-
4 votes
-
When Myspace was king, employees abused a tool called ‘overlord’ to spy on users
8 votes -
You can sue media companies over Facebook comments from readers, Australian court rules
13 votes -
Ravelry (a popular site/community for knitting and crocheting) bans posts in support of Trump or his administration
20 votes -
Is it possible to moderate a group chat on Facebook?
Long story, but I've ended up becoming the admin of a group on Facebook (the previous admin stepped down in a rush, and added me as he left). And the group has an existing group chat associated...
Long story, but I've ended up becoming the admin of a group on Facebook (the previous admin stepped down in a rush, and added me as he left). And the group has an existing group chat associated with it.
Is it possible to "moderate" this group chat? Specifically, as an admin of the group, can I remove unsavoury/unwanted messages from the chat associated with the group? It looks like I can't.
Can even the creator of a group chat do this? If I close the group chat and create a new one, will I (as its creator) be able to remove unsavoury/unwanted messages from that new chat?
I've done some searching via Google, and I'm not finding anything to indicate that this is possible. If someone posts something unsavoury in a group chat, it looks like the only option is to remove the person from the chat - but the unsavoury messages can't be deleted.
Please tell me that's wrong!
6 votes -
Reddit is moving forward with their Community Points ("donuts" in /r/ethtrader) experiment, including moving them onto the Ethereum blockchain
26 votes -
What is Block.one, the company that just paid a record-breaking $30m for the voice.com domain name?
12 votes -
Google CEO Admits That It's Impossible To Moderate YouTube Perfectly; CNBC Blasts Him
20 votes -
The death of YouTube skepticism
5 votes -
YouTube under US Federal investigation over allegations it violates children’s privacy
9 votes -
Bodies in seats: At Facebook’s worst-performing content moderation site in North America, one contractor has died, and others say they fear for their lives
28 votes -
Nifty US govt chemical disaster investigation YouTube channel
4 votes -
Jordan Peterson announces free speech platform Thinkspot
34 votes -
Meet the angry gaming YouTubers who turn outrage into views
20 votes -
The platform excuse is dying
16 votes -
Beware the Cheapfakes: Deepfakes are troubling. But disinformation doesn’t have to be high tech to be damaging.
5 votes -
The new wilderness
9 votes -
No, Elon Musk did not delete his Twitter account
4 votes -
The Trauma Floor: The secret lives of Facebook moderators in America
7 votes -
In court, Facebook blames users for destroying their own right to privacy
19 votes -
No, you’re not addicted to social media: What many commentators describe as an addiction is actually a powerful social norm at work. The distinction matters.
18 votes -
8chan is raided by the FBI regarding California synagogue shooter
@swodinsky: lmaooooooo 8chan just got search warranted
13 votes -
WeChat is watching
8 votes -
Alphabet-owned Jigsaw built a fake political site and then hired a Russian troll campaign to attack it
12 votes -
Facebook failed to delete 93% of posts containing speech violating its own rules in India
8 votes -
Who has your back? Censorship edition 2019 - Report by the EFF that assesses major tech companies' content moderation policies
8 votes -
Introducing Study from Facebook
14 votes -
Pinkwashing, harassment, and the YouTube hate machine
4 votes -
YouTube just banned supremacist content, and thousands of channels are about to be removed
14 votes -
The tricky ethics of using YouTube videos for academic research
6 votes -
Webcomics: An oral history
12 votes -
How Twitter needs to change | Jack Dorsey
11 votes -
Facebook suspends app pre-installs on Huawei phones
9 votes -
Publishers that closed their comments sections made a colossal mistake
9 votes -
US requiring social media information from visa applicants, permanent residents and naturalized citizens
15 votes -
Facebook shareholder revolt gets bloody: Powerless investors vote overwhelmingly to oust Mark Zuckerberg as chairman
12 votes -
YouTuber in Barcelona receives fifteen-month prison sentence, 20,000 euro fine, and five-year ban from social media for toothpaste-filled Oreo prank
18 votes -
Unpopular content: Outsmarting the YouTube algorithm
6 votes -
What it’s like to write a finale your fans hate. (Interview with Battlestar Galactica showrunner Ronald D. Moore in the context of the controversial Game of Thrones ending.)
18 votes -
Microsoft Windows Terminal YouTube video removed for copyright claim
12 votes -
Gab is throwing away their existing code and switching to a modified version of Mastodon
Posting this as a text post so that nobody has to go to Gab, but the source is here if you really want to. Full post copied below: An update on "New Gab" and what to expect: Progress on our new...
Posting this as a text post so that nobody has to go to Gab, but the source is here if you really want to. Full post copied below:
An update on "New Gab" and what to expect:
Progress on our new codebase is going well. For those who don't know, our plan is to fork existing open source software, Mastodon, which is based on the ActivityPub social networking protocol.
What does this mean in layman's terms?
- Gab will become an open source project, meaning developers from around the world can contribute the project and help us build.
- Gab will get several new features and PRO benefits, such as video uploading.
- You'll be able to log into and use dozens of existing mobile apps that exist on both App Stores with your Gab account and use Gab through these apps.
- We will be porting over all of your Gab posts, followers, etc to this new codebase.
- Gab will be getting a fresh paint job and be much more "user friendly." (See a mockup below, which isn't final.) Don't worry, it won't look anything like Mastodon (for those of you who know it is,) it will look like Gab.
What does the timeline look like for this going live?
At the moment we are working on building in Gab features that this open source social networking protocol does not currently have. Things like Gab Groups and editing. We are also finalizing a fresh redesign of the Gab interface. Once these two things are done, we will start porting over all existing Gab data. During this time we will invite Gabbers to beta test New Gab and give us feedback. Once Gabbers give us the go ahead we will finalize the transition and push it to Gab.com. All of these steps will occur over the next few weeks.
Why are you doing this?
- Moving Gab to open source brings transparency and additional help from developers in our community from around the world.
- Moving to the ActivityPub protocol as our base allows us to get into mobile App Stores without even having to submit and get approval of our own apps, whether Apple and Google like it or not.
- Ultimately we want to make Gab more user friendly, perform better, and be a product you all love. This will accomplish all of those things.
We are excited to share this with you and will have more information soon.
Thank you
This is a pretty interesting move by Gab. They had been kicked out of app stores, and like the post mentions, this will allow them to just piggyback on existing apps that work with Mastodon instead of needing their own. I saw at least one app dev say that they'd specifically block it from being used on Gab, but they probably won't all do that, and I'm sure they'll probably end up with some options.
People in the fediverse don't seem very happy about this overall, but it's probably also not a big deal. The main dev of Mastodon posted:
So Gab has decided that their own code that they spent $5M of investor money developing is so unsalvageably bad that they're going to use Mastodon's code instead, with the added bonus of leeching off of our apps (with Gab apps being banned from app stores)
This is an early warning to fellow admins to be vigilant and domain-block them on sight, when/if they appear (unconfirmed whether they intend to federate), and to app devs to consider if blocking Gab's domains from their app is necessary.
Remember that Gab is a sinking ship and they're basically grabbing onto Mastodon like a parasite in a desperate attempt to get attention from the "drama" of doing so.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/gab-is-in-full-meltdown-and-founder-andrew-torba-blames-the-deep-state
Torba has no self-awareness to see how pathetic it looks that his master race ass is incompetent at making a working website so he has to resort to using software made by a Jew instead.
App devs will block their domains, server admins will block their domains, and that'll be the end of that.
35 votes -
Twitter has started researching whether white supremacists belong on Twitter
21 votes -
Confessions of a Reddit 'Karma Whore': My years-long journey to the top of Reddit's karma leaderboards has only made me feel more alone
21 votes -
When a fatal grizzly mauling goes viral - How much does the world need to know about a deadly bear attack?
7 votes -
In 2017, Hussein Kesvani started getting regular Twitter messages from an anonymous Islamophobic user. Eventually he responded, they started talking, and arranged to meet
7 votes -
The Federation Fallacy
18 votes -
Facebook’s dystopian definition of ‘fake’ - For the social-media platform, a doctored video of Nancy Pelosi is content, not a phony
9 votes -
Top streamers can be offered $50,000 an hour or more to play new games
15 votes -
At Facebook’s shareholder meeting, a challenge to Mark Zuckerberg’s power is already doomed
5 votes -
Facebook's Zuckerberg and Sandberg will disregard subpoenas to appear in front of Canada-hosted International Grand Committee on Big Data, Privacy and Democracy
13 votes