-
15 votes
-
Apple's child protection features spark concern within its own ranks: sources
19 votes -
An open letter against Apple's privacy-invasive content scanning technology
20 votes -
Apple's plan to "think different" about encryption opens a backdoor to your private life
15 votes -
Apple introduces expanded protections for children, including on-device scanning of images to detect child abuse imagery
24 votes -
Diners beware: That meal may cost you your privacy and security
8 votes -
Venmo gets more private—but it’s still not fully safe
5 votes -
The privacy war raging within the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), where normally-secretive tech companies are wrangling over the future of your data — and their own power — in plain sight
14 votes -
The day I almost decided to hold the press to account
8 votes -
Trust in software, an all time low
26 votes -
New ad-free search subscription service: Neeva
6 votes -
Oildrop - A self-auditable userscript manager
13 votes -
LinkedIn breach reportedly exposes data of 92% of users, including inferred salaries
13 votes -
Differential privacy code removed from Chromium
In a discussion on Hacker News, Jonathan Mayer pointed out that the differential privacy code was removed from Chromium. It looks like they finished doing this in February. I haven't seen any...
In a discussion on Hacker News, Jonathan Mayer pointed out that the differential privacy code was removed from Chromium. It looks like they finished doing this in February.
I haven't seen any announcement, discussion, or explanation of this based on a brief web search, so I figured I'd note it here.
At about the time this process finished, there was a Google blog post about how they're still using it in other products.
We first deployed our world-class differential privacy anonymization technology in Chrome nearly seven years ago and are continually expanding its use across our products including Google Maps and the Assistant.
(If you read this quickly, you might think it's still used in Chrome.)
Reading between the lines, I suspect that some folks at Google are still advocating for more usage of differential privacy, but they lost an important customer. Why that happened is a mystery.
11 votes -
How to make your data harder to find online
7 votes -
Security tips for online LGBTQ+ dating
11 votes -
Why we should end the data economy
7 votes -
Amazon devices in the US will automatically join the Amazon Sidewalk mesh network and start sharing internet with neighbors on June 10th, unless opted out
30 votes -
King County, WA is first in the country to ban government use of facial recognition software
15 votes -
Why does a completely local, self-contained html file need to access gstatic.com?
So, I'm a privacy advocate (or paranoiac, depending on your perspective). I run both uMatrix and NoScript plug-ins (among others) in my Firefox browser, so I can see when and where websites send...
So, I'm a privacy advocate (or paranoiac, depending on your perspective). I run both uMatrix and NoScript plug-ins (among others) in my Firefox browser, so I can see when and where websites send calls out to other locations, and block the ones I want ... google analytics, google fonts, google-apis, google tag manager, and gstatic are all ubiquitous out there, probably 99% of websites use at least one of them (PS: Tildes is in the 1%; yeay, Deimos).
And note ... there may well be nothing at all wrong with any of those sites/services ... but Google has a global all-encompassing Terms and Conditions policy that says, you use anything of Theirs, and They are allowed to harvest your personal data and make money off of it.
And I do not accept those terms.
Okay, that's the prologue. The deal is, I have a small piece of documentation, just basic "how to use this" info, for a WordPress plug-in. It is in .html format, with bundled bootstrap and jquery and a few other assets.
Nothing, anywhere in the entire folder, references gstatic. And yet when I open this local, on-my-computer-only html file ... my browser tells me that it is trying to connect to gstatic.com.
Anyone happen to know why/how that is happening?
4 votes -
Our digital pasts weren’t supposed to be weaponized like this
17 votes -
Introducing Firefox’s new Site Isolation security architecture
19 votes -
Terms and Conditions Apply
9 votes -
Huge Eufy privacy breach shows live and recorded cam feeds to strangers
5 votes -
Here’s what the opt-in app tracking in iOS 14.5 means to marketers — and how they might respond
11 votes -
We found Joe Biden’s secret Venmo. Here’s why that’s a privacy nightmare for everyone.
17 votes -
I mailed an AirTag and tracked its progress; here’s what happened
23 votes -
Ransomware gang threatens release of DC police records
10 votes -
Upcoming lecture and Q&A, May 13th 2021 - Edward Snowden, “What I learned from games: playing for and against mass surveillance”
2 votes -
Australian Criminal Intelligence Agency looking to expand it's intelligence gathering powers by claiming that criminals use encrypted platforms 'almost exclusively'
19 votes -
EFF Surveillance Self-Defense - Privacy breakdown of mobile phones
18 votes -
96% of US users opt out of app tracking in iOS 14.5
35 votes -
The Instagram ads Facebook won't show you
26 votes -
They told their therapists everything. Hackers leaked it all.
15 votes -
Disclosure of a vulnerability in AI Dungeon that enabled accessing all users' private adventures, scenarios, and posts via its GraphQL API
16 votes -
In the tales told by sewage, public health and privacy collide
5 votes -
Misinformation about Permissions Policy and FLoC
8 votes -
Team Navalny apologizes after database of email addresses registered for planned protest leaks online
7 votes -
In defense of Signal
12 votes -
Am I FLoCed?
22 votes -
I called off my wedding. The internet will never forget
24 votes -
533 million Facebook users' phone numbers and personal data have been leaked online
29 votes -
Employees at law enforcement agencies across the US ran thousands of Clearview AI facial recognition searches — often without the knowledge of the public or even their own departments
9 votes -
What does your gaze reveal about you? On the privacy implications of eye tracking
10 votes -
Pasco County’s Sheriff must end its targeted child harassment program
11 votes -
Finding virtue in the virtual
2 votes -
A comparative analysis of security, privacy, and censorship issues in TikTok and Douyin, both developed by ByteDance
5 votes -
French subsidiary of the Swedish retailer IKEA will go on trial over allegations that they snooped on employees and customers using private detectives and police officers
5 votes -
Reddit announces online presence indicators
67 votes -
Encrypted messaging app Signal blocked in China
29 votes