-
9 votes
-
Study finds hydroxychloroquine may have boosted survival, but other researchers have doubts
5 votes -
The hard truth of poker — and life: You’re never ‘due’ for good cards
10 votes -
Making people aware of their implicit biases doesn’t usually change minds. But here’s what does work
10 votes -
The 'this is fine' bias in cable news
10 votes -
The US pesticide industry's playbook for avoiding neonicotinoid bans
10 votes -
Why selection bias is the most powerful force in education
16 votes -
Correcting the historical bias against domestic materials
4 votes -
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
6 votes -
Scientist who discredited meat guidelines didn’t report past food industry ties
8 votes -
Why can’t we agree on what’s true any more?
18 votes -
The unhappy millionaire
6 votes -
World first as local council uses robots to perform 'unbiased' job interviews
6 votes -
Caution on bias arguments
4 votes -
San Francisco says it will use AI to reduce bias when charging people with crimes
11 votes -
In Swiss academic science, charges of bullying and gender bias
5 votes -
A job for the boys
7 votes -
'Bias deep inside the code': The problem with AI 'ethics' in Silicon Valley
9 votes -
Period-tracking apps are not for women
28 votes -
News and articles linked on Tildes
I've been thinking about my experience on Tildes with news and articles. It's mostly been seeing high quality content and discussion that I'm happy with. However for the sake of this, I want to...
I've been thinking about my experience on Tildes with news and articles. It's mostly been seeing high quality content and discussion that I'm happy with. However for the sake of this, I want to discuss avoiding something negative.
Lately I've noticed news and articles with headlines that I feel are biasing in nature and potentially inflammatory.
I would guess that we're all pretty familiar with this method in general. At some point when a forum/aggregate becomes large enough it provides an profitable opportunity for third parties to distribute content. Or an individual is pursuing their fulfillment of a personal ideal.
I have a few suggestion to handle the issues productively.
News sources that put a higher priority on traffic versus their reputation tend to do so consistently. It would be valuable for users to be required to tag the parent domain when posting external links to allow users to discern sources case by case using tags.
Blocking something a news source versus <inciting-phrase> has the benefit of allowing higher quality sources mentioning the same topic to have an impact on the user. That's potentially very valuable in encouraging informed perspective.
Linking news and articles for commercial or personally motivated reasons is posted on subs that have a marginal relation. E.g. Posting a story on Mike Pence denouncing all white men working in agriculture in an agriculture sub. The connection can certainly be made but I don't think that's a good way of organizing that information. I think it would be more productive to post that in a news or news/political thread. Having the ability to choose when we see and engage with that type of content is important. It benefits the individual and encourages healthy and engaged communities.
Blocking users ( I wasn't sure if this existed ) Alternatively, a system for linked content reputation per user. But I think that's a bad solution overall.
I meant filtering users content and comments as a preference for users. I'm not talking about site wide.
I'm curious if other Tilde users agree with my issues or suggestions.
13 votes -
One man’s (very polite) fight against media Islamophobia
5 votes -
The Foundations of Algorithmic Bias
8 votes -
IBM researchers propose transparency docs for AI services
7 votes -
California abolishes cash bail, replacing with algorithmic based risk assessment
17 votes -
How hidden bias can stop you getting a job
6 votes -
In order to cultivate an environment where the truth wins out in the end, you have to be biased against falsehoods
8 votes -
Democrats value communal personality traits while Republicans value agentic traits
4 votes -
Supreme Court rules on controversial risk assessment tests accused of bias against Indigenous offenders
5 votes -
Dad bias: Why are fathers disproportionately praised for parenting their kids?
12 votes -
Keep the votes, but lose the vote count?
I know similar topics have been discussed, but I'd like to talk about removing the vote count OR, having the count appear after you've voted. To be clear, I'd like to keep the voting mechanism...
I know similar topics have been discussed, but I'd like to talk about removing the vote count OR, having the count appear after you've voted. To be clear, I'd like to keep the voting mechanism as-is, just reduce the visibility of the actual number of votes.
It's not foolproof, but it might reduce the "bandwagon" voting we're trying to avoid. I realize that vote count could still be guessed based on sorting by "most votes," but I think this is a worthwhile discussion to have.
*Edit 2: Removed the joke I made about spamming as I think it detracts from the conversation.
20 votes -
Starbucks’ bias training finally happened. Here’s what it looked like
20 votes -
New Toronto Declaration calls on algorithms to respect human rights
8 votes