-
5 votes
-
1988 - Welcome to the wild world of computer animation
10 votes -
Deimos Loading Screens mod for Fallout: New Vegas
30 votes -
The most fragile gif on the internet
37 votes -
Art in the Fukushima Exclusion Zone (2022)
5 votes -
Raymond Schlitter - Pixelblog
11 votes -
The cost of performing childhood for your parent’s art
23 votes -
AI content warning label
Edit: my post has been deemed malformed, and I’d like to apologize and clarify to the community. The concept of a digital watermark signifying that the artist didn’t use any image generation, LLM,...
Edit: my post has been deemed malformed, and I’d like to apologize and clarify to the community. The concept of a digital watermark signifying that the artist didn’t use any image generation, LLM, GPT, etc is the proposition. I do understand it’s tough to identify the term AI in use, since most of our tech uses some form of code to modify our work without our knowledge. More-so, I mean to identify work, art, or content that did not specifically use tools to create. Again apologies!
Post: I’m wondering the world of Tildenisian thoughts on this. Say I make a piece of art, no matter the content, and it’s completely of my own hand. Should there be some kind of digital watermark to signify that accomplishment? Maybe accomplishment isn’t the right word.
I must be looking for validation, because I’ve made art recently where folks have asked the question, “What tool did you use?” and immediately felt dread and disappointment.
Perhaps it’s not even feasible to signify since “AI” is eventually impossible to circumvent when sharing your art over these series of tubes. Oh well.
What do you fine folks think?
19 votes -
Amiga ASCII text art (2015)
6 votes -
The color of the future - A history of blue
8 votes -
The storm hits the art market
27 votes -
New Art City: Virtual Art Space
10 votes -
Jessica Joslin
13 votes -
What art means to me in this era of AI tools
15 votes -
Spoon - Everything Hits At Once (2001)
7 votes