate with fewer keywords with no option to modify this behavior.
It is especially damaging for(at least my) ability to research a topic. A decade and half ago I could go in with a topic I had no idea about and emerge two hours later with a very basic but likely mostly accurate and slightly in-depth overview by refining my searches. Now I'm lucky to get one single thoughtful blog post or discussion among dozens or tutorials, 10-bests and ads with the query being almost completely disregarded and keywords being straight up ignored to deliver this deluge of both low quality and mostly completely irrelevant results.
Are there any projects, search engines or anything other that aim to deliver actually useful, steerable, user directed results?
34 votes -
Internet use statistically associated with higher wellbeing, finds new global Oxford study
13 votes -
Everything is Sludge, art in the post-human era
19 votes -
Heat death of the internet
88 votes -
Was there a trojan horse hidden in Section 230 all along that could enable adversarial interoperability?
16 votes -
US Supreme Court leaves in place a Texas law requiring pornographic websites to verify users' ages
33 votes -
Net neutrality is back as US FCC votes to regulate internet providers
65 votes -
US FCC to vote to restore net neutrality rules years after the agency voted to repeal them
82 votes -
The internet used to be ✨fun✨
44 votes -
SSL.com is evil and deceptive: Don’t do business with SSL.com
21 votes -
FYI: This site claims to have harvested 4B+ Discord chats, today all yours for a price
41 votes -
We need to rewild the internet
18 votes