-
16 votes
-
Nintendo's war on ROMs threatens to destroy gaming history
8 votes -
Wikipedia blacked out across Europe in protest against laws that could change the internet forever
18 votes -
YouTube and Facebook could escape billions in copyright payouts after EU vote. Lawmakers reject overhaul of rules which aimed to make tech giant's pay a bigger share.
2 votes -
EU sends controversial internet copyright reforms back to the drawing board
13 votes -
Wikipedia makes the case for Google and Facebook to give back to the Commons, rather than just take
11 votes -
Inside a heist of American chip designs, as China bids for tech power
7 votes -
EU committee approves new rules that could "destroy the internet as we know it."
13 votes -
Cory Doctorow: "The EU is about to end everything that's good and pure about the internet"
12 votes -
Norwegian court orders website of public domain court decisions shut down with no due process
14 votes -
The list of MEPs who voted to restrict internet in Europe
6 votes -
YouTube blocks Blender's (and MIT's) videos, pressures Blender into a contract forcing monetization or no service, Blender switches to PeerTube
38 votes -
YouTube faces paying billions to music stars after copyright vote
6 votes -
YouTube faces paying billions to music stars after copyright vote
1 vote -
YouTube blocks MIT OpenWare and Blender videos, asks for monetization agreement
18 votes -
The EU's Copyright Directive, Article 13
Next week the EU parliament will vote for their new copyright directive. In general it contains some good ideas, but also some extremely bad ones, such as article 13. It will require all uploaded...
Next week the EU parliament will vote for their new copyright directive. In general it contains some good ideas, but also some extremely bad ones, such as article 13. It will require all uploaded content to be scanned, and deleted if it might contain references to other copyrighted material.
The issue here is the word might. Due to the possible fines for companies that accidentally leave up something that contains a copyrighted work, they are incentivized to act more harsh than often necessary. It's safer for them to delete everything that looks like it might infringe copyright than risk the fine.
This could be disastrous for the Internet as we know it. And this is why many movements are speaking out against it. One such example would be the open letter to EU parliament. More information is available on https://saveyourinternet.eu/resources/, and you can find much more about it all over the Internet if you search with your favourite search engine.
What's your opinion on article 13, and have you done anything to make your voice heard?
13 votes -
The EU could be about to ban memes and 'destroy the internet'
4 votes -
The EU's copyright proposal is extremely bad news for everyone, even (especially!) Wikipedia
8 votes -
Congress wants to extend the copyrights on some sound recordings to 144 years
11 votes -
I'm Brian. I'm an intellectual property attorney and I moderate some stuff on Reddit, like IAmA. Ask Me Anything.
Hey! I practice IP law with my brothers in Southern California. I primarily do trademark, copyright and litigation work. My brothers do patents and litigation. I also moderate stuff on Reddit,...
Hey! I practice IP law with my brothers in Southern California. I primarily do trademark, copyright and litigation work. My brothers do patents and litigation.
I also moderate stuff on Reddit, like IAmA. Ideally, I'd like to host some AMAs here. This is kind of a test to see how it goes at an early stage.
Ask me stuff!
Edit: This was fun. Thank you guys. I'm headed out for a bit. :)
22 votes -
Lessig: Congress' latest move to extend copyright protection (to 144 years) is misguided
9 votes -
'I won't give up my name,' says local barber of demand from national chain
5 votes -
Not everything needs copyright: Lawyers flip out that photos taken by AI may be public domain
6 votes -
Epic decides to double down on copyright for cheating lawsuit against 14 year old by taking on mom
6 votes