-
56 votes
-
Google claims news is worthless to its ad business after test involving 1% of search results in eight EU markets
23 votes -
A history of the San Francisco bouncy ball TV ad
12 votes -
Google may be close to launching YouTube Premium Lite
25 votes -
Stellantis introduces pop-up ads in vehicles, sparking outrage among owners
67 votes -
In Vermont personal ads for relationships are still going strong
14 votes -
Google’s ad policy changes to allow device fingerprinting
50 votes -
Is it just me or has advertising lost the plot entirely?
If you know me you probably know I hate advertising with a passion. I have blocked ads on my computer but I have limited control on my TV and phone when it comes to YouTube advertisements. And the...
If you know me you probably know I hate advertising with a passion. I have blocked ads on my computer but I have limited control on my TV and phone when it comes to YouTube advertisements. And the other day I got this incredibly bizarre ad.
I only speak the tiny amount of Spanish I have learned through osmosis, but the phrase they are using is essentially “we’ll eat at home.” The scenario is a familiar one; you’ve got a kid in the car out in town and they see a restaurant they want to go and they ask if they can stop to eat. The parent says no, we’ll eat at home, because there are a lot of reasons why it’s better for them. Home cooked meals are cheaper. They can be higher quality, both in terms of taste and nutrition. They might have food that will go bad soon and so they want to go and eat it first. They don’t want to normalize eating rich unhealthy foods for their kids.
But this isn’t an ad for groceries or processed food products. This is an ad for DoorDash. A food delivery app. Literally none of the reasons you would want to eat at home apply here. Actually, using DoorDash in this particular situation is dramatically worse, because you are paying more money to get food you could have just picked up on the way only to get a worse version of it because it is no longer freshly prepared and is likely cold.
I just can’t get over this because it’s so incredibly out of touch with reality. Many people have had to have signed off on this for me to see this ad. What were they thinking? Are they so out of touch with reality that they think this is something that people do? The fact that this is clearly targeting Hispanic Americans makes it even worse. I live in Southern California and about a third of the people I know are Hispanic and all of them would laugh at this. I can’t help but wonder if the teams working on them were full of privileged white guys who are saying “yeah, this is what Mexicans are really like” or if there are also rich Hispanics on board who thinks this is something that people really do.
But this is just the most egregious example of out of touch advertising. YouTube ads are supposed to be targeted right? But why do I get ads for CRM, ERP, and accounting products when I don’t own a business? Why do I get ads in languages I don’t speak? Why is it that I can report and tell Google that an advertiser is inappropriate or against their terms and still they will show me the ads again?
And beyond that I am astonished at how many ads I see that exist to mislead you. Almost every time you see something compared or tested there is somthing they aren’t telling you. The most obvious example is Scott toilet paper; they advertise that they have rolls that are significantly longer than their leading competition. But what they neglect to tell you is that their product is single-ply while their competitors are double- or triple-ply. They actually have a very comfortable amount of toilet paper on each roll. Weirdly, all toilet paper is misleading though; what is a “mega roll”, how does it differ from an “ultra roll”, and why is one roll of it somehow equivalent to six of some unspecified other type of roll? In the meanwhile Old Spice is trying to take advantage of balding men like me by telling me that their shampoo increases the volume of hair by however many percent while there is fine print at the bottom saying that it is compared to unwashed hair, meaning their shampoo probably doesn’t do anything the cheapest generic product at the dollar store won’t.
I know this is basically just a rant, but I can’t be the only one who notices this stuff, am I?
54 votes -
A robot dog advertising a darknet store seized by police in Moscow
22 votes -
What's worse than ads and AI? Ads in your AI, so Google is testing it.
30 votes -
Mel Manuel, trans candidate for US House, injected testosterone on camera in a campaign ad
18 votes -
Pokémon FAST (free ad-supported television) channel launches on Pluto TV — US for now, to be followed by Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand
5 votes -
Florida threatens TV executive with jail time for airing ad in support of abortion rights
35 votes -
Your chatbot transcripts may be a gold mine for AI companies
25 votes -
Paypal opted you into sharing data without your knowledge
90 votes -
Free Live Sports now offering free ad supported sports programming worldwide
10 votes -
uBlock Origin Lite maker ends Firefox store support, slams Mozilla for hostile reviews
44 votes -
Icelandic-Danish artist Olafur Eliasson is set to take over some of the world's biggest public spaces in his most impressive installation piece yet
5 votes -
Ford seeks patent for tech that listens to driver conversations to serve ads
58 votes -
US Department of Justice attorneys claim Google has “trifecta of monopolies” on day one of ad tech trial
30 votes -
In leak, Facebook partner brags about listening to your phone’s microphone to serve ads for stuff you mention
48 votes -
Elon Musk’s lawyers quietly subpoena public interest groups
38 votes -
Sweden and Denmark will summon tech companies over ads on their platforms that are posted by gangs to recruit young Swedes to commit violent crimes in the Nordics
17 votes -
PinkNews CEO recorded calling trans issues "contentious" on the basis it jeopardises ad revenue
38 votes -
How the rise of the camera launched a fight to protect Gilded Age Americans’ privacy
13 votes -
US Federal Trade Commission bans fake online reviews, inflated social media influence; rule takes effect in October
52 votes -
Google and Meta struck secret ads deal to target teenagers
61 votes -
YouTube without a working ad blocker
I liked ( past tense ) watching YouTube with the latest Firefox on my Mint Linux box. No more. The ad blocker I use ( latest version ) has stopped working for removing YouTube commercials. The...
I liked ( past tense ) watching YouTube with the latest Firefox on my Mint Linux box.
No more.
The ad blocker I use ( latest version ) has stopped working for removing YouTube commercials.
The commercials are obnoxious.
I think I will quit until the ad blocker I use updates again with a fix.
Sorry YouTube, you are far from being worth $14.00 USD a month.
Edit:
Mint Linux 21.2
Cinnamon 5.8
Firefox 128.0.3
Ublock Origin 1.59.0
- I completely removed UBlock Origin
- I completely emptied my Firefox cache and other data
- I signed out of Google completely
- I reinstalled UBlock Origin
- I signed back into Google
- I tried using YouTube with my VPN turned on.
No joy.
I can watch YouTube ad free via a private window in Firefox.
I can watch YouTube ad free if I log out of my Google/YouTube account
My add blocker works in other browsers when I am not logged into my Google/YouTube account.
49 votes -
Google Chrome warns uBlock Origin may soon be disabled
82 votes -
Making radio pay: Toll broadcasting and the first ad on the airwaves
6 votes -
The truly disturbing story of Kellogg's Corn Flakes
34 votes -
Google to charge new fee on ads in response to Canada’s digital services tax
12 votes -
Despite its founding promise to be ad-free, the Baldur's Gate 3 fan wiki is going to put up ads, because its creator thinks he can make a lot of money
47 votes -
Google halts its four-plus-year plan to turn off tracking cookies by default in Chrome
36 votes -
Google dropping plan to remove ad-tracking cookies on Chrome
22 votes -
"Privacy-Preserving" Attribution: Mozilla disappoints us yet again
68 votes -
‘I wouldn't come here, to be honest,’ says the disdainful star of Visit Oslo's latest advert, which has become a viral hit online
34 votes -
YouTube is testing "Premium Jump Ahead" (built-in sponsorblock)
43 votes -
YouTube tests harder-to-block server-side ad injection in videos
72 votes -
Wipeout 2097: The making of an iconic PlayStation soundtrack
13 votes -
How influencer cartels manipulate social media: fraudulent behaviour hidden in plain sight
19 votes -
EA is looking at putting in-game ads in AAA games — 'We'll be very thoughtful as we move into that,' says CEO
48 votes -
How makers of nonconsensual AI porn make a living on Patreon
15 votes -
Musi’s free music streaming app is a hit with thrifty teens. The app claims to tap content on YouTube, but some in the music industry question the legitimacy of that model.
18 votes -
Is TV advertising still relevant? Does anybody under 60 even watch traditional TV anymore?
I saw a video about the failure of a product, and they mentioned TV advertising, which got me to wondering… do people still even watch traditional TV anymore? It seems to me that everybody that I...
I saw a video about the failure of a product, and they mentioned TV advertising, which got me to wondering… do people still even watch traditional TV anymore? It seems to me that everybody that I can think of that isn’t 70 or older just streams everything. How is the old business plan still operating?
36 votes -
Reddit, AI spam bots explore new ways to show ads in your feed
61 votes -
Meet Sparkles
6 votes -
Chatting slow mo with Zack Snyder
4 votes -
Two popular Danish television presenters have reported Meta to the police after finding their images and words had been manipulated and misused in thousands of Facebook ads
29 votes -
Discord to start showing ads for gamers to boost revenue
62 votes