-
27 votes
-
United Methodist court upholds Traditional Plan’s ban on LGBTQ clergy, same sex marriage
11 votes -
'Trauma is a slow burn': Mormons seek healing as church eases anti-LGBT policy
6 votes -
State-funded adoption agencies in Michigan barred from refusing LGBTQ parents
7 votes -
Dutch Reformed Church forced to allow same-sex marriage
6 votes -
Kansas Catholic school rejects kindergartner with same-sex parents
6 votes -
United Methodist Church votes to maintain its opposition to same-sex marriage, gay clergy
21 votes -
Trying to figure out my personal craziness
I hope this is the appropriate Tilde for this. If no one has any input it will still have helped me to type this out. TL;DR In over my head with marriage, foster care, family, and work. My wife...
I hope this is the appropriate Tilde for this. If no one has any input it will still have helped me to type this out.
TL;DR In over my head with marriage, foster care, family, and work.
My wife and I became foster parents about 1.5 years ago with the intention to not adopt, but to care for children 3 and under while bio parents worked to regain custody or other permanent placements were arranged. Our first placement was two girls (7 mo and 2.5 yrs) despite wanting to do just one kid at a time (especially to start). We had them for 6 weeks and mom got them back. We had another placement (8 mo boy) for about another 6 weeks. There was a considerable lull and we were getting frustrated about not getting any new placements when the girls from our first placement were placed into custody again. So we were able to take them in again (now about 1.2 and 3.5 yrs). FF to now and we've had them for about 6 months.
We never really intended to have more than one child and for quite this long and we're struggling. My wife has always had a little less ability to weather stressful situations like this and these last 2-3 weeks I'm carrying a lot of weight. In the meantime, bio mom has gotten pregnant and there's not another hearing regarding custody for another 9 months. We fully expect that she will not be able to take them back at that time (or really realistically ever). What should probably happen would be that the county could place the kids into permanent custody (basically getting them adopted). However, from what we've heard from other foster families, temporary custody could drag on for years.
So, our main dilemma is this. We are not equipped (as a couple) to care for these kids for years. With the likely prospect of no change in custody in the near future, it feels like the best thing for these kids would be to get them into the care of someone looking to do this long-term, perhaps to eventually adopt. That being said, we absolutely love them and it feels like some kind of betrayal to force them to make yet another transition. On the other hand, with our limitations, it seems like that is inevitable anyway. Do we try to make that happen sooner?
Some other data points:
Our fostering license expires in October (about a month after the hearing is scheduled) and we don't intend to continue fostering (at least for a while, and definitely not with our current agency).
We don't have many family members close by to give us a hand with the kids, making us feel isolated and making it hard to get breaks from the kids. Our agency has not been very helpful with lining up respite care, but we're trying to be more aggressive about that now.
I've got things pretty well lined up to retire in about 5 years. My company is also just now kicking off a major project of a similar time frame and I'm in a good position to really make a mark before moving on. It will probably require some serious time commitments and effort to do it the way I want to.Thanks for listening.
12 votes -
United Methodist Church to debate LGBTQ clergy and same-sex weddings
8 votes -
Anglicans bar same-sex spouses from Lambeth Conference
6 votes -
Gay couples in Japan filed Valentine's Day lawsuits demanding marriage equality
13 votes -
Uniting Church to continue to allow same-sex marriages following deciding vote in South Australia
3 votes -
Gay couple sue for right to marry in Hong Kong
6 votes -
Emerging consensus on LGBT issues: Findings from the 2017 American Values Atlas
4 votes -
Thousands of couples have tied the knot since Australia legalised same-sex marriage
6 votes -
Same-sex marriage advocates lose Taiwan referendums
9 votes -
'White' magazine shuts down after refusing to feature same-sex weddings
A news article: 'White' magazine shuts down after refusing to feature same-sex weddings The farewell message: Farewell
10 votes -
How the same-sex marriage vote changed the lives of queer teens in country towns
6 votes -
When Asian women are harassed for marrying non-Asian men
20 votes -
One year after Yes vote, same-sex couples celebrate - and fight anew
7 votes -
Sydney Anglicans ban same-sex marriage on hundreds of church properties
5 votes -
Sydney Anglicans to ban same-sex marriage, yoga on all church property
3 votes -
Sydney Anglicans set to ban gay weddings and pro-LGBTI advocacy on church property
2 votes -
Today is my wife’s first birthday since she died
6 votes -
Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel backs same-sex marriage
6 votes -
House Appropriations Republicans adopt "license to discriminate" amendment
13 votes -
What do you appreciate about your partner(s)?
In all of the recent talk about incels, gender differentials in home tasks, and domestic violence, there's been little discussion about what makes a good relationship - sexual, psychological,...
In all of the recent talk about incels, gender differentials in home tasks, and domestic violence, there's been little discussion about what makes a good relationship - sexual, psychological, experiential or other compatibilities. There's a great deal of "Psychology Today" material on what makes for successful relationships, but it seems facile and the product of research on young WEIRD participants.
So, dear Tilders, if you have or have had a partner(s) you've been genuinely happy and satisfied with, and felt like your relationship was healthy, please discuss what made you so...
24 votes -
LGBTI lawyers lodge complaint over ‘hate speech’ during same-sex marriage survey
9 votes -
Three's a crowd: Millennials are shifting Australia's family values
12 votes -
First legal humanist marriages in Northern Ireland since Court ruling to occur this weekend
Summary The Belfast Court of Appeal ruled two months ago that weddings in Northern Ireland performed by Humanist celebrants must be deemed legal. These weddings are now starting to be performed....
Summary
The Belfast Court of Appeal ruled two months ago that weddings in Northern Ireland performed by Humanist celebrants must be deemed legal. These weddings are now starting to be performed.
The article contains comments by various people, including two couples about to be married. It also has some background about legality of Humanist wedding ceremonies in other parts of Great Britain.
Extract
In June, the Belfast Court of Appeal ruled that humanist marriages must be legally recognised in Northern Ireland. This weekend, the first two legal marriages to follow that ruling will occur.
Link
8 votes -
The Indian-Australian millennials who are choosing arranged marriage
5 votes -
Uniting Church allows ministers to conduct same-sex marriage ceremonies in Australia
1 vote -
When couple took wife's surname it was 'not a big deal' and yet the practice remains an oddity
16 votes -
The divorce surge is over, but the myth lives on
23 votes -
US Supreme Court hands narrow win to baker over gay couple dispute
18 votes -
Gay spouses granted the same freedom of movement rights as straight couples in all EU
11 votes -
Supreme Court rules narrowly for Colorado baker who wouldn't make same-sex wedding cake
10 votes -
Teenage bride, 19, appeals against death sentence for fatally stabbing man she was forced to marry as he raped her while his cousins held her down
8 votes -
Ronaldinho reportedly will marry his two fiancees in August ceremony
8 votes