-
122 votes
-
What should I look at on Google Earth?
I opened up the Google Earth app on my phone wanting to browse random beautiful and interesting places, but it doesn't seem to have a good way to do it. (Maybe this is a limitation on the mobile...
I opened up the Google Earth app on my phone wanting to browse random beautiful and interesting places, but it doesn't seem to have a good way to do it. (Maybe this is a limitation on the mobile app, and the desktop app is better?)
For example, if I try searching for "wetlands", it only shows me a list of maybe 10 places near my current location.
I tried searching the web too, but I mostly get "listicles" like "10 amazing places on Google Earth" but they're practically unreadable with the webpage being covered with ads.
I found Earth View Gallery https://blog.google/products/earth/most-stunning-images-from-google-earth/ and it's nice but it's just a gallery of images with no contextual information (at least when viewing on mobile). It shows me beautiful pictures but no information about where the picture is from... I would have expected it to link to the spot on Google Earth.
Anyway if you happen to have some recommended places for me to check out on Google Earth I'd love to see them! I like:
- wetland-type habitats like marshes, pond systems, mangrove swamps
- beautiful natural scenery in general
- abandoned and/or ancient architecture
But open to any interesting recommendations in general.
Edit: It does seem to be slightly better on desktop. Searching on Google Earth works better, and Earth View Gallery does link to the location on Google Earth. I wish Google Earth had like, a built-in community feature for me to check out other people's public projects.
22 votes -
Should I bother installing another OS on my Pixel 4a?
I have a Pixel 4a which has just reached end of support for Android. However, I love this phone and the only hardware issue is that the battery doesn't last me scrolling social media all day, so I...
I have a Pixel 4a which has just reached end of support for Android. However, I love this phone and the only hardware issue is that the battery doesn't last me scrolling social media all day, so I am not looking to upgrade to a newer handheld just yet.
I've been looking into Graphene OS and Lineage OS as perhaps alternatives I should consider, at least just so I can keep getting security updates. However, looking through GOS, they say that their 4a build is an "extended support" build different from the main OS which is described as a "stopgap" before upgrading phones. LOS says it's supported but through an automatically generated page which doesn't leave me with much confidence about the attention and stability of the build on my particular phone.
I'm asking y'all's opinion on whether I should even bother. Security upgrades are important, but my phone is a secondary device at best, one which I always use with the same apps and websites and honestly not really that much of a security risk. Watch hubris get me.
23 votes -
Google user data has become a favorite police shortcut
54 votes -
Pixel 8 and Pixel 8 Pro to get seven years of software updates
43 votes -
New developments in US antitrust enforcement - more and new types of cases brought under Joe Biden, new leaders at the Federal Trade Commission
14 votes -
Critical 0day in WebP: Google assigns a CVE for libwebp and gives it a 10.0 base score.
28 votes -
Google sued for negligence after man drove off collapsed bridge while following map directions
67 votes -
EU warns Elon Musk after Twitter found to have highest rate of disinformation followed by Facebook
34 votes -
Google killing basic HTML version of Gmail in January 2024
44 votes -
Your Fitbit is useless – unless you consent to unlawful data sharing
74 votes -
You can tell how bad Google Searches are now when you try to search for "Baldur's Gate 3 Wiki" and it pushes you a single outdated wiki and a bunch of posts telling you to use bg3.wiki
54 votes -
Google US antitrust trial - judge ordered trial exhibits removed from the web - the Verge responds by publishing them
24 votes -
Incomplete disclosures by Apple and Google create “huge blindspot” for 0-day hunters
13 votes -
Bard can now connect to your Google apps and services
16 votes -
Collective letter from game development companies concerning Unity's runtime fee
36 votes -
Chromebooks will get updates for ten years
23 votes -
Economist, business professor, digital economy expert Shane Greenstein discusses the US Department of Justice vs Google antitrust case
4 votes -
YouTube is testing a three-strikes policy for ad blocking
173 votes -
Google goes to trial in biggest US challenge to tech power in decades
32 votes -
EU ‘gatekeeper’ list has five American and no European companies
43 votes -
Google gets its way, bakes a user-tracking ad platform directly into Chrome
138 votes -
Google Gemini eats the world – Gemini smashes GPT-4 by 5X, the GPU-poors
9 votes -
After two decades the dominance of Google Search comes into question
85 votes -
Google wants an invisible digital watermark to bring transparency to AI art
30 votes -
Google removes fake Signal and Telegram apps hosted on Play
27 votes -
The Ugly Mugs Ireland android app has been removed from the app store
16 votes -
Google axes bad reviews of tracker exposing Uyghur forced labor
38 votes -
YouTube's privacy settings now block you from seeing suggested content
I've always been a bit of a privacy enthousiast. Have had everything blocked that Google and by extension YouTube wants to scrape off you. This means I've also blocked my view history. Recently...
I've always been a bit of a privacy enthousiast. Have had everything blocked that Google and by extension YouTube wants to scrape off you. This means I've also blocked my view history.
Recently YouTube started giving out a warning on the homepage that you have blocked your view history, that you can change it in your privacy settings and that it helps them serve you better content. What it also means is that your homepage is just one big popup to guilt trip you into sharing your data. The homepage won't show any suggested content anymore.
While it is in their interest to do so and since they are a company wanting to make money it is understandable. Nevertheless it seems harsh from going to see content that you might like to only seeing a big warning sign right now.
What are you experiences with this?
34 votes -
darken (developer of SD Maid for Android) has had his developer account terminated after twelve years for "stalkerware policy" on Google Play despite having no actual stalking tools in the app
14 votes -
“Gaming Chromebooks” with Nvidia GPUs apparently killed with little fanfare
11 votes -
Baldur’s Gate 3 could have saved Google Stadia
40 votes -
CNET is deleting old articles to try to improve its Google Search ranking
29 votes -
$5 billion Google lawsuit over ‘Incognito mode’ tracking moves a step closer to trial
58 votes -
Typograms — an image format for lightweight diagrams
18 votes -
Sync for Lemmy now available on Play Store
80 votes -
Google Messages signs onto cross-platform encrypted group chat standard
53 votes -
Google-owned YouTube makes millions from channels pushing climate disinformation: Analysis
80 votes -
Google begins their push for WEI in Chromium
94 votes -
On attestation on the web and why this could threaten the open web
13 votes -
Can AI chatbots be used for geolocation?
4 votes -
Google raising price of YouTube Premium to $13.99 per month
115 votes -
Unpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specification
45 votes -
Web Environment Integrity - A Google proposal for general web drm
47 votes -
Looking back at the original Chromecast, which just turned ten years old
9 votes -
Apple tests ‘Apple GPT,’ develops generative AI tools to catch OpenAI
17 votes -
Firefox outperforms Chrome in speed for the first time according to a Speedometer assessment
75 votes -
Google is directing searchers straight to troves of nonconsensual deep fake porn, raising legal and ethical concerns
18 votes -
How to find a street in two minutes
7 votes -
Tax prep companies shared private taxpayer data with Google and Meta for years, congressional probe finds
45 votes